Journal of Organization and Human Behaviour

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Organisational Structure and Work Related Attitude:Mediating Role of Psychological Empowerment


Affiliations
1 Indian Institute of Forest Management, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The present study examines the role of psychological empowerment (PE) in mediating the relationship between organisational structure and work related attitude. Through a sample of 324 middle and senior level executives working in India using a self-report questionnaire, the study established the linkage between organisational structure, psychological empowerment, and work related attitude thus extended the psychological empowerment theory. It was found that employee perceptions of the organisation structure they work in, directly influence their perceptions of empowerment, which, in turn, influence their work outcomes like job satisfaction, commitment and turnover intention. As per the findings, formalisation and participation in decision-making characteristics of organisation structure were found to be critical in enhancing psychological empowerment. Hierarchy of authority was found to negatively co-vary with psychological empowerment indicating that the more centralised the structure is, the lesser the feeling of empowerment experienced by the employees. The findings will facilitate managers to analyse their organisations’ with respect to centralisation and formalisation variables and assess to what extent they are matching with their goals of organisation to ascertain positive work outcomes.

Keywords

Organisational Structure, Psychological Empowerment, Turnover Intentions, Job Satisfaction, Commitment, India.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Aryee, S., & Chen, Z. X. (2006). Leader-member exchange in a Chinese context: Antecedents, the mediating role of psychological empowerment and outcomes. Journal of Business Research, 59(7), 793-801.

  • Ashforth, B. E. (1989). The experience of powerlessness in organizations. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 43(2), 207-242.

  • Avolio, B. J., Zhu, W., Koh, W., & Bhatia, P. (2004). Transformational leadership and organizational commitment: Mediating role of psychological empowerment and moderating role of structural distance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(8), 951-968.

  • Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.

  • Bhargava, S., & Kelkar, A. (2001). Examining the relationship between organisational structure, job involvement, job satisfaction, and empowerment: Implications for human resource development. International Journal of Human Resources Development and Management, 2, 150-161.

  • Bhatnagar, J. (2013). Mediator analysis of psychological empowerment: reverse causality with strategic HRM dimensions & firm performance. International Journal of Indian Culture and Business Management, 6(4), 430-457.

  • Bitner, M. J., Booms, B. H., & Tetreault, M. S. (1990). The service encounter: Diagnosing favourable and unfavourable incidents. Journal of Marketing, 54, 71-84.

  • Blau, P. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.

  • Chen, H. F., & Chen, Y. C., (2008). The impact of work redesign and psychological empowerment on organizational commitment in a changing environment: An example from Taiwan’s state-owned enterprises. Public Personnel Management, 37(3), 279-302.

  • Colarelli, S. M. (1984). Methods of communication and mediating processes in realistic job previews. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69(4), 633-642.

  • Combs, J., Liu, Y., Hall, A., & Ketchen, D. (2006). How much do high-performance work practices matter? A meta-analysis of their effects on organizational performance. Personnel Psychology, 59, 501-528.

  • Conger, J. A., & Kanungo, R. N. (1988). The empowerment process: Integrating theory and practice. Academy of Management Journal, 13(3), 471-482.

  • Daniels, K., & Bailey, A. J., (1999). Strategy development processes and participation in decision making: Predictors of role stressors and job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Management Studies, 8(1), 27-42.

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behaviour. Springer. New York, NY.

  • Dee, J. R., Henkin, A. B., & Duemer, I. (2002). Structural antecedents and psychological correlates of teacher empowerment. Journal of Educational Administration, 41(3), 257-277.

  • Delery, J. E., & Shaw, D. (2001). The strategic management of people in work organizations: Review, synthesis, and extension. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 20, 165-197.

  • Dewettinck, K., & Ameijde, M. V. (2007). Linking leadership empowerment behavior to employee attitudes and behavioral intentions: Testing the mediating role of psychological empowerment. Vlerick Leuven Gent Working Paper Series 2007/21.

  • Egan, T. M., Yang, B., & Bartlett, K. R. (2004). The effects of organizational learning culture and job satisfaction on motivation to transfer learning and turnover intention. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 15(3), 279-301.

  • Griffeth, R. W., Hom, P. W., & Gaertner, S. (2000). A meta-analysis of antecedents and correlates of employee turnover: Update, moderator tests, and research implications for the next millennium. Journal of Management, 26(3), 463-88.

  • Hage J., & Aiken M. (1969). Routine technology, social structure, and organizational goals. Administrative Science Quarterly, 14, 366-376.

  • Han, S. H., Seo, G., Yoon, S. W., & Yoon, D. Y. (2016). Transformational leadership and knowledge sharing. Journal of Workplace Learning, 28(3), 130-149.

  • Hempel, P. S., Zhang, Z., & Han, Y., (2012). Team empowerment and the organizational context: Decentralization and the contrasting effects of formalization. Journal of Management, 38(2), 475-50.

  • Huselid, M. A. (1995). The impact of human resource management practices on turnover, productivity, and corporate financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 38(3), 635-872.

  • Kanter, R. M. (1977). Men and women of the corporation. New York, NY: Basic Books.

  • Koberg, C. S., Boss, W., Senjem, J. C., & Goodman, E. A. (1999). Antecedents and outcomes of empowerment: Empirical evidence from the health care industry. Group and Organization Management, 3(1), 71-91.

  • Kristof-Brown, A. L., Zimmerman, R. D., & Johnson, E. C. (2005). Consequences of individuals’ fit at work: A meta-analysis of person-job, person-organization, person-group, and person-supervisor fit. Personnel Psychology, 58, 281-342.

  • Lawler, E. E., Mohrman, S. A., & Ledford, G. E. (1998). Strategies for high performance organizations: Employee involvement, TQM, and reengineering programs in Fortune 1000 corporations. San Francisco: Josey-Bass.

  • Liao, H., Toya, K., Lepak, D. P., & Hong, Y. (2009). Do they see eye to eye? Management and employee perspectives of high-performance work systems and influence processes on service quality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 371-391.

  • Liden, R. C., & Arad, S. (1996). A power perspective of empowerment and work groups: Implications for human resource management research In G. R. Ferris (Ed.). Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 14, 205-252.

  • Liden, R. C., & Tewksbury, T. W. (1995). Empowerment and work teams. In G. R. Ferris, S. D. Rosen, and D. T. Barnum (Eds.). Handbook of Human Resources Management, 386-403. Oxford, England: Blackwell

  • Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., & Sparrow, R. T. (2000). An examination of the mediating role of psychological empowerment on the relations between the job, interpersonal relationships, and work outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(3), 407-416.

  • Mark, J., Martinko, M. J., & Gardner W. L. (1980). Learned helplessness: An alternative explanation for performance deficits. The Academy of Management Review, 7(2), 195-204.

  • Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1(1), 61-98.

  • Mishra, A. K., & Spreitzer, G. M. (1998). Explaining how survivors respond to downsizing: The roles of trust, empowerment, justice, and work redesign. The Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 567-588.

  • Nabila, A. A. (2008). The relationship between Psychological Empowerment and organizational Commitment: A case study among employees in construction sector in Kota Kinabalu, Sabah. School of Business and Economic. UMS (Unpublished Masters Dissertation).

  • Netemeyer, G. R., Boles, S. J., & McMurrian, R. (1997). An investigation into the antecedents of organizational citizenship behaviors in a personel selling context. Journal of Market, 6(3), 85-98.

  • Patterson, M. G., West, M. A., & Wall, T. D. (2004). Integrated manufacturing, empowerment, and company performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 641-665.

  • Pfeffer, J. (1998). The human equation: Building profits by putting people first. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

  • Pugh, D. S., Hickson, D. J., Hinings, C. R., & Turner, C., (1968). Dimensions of organization structure. Administrative Science Quarterly, 13, 65-105.

  • Quinn, R., & Spreitzer, G. (1997). The road to empowerment: seven questions every leader should consider. Organizational Dynamics, 26(2), 37-49.

  • Quinones, M., Broeck, A. V., & Witte, H. D. (2013). Do job resources affect work engagement via psychological empowerment? A mediation analysis. Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 29(3), 127-134.

  • Rebelo, T. M., & Gomes, A. D., (2011). Conditioning factors of an organizational learning culture. Journal of Workplace Learning, 23(3), 173-194.

  • Sagie, A., & Koslowsky, M., (2000). Participation and empowerment in organizations: Modeling, effectiveness, and applications. Sage Publications.

  • Seibert, S. E., Wang, G., & Courtright, S. H. (2011). Antecedents and consequences of psychological and team empowerment in organizations: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(5), 981-1003.

  • Seibert, S. E., Silver, S. R., & Randolph, W. A. (2004). Taking empowerment to the next level: A multiple-level model of empowerment, performance and satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal, 47(3), 332-349.

  • Sinha, S., Priyadarshi, P., & Kumar, P. (2016). Organizational culture, innovative behaviour and work related attitude: Role of psychological empowerment. Journal of Workplace Learning, 28(8), 519-535.

  • Sparrowe, R. T. (1994). Empowerment in the hospitality industry: An exploration of antecedents and outcomes. Hospitality Research Journal, 17(3), 51-73.

  • Spreitzer, G. M. (1996). Social structural characteristics of psychological empowerment. Academy of Management Journal, 39(2), 483-504.

  • Spreitzer, G. M. (2008). Taking stock: A review of more than twenty years of research on empowerment at work. In J. Barling and C. L. Cooper (Eds.). Handbook of organizational behaviour, 1, 54-72. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

  • Spreitzer, G. M. (1995). Psychological empowerment in the workplace: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 38(5), 1442-1465.

  • Spreitzer, G. M., De Janesz, S., & Quinn, R. E. (1999). Empowered to lead: The role of psychological empowerment in leadership. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20(4), 511-526.

  • Spreitzer, G. M., Kizilos, M., & Nason, S. (1997). A dimensional analysis of the relationship between psychological empowerment and effectiveness, satisfaction, and strain. Journal of Management, 23, 679-704.

  • Stander, M. W., & Rothmann, S. (2009). Psychological empowerment of employees in selected organisations in South Africa. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 35(1), 466- 474.

  • Thomas, K. W., & Velthouse, B. A. (1990). Cognitive elements of empowerment: An interpretive model of intrinsic task motivation. Academy of Management Review, 15(4), 66-81.

  • Zacharatos, A., Barling, J., & Iverson, R. D. (2005). High-performance work systems and occupational safety. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 77-93.


Abstract Views: 408

PDF Views: 0




  • Organisational Structure and Work Related Attitude:Mediating Role of Psychological Empowerment

Abstract Views: 408  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Shruti Sinha
Indian Institute of Forest Management, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India

Abstract


The present study examines the role of psychological empowerment (PE) in mediating the relationship between organisational structure and work related attitude. Through a sample of 324 middle and senior level executives working in India using a self-report questionnaire, the study established the linkage between organisational structure, psychological empowerment, and work related attitude thus extended the psychological empowerment theory. It was found that employee perceptions of the organisation structure they work in, directly influence their perceptions of empowerment, which, in turn, influence their work outcomes like job satisfaction, commitment and turnover intention. As per the findings, formalisation and participation in decision-making characteristics of organisation structure were found to be critical in enhancing psychological empowerment. Hierarchy of authority was found to negatively co-vary with psychological empowerment indicating that the more centralised the structure is, the lesser the feeling of empowerment experienced by the employees. The findings will facilitate managers to analyse their organisations’ with respect to centralisation and formalisation variables and assess to what extent they are matching with their goals of organisation to ascertain positive work outcomes.

Keywords


Organisational Structure, Psychological Empowerment, Turnover Intentions, Job Satisfaction, Commitment, India.

References