Journal of Organization and Human Behaviour

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

(Un)Easy Lies the Head that Wears the Crown:Leadership Selection and Group Performance Among Undergraduate Women


Affiliations
1 Department of Psychology, Lady Shri Ram College for Women, University of Delhi, Delhi, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The present study investigated the effect of the process of leader selection (formal, random, and no leader/control) on the group performance of college students, measured through goal achievement and team maintenance, using an experimental design. A sample comprising 119 female undergraduate students at women’s college in Delhi in the age range of 18–21 years was randomly assigned to one of the three leadership selection conditions. Each condition comprised of seven sub-groups each (a total of 21 sub-groups), containing five to six participants each. After the appointment of the leader (formally or randomly), the groups participated in a desert survival task. One-way analysis of variance revealed that the group where the leader was randomly selected outperformed the group with a formally appointed leader and the group with no leader, in terms of goal achievement and team maintenance, respectively. Our findings suggest that under certain circumstances, the systematic selection of leaders may have a deleterious impact on group performance. These counterintuitive findings are discussed in the light of past and current body of organizational research.

Keywords

Leadership Selection, Formal/Random/No Leader, Team Maintenance, Goal Achievement.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Ahuja, K. A., Srivastava, G., & Padhy, P. (2017). Do team building interventions work? Evaluation using Kirkpatrick’s model in a college setting. International Journal of Education and Management Studies, 7(4), 450–455.

  • Amit, K., Lisak, A., Popper, M., & Gal, R., Mamane-Levy, & Lisak, L. (2009). Leadership shaping experiences: A comparative study of leaders and non-leaders. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 30(4), 302–318.doi: 10.1108/01437730910961658

  • Antonakis, J., & Atwater, L. (2002). Leader distance: A review and a proposed theory. The Leadership Quarterly, 13(6), 673–704. doi:10.1016/S1048–9843(02)00155 -8

  • Arbak, E., & Villeval, M. C. (2013). Voluntary leadership: Motivation and influence. Social Choice and Welfare, 40(3), 635–662. doi: 10.1007/s00355–011–0626–2

  • Baker, S. D. (2007). Followership: The theoretical foundation of a contemporary construct. Journal of leadership and Organizational Studies, 14(1), 345–373.

  • Brandts, J., Rott, C., & Solà, C. (2016). Not just like starting over- Leadership and revivification of cooperation in groups. Experimental Economics, 19(4), 792–818. doi: 10.1007/s10683–015–9468–6 Cartwright, D., & Zander, A. F. (1960). Group dynamics: Research and theory. New York: Harper & Row.

  • Cremer, D., & Dijk, E. V. (2005). When and why leaders put themselves first: Leader behavior in resource allocations as a function of feeling entitled. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35(4), 553–563. doi:10.1002/ejsp.260

  • Derue, D. S., Nahrgang, J. D., Wellman, N., & Humphrey, S. E. (2011). Trait and behavioral theories of leadership: An integration and meta-analytic test of their relative validity. Personnel Psychology, 64(1), 7–52. doi: 10.1111/j.1744–6570.2010.01201.x

  • Dionne, S. D., Yammarino, F. J., Atwater, L. E., & James, L. R. (2002). Neutralizing substitutes for leadership theory: Leadership effects and common-source bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 454–464.doi:10.1037/0021–9010.87.3.454

  • Erling, M., & Heijden, E.V. D. (2003). The effect of leadership in a public bad experiment. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 47(6), 773–795. doi: 10.1177/0022002703258962

  • Felfe, J., & Petersen, L. E. (2007). Romance of leadership and management decision making. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 16(1), 1–24. doi: 10.1080/13594320600873076

  • Fiedler, F. E., & Gibson, F. (2001). Determinants of effective utilization of leader abilities.Concepts for Air Force Leadership, 24, 171–176. Retrieved from http://www.au.af.mil/AU/AWC/AWCGATE/au-24/fiedler.pdf

  • Foti, R. J., Fraser, S. L., & Lord, R. G. (1982). Effects of leadership labels and prototypes on perceptions of political leaders. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67(3), 326–333. doi: 10.1037//0021–9010.67.3.326

  • Goldman, M., & Frass, L. A. (1965). The effects of leader selection on group performance. Sociometry, 28(1), 82–88. doi:10.2307/2786087

  • Harris, K. J., Wheeler, A. R., & Kacmar, K. M. (2009). Leader-member exchange and empowerment: Direct and interactive effects on job satisfaction, turnover intentions, and performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 20(3), 371–382. doi/10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.03.006

  • Haslam, S. A., McGarty, C., Brown, P. M., Eggins, R. A., Morrison, B. E., & Reynolds, K. J. (1998). Inspecting the emperor’s clothes: Evidence that random selection of leaders can enhance group performance. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 2(3), 168–184. doi.org/10.1037/1089–2699.2.3.168

  • Hersey, P., & Blanchard, K. H. (1974). So you want to know your leadership style? Training and Development Journal, 28(2), 22–37. Retrieved from http://www.psynet.apa.org/

  • Hogg, M. A., & Terry, D. J. (2014). Social identity processes in organizational contexts. New York, NY: Psychology Press.

  • Hollander, E. P. (1995). Ethical challenges in the leader-follower relationship. Business Ethics Quarterly, 5(1), 55–65. doi.org/10.2307/3857272

  • Howell, J. M., & Shamir, B. (2005). The role of followers in the charismatic leadership process: Relationships and their consequences. The Academy of Management Review, 30(1), 96–112. doi:10.5465/AMR.2005.15281435

  • Iqbal, N., Anwar, S., & Haider, N. (2015). Effect of leadership style on employee performance. Arabian Journal of Business and Management Review, 5,146. doi:10.4172/2223–5833.1000146

  • Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, F. P. (1991). Joining together; Group theory and group skills. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

  • Jung, D. I., & Sosik, J. J. (2002). Transformational leadership in work groups. The role of empowerment, cohesiveness, and collective-efficacy on perceived group performance. Small Group Research, 33(3), 313–336. doi:10.1177/10496402033003002.

  • Kerr, S., & Jermier, J. M. (1978). Substitutes for leadership: Their meaning and measurement. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 22(3), 375–403. doi:10.1016/0030–5073(78)90023–5

  • Khan, R., Bukhari, A., & Channar, Z. (2016). Effects of leadership style on health care organizational performance: A survey of selected tertiary care Hospital in Karachi, Pakistan. International Journal of Economics & Management Sciences, 5, 333. doi: 10.4172/2162–6359.1000333

  • Koech, P. M., & Namusonge, G. S. (2012). The effect of leadership styles on employee performance at state corporations in Kenya. International Journal of Business and Commerce, 2(1), 1–12. Retrieved from http://www.ijbcnet.com/vol2no1sep2012.htm

  • Markulis, P., Jassawalla, A., & Sashittal, H. (2006). The impact of leadership modes on team dynamics and performance in undergraduate management classes. Journal of Education for Business, 81(3), 145–150. doi:10.3200/JOEB.81.3.145–150

  • Özer, F., & Tınaztepe, C. (2014). Effect of strategic leadership styles on firm performance: A study in a Turkish SME. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 150, 778–784. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.09.059

  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Bommer, W. H. (1996). Transformational leader behaviors and substitutes for leadership as determinants of employee satisfaction, commitment, trust, and organizational citizenship behaviors. Journal of Management, 22(2), 259–298.doi:10.1016/S0149–2063(96)90049–5

  • Ritchie, R. J., & Moses, J. L. (1983). Assessment center correlates of women’s advancement into middle-management. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68, 227–231.

  • Rivas, M. F., & Sutter, M. (2011). The benefits of voluntary leadership in experimental public goods games. Economics Letters, 112(2), 176–178. doi:10.1016/j.econlet.2011.04.007

  • Rock, D., & Grant, H. (2016, November, 4). Why diverse teams are smarter? The Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2016/11/why-diverse-teams-are-smarter

  • Sarros, J. C., & Butchatsky. (1996). Leadership: Australia’s top CEOs: Finding out what makes them the best. Sydney, NSW: Harper Collins.

  • Solat, S., Bashir, M., Ali, A., Baig, S. A, Hussain, Z., & Jamil, K. (2017). The impact of leadership style on group effectiveness: The mediating role of counterproductive behavior. City University Research Journal, 1–13. Retrieved from http://www.cityuniversity.edu.pk/curj/Journals/Journal/special_aic_16/1.pdf

  • Sronce, R., & Arendt, L. A. (2009). Demonstrating the interplay of leaders and followers: An experiential exercise. Journal of Management Education, 33(6), 699–724. doi:10.1177/1052562908330726

  • Staples, D. S., & Zhao, L. (2006). The effects of cultural diversity in virtual teams versus face-to-face teams. Group Decision and Negotiation,15(4), 389–406. doi: 10.1007/s10726–006–9042-x

  • Stogdill, R. M. (1948). Personal factors associated with leadership: A survey of the literature. The Journal of Psychology, 25(1), 35–71. doi:10.1080/00223980.1948.9917362

  • Sutton, B. (2011, October 07). Is it sometimes rational to select leaders randomly? A cool old study. Retrieved from http://bobsutton.typepad.com/my_weblog/leadership/page/3/

  • Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1985). The social identity theory of intergroup behaviour. Chicago, Nelson Hall.

  • Vahdani, M., Sheikhyousefi, R., Moharramzadeh, M., Ojaghi, A., & Salehian, M. H. (2012). Relationship between coach’s leadership styles and group cohesion in the teams participating in the 10th Sport Olympiad of male students. European Journal of Experimental Biology, 2(4), 1012–1017.

  • Williams, K. D., & Karau, S. J. (1991). Social loafing and social compensation: The effects of expectations of co-worker performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(4), 570–581. doi:10.1037/0022–3514.61.4.570

  • Zaleznik, A. (2004). Managers and leaders: Are they different? Clinical Leadership and Management Review: The Journal of CLMA, 18(3), 171–177. doi: 10.1097/00005110–198107000–00005


Abstract Views: 310

PDF Views: 0




  • (Un)Easy Lies the Head that Wears the Crown:Leadership Selection and Group Performance Among Undergraduate Women

Abstract Views: 310  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Kanika K. Ahuja
Department of Psychology, Lady Shri Ram College for Women, University of Delhi, Delhi, India
Garima Srivastava
Department of Psychology, Lady Shri Ram College for Women, University of Delhi, Delhi, India
Priyanka Padhy
Department of Psychology, Lady Shri Ram College for Women, University of Delhi, Delhi, India
Nirupuma Yadav
Department of Psychology, Lady Shri Ram College for Women, University of Delhi, Delhi, India

Abstract


The present study investigated the effect of the process of leader selection (formal, random, and no leader/control) on the group performance of college students, measured through goal achievement and team maintenance, using an experimental design. A sample comprising 119 female undergraduate students at women’s college in Delhi in the age range of 18–21 years was randomly assigned to one of the three leadership selection conditions. Each condition comprised of seven sub-groups each (a total of 21 sub-groups), containing five to six participants each. After the appointment of the leader (formally or randomly), the groups participated in a desert survival task. One-way analysis of variance revealed that the group where the leader was randomly selected outperformed the group with a formally appointed leader and the group with no leader, in terms of goal achievement and team maintenance, respectively. Our findings suggest that under certain circumstances, the systematic selection of leaders may have a deleterious impact on group performance. These counterintuitive findings are discussed in the light of past and current body of organizational research.

Keywords


Leadership Selection, Formal/Random/No Leader, Team Maintenance, Goal Achievement.

References