Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Effects of Members’ Relationships on Law-Enforcement Effectiveness and Performance in Protected Areas


Affiliations
1 Tumu Upper West Region, Ghana
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


This study was set to assess protected area staff’ interpersonal and intergroup relationships effect on patrol effectiveness and performance. Our findings showed members assessed their teams with high scores for interpersonal and intergroup relationships. The four patrol teams showed differences in team performances in the number of patrols organised, number of hours spent on patrols and its resultant effective patrol days (EPDs) achieved per staff. Teams that scored highest in team purpose, goals and roles as well as team skills and competencies were found to spend much more time on patrols. There were no statistically significant variations among the teams’ interpersonal and intergroup relationship versus (1) team purpose, goals and roles, (2) team skills and competencies and (3) team learning and commitment in a Kruskal-Wallis H test. However, there were statistically significant differences among the four teams in the number of animals sighted and illegal activities detected in ANOVA tests. These variations were attributed to ecological conditions rather than differences in the teams’ effectiveness scores.

Keywords

Biodiversity, Ecological, Illegal Activities, Patrol Teams, Poaching.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size

Abstract Views: 212

PDF Views: 0




  • Effects of Members’ Relationships on Law-Enforcement Effectiveness and Performance in Protected Areas

Abstract Views: 212  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Nana Owusu-Ansah
Tumu Upper West Region, Ghana
Kwadwo Asare-Gyebi
Tumu Upper West Region, Ghana

Abstract


This study was set to assess protected area staff’ interpersonal and intergroup relationships effect on patrol effectiveness and performance. Our findings showed members assessed their teams with high scores for interpersonal and intergroup relationships. The four patrol teams showed differences in team performances in the number of patrols organised, number of hours spent on patrols and its resultant effective patrol days (EPDs) achieved per staff. Teams that scored highest in team purpose, goals and roles as well as team skills and competencies were found to spend much more time on patrols. There were no statistically significant variations among the teams’ interpersonal and intergroup relationship versus (1) team purpose, goals and roles, (2) team skills and competencies and (3) team learning and commitment in a Kruskal-Wallis H test. However, there were statistically significant differences among the four teams in the number of animals sighted and illegal activities detected in ANOVA tests. These variations were attributed to ecological conditions rather than differences in the teams’ effectiveness scores.

Keywords


Biodiversity, Ecological, Illegal Activities, Patrol Teams, Poaching.