Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Identifying the Need and Implementing the Change Process Through Collaborative Decision Making


Affiliations
1 International Management Institute Kolkata, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
2 Calcutta Business School, Bishnupur, West Bengal, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Whether an organisation would adopt change or not is generally decided by its strategic apex. But since with any change of the status quo, disruptive or incremental, comes resistance. It is imperative for the management to decide in a rational way whether the suggested change would in aggregation gives favourable results. This is a conceptual study inspired by the analytic hierarchy process and develops a model to identify the reasons for a company that pull to no change or push to change. We define, push to change as those efforts which positively affect change and negatively affect no change and pull to no change as those efforts which negatively affect change and positively affect no change.

Keywords

Organisational Change, Organisational Resistance, Deviant Behaviour, Decision Making, Prioritisation.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Abrhiem, T. H. (2013). Managing transformation and change for the business leader. Business and Management Review, 3(2), 14-22.
  • Agboola, A. A., & Salawu, R. O. (2011). Managing deviant behavior and resistance to change. International Journal of Business and Management, 6(1), 235-242.
  • Atkinson, P. (2013). Managing change and building a positive risk culture. Management Services, Summer, 9-13.
  • Beer, M., & Nohria, N. (2006). Cracking the code of change. Harvard Business Review, Best of HBR, 137-154.
  • Chatterjee, D., & Sharma, R. R. K. (2012). Choosing the right control system for organizational strategies; Adapting cultures and best-fit leadership. Germany: Lap Lambert Academic Publishing.
  • Collinson, D. (1994). Strategies of resistance: Power, knowledge, and subjectivity in the workplace. In J. M. Jermier, D. Knights and W. R. Nord (Eds.), Resistance and power in organizations, 25-68. New York: Routledge.
  • Carnall, C. A. (1995). Managing change in organizations (2nd ed.). Essex: Pearson Education Limited.
  • Carr, D. K., Hard, H. J., & Tranhant, W. J. (1996). Managing the change process: A field book for change agents, consultants, team leaders and reengineering managers. New York: McGraw Hill.
  • Gaetz, F., Rimmer, M., Lawrence, A., & Smith, A. (2006). Managing organizational change (2nded.). Australia: Wiley and Sons, Sidney and Melbourne.
  • Grieves, J. (2010). Organizational Change: Themes and Issues, USA: Oxford University Press.
  • Harvey, D., & Brown, D.R. (2001). An experiential approach to organizational development (6th ed.). New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.
  • Ishizaka, A., & Labib, A. (2011). Review of the main developments in the analytic hierarchy process. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(11), 14336-14345.
  • Jermier, J. M., Knights, D., & Nord, W. (1994). Resistance and Power in Organizations, London: Routledge.
  • Kotter, J. P. (1996). Leading change. Boston: Harvard Business Review Press.
  • Kotter, J. P. (2006). Leading change: Why transformational efforts fail. Harvard Business Review, Best of HBR, 1-9.
  • Mariana, P., & Violeta, S. (2011). Opportunity to reduce resistance to change in a process of organizational change. Annals of Faculty of Economics, 1(2), 698-702.
  • Meaney, M., & Pung, C. (2008). McKinsey global results: Creating organizational Transformations. The McKinsey Quarterly, 1-7.
  • Mintzberg, H. (1981). Organization design: Fashion or fit?. Harvard Business Review, 103-115.
  • Maurer, R. (199). Using resistance to build support for change. Journal for quality and participation, 56-63.
  • Nasim, S., & Sushil. (2011). Revisiting organizational change: exploring the paradox of managing continuity and change. Journal of Change Management, 11(2), 185-206.
  • Saaty, T. L. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process. McGrawHill, New York.
  • Shin, J., Taylor, M. S., & Seo, M. (2012). Resources for change: The relationships of organizational inducements and psychological resilience to employees' attitudes and behaviors toward organizational change. Academy of Management Journal, 55(3), 727-748.
  • Wadell, D., & Sohal, A. S. (1998). Resistance: A constructive tool for change management. Management Decision, 36(8), 543-548.
  • Warren, D. E. (2003). Constructive and destructive deviance in organizations. Journal of academy of management review, 28, 622-632.
  • Westover, J. H. (2010). Managing organizational change: Change agent strategies and techniques to successfully managing the dynamics of stability and change in organizations. International Journal of Management and Innovation, 2(1), 45-50.

Abstract Views: 283

PDF Views: 2




  • Identifying the Need and Implementing the Change Process Through Collaborative Decision Making

Abstract Views: 283  |  PDF Views: 2

Authors

Devjani Chatterjee
International Management Institute Kolkata, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
Sabyasachi Patra
Calcutta Business School, Bishnupur, West Bengal, India

Abstract


Whether an organisation would adopt change or not is generally decided by its strategic apex. But since with any change of the status quo, disruptive or incremental, comes resistance. It is imperative for the management to decide in a rational way whether the suggested change would in aggregation gives favourable results. This is a conceptual study inspired by the analytic hierarchy process and develops a model to identify the reasons for a company that pull to no change or push to change. We define, push to change as those efforts which positively affect change and negatively affect no change and pull to no change as those efforts which negatively affect change and positively affect no change.

Keywords


Organisational Change, Organisational Resistance, Deviant Behaviour, Decision Making, Prioritisation.

References