Open Access
Subscription Access
Design and Analysis of High-Performance and Low-Power Quaternary Latch, Quaternary D Flip-Flop and XY Flip-Flop
Multiple-valued logic (MVL) circuits propose a number of possible improvements to current VLSI circuit designs. For example, serious difficulties with limitations on the number of connections between an integrated circuit and the outside world (pinout concern) and also the number of links within the circuit encountered in some VLSI circuit synthesis could be greatly reduced if signals in the circuit could assume four or more states instead of only two. This research work shows a quaternary logic-based latch, a level-sensitive flop, and an edge-sensitive flop. In most of the cases it is seen that a sequential digital circuit produces two outputs which are complementary to each other. But in most of the designs, there is no need of having both the outputs of the flip-flops, so one of the quaternary outputs can be removed from the circuit, resulting in a decrease in area and static power. In quaternary circuits, several power sources or a single power supply source are employed. Those that have several sources of supply use less energy. In multiple-valued logic we need the design to have multiple logic levels, like in quaternary logic, GND is used for logic ‘0’, 1/3Vdd is used for logic ‘1’, 2/3Vdd is for logic ‘2’, and Vdd is for logic ‘3’. The multi-Vdd design method is incompatible with the purpose of reducing the inter-chip and intra-chip connections. In order to resolve this, a capacitive divider network is used while designing. The QFF is demonstrated with the necessary simulation results using LTSpice tool and the simulations are performed using 32nm technology file. Finally, a quaternary shift register is built to demonstrate the applicability and appropriate operation of the proposed QFF in larger sequential circuits.
Keywords
Binary Logic, Multi-Valued Logic, CMOS, Quaternary Logic, Sequential Circuits, Shift Register.
User
Font Size
Information
- Dhande A P & Ingole V T, Int J Softw Eng Knowl Eng, 15 (2005) 411.
- Balla P C & Andreas A, IEEE J Solid-State Circuits, 19 (1984) 739.
- Bajec I L, Nikolaj Z & Miha M, Nanotechnology, 17 (2006) 1937.
- Jain F, et al., J Electron Mater, 45 (2016) 5663.
- Kobashi K, et al., Nano Lett, 18 (2018) 4355.
- Zhang Y J, et al., IEEE Trans Electron Dev, 66 (2019) 4710.
- Rakos B, Int J Circuit Theor Appl, 47 (2019) 1357.
- Keshavarzian P & Keivan N, Int J Nanotechnol, 6 (2009) 942.
- Lin S, Yong-Bin K & Fabrizio L, IEEE Trans Nanotechnol, 10 (2009) 217.
- Duong N T, et al., ACS Nano, 13 (2019) 4478.
- Current K W, Proc 30th IEEE Int Symposium on MultipleValued Logic, (ISMVL), 2000.
- Lang Y F & Shen J Z, Int J Electron, 100 (2013) 1637.
- Prosser F, Wu X & Chen X, IEE Proc E-Computers and Digital Techniques, 135 (1988) 266.
- Lang Y F, et al., Electron Lett, 50 (2014) 1052.
- Lang Y F, Int J Electron Lett, (2021) 1.
- Datla S, Raju R P & Mitchell A T, 40th IEEE Int Symp Multiple-Valued Logic, 2010.
- Chaudhuri S, IEEE 48th Int Symp Multiple-Valued Logic, 2018.
- Safipoor F, Reza F M & Mahdi Z, Microelectron J, 113 (2021) 105079.
- Bolton W, Control systems, 2002.
- Chowdary G R, et al., Int J Nanotechnol 8 (2020).
Abstract Views: 121
PDF Views: 120