Indian Journal of Pure and Applied Physics

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Core Loss Study of Different Structures of Terfenol-D Rods


Affiliations
1 School of Physics and Information Technology, Shaanxi Normal University, No. 620 West Chang'an Street, Chang'an District, Xi'an, Shaanxi Province, 710 119, China
 

To efficiently use Terfenol-D rods, six of its structures were studied. Finite element analysis was used to estimate and compare the hysteresis, eddy current, and coil resistance losses of the six Terfenol-D rods. The loss factors of the rods were calculated and analyzed. Furthermore, three structures of Terfenol-D rods were manufactured, and the loss factors of the rods were measured. The results showed that an untreated rod had the largest hysteresis and eddy current losses on the outer diameter surface, and the overall hysteresis loss of the rod was the smallest. Compared with the untreated rod, the eddy current and hysteresis losses on the outer diameter surface of sliced and slit rods reduced, the overall hysteresis loss of sliced and slit rods increased, and the overall eddy current loss of sliced rods reduced; the hysteresis and eddy current losses on the surface of the sliced rods were less than that of the slit rods, and the overall eddy current loss of the sliced rods was less than that of the slit rods; moreover, the eddy current loss of each rod was larger than its hysteresis loss. The numerical calculation values of the coil resistance loss basically agreed with the theoretical calculation values. The finite element simulation calculation values of the loss factors of the Terfenol-D rods agreed with the experimental test values.

Keywords

Terfenol-D Rod, Hysteresis Loss, Eddy Current Loss, Coil Resistance Loss, Finite Element Calculation.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • YaoY, PanY & Liu S,Ultrason Sonochem, 62 (2020) 104722.

  • Li P, Chen Y, Li W, et al., Alexandria Eng J, 61 (2022) 10939.

  • Pernía A M, Mayor H A, Prieto M J, et al., Sensors, 19 (2019) 2382.

  • Tang J, Bai Y, Yan L, et al., Appl Acoust, 190 (2022) 108646.

  • Liu H, Li W, Sun X,et al., J Sound Vib, 492 (2020) 115805.

  • Kwak Y, Kim S, Ahn J, Int J Precis Eng Man, 12 (2011) 829.

  • Zeng J, Zeng H, Bai B, et al., Proc SPIE 7493, Second International Conference on Smart Materials and Nanotechnology in Engineering, Weihai, (2009).

  • Takahashi R, Moongki C, Tashiro K, et al., Appl Environ Microb, 19 (2011) 503.

  • Engdahl G & Bergqvist A, J Appl Phys, 79 (1996) 4689.

  • Xu H, Pei Y, Fang D, et al., Int J Solids Struct, 50 (2013) 672.

  • Talebian S, Hojjat Y, Ghodsi M, et al., J Magn Magn Mater, 388 (2015) 150.

  • Yamamoto K, Nakano H, Yamashiro Y, J Magn Magn Mater, 254 (2003) 222.

  • Meng H, Zhang T, Jiang C, IEEE T Magn, 50 (2014) 1.

  • Stillesjo F, Engdahl G, Wei Z, Proc SPIE 3992, Smart Structures and Materials, California, (2000).

  • Huang W, Gao C,Li Y, et al., IEEE Trans Magn, 54(2018) 1.

  • He X & Zhang P, Sci China: Technol Sci, 52 (2009) 336.

  • Tang Z, Lv F & Liu Y, J Rare Earths, 27 (2009) 525.

  • Teng D & Li Y, Sensors, 20 (2020) 2808.

  • Tao M, Chen D, Lu Q, et al., J Mech Eng, 48 (2012) 146.

  • Gandomzadeh D & Abbaspour-Fard M, J Magn Magn Mater, 513 (2020) 166823.

  • Huang W, Wu X & Guo P, IEEE Trans Magn, 57 (2021) 1.

  • Li P, Liu Q, Zhou X, et al., J Vib Control, 27 (2020) 573.

  • AC/DC Module User's Guide. COMSOL Multiphysics® V-5.4. COMSOL AB, Stockholm, (2018).

  • Huang W, Wu X, Wu Y, et al., Chin J Sci Instrum, 41 (2020) 215.


Abstract Views: 121

PDF Views: 99




  • Core Loss Study of Different Structures of Terfenol-D Rods

Abstract Views: 121  |  PDF Views: 99

Authors

Qiang Liu
School of Physics and Information Technology, Shaanxi Normal University, No. 620 West Chang'an Street, Chang'an District, Xi'an, Shaanxi Province, 710 119, China
Xiping He
School of Physics and Information Technology, Shaanxi Normal University, No. 620 West Chang'an Street, Chang'an District, Xi'an, Shaanxi Province, 710 119, China

Abstract


To efficiently use Terfenol-D rods, six of its structures were studied. Finite element analysis was used to estimate and compare the hysteresis, eddy current, and coil resistance losses of the six Terfenol-D rods. The loss factors of the rods were calculated and analyzed. Furthermore, three structures of Terfenol-D rods were manufactured, and the loss factors of the rods were measured. The results showed that an untreated rod had the largest hysteresis and eddy current losses on the outer diameter surface, and the overall hysteresis loss of the rod was the smallest. Compared with the untreated rod, the eddy current and hysteresis losses on the outer diameter surface of sliced and slit rods reduced, the overall hysteresis loss of sliced and slit rods increased, and the overall eddy current loss of sliced rods reduced; the hysteresis and eddy current losses on the surface of the sliced rods were less than that of the slit rods, and the overall eddy current loss of the sliced rods was less than that of the slit rods; moreover, the eddy current loss of each rod was larger than its hysteresis loss. The numerical calculation values of the coil resistance loss basically agreed with the theoretical calculation values. The finite element simulation calculation values of the loss factors of the Terfenol-D rods agreed with the experimental test values.

Keywords


Terfenol-D Rod, Hysteresis Loss, Eddy Current Loss, Coil Resistance Loss, Finite Element Calculation.

References