Journal of Rural and Industrial Development

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Ecological Impact Assessment for Drawl of Water for Industrial Use : A Case Study of River Wainganga


Affiliations
1 Department of Environment Management, Indian Institute of Social Welfare and Business Management, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
2 Department of Environment Management, Indian Institute of Social Welfare and Business Management, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
3 Department of Environmental Science, University of Kalyani, Kalyani, West Bengal, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The study has attempted to assess ecological impact for drawl of water for industrial usage from river Wainganga comprising of producers (viz., Planktons, Periphytons, Macrophytes) and consumers like benthic organisms and fishes, reptiles, amphibians and birds. For the purpose, the study analysed the diversity and load of phytoplankton and zooplankton of river Wainganga. Furthermore, Species Diversity, which measures the bio-diversity and heterogeneity of aquatic ecosystem, was calculated based on the Shanon Weiner’s function. Now, species diversity of a community has 2 components: (i) species richness, and (ii) species evenness. To calculate species evenness, Pielou’s Index of equitability was used. The study further explored the presence of periphytons, macrobenthos, aquatic/semiaquatic macrophytes, fishes, reptiles, amphibians, water birds, etc. in Wainganga river. Finally, based on the threat assessment, the study has envisaged essential actions to restore the ecological balance of the river Wainganga. Considering the scenario of likely impacts for drawl of water for industrial usage from the river, it was explored that there will be no major negative impacts on the ecology, as only 70 MCM water annually have been allocated for industrial usage. Furthermore, as ecological cycle has a self-regulating mechanism, therefore it is hoped that possibility of having minor impacts on the ecological environment of the River Wainganga shall be naturally mitigated with time.

Keywords

Impact Assessment Study, Ecology, Drawl of Water, Species Diversity, Ecological Balance, Aquatic Biodiversity.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Bogra, S., Bakshi, B. R., & Mathur, R. (2016). A water-withdrawal input-output model of the Indian economy. Environmental Science & Technology, 50(3), 1313-1321.

  • Crump, M. L., & Scott, N. J. Jr. (1994). Visual encounter survey. In W. R. Heyer, M. A. Donnelly, R. W. McDiarmid, L. C. Donnelly Heyek & M. S. Foster (Eds.), Measuring and Monitoring Biological Diversity (pp. 84-91). Washington DC: Standard Methods for Amphibians Smithsonian Institution Press.

  • Falkenmark, M. (2001). The greatest water problem: The inability to link environmental security, water security and food security. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 17(4), 539-554.

  • Fetter, C. W. (1994). Applied hydrogeology. New York: Macmillan.

  • Glenn, E. P., Zamora-Arroyo, A., Nagler, P. L., Briggs, W. S., & Flessa, K. (2001). Ecology and conservation biology of the Colorado river delta, Mexico. Journal of Arid Environments, 49, 5-15.

  • Harvey, F. E. (2007). Ground water dependence of endangered ecosystems: Nebraska’s Eastern Saline Wetlands. Ground Water, 45, 736-752.

  • Havera, S. P., Suloway, L. B., & Hoffman, J. E. (1997). Wetlands in the midwest with special reference to Illinois. In M. W. Schwartz (Ed.), Conservation in Highly Fragmented Landscapes (pp. 88-104). New York: Chapman and Hall.

  • Malmqvist, B., & Rundle, S. (2002). Threats to the running water ecosystems of the world. Environmental Conservation, 29(2), 134-153.

  • Mubako, S. T., Ruddell, B. L., & Mayer, A. S. (2013). Relationship between water withdrawals and freshwater ecosystem water scarcity quantified at multiple scales for a great lakes watershed. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 139(6).

  • Nilsson, C., & Svedmark, M. (2002). Basic principles and ecological consequences of changing water regimes: Riparian plant communities. Environmental Management, 30(4), 468-480.

  • Olson, D. M., & Dinerstein, E. (1998). The global 200: A representation approach to conserving the earth’s most biologically valuable Ecoregions. Conservation Biology, 12(3), 502-515.

  • Pfister, S., Koehler, A., & Hellweg, S. (2009). Assessing the environmental impacts of freshwater consumption in LCA. Environmental Science & Technology, 43(11), 4098-4104.

  • Pimentel, D., Berger, B., Filiberto, D., Newton, M., Wolfe, B., Karabinakis, E., Clark, S., Poon, E., Abbett, E., & Nandagopal, S. (2004). Water resources: Agricultural and environmental issues. David Pimentel BioScience, 54(10), 909-918.

  • Puri, S. D., & Virani, R. S. (2016). Avifaunal diversity from Khairbandha Lake in Gondia District, Maharashtra State, India. Bioscience Discovery, 7(2), 140-146.

  • Rolls, R. J., & Bond, N. R. (2017). Environmental and ecological effects of flow alteration in surface water ecosystems. In A. C. Horne, J. A. Webb., Angus, M. J. Stewardson & R. Brian (Eds.), Water for the Environment: From Policy and Science to Implementation and Management, 4, 65-83.

  • Shank, M. K., & Stauffer, J. R. (2014). Land use and surface water withdrawal effects on fish and macro invertebrate assemblages in the Susquehanna river Basin, USA. Journal of Freshwater Ecology, 30(2), 229-248.


Abstract Views: 142

PDF Views: 0




  • Ecological Impact Assessment for Drawl of Water for Industrial Use : A Case Study of River Wainganga

Abstract Views: 142  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Sarbani Mitra
Department of Environment Management, Indian Institute of Social Welfare and Business Management, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
K. M. Agrawal
Department of Environment Management, Indian Institute of Social Welfare and Business Management, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
S. C. Santra
Department of Environmental Science, University of Kalyani, Kalyani, West Bengal, India

Abstract


The study has attempted to assess ecological impact for drawl of water for industrial usage from river Wainganga comprising of producers (viz., Planktons, Periphytons, Macrophytes) and consumers like benthic organisms and fishes, reptiles, amphibians and birds. For the purpose, the study analysed the diversity and load of phytoplankton and zooplankton of river Wainganga. Furthermore, Species Diversity, which measures the bio-diversity and heterogeneity of aquatic ecosystem, was calculated based on the Shanon Weiner’s function. Now, species diversity of a community has 2 components: (i) species richness, and (ii) species evenness. To calculate species evenness, Pielou’s Index of equitability was used. The study further explored the presence of periphytons, macrobenthos, aquatic/semiaquatic macrophytes, fishes, reptiles, amphibians, water birds, etc. in Wainganga river. Finally, based on the threat assessment, the study has envisaged essential actions to restore the ecological balance of the river Wainganga. Considering the scenario of likely impacts for drawl of water for industrial usage from the river, it was explored that there will be no major negative impacts on the ecology, as only 70 MCM water annually have been allocated for industrial usage. Furthermore, as ecological cycle has a self-regulating mechanism, therefore it is hoped that possibility of having minor impacts on the ecological environment of the River Wainganga shall be naturally mitigated with time.

Keywords


Impact Assessment Study, Ecology, Drawl of Water, Species Diversity, Ecological Balance, Aquatic Biodiversity.

References