Journal of Rural and Industrial Development

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Causal Relationship between the Performance of Manufacturing and Energy Sector: Current Scenario of Indian Economy


Affiliations
1 Amity School of Economics, Amity University, Noida, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Economic development has often been associated with the performance of the manufacturing sector. Current slowdown of Indian manufacturing has been the centre of economic debate. This paper dwells into the complexities of the Indian manufacturing sector highlighting its relation with the power sector. The study emphasizes that sluggish performance of manufacturing is attributed to the retarded growth of Indian power. Due to the insufficient energy resources, growth of Indian manufacturing has faced tremendous challenges. The study recommends that higher productivity in the power sector through lowering transmission losses and increasing investment in renewable sources may act as a stimulus for both Indian power and manufacturing sector.

Keywords

Indian Manufacturing, Indian Power, Causal Relationship
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Akarca, A.T., & Long, T.V. (1980). On the relationship between energy and GNP: A re-examination. J.Energy Development, 5, 326-331.

  • Cheng, B.S. (1995). An investigation of cointegration and causality between energy consumption and economic growth. J. Energy Development, 21(1), 73-84.

  • Glasure, Y.U., & Lee, A.R. (1997). Cointegration, error correction and the relationship between GDP and energy: the case of South Korea and Singapore. Resource. Energy Economics, 20, 17-25.

  • Granger, C.W.J., (1969). Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica, 37, 424-438.

  • Kochhar, K., Kumar, U., Rajan, R., Subramanian, A., & Tokatlidis, I. (2006). India’s Pattern of Development: What Happened, What Follows. IMF Working Paper. Retrieved from http://www.imf.orgexternal /pubs/ft/wp0622.pdf

  • Kraft, J., & Kraft, A. (1978). On the relationship between energy and GNP. J. Energy Development, 3,401-403.

  • Kumar R., & Gupta, A. S. (2008). Towards A Competitive Manufacturing Sector. ICRIER Research Paper, 203.

  • Masih, A.M.M., & Masih, R. (1996). Energy consumption, real income and temporal causality: Results from a multicountry study based on cointegration and error-correction modeling techniques. Energy Economics, 18, 165-183.

  • Masih, A.M.M., & Masih, R. (1997). On the temporal causal relationship between energy consumption, real income and prices: Some new evidence from Asian-energy dependent NICs based on a multivariate cointegration, vector error-correction approach. J. Policy Modeling, 19, 417-440.

  • McKinsey & Company. Retrieved from http://www.mckinsey. com/locations/india/mckinseyonindia/pdf/Power_Report_Exec_Summary.pdf

  • Ravi, B., & Trivedi, P. (2003). The Past, Present and Future of Indian Manufacturing Industry.

  • Sims, C.A. (1972). Money, income and causality. Am. Econ. Rev., 62, 540-552.

  • Yu, S.H., & Jin, J.C. (1992). Cointegration tests of energy consumption, income and employment. Resources Energy, 14, 259-266.

  • Dhungel, K.R. (2008), A causal relationship between energy consumption and economic growth in Nepal. Asia-Pacifi c Development Journal, 15 (1), 137-150.

  • Mongia, P., Schumacher, K., & Sathaye, J. (2001). Policy reforms and productivity growth in India’s energy intensive industries. Energy Policy, 29 (9), 715-724.

  • Sahu, S. K., & Narayanan, K., (2011). Determinants of energy intensity in Indian manufacturing industries: A cross sectional study. Electrical India, 51 (6), 108-120.

  • Ramesh, J. (2009). India opens up nuclear to private sector. The Energy Industry Times, January, 7.

  • Vanden, K.F., Jeferson, G.H., Hangmei L., & Quan, T. (2002). What is driving China’s decline in energy intensity. Retrieved from http://weber.ucsd.edu/~carsonvs/papers/787.pdf

  • Mongia, P., & Jayant S. (1998). Productivity Trends in India’s Energy Intensive Industries: A Growth Accounting Analysis. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, #41838. Berkeley, California.


Abstract Views: 471

PDF Views: 4




  • Causal Relationship between the Performance of Manufacturing and Energy Sector: Current Scenario of Indian Economy

Abstract Views: 471  |  PDF Views: 4

Authors

Shivani Jaswal
Amity School of Economics, Amity University, Noida, India
Keerti Singh
Amity School of Economics, Amity University, Noida, India
Japneet Kaur
Amity School of Economics, Amity University, Noida, India

Abstract


Economic development has often been associated with the performance of the manufacturing sector. Current slowdown of Indian manufacturing has been the centre of economic debate. This paper dwells into the complexities of the Indian manufacturing sector highlighting its relation with the power sector. The study emphasizes that sluggish performance of manufacturing is attributed to the retarded growth of Indian power. Due to the insufficient energy resources, growth of Indian manufacturing has faced tremendous challenges. The study recommends that higher productivity in the power sector through lowering transmission losses and increasing investment in renewable sources may act as a stimulus for both Indian power and manufacturing sector.

Keywords


Indian Manufacturing, Indian Power, Causal Relationship

References