Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Energy Consumption and Economic Growth Nexus in the Indian Context


Affiliations
1 Army Institute of Management, Kolkata, India
2 Rajiv Gandhi Indian Institute of Management, Shillong, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


An attempt is made to determine the direction of causality between disaggregated energy consumption (coal consumption, petroleum consumption and electricity consumption) and overall economic growth in India's economy. Methodology adopted includes Johansen co-integration test, Granger causality test in a VECM framework followed by impulse response analysis. The findings show a long term relationship among the variables. Additionally, bidirectional causality between coal consumption and economic growth is observed and a unidirectional causality is observed from petroleum consumption to economic growth. The findings suggest that proper and efficient sectoral allocation policy on energy should be designed coupled with adoption of environmental policies aiming at increasing energy efficiency and the use of renewable energy.

Keywords

Energy Consumption, Economic Growth, Co–integration, Granger Causality, Impulse Response Analysis
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Apergis, N., & Payne, J. E. (2010). The causal dynamics between coal consumption and growth: evidence from emerging market economies. Applied Energy, 87(6), 1972-1977.
  • Apostolakis, B. E. (1990). Energy-capital substitutability / complementarity: The dichotomy. Energy Economics, 12(1), 48-58.
  • Arbex, M., & Perobelli, F.S. (2010). Solow meets leontief : Economic growth and energy consumption. Energy Economics, 32(1), 43-53.
  • Cheng, B. S. (1999). Causality between energy consumption and economic growth in India: An application of cointegration and error-correction modeling. Indian Economic Review, 34(1), 39-49.
  • Dickey, D. A. & Fuller, W. A. (1979). Distribution of the estimations for autoregressive time series with a unit ischolar_main. Journal of American Statistical Association, 74(366), 427-431.
  • Engle, R.F., & Granger, C.W.J. (1987). Cointegration and error-correction: Representation, estimation, and testing. Econometrica, 55(2), 251-276.
  • Ferguson, R., Wilkinson, W., & Hill, R. (2000). Electricity use and economic development. Energy Policy, 28(13), 923-934.
  • Ghosh, S. (2002). Electricity consumption and economic growth in India. Energy Policy, 30(2), 125-129.
  • Ghosh, S. (2006). Future demand of petroleum products in India. Energy Policy, 34(15), 2032–2037.
  • Jinke, L., Hualing, S., & Dianming, G. (2008). Causality relationship between coal consumption and GDP: Difference of major OECD and non-OECD countries. Applied Energy, 85(6), 421-429.
  • Johansen, S. (1988). Statistical analysis of Co-integrating vectors. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 12(6), 231-254.
  • Johansen, S., & Juselius, K. (1990). Maximum likely/hood estimation and inference on Co-integration with application to the demand for money. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 52(2), 169-210.
  • Kraft, J., & Kraft, A. (1978). On the relationship between energy and GNP. Journal of Energy Development, 3(2), 401-403.
  • Lee, C. C. (2005). Energy consumption and GDP in developing countries: A Cointegrated Panel Analysis. Energy Economics, 27(3), 415-427.
  • Lee, C. C. (2006). The causality relationship between energy consumption and GDP in G-11 countries revisited. Energy Policy, 34(9), 1086-1093.
  • MacKinnon, J.G. (1991). Critical values for Co-integration Tests. In R.F. Engle & C.W.J. Granger (Eds.). Long Run Economic Relationships: Readings in Co-integration , 267-276. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • MacKinnon, J.G., Haug, A. A., & Michelis, L. (1999). Numerical distribution functions of likelihood ratio tests for cointegration. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 14(5), 563-577.
  • Masih, A. M. M, & Masih, R. (1997). On the temporal causal relationship between energy consumption, real income, and prices: Some new evidence from Asian-energy dependent NICs based on a multivariate cointegration/ Vector error-correction approach. Journal of Policy Modelling, 19(4), 417-440.
  • Narayan, P. K., & Prasad, A. (2008). Electricity consumption- real GDP causality nexus: Evidence from a bootstrapped causality test for 30 OECD countries. Energy Policy, 36(2), 910-918.
  • Paul, S., & Bhattacharya, R. N. (2004). Causality between energy consumption and economic growth in India: A note on confl icting results. Energy Economics, 26(6), 977–983.
  • Payne, J. E. (2010). Survey of the international evidence on the causal relationship between energy consumption and growth. Journal of Economic Studies, 37(1), 53-95.
  • Phillips, P.C.B., & Perron, P. (1988). Testing for a unit ischolar_main in time series regression. Biometrika, 75(2), 335–346.
  • Pradhan, R. P. (2010). Energy consumption - Growth nexus in SAARC countries: Using cointegration and error correction model. Modern Applied Science, 4(4), 74-90.
  • Shiu, A., & Lam, P. L. (2004). Electricity consumption and economic growth in China. Energy Policy, 32(1), 47-54.
  • Soytas, U., & Sari, R. (2003). Energy consumption and GDP: Causality relationship in G-7 countries and emerging markets. Energy Economics, 25(1), 33-37.
  • Stern, D. I., & Cleveland, C. J. (2004). Energy and Economic Growth (Rensselaer working papers in economics 0410). Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Department of Economics.
  • Toman, M.T., & Jemelkova, B. (2003). Energy and economic development: An assessment of the state of knowledge. The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, 24(4), 93-112.
  • Yang, H.Y. (2000). Coal consumption and economic growth in Taiwan. Energy Sources, 22(2), 109-115.
  • Yoo, S. (2006a). The causal relationship between electricity consumption and economic growth in the ASEAN countries. Energy Policy, 34(18), 3573-3582.
  • Yoo, S. (2006b). Causal relationship between coal consumption and economic growth in Korea. Applied Energy, 83(11), 1181-1189.

Abstract Views: 440

PDF Views: 0




  • Energy Consumption and Economic Growth Nexus in the Indian Context

Abstract Views: 440  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Mousumi Bhattacharya
Army Institute of Management, Kolkata, India
Sharad Nath Bhattacharya
Rajiv Gandhi Indian Institute of Management, Shillong, India

Abstract


An attempt is made to determine the direction of causality between disaggregated energy consumption (coal consumption, petroleum consumption and electricity consumption) and overall economic growth in India's economy. Methodology adopted includes Johansen co-integration test, Granger causality test in a VECM framework followed by impulse response analysis. The findings show a long term relationship among the variables. Additionally, bidirectional causality between coal consumption and economic growth is observed and a unidirectional causality is observed from petroleum consumption to economic growth. The findings suggest that proper and efficient sectoral allocation policy on energy should be designed coupled with adoption of environmental policies aiming at increasing energy efficiency and the use of renewable energy.

Keywords


Energy Consumption, Economic Growth, Co–integration, Granger Causality, Impulse Response Analysis

References