Journal of Rural and Industrial Development

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Linkage between Microfinance and Rural Development in India


Affiliations
1 Department of Commerce, Assam University (a central University), Diphu Campus Diphu, Assam, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The basic assumption of this paper is that rural development in India should not be seen as a package of specific needs but as a transformation of rural life and conditions of the country. In this paper, it is assumed that the term rural development means the overall development of rural areas on a sustainable basis. In this background, the paper attempts to explain the link between the microfinance services and the rural development. The paper also argues that microfinance is not a magic bullet for poverty reduction and rural development in India. The paper which is conceptual in nature is totally based on secondary data.

Keywords

Microfinance, Rural Development, Magic Bullet, Poverty Reduction
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Bhatt, N. (1999). Can microcredit work in the United States? Harvard Business Review, 77, 26-27.

  • Borman, R., & Chanu, A. I. (2010a). Microfi nance in India: Some issues, In S Kr Das & S Das (Eds) Micro Finance and India’s Rural Economy, 28-39, New Delhi, ND: New century.

  • Borman, R., & Chanu, A. I. (2009), (b) Rural industrialisation in North eastern Indian region: reexamining the policy perspective, Banijya 4,(1) 133-141

  • Chanu, A. I. (2005). Insurgency Movement in Manipur, Guwahati, GH:OKDISCD

  • Chanu, A. I., & Borman, R. (2009). What is wrong with the microfi nance programme? Banijya, 2 (1), 70-73

  • Ministry of Rural Development, Government of India (2013). Annual Report. 2012-2013, Retrieved from http//www. rural.nic.in/sites/annual-report.asp

  • NABARD :Microfi nance Reports 2008-09, 2009-2010.

  • Sanders, C. K. (2002). The impact of microenterprise assistance programs: A comparative study of program participants, nonparticipants, and other low-wage workers. The Social Service Review, 76, 321-340.

  • Schreiner, M. (2002). Evaluation and microenterprise programs in the United States. Journal of Microfi nance, 4, 67-92.

  • Sen, A. ( 2000), Development as Freedom, New Delhi, NY: Oxford.

  • Sundaram, S. (2011). Rural Development, New Delhi, NY:Himalaya.


Abstract Views: 435

PDF Views: 1




  • Linkage between Microfinance and Rural Development in India

Abstract Views: 435  |  PDF Views: 1

Authors

A. Ibemcha Chanu
Department of Commerce, Assam University (a central University), Diphu Campus Diphu, Assam, India

Abstract


The basic assumption of this paper is that rural development in India should not be seen as a package of specific needs but as a transformation of rural life and conditions of the country. In this paper, it is assumed that the term rural development means the overall development of rural areas on a sustainable basis. In this background, the paper attempts to explain the link between the microfinance services and the rural development. The paper also argues that microfinance is not a magic bullet for poverty reduction and rural development in India. The paper which is conceptual in nature is totally based on secondary data.

Keywords


Microfinance, Rural Development, Magic Bullet, Poverty Reduction

References