Journal of Supply Chain Management Systems

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

An Impact of Life Cycle Sustainability on the Shareholder Value of a Firm:An Analysis of Interaction Effects


Affiliations
1 Guru Nanak Dev University, Punjab, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The present paper studies the impact of life cycle sustainability of goods and services on shareholder value of the firm and further this study extends to analyse the role of interaction effects of variables on shareholder value as measured by Tobin’s q. For this purpose, 73 companies listed on Bombay Stock Exchange have been studied. Content analysis methodology has been employed to analyse the content of Business Responsibility Report given in annual reports. Further regression analysis has been conducted to study the impact of sustainable supply chain on Tobin’s q and to analyse the interaction effects. The results of the study indicate that sustainable activities related to pre-operations and society has significant positive impact on shareholder value of the firm. Further the results of interaction effects of the variables also state that interaction has significant impact on the shareholder value and the impact depends upon the nature of the control variable with which the explanatory variables interact. It has been concluded that companies must practice sustainability in supply chain in order to enjoy high shareholder value. Thus, the study bestows to the existing literature on sustainability by expanding it to the developing country like India.

Keywords

Life Cycle Sustainability, Shareholder Value, Tobin’s q, India, Interaction Effects, Supply Chain.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Albino, V., Balice, A., & Dangelico, R. M. (2009). Environmental strategies and green product development: An overview on sustainability-driven companies. Business Strategy and the Environment, 18(2), 83–96.

  • Chang, D. S., & Kuo, L. C. R. (2008). The effects of sustainable development on firms’ financial performance: An empirical approach. Sustainable Development, 16(6), 365–380.

  • Dickinson, S. J., Gill, D. L., Purushothaman, M., & Scharl, A. (2008). A web analysis of sustainability reporting: An oil and gas perspective. Journal of Website Promotion, 3(3–4), 161–182.

  • Dowell, G., Hart, S., & Yeung, B. (1999). Do corporate global environmental standards in emerging markets create or destroy market value. Ann Arbor, 1001, 48109.

  • Dowell, G., Hart, S., & Yeung, B. (2000). Do corporate global environmental standards create or destroy market value? Management Science, 46(8), 1059–1074.

  • Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. London: Sage.

  • Gill, D. L., Dickinson, S. J., & Scharl, A. (2008). Communicating sustainability: A web content analysis of North American, Asian and European firms. Journal of Communication Management, 12(3), 243–262.

  • Guthrie, J., & Abeysekera, I. (2006). Content analysis of social, environmental reporting: What is new? Journal of Human Resource Costing & Accounting, 10(2), 114–126.

  • Guthrie, J., Cuganesan, S., & Ward, L. (2008, March). Industry specific social and environmental reporting: The Australian food and beverage industry. In Accounting Forum (Vol. 32, No. 1, pp. 1–15). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.

  • Hart, S. L., & Ahuja, G. (1996). Does it pay to be green? An empirical examination of the relationship between emission reduction and firm performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 5(1), 30–37.

  • Hedberg, C. J., & Von Malmborg, F. (2003). The global reporting initiative and corporate sustainability reporting in Swedish companies. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 10(3), 153–164.

  • Jose, A., & Lee, S. M. (2007). Environmental reporting of global corporations: A content analysis based on website disclosures. Journal of Business Ethics, 72(4), 307–321.

  • King, A. A., & Lenox, M. J. (2001). Does it really pay to be green? An empirical study of firm environmental and financial performance: An empirical study of firm environmental and financial performance. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 5(1), 105–116.

  • Kolk, A. (2003). Trends in sustainability reporting by the Fortune Global 250. Business Strategy and the Environment, 12(5), 279–291.

  • Kolk, A. (2004a). A decade of sustainability reporting: Developments and significance. International Journal of Environment and Sustainable Development, 3(1), 51–64.

  • Kolk, A. (2004b). More than words?: An analysis of sustainability reports. New Academy Review, 3(3), 59–75.

  • Kolk, A. (2008). Sustainability, accountability and corporate governance: Exploring multinationals’ reporting practices. Business Strategy and the Environment, 17(1), 1–15.

  • Kolk, A., & Perego, P. (2010). Determinants of the adoption of sustainability assurance statements: An international investigation. Business Strategy and the Environment, 19(3), 182–198.

  • Konar, S., & Cohen, M. A. (2001). Does the market value environmental performance? Review of Economics and Statistics, 83(2), 281–289.

  • Lin, S. L., & Wang, F. C. (2008). Corporate environmental performance and market value of intangible assets. World Review of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development, 5(1), 72–101.

  • Lo, S. F., & Sheu, H. J. (2007). Is corporate sustainability a value-increasing strategy for business? Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15(2), 345–358.

  • López, M. V., Garcia, A., & Rodriguez, L. (2007). Sustainable development and corporate performance: A study based on the Dow Jones sustainability index. Journal of Business Ethics, 75(3), 285–300.

  • Morali, O., & Searcy, C. (2013). A review of sustainable supply chain management practices in Canada. Journal of Business Ethics, 117(3), 635–658.

  • Moreno, A., & Capriotti, P. (2009). Communicating CSR, citizenship and sustainability on the web. Journal of Communication Management, 13(2), 157–175.

  • Morhardt, J. E. (2010). Corporate social responsibility and sustainability reporting on the internet. Business Strategy and the Environment, 19(7), 436–452.

  • Wagner, M. (2010). The role of corporate sustainability performance for economic performance: A firmlevel analysis of moderation effects. Ecological Economics, 69(7), 1553–1560.


Abstract Views: 216

PDF Views: 0




  • An Impact of Life Cycle Sustainability on the Shareholder Value of a Firm:An Analysis of Interaction Effects

Abstract Views: 216  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Harmeet Kaur
Guru Nanak Dev University, Punjab, India

Abstract


The present paper studies the impact of life cycle sustainability of goods and services on shareholder value of the firm and further this study extends to analyse the role of interaction effects of variables on shareholder value as measured by Tobin’s q. For this purpose, 73 companies listed on Bombay Stock Exchange have been studied. Content analysis methodology has been employed to analyse the content of Business Responsibility Report given in annual reports. Further regression analysis has been conducted to study the impact of sustainable supply chain on Tobin’s q and to analyse the interaction effects. The results of the study indicate that sustainable activities related to pre-operations and society has significant positive impact on shareholder value of the firm. Further the results of interaction effects of the variables also state that interaction has significant impact on the shareholder value and the impact depends upon the nature of the control variable with which the explanatory variables interact. It has been concluded that companies must practice sustainability in supply chain in order to enjoy high shareholder value. Thus, the study bestows to the existing literature on sustainability by expanding it to the developing country like India.

Keywords


Life Cycle Sustainability, Shareholder Value, Tobin’s q, India, Interaction Effects, Supply Chain.

References