Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Factors Analysis of ISCM Benchmarking using DEMATEL Technique


Affiliations
1 Department of Mechanical Engineering, YMCAUST, Faridabad, Haryana, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The present competitive scenario requires high degree of sophistication in the benchmarking practice that helps to improve the performance of internal supply chain management (ISCM) of any organization. Thus, it is necessary to analyze effectively the factors of ISCM benchmarking. The present study deals with the identification of factors of ISCM using literature survey. The influence between the identified factors was evaluated through brainstorming as well as decision making trial and evaluation laboratory [DEMATEL] technique. The internal assessment of factors is decided on the basis of 5 point rating scale, where 0 point indicates less influence of factor, while 5 point indicates high influence of factor. The main goal of this research work is to perform factor’s analysis and finally classify them into cause and effects groups using DEMATEL technique. This research work might be fruitful for researchers as well as managers to identify those factors which are responsible for cause and effect of problem in any type of business.

Keywords

DEMATEL Technique, Factor Analysis, Benchmarking Practice, ISCM, Matrix Calculator.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Amiri, M., Sadaghiyani, J., Payani, N., & Shafieezadeh, M. (2011). Developing a DEMATEL method to prioritize distribution centers in supply chain. Management Science Letters, 1(3), 279–288.
  • Abdullah, H. (2009). Major challenges to the effective management of human resource training and development activities, The Journal of International Social Research, 2(8), 11–25.
  • Abdul Adis, A. A., & Jublee, E. (2010). Market orientation and new product performance: The mediating role of product advantage. African Journal of Marketing Management, 2(5), 91–100.
  • Al-kuhali, K., Zain, Z. M., & Hussein, M. I. (2012). Production planning of LCDs: Optimal Linear programming and sensitivity analysis. Industrial Engineering Letters, 2(9), 1–10.
  • Anwar, R. S., & Ali, S. (2015). Economies of scale. International Interdisciplinary Journal of Scholarly Research, 1(1), 51–57.
  • Angkiriwanga, R., Pujawana, N., & Santosaa, B. (2014). Managing uncertainty through supply chain flexibility: reactive vs. proactive approaches. Production & Manufacturing Research, 2(1), 50–70.
  • Agboyi, M. R., Yeboah O., & Ackah, D. (2015). The impact of sourcing on the delivery of raw material. International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science and Software Engineering, 5(8), 108–122.
  • Bhuiyan, N. (2011). A framework for successful new product development. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 4(4), 746–770.
  • Balogun, O. S. et al. (2012). Use of linear programming for optimal production in a production line in coca – cola bottling company, Ilorin. International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications, 2(5), 2004–2007.
  • Bhutta, Khurrum, S., & Huq, F. (1999). Benchmarking Best practices, an integrated approach. Benchmarking: an International Journal, 6(3), 254–268.
  • Bertelsen, S., & Nielsen, J. (1997). Just-in-Time Logistics in the Supply of Building Materials, Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Construction Industry Development: Building the future Together, 9–11 December, Singapore.
  • Bhuiyan, N. (2011). A framework for successful new product development. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 4(4), 746–770.
  • Chaghooshi, A. J., et al. (2012). Integration of fuzzy Shannon’s entropy with fuzzy TOPSIS for industrial robotic system selection. Journal of Industrial Engineering & Management, 5(1), 102–114.
  • Chen, C. W., & Wong, V. (2012). Design and delivery of new product preannouncement messages. Journal of Marketing Theory & Practice, 20(2), 203–222.
  • Cowling, P. (2002). Manufacturing and logistics, using real time information for effective dynamic scheduling. European Journal of Operational Research, 139(2), 230–244.
  • Chen, X. (2010). Suggestions on effective corporate new employee orientation program for human resource specialists. Online Journal of Workforce Education and Development, 4(3), 1–11.
  • Dangayach G. S., & Deshmukh S. G. (2006). An exploratory study of manufacturing strategy practices of machinery manufacturing companies in India. Omega, 34(3), 254–273.
  • Eksioglua, B. et al (2009). The vehicle routing problem: A taxonomic review. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 57(4), 1472–1483.
  • Fekete, M., & Hulvej, J. (2015). Production planning and production levelling. Comenius Management Review, 9(1), 41–52.
  • Forza, C. (2002). Survey research in operations management: A process based perspectives. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 22(2), 152–194.
  • Foggin, J. H., Mentzer, J. T., & Monroe, C. L. (2004). A supply chain diagnostic tool. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 34(10), 827–855.
  • Fontela, E., & Gabus, A. (1976). The DEMATEL Observer. DEMATEL 1976 Report. Geneva: Battelle Geneva Research Centre.
  • Gu, J., Goetschalckx, M., & Mcginnis, L. F. (2007). Research on warehouse operation: A comprehensive review. European Journal of Operational Research, 177(1), 1–21.
  • Gunasekaran, A., & Ngai, E. W. T. (2004). Information systems in supply chain integration and management. European Journal of Operational Research, 159(2), 269–295.
  • Goyal, T. M. (2012). Employment conditions in organised and unorganised retail: Implications for FDI Policy in India with Arpita Mukherjee. Journal of Business and Retail Management Research, 6(2), 26–37.
  • Goyal, T. M. (2013). FDI in services sector in India. Foreign Trade Review, 48(3), 413–430.
  • Gram, M. (2013). A systematic methodology to reduce losses in production with the balanced scorecard approach. Manufacturing Science and Technology, 1(1), 12–22.
  • Grosso, M. G., & Shepherd, B. (2011). Air cargo transport in APEC: Regulation and effects on merchandise trade. Journal of Asian Economics, 22(3), 203–212.
  • Goyal, T. M. (2013). FDI in Retail: Implications for India’s trade agreement with Arpita Mukherjee. Foreign Trade Review, 48(1), 143–151.
  • Gogi, V. S., & Badarinarayana, K. S. (2016). Flexible Manufacturing Systems Scheduling: A Systematic Review. Bonfring International Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management Science, 6(3), 61–62.
  • Grigore, S. D. (2007). Supply chain flexibility. Romanian Economic and Business Review, 2(1), 66–70.
  • He, Y. T., & Down, D.G. (2009). On accommodating customer flexibility in service systems. INFOR Information Systems and Operational Research, 47(4), 2009.
  • Hessami, Z. H., & Savoji, A. (2011). Risk management in supply chain management. International Journal of Economics and Management Sciences, 1(3), 60–72.
  • Hanson, O. Y. (2015). Assessing the impact of efficient inventory management in on organization. International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science and Software Engineering, 5(8), 86–103.
  • Imam, T., & Hassan, F. (2009). Linear programming and sensitivity analysis in production planning. International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security, 9(2), 456–465.
  • Jayant, A., & Ghagra, H. S. (2013). Supply Chain Flexibility Configurations: Perspectives, Empirical Studies and Research Directions. International Journal of Supply Chain Management, 2(1), 21–29.
  • Kaushal, A. et al. (2016). Flexible manufacturing system a modern approach to manufacturing technology. International Refereed Journal of Engineering and Science, 5(4), 16–23.
  • Kailash, Saha, R. K., & Goyal, S. (2017a). Systematic literature review of classification and categorisation of benchmarking in supply chain management. International Journal of Process Management and Benchmarking, 7(2), 183–205.
  • Kailash, Saha, R. K., & Goyal, S. (2017b). Benchmarking practice for identification of internal supply chain management performance factors gap. Journal of Supply Chain Management System (JSCMS), 6(4), 33–38.
  • Kailash, Saha, R. K., & Goyal, S. (2017c), Performance indicators for benchmarking of internal supply chain management. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, International Science Index 127, International Journal of Social, Behavioral, Educational, Economic, Business and Industrial Engineering, 11(7), 1940–1944.
  • Kailash, Saha, R. K., & Goyal, S. (2017d). Scope of Internal Supply Chain Management Benchmarking in Indian Manufacturing Industries. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, International Science Index 126, International Journal of Social, Behavioral, Educational, Economic, Business and Industrial Engineering, 11(6), 1638–1641.
  • Kailash, Saha, R. K., & Goyal, S. (2017e). Benchmarking framework for internal supply chain management: A case study for comparative analysis. International Journal of Manufacturing Technology and Management, [In Press].
  • Kailash, Saha, R. K., & Goyal, S. (2017f). Benchmarking Model to Analyse ISCM Performance of Selected Indian Manufacturing Industries using Fuzzy AHP Technique. International Journal of Industrial & System Engineering (IJISE), [Inderscience, Accepted].
  • Kailash, Saha, R. K., & Goyal, S. (2015). Integrity of supplier and distributor with manufacturing company in supply chain management. Invertis Journal of Science & Technology, 8(2), 95–100.
  • Kumar, P., Shankar, R., & Yadav, S. S. (2008). Flexibility in global supply chain: Modeling the enablers. Journal of Modelling in Management, 3(3), 277–297.
  • Kotzab, H., Teller, C., Grant, D. B., & Sparks, L. (2011). Antecedents for the adoption and execution of supply chain management. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 16(4), 231–245.
  • Kwateng, K. O., Manso, J. F., & Osei-Mensah, R. (2014). Outbound logistics management in manufacturing companies in Ghana. Review of Business and Finance Studies, 5(1), 83–92.
  • Kumar, S., & Raj, T. (2016). Selection of material handling equipment for flexible manufacturing system using FAHP. International Journal of Recent advances in Mechanical Engineering, 5(1), 25–45.
  • Kesavan, S. (2014). Volume flexibility in services: The costs and benefits of flexible labor resources. Management Science, 60(8), 1884-1906.
  • Liu, X., & Sun, Y. (2011). Information flow management of vendor managed inventory system in automobile parts inbound logistics based on internet of things. Journal of Software, 6(7), 1374–1380.
  • Lenin, K. (2015). A study on the air cargo logistics operations in Dubai. Management, 4(5), 313–315.
  • Lin, Y., Li, W., Qiu, F., & Xu, H.(2012). Research on optimization of vehicle routing problem for ride-sharing Taxi. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 43, 494–502.
  • Lee, Y.-C. Hsieh, Y.-F., & Guo, Y.-B. (2013). Construct DTPB model by using DEMATEL: A study of a university library website. Program: Electronic Library and Information Systems, 47(2), 155–169.
  • Murthy, D. N. P. (2006). Product warranty and reliability. Annals of Operations Research, 143(1), 133–146.
  • Meehan, J., & Muir, L. (2008). SCM in Merseyside SMEs: Benefits and barriers. The TQM Journal, 20(3), 223–232.
  • Matias, J. C. D. O., & Coelho, D. A. (2002). The integration of the standards systems of quality management, environmental management and occupational health and safety management. International Journal of Production Research, 40(15), 3857–3866.
  • Murthy, D. N. P. (2007). Product reliability and warranty: an overview and future research. Production, 17(3), 426–434.
  • Maleki, R. A., & Reimche, J. (2011). Managing Returnable Containers Logistics - A Case Study Part I - Physical and Information Flow Analysis. International Journal of Engineering Business Management, 3(2), 1–8.
  • Neely, A, Gregory, M., & Platts, K. (1995). Performance measurement systems design: A literature review and research agenda. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 15(4), 80–116.
  • Commandeur, H. R., Pattikawa, L. H., & Verwaal, E. (2006). Understanding new product project performance. European Journal of Marketing, 40(11/12), 1178–1193.
  • Pekgun, P., Griffin, P., & Keskinocak, P. (2008). Coordination of marketing and production for price and lead time decisions. IIE Transactions, 40(1), 12–30.
  • Rushton, A., & Saw, R. (1992). A methodology for logistics strategy planning. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 3(1), 46–62.
  • Rakicevic, Z., & Vujosevic, M. (2015). Focus forecasting in supply chain: The case study of fast moving consumer goods company in Serbia. Serbian Journal of Management, 10(1), 3–17.
  • Rodrigue, J. P. (2006). Transportation and the geographical and functional integration of global production networks. Growth and Change, 37(4), 510–525.
  • Ramaa, A., Subramanya, K. N., & Rangaswamy, T. M. (2012). Impact of warehouse management system in a supply chain. International Journal of Computer Applications, 54(1), 14–20.
  • Singh, R. K., & Acharya, P. (2014). Identification and evaluation of supply chain flexibilities in Indian FMCG sector using DEMATEL. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 15(2), 91–100.
  • Shieh, J. I., Wu, H.-H., & Huang, K. K. (2010). A DEMATEL method in identifying key success factors of hospital service quality. Knowledge-Based Systems, 23(3), 277–282.
  • Sadeh, E., Mousavi, L., & Sadeh, S. (2011). Presenting a framework to study linkages among TQM practices, supply chain management practices, and performance using Dematel technique. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 5(9), 885–890.
  • Singh, R. K. (2011). Developing the framework for coordination in supply chain of SMEs. Business Process Management Journal, 17(4), 619–638.
  • Shen, Y. C., et al. (2012). A novel multicriteria decisionmaking combining decision making trial and evaluation laboratory technique for technology evaluation. Foresight, 14(2), 139–153.
  • Shaw, S., Grant, D. B., & Mangan, J. (2010). Developing environmental supply chain performance measures. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 17(3), 320–339.
  • Stevenson, M., & Spring, M. (2009). Supply chain flexibility: An inter-firm empirical study. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 29(9), 946–971.
  • Singh, R. K., & Acharya, P. (2013). Supply chain flexibility: A frame work of research dimensions. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 14(3), 157–166.
  • Soon, Q. H., & Udin, Z. M. (2011). Supply chain management from the perspective of value chain flexibility: an exploratory study. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 22(4), 506–526.
  • Stefanovic, N., & Stefanovic, D. (2011). Supply chain performance measurement system based on scorecards and web portals. Computer Science & Information Systems, 8(1), 167–192.
  • Stawowy, A., & Duda, J. (2012). Models and Algorithms for Production Planning and Scheduling in Foundries – Current State and Development Perspectives. Archives of Foundry Engineering, 12(2), 69–74.
  • Sanchez, A. M., & Perez, M. (2005). Supply chain flexibility and firm performance: A conceptual model and empirical study in the automotive industry. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 25(7), 681–700.
  • Sadeh, E. et al. (2011). Presenting A Framework To Study Linkages Among Tqm Practices, Supply Chain Management Practices, And Performance Using Dematel Technique. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 5(9), 885–890.
  • Svensson, G. (2002). A conceptual framework of vulnerability in firms inbound and outbound logistics flows. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 32(2), 110–134.
  • Senk, M. K. et al. (2010). Development of New Product/Process Development Procedure for SMEs. Organizacija, 43(2), 76–86.
  • Scott, C., & Westbrook, R. (1991). New Strategic Tools for Supply Chain Management. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 21(1), 23–33.
  • Sheu, J. B. (2007). Challenges of emergency logistics management. Transportation Research Part E, 43(6), 655–659.
  • Shieh, J. I., & Wu, H. H. (2016). Measures of consistency for DEMATEL method. Communications in Statistics Simulation and Computation, 45(3), 781–790.
  • Tzeng, G.H. et al. (2007). Evaluating intertwined effects in e-learning programs: a novel hybrid MCDM model based on factor analysis and DEMATEL. Expert Systems with Applications, 32(4), 1028–1044.
  • Tilokavichai, V. et al. (2012). Innovative logistics management under uncertainty using Markov model. Information and Knowledge Management, 2(5), 19–30.
  • Tan, X.C., Wang, Y. Y., Gu, B. H., Mu, Z. K., & Yang, C. (2011). Improved methods for production manufacturing processes in environmentally benign manufacturing. Energies, 4(9), 1391–1409.
  • Vemic, J. (2007). Employee training and development and the learning organization. Economics and Organization, 4(2), 209–216.
  • Wei, P.-L., Huang, J.-H., Tzeng, G.-H., & Wu, S.-I. (2010). Causal modeling of web advertising effects by improving SEM based on DEMATEL technique. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 9(5), 799–829.
  • Wu, H. H., Chen, H. K., & Shieh, J. I. (2010). Evaluating performance criteria of employment service outreach program personnel by DEMATEL method. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(7), 5219–5223.
  • Wang, C. X., & Webster, S. (2007). Channel coordination for a supply chain with a risk-neutral manufacturer and a loss-averse retailer. Decision Sciences, 38(3), 361–389.
  • Wu, H. H., & Tsai, Y. N. (2011). A DEMATEL method to evaluate the causal relations among the criteria in auto spare parts industry. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 218(5), 2334–2342.
  • Wu, H. H., & Tsai, Y. N. (2012a). An integrated approach of AHP and DEMATEL methods in evaluating the criteria of auto spare parts industry. International Journal of Systems Science, 43(11), 2114–2124.
  • Wu, W. (2008). Choosing knowledge management strategies by using a combined ANP and DEMATEL approach. Expert Systems with Applications, 35(3), 828–835.
  • Wang, Y. C. (2008). Evaluating flexibility on order quantity and delivery lead time for a supply chain system. International Journal of Systems Science, 39(12), 1193–1202.
  • Yang, Y. P. O., Shieh, H.-M., Leu, J.-D., & Tzeng, G.-H. (2008). A novel hybrid MCDM model combined with DEMATEL and ANP with applications. International Journal Operational Research, 5(3), 160–168.

Abstract Views: 355

PDF Views: 0




  • Factors Analysis of ISCM Benchmarking using DEMATEL Technique

Abstract Views: 355  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Kailash
Department of Mechanical Engineering, YMCAUST, Faridabad, Haryana, India
Rajeev Kumar Saha
Department of Mechanical Engineering, YMCAUST, Faridabad, Haryana, India
Sanjeev Goyal
Department of Mechanical Engineering, YMCAUST, Faridabad, Haryana, India

Abstract


The present competitive scenario requires high degree of sophistication in the benchmarking practice that helps to improve the performance of internal supply chain management (ISCM) of any organization. Thus, it is necessary to analyze effectively the factors of ISCM benchmarking. The present study deals with the identification of factors of ISCM using literature survey. The influence between the identified factors was evaluated through brainstorming as well as decision making trial and evaluation laboratory [DEMATEL] technique. The internal assessment of factors is decided on the basis of 5 point rating scale, where 0 point indicates less influence of factor, while 5 point indicates high influence of factor. The main goal of this research work is to perform factor’s analysis and finally classify them into cause and effects groups using DEMATEL technique. This research work might be fruitful for researchers as well as managers to identify those factors which are responsible for cause and effect of problem in any type of business.

Keywords


DEMATEL Technique, Factor Analysis, Benchmarking Practice, ISCM, Matrix Calculator.

References