Journal of Supply Chain Management Systems

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

A Comparison Between the Main Drivers and Effects of Dynamic Supply Chain Concepts


Affiliations
1 Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy
2 Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Nowadays, the supply chain (SC) represents the way to adapt business organizations to unpredictably changing scenarios. No organization can control nor manage the drivers that lead to such changes: moreover, they need to follow them.

The purpose of this paper is to provide two broad conceptual contributions. On the one hand, its purpose is to clarify the most commonly used terms and definitions. On the other hand, it tries to highlight the actual differences between drivers and effects of each SC-feature.

In particular, this paper aims to present a robust literature review and a chart that summarizes the key points at stake. The goal here is to provide a pragmatic way of avoiding any misunderstanding connected when dealing with such concepts. This paper starts by defining two primary research questions: (1) “How do adaptability, flexibility, agility, lean, and leagility differ in the SC context?”; and (2) “Considering the SC main features, which are the differences among the various drivers that push companies to implement them in order to get the desired effects?”. Based on a detailed analysis of the current literature review, a set of final definitions of lean, agile, leagile, flexible, and adaptable SC is then provided. This research also offers a broad view of how different features relate to distinct effects when they are implemented into business strategies.

However, this literature review does not focus on a specific SC sector. The implementation of SC features in different industries slightly differs from one another. Moreover, implementation issues of SC features vary from country to country and depend on the work culture of the organization and the geographic location within the country. Hence, the results of this study would benefit from the differentiation between industries and geographical areas.


Keywords

Lean, Agility, Leagility, Adaptability, Flexibility, Supply Chain Management.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Al Samman, T. A. S. (2014). Modeling lean, agile, leagile, leagile manufacturing strategies: a fuzzy analytical hierarchy process approach for readymade wear (clothing) industry in Mosul-Iraq. International Journal of Advances in Engineering & Technology, 7(2014), 1091-1108

  • Arnas, E. R., de Sousa Jabbour, A. B. L., & Saltorato, P. (2013). Relationships between operations strategy and lean manufacturing: An exploratory study African. Journal of Business Management, 7(5), 344-353.

  • Aslam, H., Blome, C., Roscoe, S., & Azhar, T. M. (2018). Dynamic SC capabilities. International Journal of Operations & Production Management. doi:10.1108/ ijopm-09-2017-0555

  • Avenier, M.-J. (2010). Shaping a constructivist view of organizational design science. Organization Studies, 31(9), 1-27.

  • Bag, S. (2014). Modeling the enabers of flexible Manufacturing Systems using interpretaive Structural Modeling. Journal of Supply Chain Management Systems, 3(3), 12-20.

  • BCG (2006). Creating the optimal Supply Chain. In Boston Consulting Group and Knowledge@Wharton Special Report.

  • Baramichai, M., Zimmers J., Marangos A. Agile supply chain transformation matrix: An integrated tool for creating an agile enterprise. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 12(5) (2007), 334-348.

  • Beck, A. (2012). Agile manufacturing: A broader perspective. International Business & Economics Research, 11(9), 991-996.

  • Behrouzi, F., & Wong, K. Y. (2011). An investigation and identification of lean supply chain performance measures in the automotive SMEs. Scientific Research and Essays, 6(24), 5239-5252.

  • Benton, W. C. (2010). Purchasing and supply chain management (2nd ed.). Irwin: McGraw-Hill.

  • Blome, C., Schoenherr, T., & Eckstein, D. (2014). The impact of knowledge transfers and complexity on supply chain flexibility: A knowledge-based view. International Journal of Production Economics, 147, Part B, 307-316.

  • Boyle, T. A., Scherrer-Rathje, M., & Stuart, I. (2011). Learning to be lean: The influence of external information sources in lean improvements. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 22(5), 587-603.

  • Bozarth, C., Warsing, D., Flynn, B. B., & Flynn, E. J., (2009). The impact of supply chain complexity on manufacturing plant performance. J. Oper. Manag, 27, 78-93.

  • Brambilla, M., De Mauri A., Lizio D., Leva L., Carriero A., Carpeggiani C., & Picano, E. (2014). Cumulative radiation dose estimates from medicalimaging in paediatricpatients with non-oncologicchronicillnesses. A systematic review. PhysicaMedica, 30, 403-412.

  • Braunscheidel, M. J., & Suresh, N. C. (2009). The Organizational antecedents of a firm’s supply chain agility for risk mitigation and response. Journal of Operations Management, 27(2), 119-140.

  • Carvalho, H., Govindan, K., Azevedo, S. G., & CruzMachado, V. (2017). Modelling green and lean supply chains: An eco-efficiency perspective. Res., Conserv. and Recycl., 120, 75-87.

  • Chai J., Liu, J. N. K., & Ngai, E. W. T. (2013). Application of decision-making techniques in supplier selection: A systematic review of literature. Expert Systems with Applications, 40, 3872-3885.

  • Chalotra V. (2013). An exploratory Framework of the role of the handling inventory and its management. Journal of Supply Chain Management Systems, 2(3), 57-64.

  • Chen, J. C., Cheng, C., & Huang, P. B. (2013). Supply chain management with lean production and RFID application: A case study. Expert Systems with Applications, 40(9), 3389-3397.

  • Choi, T. Y., Dooley, K. J, Rungtusanatham M., (2001). Supply networks and complex adaptive systems: Control versus emergence. Journal of Operations Management, 19, 351-366.

  • Hofer, C., Eroglu, C., & Hofer, A. R. (2012). The effect of lean production on financial performance: The mediating role of inventory leanness. International Journal of Production Economics, 138(2), 242-253.

  • Dües, C. M., Tan, K. H., & Lim, M. (2013). Green as the new Lean: How to use lean practices as a catalyst to greening your supply chain. Journal of Cleaner Production, 40, 93-100.

  • Christopher, M. (2000). The agile supply chain: Competing in volatile markets. Industrial Marketing Management, 29(1), 37-44.

  • Christopher, M., & Towill, D. (2001). An integrated model for the design of agile supply chains. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management 31(4), 235-246.

  • Ciccullo, F., Pero, M., Caridi, M., Gosling, J., & Purvis, L. (2018). Integrating the environmental and social sustainability pillars into the lean and agile supply chain management paradigms: A literature review and future research directions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 2336-2350. ISSN 0959-6526, https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.176.

  • DeTreville, S., Shapiro, R. D., Hameri A.-P. (2004). From supply chain to demand chain: The role of lead time reduction in improving demand chain performance. Journal of Operations Management, 21(6), 613-627.

  • Deckx, L., van den Akker, M., & Buntinx, F. (2014). Risk factors for loneliness in patients with cancer: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis. European Journal of Oncology Nursing, 18, 466-477.

  • Denyer, D., & Neely, A. (2004). Introduction to special issue: innovation and productivity performance in the UK. International Journal of Management Reviews, 5/6(3&4), 131-135.

  • Desai. S., Irani, Z. & Sharp, J. M. (1999). Working Towards agile manufacturing in the UK Industry. International Journal of Production and Economics, 62, 155-169.

  • Dileep, S., Chemmannur, S. J. (2014). Lean on time and production efficiency. Journal of Supply Chain Management Systems, 3(4), 13-17.

  • Do Rosário Cabrita, M., Duarte, S., Carvalho, H., & Cruz-Machado, V. (2016). Integration of Lean, Agile, Resilient and Green Paradigms in a Business Model Perspective: Theoretical Foundations. IFACPapersOnLine, 49(12), 1306-1311.

  • Duriau, V. J., Reger, R. K., & Pfarrer, M. D. (2007). A content analysis of the content analysis literature in organization studies: Research themes, data sources, and methodological refinements. Organizational Research Methods, 10(1), 5-34.

  • Ellram, L. M., & Cooper, M. C. (2014). Supply Chain Management: It’s All About the Journey, Not the Destination. J. Supply Chain Manag., 50, 8-20.

  • Eckstein, D., Goellner, M., Blome, C., & Henke, M. (2015). The performance impact of supply chain agility and supply chain adaptability: the moderating effect of product complexity. International Journal of Production Research, 53(10), 3028-3046.

  • Esposito, E., & Evangelista, P. (2014). Investigating virtual enterprise models: Literature review and empirical findings. International Journal of Production Economics, 148, 145-157.

  • Evans, W. D., Pattanayak, S. K., Young S., Buszin J., Rai S., & Wallace, B. J. (2014). Social marketing of water and sanitation products: A systematic review of peerreviewed literature. Social Science & Medicine, 110, 18-25.

  • Fang, L., & Li, H. (2015). Multi-criteria decision analysis for efficient location-allocation problem combining DEA and goal programming. RAIRO - Operations Research, 49(4), 753-772.

  • Fayezi, S., Zutshi, A., & O’ Loughlin, A. (2017). Understanding and development of supply chain agility and flexibility: A structured literature review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 19(4), 379.

  • Flumerfelt, S., Siriban-Manalang, A. B., & Kahlen, F. J. (2012). Are agile and lean manufacturing systems employing sustainability, complexity and organizational learning? Learning Organization, 19(3), 238-247.

  • Folinas, D., Aidonis, D., Triantafillou, D., & Malindretos, G. (2013). Exploring the greening of the food supply chain with lean thinking techniques. Procedia Technology, 8, 416-424.

  • Gates, P. J., Albertella, L., & Copeland, J. (2014). The effects of cannabinoid administration on sleep: A systematic review of human studies. Sleep Medicine Reviews, 18, 477-487.

  • Giannoccaro, I. (2015). Adaptive supply chains in industrial districts: A complexity science approach focused on learning. International Journal of Production Economics. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.01.004i

  • Gligor, D. M. (2013). The concept of supply chain agility: Conceptualization, antecedents, and the impact on firm performance. Marketing and Logistics Publications and Other Works. Retrieved from http://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_markpubs/1.

  • Gligor, D. M., Esmarkb, C. L., & Holcombca, M. C.(2015). Performance outcomes of supply chain agility: When should you be agile? Journal of Operations Management, 33-34, 71-82.

  • Goldman, A., Eggen, B., Golding, B., & Murray, V.(2014). The health impacts of windstorms: A systematic literature review. Public Health, 128, 3-28.

  • Goldman, S. L., Nagel, R. N., & Priess, K. (1995). Agile competitors and virtual organizations: Strategies for enriching the customer. Van Nostrand Reinhold, United States.

  • Gunasekaran, A., & Ngai, E.W. T. (2004). Information systems in supply chain integration and management.European Journal of Operational Research, 59, 269-295.

  • Hajmohammad, S., Vachon, S., Klassen, R. D., & Gavronski, I. (2013). Lean management and supply management: Their role in green practices and performance.Journal of Cleaner Production, 39, 312-320.

  • Harrison, A., & Van Hoek, R. (2005). Logistics management and strategy. London, Prentice Hall.

  • Hoffmann M. R., Senior P. A., & Mager D. R. (2015).Vitamin D supplementation and health-related quality of life: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics.

  • Holweg, M. C. M. (2011). Supply Chain 2.0: Managing supply chains in the era of turbulence. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 41(1), 63-82.

  • Hopp, W. J., & Spearman, M. L. (2004). To pull or not to pull: what is the question?. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 6(2), 133-148.

  • Hu, F., Lim, C., & Lu, Z. (2013). Coordination of supply chains with a flexible ordering policy under yield and demand uncertainty. International Journal of Production Economics, 146(2), 686-693.

  • Huang X., Lin J., & Demner-Fushman, D. (2006).Evaluation of PICO as a Knowledge Representation for Clinical Questions. AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings, pp. 359-363.

  • Inayat, I., Salwah, S. S., Marczak, S., Daneva, M., & Shamshirband, S. (2014). A systematic literature review on agile requirements engineering practices and challenges. Computers in Human Behavior. ISSN 0747-5632, Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.10.046.

  • Jadhav, R. J., Mantha, S. S., & Rane, S. B. (2014).Exploring barriers in lean implementation. Int. J. Lean Six Sigma, 5(2), 122-148.

  • Jain, V., Benyoucef, L., & Deshmukh, S. G. (2008).What’s the buzz about moving from “Lean” to “Agile” integrated supply chains? A fuzzy intelligent agentbased approach. International Journal of Production Research, 46(23), 6649-6677.

  • Janik, M., Straka, L., Krajcovic, J., Hejna, P., Hamzik, J., & Novomesky, F. (2014). Non-traumatic and spontaneous hemothorax in the setting of forensic medical examination: A systematic literature survey. Forensic Science International, 236, 22-29.

  • Manders, J. H. M., Caniëls, M. C. J., & Ghijsen, P. W. T.(2016). Exploring supply chain flexibility in a FMCG food supply chain. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 22(3), 181.

  • Spens, K. M., & Kovács, G. (2006). A content analysis of research approaches in logistics research. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 36(5), 374-390.

  • Kisperska-Moron, D., & De Haan, J. (2011).Improving supply chain performance to satisfy final customers: “Leagile” experiences of a polish distributor. International Journal of Production Economics, 133(1), 127-134.

  • Kumar, B. R.., Agarwal, A., Sharma, M. K., & Sharma, M. K. (2016). Lean management - A step towards sustainable green supply chain. Competitiv. Rev. 26(3), 311-331.

  • Kuruppu, N., & Willie, R. (2014). Barriers to reducing climate enhanced disaster risks in Least Developed Country-Small Islands through anticipatory adaptation, Weather and Climate Extremes.

  • Laureani, A., & Antony, J. (2012). Critical success factors for the effective implementation of Lean Sigma: Results from an empirical study and agenda for future research. Int. J. Lean Six Sigma, 3(4), 274-283, Nov.2012.

  • Lee, H. L. (2004). The triple-a supply chain. Harvard Business Review, 82(10), 102-112.

  • Lewis, M. A. (2006). Lean production and sustainable competitive advantage, in Rhodes, E., Warren, J.P. and Carter, R. (EDS), Supply Chains and Total Product Systems: A Reader, The Open University, Milton Keynes, pp. 306-26.

  • Liu, R. T., & Miller, I. (2014). Life events and suicidal ideation and behavior: A systematic review. Clinical Psychology Review, 34, 181-192.

  • Louw, M., & Deary, C. (2014). The biomechanical variables involved in the aetiology of iliotibial band syndrome in distance runners - A systematic review of the literature. Physical Therapy in Sport, 15, 64-75.

  • MacMillan, H., & Tampoe, M. (2000). Strategic management, OUP Oxford.

  • Malhotra, A., Gosain, S., & ElSawy, O. A. (2007).Leveraging standard electronic business interfaces to enable adaptive supply chain partnerships. Inf. Syst.Res., 18, 270-279.

  • Martínez-Jurado, P. J., & Moyano-Fuentes, J. (2014).Lean management, supply chain management and sustainability: A literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 85, 134-150, ISSN 0959-6526,

  • Martínez, L. H. C., & Javier, C. A. (2016). Towards lean for sustainability: Understanding the interrelationships between lean and sustainability from a systems thinking perspective. J. Clean. Prod., 142, 4384e4402.

  • Merriam-Webster (2012). Retrieved from http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/, Accessed: 06.14.2014.

  • Pearson, M., Masson, R., & Swain, A. (2010). Process control in an agile supply chain network. International Journal of Production Economics, 128(1), 22-30.

  • Moore, M. L., von der Porten, S., Plummer, R., Brandes, O., & Baird, J. (2014). Water policy reform and innovation: A systematic review. Environmental Science & Policy, 38, 263-271.

  • Mooren L., Grzebieta R., Williamson A., Olivier J., Friswell R., (2014). Safety management for heavy vehicle transport: A review of the literature. Safety Science, 62, 79-89.

  • Narasimhan, R., Swink, M., & Kim, S. W. (2006).Disentangling leanness and agility: An empirical investigation.Journal of Operations Management, 24,440-457.

  • Naylor, J. B., Naim, M. M., & Berry, D. (1999). Leagility: Integrating the lean and agile manufacturing paradigms in the total supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 62(1/2), 12-19.

  • Pathak, S. D., Day, J. M., Nair, A., Sawaya, W. J., & Kristal, M. M. (2007). Complexity and adaptivity in supply networks: Building supply network theory using a complex adaptive systems perspective. Decis.Sci., 38, 547-580.

  • Piercy, N., & Rich, N., 2015. The relationship between lean operations Sand sustainable operations. Int. J. of Oper. & Prod. Manag., 35, 282-315.

  • Potier C., Laprévote V., Dubois-Arber F., Cottencin, O., & Rolland, B. (2014). Supervised injection services: What has been demonstrated? A systematic literature review. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 145, 48-68.

  • PricewaterhouseCoopers (2006). In 9th Annual Global CEO Survey: Globalization and Complexity.

  • Purvis, L., Gosling, J., & Naim, M. M. (2014). The development of a lean, agile and leagile supply network taxonomy based on differing types of flexibility.International Journal of Production Economics, 151, 100-111.

  • Reeves, M., & Deimler, M. (2011). Adaptability: The new competitive advantage. Harv. Bus. Rev., 89, 134-141.

  • Riboldi, P. B., Vinhas, A., & Moreira, D. J. (2014). Risks of dietary acrylamide exposure: A systematic review.Food Chemistry, 157, 310-322.

  • Roh, J., Hong, P., & Min, H. (2014). Implementation of a responsive supply chain strategy in global complexity: The case of manufacturing firms. Int. J. Production Economics, 147, 198-210.

  • Roll, S. C., Case-Smith, J., & Evans, K. D. (2011).Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography vs. electromyography in carpal tunnel syndrome. A systematic review of literature. Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology, 37, 1539-1553.

  • Routroy, S., Potdar, P. K., & Shankar, A. (2015).Measurement of manufacturing agility: A case study.Measuring Business Excellence, 19(2), 1-22.

  • Salvi, V., & Mayerle, S. F. (2014). LEAGILITY and PARETO: Increasing services level through a combination of LEAGILITY and ABC Curve. Business and Management Research, 3(2).

  • Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2009). Research methods for business students. Pearson, Harlow.

  • Schardt, C., Adams, M. B., Owens, T., Keitz, S., & Fontelo, P. (2007). Utilization of the PICO framework to improve searching PubMed for clinical questions. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 7-16.

  • Seifert, R. W., & Langenberg, K. U. (2011). Managing business dynamics with adaptive supply chain portfolios. Eur. J. Oper. Res., 215, 551-562.

  • Serdarasan, S. (2013). A review of supply chain complexity drivers. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 66(3), 533-540.

  • Shibin, K. T., Gunasekaran, A., Papadopoulos, T., Dubey, R., Singh, M., & Wamba, S. F. (2016). Enablers and barriers of flexible green supply chain management: A total interpretive structural modeling approach. Gl. J. of Flex. Syst. Manag., 17(2), 171-188.

  • Singh, R. J., Sohani, N., & Marmat, H. (2013). Effect of Lean/JIT practices and supply chain integration on lead time performance. Journal of Supply Chain Management Systems, 2(2), 37-41.

  • Singh, S. C., & Pandey, S. K. (2015). Lean supply chain: A state of the art literature review. Journal of Supply Chain Management Systems, 4(3), 33-46.

  • Singh, S. C., & Pandey S. K. Supply Chain Performance: a review of literature. Journal of Supply Chain Management Systems, 2(4), 1-12.

  • Srivastava, M. K. (2017). Coordination mechanisms for supply chain: A review. Journal of Supply Chain Management Systems, 6(4), 22-32.

  • Stavrulaki, E., & Davis, M. (2010). Aligning products with supply chain processes and strategy. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 21(1), 127-151.

  • Steinmacher, I., Graciotto S. M. A., Gerosa M. A., & Redmiles D. F. (2015). A systematic literature review on the barriers faced by newcomers to open source software projects. Information and Software Technology, 59, 67-85.

  • Stevenson, M., & Spring, M. (2007). Flexibility from a supply chain perspective: Definition and review. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 27(7), 685-713.

  • Seuring, S., & Gold, S. (2012). Conducting content-analysis based literature reviews in supply chain management. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 17(5), 544-555.

  • Surana, A., Kumara, S., Greaves, M., & Raghavan, U. N.(2005). Supply-chain networks: A Complex adaptive systems perspective. Int. J. Prod. Res., 20, 4235-4265.

  • Sushil. (2012). Multiple perspectives of flexible systems management. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 13(1), 1-2.

  • Thilak, V. M. M., Devadasan, S. R., & Sivaram, N. M.(2015). A literature review on the progression of agile manufacturing paradigm and its scope of application in pump industry. Hindawi Publishing Corporation.Scientific World Journal.

  • Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review.British Journal of Management, 14(3), 207-22.

  • Teece, D., Peteraf, M., & Leih, S. (2016). Dynamic capabilities and organizational agility. California Management Review, 58(4), 13-35.

  • Tseng, Y., & Lin, C. (2011). Enhancing enterprise agility by deploying agile drivers, capabilities and providers.Information Sciences, 181(17), 3693-3708.

  • Tummala, V. M. R., & Schoenherr T. (2008). Best practices for the implementation of supply chain initiatives.International Journal of Logistics Systems and Management, 4(4), 391-410.

  • Underwood A., Agg. S., & Neame, C. (2011). Supply chain complexity: Managing constant change. In A study of supply chain maturity. (UK).

  • Vickery, S., Calantone, R., & Droge, C. (1999). Supply chain flexibility: An empirical study. J. Supply Chain Manag., 35(3), 16-24

  • Vinodh, S., Devadasan, S. R., Vimal, K. E. K., & Kumar, D. (2013). Design of agile supply chain assessment model and its case study in an Indian automotive components manufacturing organization. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 32(4), 620-631.

  • Wang, J., & Cao, D. (2008). Relationships between two approaches for planning manufacturing strategy: A strategic approach and a paradigmatic approach. Int. J.Prod. Econ., 115, 349-361.

  • Wichaisri, S., & Sopadang, A. (2017). Trends and Future Directions in Sustainable Development. Sust. Develop [in press].

  • Wiggins, R. R., & Ruefli, T. W. (2002). Sustained competitive advantage: Temporal dynamics and the incidence and persistence of superior economic performance.Organization Science, 13(1).

  • Womack, J., Jones, D., Roos, D., (1990). The Machine That Changed the World. Macmillan, New York.

  • Yang, M. G., Hong, P., & Modi, S. B. (2011). Impact of lean manufacturing and environmental management on business performance: An empirical study of manufacturing firms. International Journal of Production Economics, 129(2), 251-261.

  • Yusuf, Y. Y., Sarhadi, M., & Gunasekaran, A. (1999).Agile manufacturing: the drivers, concepts and attributes.Int. J. Prod. Econ., 62(1/2), 33-43.


Abstract Views: 321

PDF Views: 0




  • A Comparison Between the Main Drivers and Effects of Dynamic Supply Chain Concepts

Abstract Views: 321  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Francesco Stefanelli
Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy
Daniele Giulianelli
Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
Ilaria De Sanctis
Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy

Abstract


Nowadays, the supply chain (SC) represents the way to adapt business organizations to unpredictably changing scenarios. No organization can control nor manage the drivers that lead to such changes: moreover, they need to follow them.

The purpose of this paper is to provide two broad conceptual contributions. On the one hand, its purpose is to clarify the most commonly used terms and definitions. On the other hand, it tries to highlight the actual differences between drivers and effects of each SC-feature.

In particular, this paper aims to present a robust literature review and a chart that summarizes the key points at stake. The goal here is to provide a pragmatic way of avoiding any misunderstanding connected when dealing with such concepts. This paper starts by defining two primary research questions: (1) “How do adaptability, flexibility, agility, lean, and leagility differ in the SC context?”; and (2) “Considering the SC main features, which are the differences among the various drivers that push companies to implement them in order to get the desired effects?”. Based on a detailed analysis of the current literature review, a set of final definitions of lean, agile, leagile, flexible, and adaptable SC is then provided. This research also offers a broad view of how different features relate to distinct effects when they are implemented into business strategies.

However, this literature review does not focus on a specific SC sector. The implementation of SC features in different industries slightly differs from one another. Moreover, implementation issues of SC features vary from country to country and depend on the work culture of the organization and the geographic location within the country. Hence, the results of this study would benefit from the differentiation between industries and geographical areas.


Keywords


Lean, Agility, Leagility, Adaptability, Flexibility, Supply Chain Management.

References