Journal of Supply Chain Management Systems

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Impact of Logistics Information Technology on Organisational Performance:Mediating Role of Supply Chain Integration and Customer Satisfaction


Affiliations
1 Dalian Maritime University, China
2 Regent University College of Science and Technology, Ghana
3 Ho Technical University, Ghana
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The current market setting breeds stern competition among business organisations. This has made firms that rely on only in-house core competencies to reengineer their strategies and approaches to look beyond their boundaries to tap into the supply chain capabilities and benefits. This has ignited our interest to conduct this study to investigate how logistics information technology can enhance supply chain integration and improve firms’ ability to increase customer satisfaction to achieve high organisational performance in the distribution industry in Ghana. We use survey data we collected from 179 managers at least 5 years’ experience in procurement, supply chain, distribution, information and logistics. All the hypotheses we tested using SmartPLS-3 were supported and accepted. We have discovered that firms that adopt logistics information technology have a great chance of influencing their performance through customer satisfaction, and both internal and external integration with customers and suppliers. Limitations are explained in conclusion.

Keywords

Logistics Information Technology, Supply Chain Integration, Organisational Performance, Customer Satisfaction.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Bechtel, C., & Jayaram, J. (1997). Supply chain management: A strategic perspective. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 8(1), 15-34.

  • Blome, C., Schoenherr, T., & Rexhausen, D. (2013). Antecedents and enablers of supply chain agility and its effect on performance: A dynamic capabilities perspective. International Journal of Production Research, 51(4), 1295-1318.

  • Carter, C. R., & Rogers, D. S. (2008). A framework of sustainable supply chain management: Moving toward new theory. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 38(5), 360-387.

  • Chan, H. K., Wang, W. Y., Luong, L. H., & Chan, F. T. (2009). Flexibility and adaptability in supply chains: A lesson learned from a practitioner. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 14(6), 407-410.

  • Dehning, B., Richardson, V. J., & Stratopoulos, T. (2005). Information technology investments and firm value. Information & Management, 42(7), 989-1008.

  • De Sousa Jabbour, A. B. L. (2015). Understanding the genesis of green supply chain management: Lessons from leading Brazilian companies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 87, 385-390.

  • Dubey, R., Gunasekaran, A., Papadopoulos, T., Childe, S. J., Shibin, K. T., & Wamba, S. F. (2017). Sustainable supply chain management: Framework and further research directions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142, 1119-1130.

  • Dyer, J. H., & Singh, H. (1998). The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(4), 660-679.

  • Ellram, L. M., & Cooper, M. C. (1990). Supply chain management, partnership, and the shipper-third party relationship. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 1(2), 1-10.

  • Eskandarpour, M., Dejax, P., Miemczyk, J., & Péton, O. (2015). Sustainable supply chain network design: An optimisation-oriented review. Omega, 54, 11-32.

  • Franklin, J. R. (2008). Managing the messy process of logistics service innovation. Managing Innovation. The New Competitive Edge for Logistics Service Providers, Schweiz, Berne, 208, 153-171.

  • Fraser, R., & Monteiro, D. S. (2009). A conceptual framework for evaluating the most cost-effective intervention along the supply chain to improve food safety. Food Policy, 34(5), 477-481.

  • Gimenez, C., van der Vaart, T., & Pieter van Donk, D. (2012). Supply chain integration and performance: The moderating effect of supply complexity. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 32(5), 583-610.

  • Gligor, D. M., & Holcomb, M. C. (2012). Antecedents and consequences of supply chain agility: Establishing the link to firm performance. Journal of Business Logistics, 33(4), 295-308.

  • Hammervoll, T., Jensen, L. M., & Beske, P. (2012). Dynamic capabilities and sustainable supply chain management. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 42(4), 372-387.

  • Hart, S. L. (1995). A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 986-1014.

  • Holweg, M., Disney, S., Holmström, J., & Småros, J. (2005). Supply chain collaboration: Making sense of the strategy continuum. European Management Journal, 23(2), 170-181.

  • Hunt, S. D., & Davis, D. F. (2012). Grounding supply chain management in resource-advantage theory. In defence of a resource-based view of the firm. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 48(2).

  • Hunt, S. D., & Lambe, C. J. (2000). Marketing’s contribution to business strategy: Market orientation, relationship marketing, and resource-advantage theory. International Journal of Management Reviews, 2(1), 17-43.

  • John, F. R., & Prasad, P. S. S. (2012). An overview of conflicts in supply chain systems. International Journal of Logistics Systems and Management, 11(3), 325-353.

  • Kim, H. J. (2017). Information technology and firm performance: The role of supply chain integration. Operations Management Research, 10(1-2), 1-9.

  • Kock, N. (2015). Common method bias in PLS-SEM: A full collinearity assessment approach. International Journal of e-Collaboration (IJeC), 11(4), 1-10.

  • Krause, D. R., Handfield, R. B., & Tyler, B. B. (2007). The relationships between supplier development, commitment, social capital accumulation, and performance improvement. Journal of Operations Management, 25(2), 528-545.

  • Lambert, D. M., & Cooper, M. C. (2000). Issues in supply chain management. Industrial Marketing Management, 29(1), 65-83.

  • Laudon, K. C., & Laudon, J. P. (2015). Management information systems: Managing the digital firm plus MyMISLab with Pearson e-text-access card package. Prentice Hall Press.

  • Lavie, D. (2006). The competitive advantage of interconnected firms: An extension of the resource-based view. Academy of Management Review, 31(3), 638-658.

  • Lee, H. L., & Whang, S. (2004). E-business and supply

  • chain integration. In the Practice of Supply Chain Management: Where theory and application converge (pp. 123-138). Springer, Boston, MA.

  • Leuschner, R., Rogers, D. S., & Charvet, F. F. (2013). A meta-analysis of supply chain integration and firm performance. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 49(2), 34-57.

  • Lyytinen, K., & Damsgaard, J. (2011). Inter-organisational information systems adoption - A configuration analysis approach. European Journal of Information Systems, 20(5), 496-509.

  • Min, H., Ko, C. S., & Ko, H. J. (2006). The spatial and temporal consolidation of returned products in a closed-loop supply chain network. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 51(2), 309-320.

  • Min, S., Roath, A. S., Daugherty, P. J., Genchev, S. E., Chen, H., Arndt, A. D., & Glenn Richey, R. (2005). Supply chain collaboration: What is happening? The International Journal of Logistics Management, 16(2), 237-256.

  • Mishra, D., Gunasekaran, A., Papadopoulos, T., & Childe, S. J. (2018). Big data and supply chain management: A review and bibliometric analysis. Annals of Operations Research, 270(1-2), 313-336.

  • Moshtari, M. (2016). Inter-organisational fit, relationship management capability, and collaborative performance within a humanitarian setting. Production and Operations Management, 25(9), 1542-1557.

  • Sanders, N. R., & Premus, R. (2005). Modeling the relationship between firm IT capability, collaboration, and performance. Journal of Business Logistics, 26(1), 1-23.

  • Singh, P. J., & Power, D. (2009). The nature and effectiveness of collaboration between firms, their customers, and suppliers: A supply chain perspective. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 14(3), 189-200.

  • Stratopoulos, T., & Dehning, B. (2000). Does successful investment in information technology solve the productivity paradox? Information & Management, 38(2), 103-117.

  • Sungbae, K., & Taesoo, M. (2016, January). Supply chain integration and collaboration for improving supply chain performance: A dynamic capability theory perspective.

  • In 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) (pp. 307-316). IEEE.

  • Swafford, P. M., Ghosh, S., & Murthy, N. (2008). Achieving supply chain agility through IT integration and flexibility. International Journal of Production Economics, 116(2), 288-297.

  • Tracey, M., & Leng, Tan, C. (2001). An empirical analysis of supplier selection and involvement, customer satisfaction, and firm performance. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 6(4), 174-188.

  • Teekasap, P. (2016, October). Information technology investment and firm performance. In 2016 Management and Innovation Technology International Conference (MITicon) (pp. MIT-157). IEEE.

  • Turek, B. (2013). Information systems in supply chain integration and management. Retrieved from http://www.ehow.com/info_8337099_information-supply-chain-integration-management.html Verissimo

  • Pereira, J. (2009). SD-DES model: A new approach for implementing an e-supply chain. Journal of Modelling in Management, 4(2), 134-148.

  • Wang, W. Y., & Chan, H. K. (2010). Virtual organisation for supply chain integration: Two cases in the textile and fashion retailing industry. International Journal of Production Economics, 127(2), 333-342.

  • Xuhua, P. (2008, September). Information technology in logistics and supply chain management. In 2008 IEEE International Conference on Automation and Logistics (pp. 2185-2188). IEEE.


Abstract Views: 328

PDF Views: 1




  • Impact of Logistics Information Technology on Organisational Performance:Mediating Role of Supply Chain Integration and Customer Satisfaction

Abstract Views: 328  |  PDF Views: 1

Authors

Yaw Agyabeng-Mensah
Dalian Maritime University, China
Esther Nana Konadu Ahenkorah
Regent University College of Science and Technology, Ghana
Eric Osei
Ho Technical University, Ghana

Abstract


The current market setting breeds stern competition among business organisations. This has made firms that rely on only in-house core competencies to reengineer their strategies and approaches to look beyond their boundaries to tap into the supply chain capabilities and benefits. This has ignited our interest to conduct this study to investigate how logistics information technology can enhance supply chain integration and improve firms’ ability to increase customer satisfaction to achieve high organisational performance in the distribution industry in Ghana. We use survey data we collected from 179 managers at least 5 years’ experience in procurement, supply chain, distribution, information and logistics. All the hypotheses we tested using SmartPLS-3 were supported and accepted. We have discovered that firms that adopt logistics information technology have a great chance of influencing their performance through customer satisfaction, and both internal and external integration with customers and suppliers. Limitations are explained in conclusion.

Keywords


Logistics Information Technology, Supply Chain Integration, Organisational Performance, Customer Satisfaction.

References