Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Executives' Reactions to a Prescriptive Strategic Procurement Planning Model


Affiliations
1 School of Business, Indiana University Kokomo, Kokomo, Indiana, United States
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Procurement has recently received increased corporate recognition, and its responsibilities have significantly expanded. Hence, a need has arisen for conceptual, integrative models that assist purchasing executives to more effectively manage their increased responsibilities in a dynamic environment. One such model is the Product Life Cycle (PLC) concept. Recently, two researchers formulated a set of procurement strategies for each PLC stage, which they recommended purchasing managers implement. To test this model, practitioners from five chapters of the Institute for Supply Management were asked to indicate the importance level and usage frequency of each procurement strategy. Almost 81% of the 145 purchasing strategies were rated "important" or higher by respondents, and about 58% were "used frequently" or more often. Executives were also asked to assign each procurement strategy to the sales phase they thought most appropriate. Their assignments matched almost 60% of the prescriptive model. Above-average assigners were more likely than their average/below-average counterparts to have worked 13 or more years in procurement, earned a college degree, and majored in business or purchasing as well as be professionally certified (i.e., CPM) and at least a manager or higher. Limitations and implications are discussed.

Keywords

Procurement, Strategic Procurement Planning, Product Life Cycle (PLC), Purchasing Strategies, PLC-Procurement, Strategy Models.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Adamson, J. (1991).Strategic planning and procurement. NAPM Insights, 2, 10-11.
  • Ball, R. (2004). Aggressive initiatives lead purchasers to the strategic table. Government Procurement, 12, 10-13.
  • Berenson, C. (1967). The purchasing executive's adaptation to the product life cycle. Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 52-68.
  • Biemans, W., & Brand, M. (1995). Reverse marketing: A synergy of purchasing and relationship marketing. International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 31, 29-37.
  • Blascovich, J., Ferrer, A., & Markham, B. (2011). Follow the leaders: 7 ways to procurement excellence. Supply Chain Management Review, 15, 32-36.
  • Burt, D., & Sukoup, W. (1989). Purchasing's role in new product development. Harvard Business Review, 90-97.
  • Carr, A., & Smeltzer, L. (2000). An empirical study of the relationships among purchasing skills and strategic purchasing, financial performance, and supplier responsiveness. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 36, 40-54.
  • Carr, A., & Pearson, J. (2002).The impact of purchasing and supplier involvement on strategic purchasing and its impact on fi rm's performance. Journal of Operations and Production Management, 22, 1032-1053.
  • Carter, J., & Narasimhan, R. (1996). Is purchasing really strategic? International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 32, 20-28.
  • Cavinato, J. (1991). Integrating purchasing into corporate strategy. NAPM Conference Proceedings, 130-134.
  • Cousins, P., & Spekman, R. (2003). Strategic supply and the management of inter- and intra-organizational relationships. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 9, 19-30.
  • Day, M., & Lichtenstein, S. (2006). Strategic supply management: The relationship between supply management practices, strategic orientation and their impact on organizational performance. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 12, 313-321.
  • den Butter, F., & Linse, K. (2008). Rethinking procurement in the era of globalization. MIT Sloan Management Review, 50, 76-80.
  • Ellram, L., Zsidisin, G., Siferd, S., & Stanly, M. (2002). The impact of purchasing and supply management activities on corporate success. The Journal of Supply Chain Management, 38, 4-17.
  • Ferguson, W., Hartley, M., Turner, G., & Pierce, E. (1996). Purchasing's role in corporate strategic planning. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Materials Management, 26, 51-63.
  • Fox, H., & Rink, D. (1977). Coordination of purchasing with salestrends. Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 13, 10-18.
  • Freeman, V., & Cavinato, J. (1990). Fitting purchasing to the strategic firm: Frameworks, processes, and values. Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 26, 19-25.
  • Gadde, L., & Hakansson, H. (1994). The changing role of purchasing. European Journal of Purchasing and SupplyManagement,1, 27-35.
  • Goh, M., Lau, G., & Neo, L. (1999). Strategic role and contribution of purchasing: A survey of CEOs. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 35, 12-22.
  • Hawkins, D. (2006). Procurement is the prime mover. Supply Management, 11, 18-19.
  • Heberling, M. (1993). The rediscovery of modern purchasing. International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 29, 48-53.
  • Hofman, E. (2010). Linking corporate strategy and supply chain management. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 40, 256-276.
  • Kotler, P., & Keller, K. (2012). Marketing Management, 14th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Monczka, R. (1992). Integrating Purchasing and Corporate Strategy. NAPM Conference Proceedings, 1-6.
  • Pearson, J., & Gritzmacher, K. (1990). Integrating purchasinginto strategic management Long Range Planning, 23, 91-99.
  • Rajagopal, S., & Bernard, K. (1993). Strategic procurement and competitive advantage. International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 29, 13-20.
  • Rink, D. (1975). An empirical investigation of the use of the product life cycle in formulating purchasing strategy. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. University of Arkansas.
  • Rink, D., & Fox, H. (2012). Effective strategic procurement management in a dynamic environment. Academy of Taiwan Business Management Review, 8, 38-44.
  • Spekman, R. (1994). Purchasing is becoming strategic. Long Range Planning, 27, 76-84.
  • Tassabehji, R., & Moorhouse, A. (2008). The changing role of procurement. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 14, 55-68.
  • Trent, R., & Monczka, R. (2002). Pursuing competitive advantage through integrated global sourcing. Academy of Management Executive, 16, 66-80.
  • Trommer, D. (1997). Buyers have more corporate clout. Electronic Buyers' News, 78.
  • Tully, S. (1995). Purchasing's new muscle. Fortune, 75-83.
  • Watts, C., Kim, K., & Hahn, C. (1992). Linking purchasing to corporate competitive strategy. International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 28, 2-8.

Abstract Views: 264

PDF Views: 2




  • Executives' Reactions to a Prescriptive Strategic Procurement Planning Model

Abstract Views: 264  |  PDF Views: 2

Authors

David R. Rink
School of Business, Indiana University Kokomo, Kokomo, Indiana, United States

Abstract


Procurement has recently received increased corporate recognition, and its responsibilities have significantly expanded. Hence, a need has arisen for conceptual, integrative models that assist purchasing executives to more effectively manage their increased responsibilities in a dynamic environment. One such model is the Product Life Cycle (PLC) concept. Recently, two researchers formulated a set of procurement strategies for each PLC stage, which they recommended purchasing managers implement. To test this model, practitioners from five chapters of the Institute for Supply Management were asked to indicate the importance level and usage frequency of each procurement strategy. Almost 81% of the 145 purchasing strategies were rated "important" or higher by respondents, and about 58% were "used frequently" or more often. Executives were also asked to assign each procurement strategy to the sales phase they thought most appropriate. Their assignments matched almost 60% of the prescriptive model. Above-average assigners were more likely than their average/below-average counterparts to have worked 13 or more years in procurement, earned a college degree, and majored in business or purchasing as well as be professionally certified (i.e., CPM) and at least a manager or higher. Limitations and implications are discussed.

Keywords


Procurement, Strategic Procurement Planning, Product Life Cycle (PLC), Purchasing Strategies, PLC-Procurement, Strategy Models.

References