Journal of Supply Chain Management Systems

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

A Short Review on Structural Equation Modeling:Applications and Future Research Directions


Affiliations
1 Tega Industries Ltd.,, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The application of multivariate techniques is mainly to expand the researchers' explanatory ability and statistical efficiency. The first generation analytical techniques share a common limitation i.e. each technique can examine only a single relationship at a time. Structural Equation Modeling, an extension of several multivariate techniques is the technique popularly used today can examine a series of dependence relationships simultaneously. The purpose of this study is to provide a short review on Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) being used in social sciences research. A comprehensive literature review of article appearing in top journals is conducted in order to identify how often SEM theory is used. Also the key SEM steps have been provided offering potential researchers with a theoretical supported systematic approach that simplify the multiple options with performing SEM.

Keywords

Multivariate Data Analysis, SEM, Path Modeling.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Afthanorhan, A., Nazim, A., & Ahmad, S., (2015). A parametric approach using Z-test for comparing 2 means to multi-group analysis in partial least square structural equation modeling. British Journal of Applied Science & Technology, 6(2), 194-201

  • Biswas. M. (2010). Personality and organization citizenship behavior: an Indian argument An application of Structural Equation Modelling using PLS Algorithm, Vilakshan. XIMB Journal of Management, March issue, 77-102

  • Biswas, M. (2010). In search of personality inventory for Indian managers: An application of structural Equation Modelling. Journal of Services Research, 10(1), 101-123

  • Bollen, K. A., & Paearl, J. (2013). Eight myths about causality and structural equations models, In SL. Morgan (Ed.), Handbook of Causal Analysis for Social Research, Chapter 15, 301-328, Springer

  • Chen, M. F., Lin, C. P., & Lien, G. Y. (2011). Modelling job stress as a mediating role in predicting turnover intention. The Services Industries Journal, 31(8), 1327-1345

  • Grace, J. B., & Bollen, K. A. (2008). Representing general theoretical concepts in structural equation models: The role of composite variables. Environmental and Ecological Statistic, 15, 191-213

  • Hackl, P., & Westlund, A. H. (2000), On structural equation modeling for customer satisfaction measurement. Total Quality Management, 11(4/5&6), 820-825

  • Jayakumar, G. S., & Sulthan, A. (2013). Stress symptoms: Structural equation modeling. SCMS Indian Journal of Management, (July-September), 95-109

  • Jayakumar, G. S., & Sulthan, A. (2014). Modelling : Employee perception on training and development. SCMS Indian Journal of Management, (April-June), 57-70

  • Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York:

  • Guilford Press Lee, H.W. (2011). An application of latent variable structural equation modeling for experimental research in educational technology, TOJET, 10(1), 15-23

  • Mohamad, M., Mohamad, M., Mamat, I., & Mamat, M. (2014). Modelling positive development, life satisfaction and problem behavior among youths in Malaysia. World Applied Sciences Journal, 32(2), 231-284

  • Mohamad, M., Abdullah, A. R., & Mokhlis, S. (2011). Examining the influence of service recovery satisfaction on destination loyalty: A structural Equation Modelling. Journal of Sustainable Development, 4(6), 3-11

  • Nachtigall, C., Kroehne, U., Funke, F., & Steyer, R. (2003). Why should we use SEM? Pros and Cons of Structural Equation Modelling. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8(2), 1-22

  • Ogasawara, H. (2008). Some properties of pivotal statistics based on the asymptotically distribution free theory in Structural Equation Modeling. Communication in Statistics-Simulation and Computation, 37, 1931-1947

  • Pohl, S., Steyer, R., & Kraus, K. (2008). Modelling methods effects as individual causal effects. Journal of Royal Statistical Society, 171(Part 1), 41-63

  • Pousette, A., & Hanse, J. J. (2002). Job characteristics as predictors of ill-health and sickness absenteeism in different occupational types- a multi group structural modeling approach. Work & Stress, 16(3), 229-250

  • Roberts, N., Thatcher, J. B., & Grover, V. (2010). Advancing operations management theory using exploratory structural equation modeling techniques. International Journal of Production Research, 15(1), 4329-4353

  • Saxena, A., & Khanna, U. (2013). Advertising on social network sites: A structural equation modeling approach. Vision, 17(1), 17-25

  • Silva, J. L., Samah, B. A., Shaffril, H. A. M., Hassan, M. A., & Badsar, M. (2010). Determinants of attitudes towards information and communication technology usage among rural administrators in using structural equation modeling. American Journal of Applied Sciences, 8(5), 481-485

  • Singh, R., Sandhu, H. S., Metri, B. A., & Kaur, R. (2010). Relating organized retail supply chain management practices, competitive advantage and organizational performance. VISION-The Journal of Business Perspective, 14(3), 173-190

  • Singh, R. (2009). Does my structural equation model represent the real phenomenon?: a review of the appropriate use of structural equation modeling (SEM) model fit indices. The Marketing Review, 9(3), 199-212

  • Tempelaar, D. K., Loeff, S. C. V. D., & Gijselaers, W. H. (2007). A structural equation model analyzing the relationship of students’ attitudes toward statistics, prior reasoning abilities and course performance. Statistics Education Research Journal, 6(2), 78-102

  • Tenenhaus, M. (2008). Component based structural equation modeling. Total Quality Management, 19(7-8), 871-886

  • Thomas, S., & Bhasi, M. (2011). A software model for project risk management Vilakshan. XIMB Journal of Management, (March issue), 71-84

  • Wong, K. K. K. (2013). Partial least squares structural equation modeling techniques using Smart PLS. Marketing Bulletin, 24, 1-32. Retrieved from http:// marketing-bulletin.massey.ac.nz

  • Yap, B. W., & Khong, K.W. (2006). Examining the effects of customer service management on perceived business performance via structural equation modeling. Applied Stochastic models in Business and Industry, 22, 587605, DOI: 10.1002/smb.648

  • Zakuan, N. M., Yusof, S. M., Laosirihongthong, T., & Shaharoun, A. M. (2010). Proposed relationship of TQM and organizational performance using structured equation modeling. Total Quality Management, 21(2), 185-203


Abstract Views: 536

PDF Views: 0




  • A Short Review on Structural Equation Modeling:Applications and Future Research Directions

Abstract Views: 536  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Surajit Bag
Tega Industries Ltd.,, India

Abstract


The application of multivariate techniques is mainly to expand the researchers' explanatory ability and statistical efficiency. The first generation analytical techniques share a common limitation i.e. each technique can examine only a single relationship at a time. Structural Equation Modeling, an extension of several multivariate techniques is the technique popularly used today can examine a series of dependence relationships simultaneously. The purpose of this study is to provide a short review on Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) being used in social sciences research. A comprehensive literature review of article appearing in top journals is conducted in order to identify how often SEM theory is used. Also the key SEM steps have been provided offering potential researchers with a theoretical supported systematic approach that simplify the multiple options with performing SEM.

Keywords


Multivariate Data Analysis, SEM, Path Modeling.

References