The PDF file you selected should load here if your Web browser has a PDF reader plug-in installed (for example, a recent version of Adobe Acrobat Reader).

If you would like more information about how to print, save, and work with PDFs, Highwire Press provides a helpful Frequently Asked Questions about PDFs.

Alternatively, you can download the PDF file directly to your computer, from where it can be opened using a PDF reader. To download the PDF, click the Download link above.

Fullscreen Fullscreen Off


Introduction: Awake Fiberoptic Intubation (AFOI) is a valuable modality for airway management. Both optimal intubating condition and patient comfort are paramount for fiberoptic intubation. The challenges associated with the procedure are to provide adequate sedation while maintaining patent airway and ventilation. Both dexmedetomidine and propofol provide procedural sedation. Therefore, this study was taken to compare intubating conditions and haemodynamic stability between dexmedetomidine and propofol for Awake Fiberoptic Bronchoscopy. Methods: 60 patients of ASA physical status I or II undergoing elective surgery were enrolled for the study. They were randomly allocated into two groups, group D received dexmedetomidine (1 μg/kg over 10 min followed by infusion) and group P received propofol (1 mg/kg over 10 min followed by infusion). After achieving Ramsay sedation score of ≥2 bronchoscopy was performed. The following parameters were assessed and compared: Intubating conditions were evaluated by intubation score including vocal cord movement, coughing and limb movement. Post intubation condition was assessed by a subjective scale. Haemodynamic parameters were recorded at baseline, end of infusion and post intubation. Other parameters assessed were intubation time, sedation, number of attempts at intubation and any complications during the procedure. Results: Demographics were comparable. Intubating conditions and post intubation scores were comparable. Dexmedetomidine provided better haemodynamic stability at the end of infusion and post intubation (p = 0). Both provided a favorable sedation but propofol provided much deeper mean sedation score compared to dexmedetomidine. Intubation time was shorter in group D (p = 0). Conclusion: Both dexmedetomidine and propofol provide favorable intubation conditions, but dexmedetomidine in addition provides better haemodynamic stability and conscious sedation.

Keywords

Bronchoscopy, Dexmedetomidine, Intubating Conditions, Propofol
User
Notifications
Font Size