Open Access
Subscription Access
Open Access
Subscription Access
A Comparative Analysis of Different Measurement Scale and Normalization Method Performances in ELECTRE Method
Subscribe/Renew Journal
There are several preference measurement scale and normalization method in the literature. In this paper, we compare these possibilities in ELECTRE method, and compares results. In the absence of any other standards, the priorities provided by the original ELECTRE (involve: Linear scale, Vector normalization and Entropy weights) was used as the benchmark. The results indicate that linear measurement scale and vector normalization method is not the only or best scale and normalization method in ELECTRE method. In other words, the ranking for some measurement scale (i.e. Linear, Power, Logarithmic and Root Square measurement scales) and normalization method (i.e. non-linear normalization method) are effectively same, as the benchmark.
Keywords
ELECTRE, Measurement Scale, Normalization Method.
Subscription
Login to verify subscription
User
Font Size
Information
- Alinezhad A. and A. Amini,(2011)," sensitivity analysis of Topsis technique: the results of change in the weight of one attribute on the final ranking of alternatives", Journal of optimization in industrial engineering, 7(2011), pp. 23-28.
- Amiri m. et al., (2008)," developing a new ELECTRE method with interval data in multiple attributes decision making problems", journal of applied sciences, 8(22): pp., 4017-4028.
- Azadfallah, M. (2015). A Multiple Attribute Group Decision Making model for selecting the best supplier. International Journal of Business Analytics and Intelligence, 3(2), 13-19.
- Hwang C. L. and K. Yoon, (1981)," multiple attribute decision making; methods and applications", Springer - Verlag.
- Ishizaka A. et al., (2011), "Influence of Aggregation and Measurement Scale on Ranking a compromise Alternative in AHP", journal of the operational research society, 62(4), 700-710.
- Luce R.D., (1997),"Quantification and Symmetry", British journal of Psychology, 88,395-398.
- Pavl D.M., (2000), "Normalization of attribute values in MADM violates the conditions of consistent choice IV, DI and α", Yugoslav journal of operations research, 1,109-122.
- Ramanathan R.,(2001),"A note to the use of the AHP for environmental impact assessment”, journal of Environmental Management, 63, 27-35.
- Shofade O. J. S., (2011),"considering hierarchical structure of criteria in ELECTRE decision aiding methods, master thesis, Poznan University of technology, Poland.
- Stevens S. S. , (1946) ,"On the theory of scales of measurement", SCIENCE, 103, No.2684, 677-68
- Zavadskas E.K. et al., (2010),"Attributes weights determining peculiarities in Multiple Attribute Decision Making methods", Engineering Economics, 21(1), 32-43.
- Zavadskas E.K. and Z. Turskis, (2008)"A new Logarithmic Normalization method in Game theory", Informatica 19, No.2, 303-314.
- Zopounidis C. and P. M. Pardalos, (2010)," Handbook of multi criteria analysis, applied optimization (chapter 3, by: Figueira J. K. et al.), Springer - Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
Abstract Views: 355
PDF Views: 6