OPUS: HR Journal

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Stakeholder Orientation of Ethical Leadership:A Qualitative Study


Affiliations
1 Junior Research Fellow-UGC, Department of Management, Central University of Rajasthan, Ajmer, Rajasthan, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


To date, ethical leadership studies have focused on leader follower relationships for accomplishment of organizational goals. This study, extends research by considering stakeholder perspective of ethical leadership and its importance in context of higher education. The purpose of this paper is to identify the dimensions of stakeholder oriented ethical leadership in universities. The theoretical underpinning for stakeholder-oriented perspective of ethical leaders emerges from stakeholder theory reflecting ethical behaviour of leaders to promote interests of stakeholders. This paper identifies the different stakeholder categories of university and behaviour of ethical leadership for these categories of stakeholders. Descriptive and qualitative exploratory research method fit the purpose of this paper. For this purpose, in depth interviews from 20 informants have been conducted in Central University of Rajasthan. This study combines literature review and data collected from interview to identify themes and subthemes for stakeholders of universities through qualitative analysis. The paper provides tools to education policy makers to effectively manage stakeholders of university through extended views of ethical leaders focused on leader stakeholder relationships.

Keywords

Ethical Leadership, Stakeholders, Stakeholder Orientation, Higher Education, Universities.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Bandura, A., & Walters, R. H. (1977). Social learning theory (Vol. 1). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-hall.

  • Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

  • Bentham, J., & Mill, J. S. (1961). The utilitarians: An introduction to the principles of morals and legislation. Doubleday.

  • Brown, M. E., Trevino, L. K., & Harrison, D. A. (2005). Ethical leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 97(2), 117-134.

  • Burrows, J. (1999). Going beyond labels: A framework for profiling institutional stakeholders. Contemporary Education, 70(4), 5-10.

  • Ciulla. (2011). Ethics and effectiveness: The nature of good leadership. In D. V. Day, & J. Antonakis, The nature of leadership (pp. 508-543). California: SAGE Publications, Inc.

  • Craig, S. B., & Gustafson, S. B. (1998). Perceived leader integrity scale: An instrument for assessing employee perceptions of leader integrity. The Leadership Quarterly, 9(2), 127-145.

  • Cramwinckel, F., Cremer, D., & Dijke, M. (2013). Dirty hands make dirty leaders?! The effects of touching dirty objects on rewarding unethical subordinates as a function of a leader’s self-interest. Journal of Business Ethics, 115(1), 93-100.

  • Ciulla, J. (1998). Ethics, the heart of leadership. Westport, CT: Quorum Books.

  • Cunha, M., Rego, A., & Vaccaro, A. (2014). Organizations as human communities and internal markets: Searching for duality. Journal of Business Ethics, 120(4), 441-455.

  • De Hoogh, A. H. B., & Den Hartog, D. N. (2008). Ethical and despotic leadership, relationships with leader’s social responsibility, top management effectiveness and subordinates’ optimism: A multi-method study. The Leadership Quarterly, 19(3), 297-311.

  • Strider, S. H. (2013). Ethical business decision making considering stakeholder interest (Doctoral dissertation, Walden University).

  • Drydyk, J. (2014). Foundational issues: How must global ethics be global? Journal of Global Ethics, 10(1), 16-25.

  • Eisenbeiss, S. A. (2012). Re-thinking ethical leadership: An inter disciplinary integrative approach. The Leadership Quarterly, 23(5), 791-808.

  • Eisenbeiss, S., & Brodbeck, F. (2014). Ethical and unethical leadership: A cross-cultural and cross-sectoral analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 122(2), 343-359.

  • Eisenbeiss, S., Knippenberg, D., & Fahrbach, C. (2015). Doing well by doing good? Analyzing the relationship between CEO ethical leadership and firm performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 128(3), 635-651.

  • Englehardt, E. E. (2009). Academic ethics in higher education administration: The dimensions of decisions. In The Ethical Challenges of Academic Administration (pp. 13-24). Springer, Dordrecht.

  • Erdogan, M., & Uşak, M. (2009). Curricular and extra-curricular activities for developing environmental awareness of young students: A case from Turkey. Educational Sciences/Odgojne Znanosti, 11(1), 73-85.

  • Ferdig, M. A. (2007). Sustainability leadership: Co-creating a sustainable future. Journal of Change Management, 7(1), 25-35.

  • Fluker, W., (2002). Roundtable 3: Ethics and leadership. Conversation on Leadership.

  • Freeman, E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.

  • Frisch, C., & Huppenbauer, M. (2014). New insights into ethical leadership: A qualitative investigation of the experiences of executive ethical leaders. Journal of Business Ethics, 123(1), 23-43.

  • Heres, L., & Lasthuizen, K. (2010, August). Ethical leadership: A variform universal phenomenon. In Annual Conference of the European Group for Public Administration (pp. 1-36). Hoenig, C. (2000). Brave hearts. CIO, November, 1.

  • Howitt, M., & McManus, J. (2012). Stakeholder management: An instrument for decision-making. Management Services, 56(3), 29-34.

  • Jadhav, A. S., Jadhav, V. V., & Raut, P. D. (2014). Role of higher education institutions in environmental conservation and sustainable Development: A case study of Shivaji University, Maharashtra, India. Journal of Environment and Earth Science, 4(5), 30-34.

  • Jones, G. R., & George, J. M. (2000). Essentials of managing organisational behaviour. Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall.

  • Jongbloed, B., Enders, J., & Salerno, C. (2007). Higher education and its communities: Interconnections and interdependencies in higher education. Looking Forward: Themes on the Changing Relationship between Higher Education and Society. European Science Foundation.

  • Detert, J. R., Trevino, L. K., Burris, E. R., &Andiappan, M. (2007). Managerial modes of influence and counter productivity in organizations: A longitudinal business-unit-level investigation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(4), 993-1005.

  • Kalshoven, K., Den Hartog, D. N., & De Hoogh, A. H. (2011). Ethical leadership at work questionnaire (ELW): Development and validation of a multidimensional measure. The Leadership Quarterly, 22(1), 51-69.

  • Kasetwar, R. B. (2008). Quality in higher education: Role of stakeholders. University News, 46(41).

  • Khuntia, R., & Suar, D. (2004). A scale to assess ethical leadership of Indian private and public-sector managers. Journal of Business Ethics, 49(1), 13-26.

  • Komives, S. R., Lucas, N., & McMahon, T. R. (2007). Exploring leadership: For college students who want to make difference (2nd ed.). San Fransisco: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

  • Kondalkar, V. (2007). Organizational behavior (10th ed.). New Delhi: New Age International P. Ltd.

  • Maak, T., & Pless, N. M. (2006). Responsible leadership in a stakeholder society: A relational perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 66(1), 99-115.

  • May, D. R., Chan, A. Y. L., Hodges, T. D., & Avolio, B. J. (2003). Developing the moral component of authentic leadership. Organizational Dynamics, 32(3), 247-260.

  • Metcalf, L., & Benn, S. (2013). Leadership for sustainability: An evolution of leadership ability. Journal of Business Ethics, 112(3), 369-384.

  • Mihelic, K. K., Lipicnik, B., & Tekavcic, M. (2010). Ethical leadership. International Journal of Management & Information Systems, 14(5), 31-42.

  • Murphy, P. E., & Enderle, G. (1995). Managerial ethical leadership: Examples domatter. Business Ethics Quarterly, 5(1), 117-128.

  • Othman, Z., & Abdul Rahman, R. (2014). Attributes of ethical leadership in leading good governance. International Journal of Business & Society, 15(2), 359-372.

  • Pastoriza, D., & Arino, M. (2013). Does the ethical leadership of supervisors generate internal social capital?. Journal of Business Ethics, 118, 1-12.

  • Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (3rd ed.). Newbury Park: California: Sage.

  • Piccolo, R. F., Greenbaum, R., den Hartog, D. D., & Folger, R. (2010). The relationship between ethical leadership and core job characteristics. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(2-3), 259-278.

  • Podnar, K., & Jancic, Z. (2006). Towards a categorization of stakeholder groups: An empirical verification of a three-level model. Journal of Marketing Communications, 12(4), 297-308.

  • Raile, E. D. (2013). Building ethical capital: Perceptions of ethical climate in the public sector. Public Administration Review, 73(2), 253-262.

  • Sinha, A. K., & Mishra, S. K. (2012). Factors affecting ethical decision making in corporate setting. Purushartha: A Journal of Management Ethics and Spirituality, 4(1).

  • Slaper, T. F., & Hall, T. J. (2011). The triple bottom line: What is it and how does it work? Indiana Business Review, 86(1), 4-8.

  • Stouten, J., Van Dijke, M., & De Cremer, D. (2015). Ethical leadership: An overview and future perspectives. Journal of Personnel Psychology. 11(1), 1-6.

  • Uhawenimana, T. C. (2012). Higher education needs to engage in outreach-based research. University World News, 26th August.

  • Trevino, L. K. (1986). Ethical decision making in organizations: A person–situation interactionist model. Academy of Management Review, 11(3), 601-617.

  • Trevino, L. K., Brown, M., & Hartman, L. P. (2003). A qualitative investigation of perceived executive ethical leadership: Perceptions from inside and outside the executive suite. Human Relations, 56(1), 5-37.


Abstract Views: 266

PDF Views: 0




  • Stakeholder Orientation of Ethical Leadership:A Qualitative Study

Abstract Views: 266  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Pooja Paharia
Junior Research Fellow-UGC, Department of Management, Central University of Rajasthan, Ajmer, Rajasthan, India

Abstract


To date, ethical leadership studies have focused on leader follower relationships for accomplishment of organizational goals. This study, extends research by considering stakeholder perspective of ethical leadership and its importance in context of higher education. The purpose of this paper is to identify the dimensions of stakeholder oriented ethical leadership in universities. The theoretical underpinning for stakeholder-oriented perspective of ethical leaders emerges from stakeholder theory reflecting ethical behaviour of leaders to promote interests of stakeholders. This paper identifies the different stakeholder categories of university and behaviour of ethical leadership for these categories of stakeholders. Descriptive and qualitative exploratory research method fit the purpose of this paper. For this purpose, in depth interviews from 20 informants have been conducted in Central University of Rajasthan. This study combines literature review and data collected from interview to identify themes and subthemes for stakeholders of universities through qualitative analysis. The paper provides tools to education policy makers to effectively manage stakeholders of university through extended views of ethical leaders focused on leader stakeholder relationships.

Keywords


Ethical Leadership, Stakeholders, Stakeholder Orientation, Higher Education, Universities.

References