Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

The Dynamics of Work Environment on Job Satisfaction in Indian Higher Educational Institutions


Affiliations
1 Assistant Professor, VIT Business School, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
2 Professor, VIT Business School, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


This paper examines the relationship between facets of the work environment and job satisfaction in academic institutions. In previous studies, the job satisfaction (JS) and work environment (WE) have been examined, which has given less attention to the multi-faceted character of the work environment construct. In this reading, we emphasize that how work environment facets are linked to JS. Questionnaires were administered to 222 faculty members from higher educational institutions, India. Based on the statistical findings, work environment facet has significant positive relationship with JS, namely, “effective supervision,” “promotional opportunities,” “working conditions,” and “interpersonal relationships.” The study results show that faculty is more satisfied with the interpersonal relationship than other dimensions. The facets of the work environment as the antecedents help us to understand the significant factors that are more essential to determine. The findings also suggest that higher education institutions recognize the work environment’s importance in influencing faculty JS.

Keywords

Effective Supervision, Promotional Opportunities, Interpersonal Relationship, Working Condition, Motivation
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Abdulla, J., Djebarni, R., & Mellahi, K. (2011). Determinants of job satisfaction in the UAE: A case study of the Dubai police. Personnel Review, 40(2), 126-146.
  • Al-Bashareh, A. (2005). The impact of organizational climate on job satisfaction among administrative staff at Al al-Bayt University and Jerash private University (Master thesis). Al al-Bayt University, Jordan.
  • Arbuckle, J. L. (2007). Amos 18 user’s guide. Crawfordville, FL: Amos Development Corporation.
  • Barnes, B. R., Leonidou, L. C., Siu, N. Y., & Leonidou, C. N. (2015). Interpersonal factors as drivers of quality and performance in Western– Hong Kong interorganizational business relationships. Journal of International Marketing, 23(1), 23-49.
  • Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis ofcovariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88(3), 588-606.
  • Blömeke, S., Houang, R., Hsieh, F. J., & Wang, T. Y. (2017). Effects of job motives, teacher knowledge and school context on beginning teachers’ commitment to stay in the profession: A longitudinal study in Germany, Taiwan and the United States. In G. K. LeTendre & M. Akiba (Eds.), International Handbook of Teacher Quality and Policy (pp. 374-387). London: Routledge.
  • Borman, G. D., & Dowling, N. M. (2008). Teacher attrition and retention: A meta-analytic and narrative review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 78(3), 367-409.
  • Browne, M. W., Cudeck, R., Bollen, K. A., & Long, J. S. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sage Focus Editions, 154, 136-136.
  • Buhai, S., Cottini, E., & Nielsen, N., (2008). The impact of workplace conditions on firm performance. Working Paper Number 08-13.
  • Retrieved from http://www.hha.dk/nat/wper/08- 13_sebu.pdf Cano, J., & Castillo, J. X. (2004). Factors explaining job satisfaction among faculty. Journal of Agricultural Education, 45(3), 65-74.
  • Chandrasekhar, K. (2011). Workplace environment and its impact on organizational performance in public sector organizations. International Journal of Enterprise Computing and Business Systems, 1(1), 1-19.
  • Danish, R.Q., & Usman, A. (2010). Impact of reward and recognition on job satisfaction and motivation: An empirical study from Pakistan. International Journal of Business and Management, 5(2), 159-167.
  • Doloi, H., Iyer, K. C., & Sawhney, A. (2011). Structural equation model for assessing impacts of contractor’s performance on project success. International Journal of Project Management, 29, 687-695.
  • Dysvik, A., & Kuvaas, B. (2013). Perceived job autonomy and turnover intention: The moderating role of perceived supervisor support. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 22(5), 563-573.
  • Dysvik, A., Kuvaas, B., & Buch, R. (2014). Perceived training intensity and work effort: The moderating role of perceived supervisor support. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 23(5), 729-738.
  • Edem, M. J., Akpan, E. U., & Pepple, N. M. (2017). Impact of workplace environment on health workers. Occupational Medicine and Health Affairs, 5(2), 1-5.
  • Fabi, B., Lacoursie’re, R., & Raymond, L. (2015). Impact of highperformance work systems on job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and intention to quit in Canadian organizations. International Journal of Manpower, 36(5), 772-790.
  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39-50.
  • Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Babin, B. J., & Black, W. C. (2010). Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective (vol. 7). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
  • Holt-Lunstad, J., Smith, T. B., & Layton, J. B. (2010). Social relationships and mortality risk: A meta-analytic review. PLoS Medicine, 7, e1000316. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000316
  • Johnson, S. M., Kraft, M. A., & Papay, J. P. (2012). How context matters in high-need schools: The effects of teachers’ working conditions on their professional satisfaction and their pupils’ achievement. Teachers College Record, 114(10), 1- 39.
  • Khalid, S., Irshad, M. Z., & Mahmood, B. (2011). Job satisfaction among academic staff: A comparative analysis between public and private sector Universities of Punjab, Pakistan. International Journal of Business and Management, 7(1), 126-136.
  • Kinzl, J. F., Knotzer, H., Traweger, C., Lederer, W., Heidegger, T., & Benzer, A. (2005). Influence of working conditions on job satisfaction in anesthetists. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 94(2), 211-215.
  • Krishnan, L. R. K. (2021). Impact on employee morale and job satisfaction: A case study of Telecom industry network outsourcing. Journal of the International Academy for Case Studies, 27, 1-12.
  • Lai, H. H. (2011). The influence of compensation system design on employee satisfaction. African Journal of Business Management, 5(26), 10718.
  • Lambert, E. G., & Paoline, E. A. (2008). The influence of individual, job, and organizational characteristics of correctional staff job stress, job satisfaction, and organizational commitment. Criminal Justice Review, 33(4), 541-564.
  • Lambert, E. G., Minor, K. I., Wells, J. B., & Hogan, N. L. (2015). Leave your job at work: The possible antecedents of work-family conflict among correctional staff. The Prison Journal, 95(1), 114-134.
  • Lambert, E. G., Paoline III, E. A., & Hogan, N. L. (2006). The impact of centralization and formalization on correctional staff job satisfaction and organizational commitment: An exploratory study. Criminal Justice Studies, 19(1), 23-44.
  • Lambert, E., Qureshi, H., Frank, J., Klahm, C., & Smith, B. (2018). Job stress, job involvement, job satisfaction, and organizational commitment and their associations with job burnout among Indian police officers: A research note. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 33(2), 85-99.
  • Lane, K. A., Esser, J., Holte, B., & McCusker, M. A. (2010). A study of nurse faculty job satisfaction in community colleges in Florida. Teaching and Learning in Nursing, 5(1), 16-26.
  • Le, B. M., Impett, E. A., Kogan, A., Webster, G. D., & Cheng, C. (2013). The personal and interpersonal rewards of communal orientation. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 30, 694-710. doi:http:// dx.doi .org/10.1177/0265407512466227
  • Leblebici, D. (2012). Impact of workplace quality on employee’s productivity: A case study of a bank in Turkey. Journal of Business Economics and Finance, 1(1), 38-49.
  • Leech, N. L., Barrett, K. C., & Morgan, G. A. (2011). SPSS for intermediate statistics: Use and interpretation (4th ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Association Inc. doi:https//doi.org/10.4324/9780203821848
  • Liang, G., & Akiba, M. (2017). Teachers’ working conditions: A crossnational analysis using the OECD TALIS and PISA data. In G. K. LeTendre & M. Akiba (Eds.), International Handbook of Teacher Quality and Policy (pp. 388-402). London: Routledge.
  • Lindqvist, P., & Nordänger, U. K. (2016). Already elsewhere - A study of (skilled) teachers’ choice to leave teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 54, 88-97.
  • Locke, E. (1976). The nature and causes of job satisfaction. In M. Dunnell (Ed.), Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (pp. 1297-1349). Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
  • Loughland, T., Reid, A., & Petocz, P. (2002). Young people’s conceptions of the environment: A phenomenographic analysis. Environmental Education Research, 8(2), 187-197.
  • Lyons, F. W., & Akroyd, D. (2014). The impact of human capital and selected job rewards on community college faculty job satisfaction. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 38(2-3), 194-207.doi:10.
  • /10668926.2014.851965 McNamara, T. K., & Pitt-Catsouphes, M. (2016). Relative age, supervisor support, and perceived work group inclusion: The role of core selfevaluations. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, 14(4), 301-319. doi:10.1080/15350770.2016.1229551
  • Meisler, G. (2014). Exploring emotional intelligence, political skill, and job satisfaction. Employee Relations.
  • Millán, J. M., Hessels, J., Thurik, R., & Aguado, R. (2013). Determinants of job satisfaction: A European comparison of self-employed and paid employees. Small Business Economics, 40(3), 651-670.
  • Peng, J., Li, D., Zhang, Z., Tian, Y., Miao, D., Xiao, W., & Zhang, J. (2016). How can core self-evaluations influence job burnout? The key roles of organizational commitment and job satisfaction. Journal of Health Psychology, 21(1), 50-59.
  • Ronfeldt, M., Loeb, S., & Wyckoff, J. (2013). How teacher turnover harms student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 50(1), 4-36.
  • Sell, L., & Cleal, B. (2011). Job satisfaction, work environment, and rewards: Motivational theory revisited. Labour, 25(1), 1-23.
  • Seyal, A. H., Rahman, M. N. A., & Rahim, M. M. (2002). Determinants of academic use of the internet: A structural equation model. Behaviour & Information Technology, 21(1), 71-86.
  • Simon, N. S., & Johnson, S. M. (2015). Teacher turnover in high-poverty schools: What we know and can do. Teachers College Record, 117(3), 1-36.
  • Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik, S. (2011). Teacher job satisfaction and motivation to leave the teaching profession: Relations with school context, feeling of belonging, and emotional exhaustion. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(6), 1029-1038.
  • Spector, P. (1997). Industrial and organizational psychology: Research and practice. New York, NY: John Wiley.
  • Srivastava, A. K. (2008). Effect of perceived work environment on employees’ job behavior and organizational effectiveness. Journal of the Indian Academy of Applied Psychology, 34(1), 47-55.
  • Tariq, M. N., Ramzan, M., & Riaz, A. (2013).The impact of employee turnover on the efficiency of the organization. Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business, 4(9), 700-711.
  • Toropova, A., Myrberg, E., & Johansson, S. (2021). Teacher job satisfaction: The importance of school working conditions and teacher characteristics. Educational Review, 73(1), 71-97.
  • Wan, H., Sulaiman, M., & Omar, A. (2012). Procedural justice in promotion decision of managerial staff in Malaysia. Asia Pacific Business Review, 18(1), 99-121. doi:10.1080/13602380903424167
  • Warner, M., & Hausdorf, P. A. (2009). Understanding work-to-family conflict: The role of organization and supervisor support for worklife issues. Organization Management Journal, 6(3), 130-145.
  • Yousef, D. (2017). Organizational commitment, job satisfaction and attitudes toward organizational change: A study in the local government. International Journal of Public Administration, 40(1), 77-88.

Abstract Views: 154

PDF Views: 0




  • The Dynamics of Work Environment on Job Satisfaction in Indian Higher Educational Institutions

Abstract Views: 154  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

K. Praveen
Assistant Professor, VIT Business School, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
L. R. K. Krishnan
Professor, VIT Business School, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India

Abstract


This paper examines the relationship between facets of the work environment and job satisfaction in academic institutions. In previous studies, the job satisfaction (JS) and work environment (WE) have been examined, which has given less attention to the multi-faceted character of the work environment construct. In this reading, we emphasize that how work environment facets are linked to JS. Questionnaires were administered to 222 faculty members from higher educational institutions, India. Based on the statistical findings, work environment facet has significant positive relationship with JS, namely, “effective supervision,” “promotional opportunities,” “working conditions,” and “interpersonal relationships.” The study results show that faculty is more satisfied with the interpersonal relationship than other dimensions. The facets of the work environment as the antecedents help us to understand the significant factors that are more essential to determine. The findings also suggest that higher education institutions recognize the work environment’s importance in influencing faculty JS.

Keywords


Effective Supervision, Promotional Opportunities, Interpersonal Relationship, Working Condition, Motivation

References