![Open Access](https://i-scholar.in/lib/pkp/templates/images/icons/fulltextgreen.png)
![Restricted Access](https://i-scholar.in/lib/pkp/templates/images/icons/fulltextred.png)
![Open Access](https://i-scholar.in/lib/pkp/templates/images/icons/fulltextgreen.png)
![Open Access](https://i-scholar.in/lib/pkp/templates/images/icons/fulltext_open_medium.gif)
![Restricted Access](https://i-scholar.in/lib/pkp/templates/images/icons/fulltextred.png)
![Restricted Access](https://i-scholar.in/lib/pkp/templates/images/icons/fulltext_restricted_medium.gif)
High Performance Work Practices: A Study of Variations Based on Personal Characteristics
Subscribe/Renew Journal
High Performance Work Practices (HPWPs) has evolved as a pivotal paradigm of performance excellence. These practices are applied in bundles to accrue complementary benefits associated with each practices. Literature suggests that success of any system relies on various employee related factors. The present paper highlights variations among employees' awareness and perception for HPWPs based on individual characteristics like gender, sex, experience etc. Differences in employees' awareness and perception could arise owing to different inbuilt mechanism to filter external information. Presently as many as thirty-five HPWPs have been considered. Factor analysis reduces 35 practices into nine factors. It is observed that employees' awareness varies significantly across age, experience and educational qualification of the employees. However employees' awareness is observed to gender neutral. Further employees' perception is reported to vary significantly across all four individual characteristic taken in the study i.e. gender, age, experience and educational qualification of the employees. Further nine extracted factors are subjected to test of variance across various variables of individual differences. Lastly paper gives a glimpse of practical utility of the findings and a brief description of future research scope is also given herewith.
Keywords
High Performance Work Practices, High Performance Work System, Gender, Awareness, Perception.
Subscription
Login to verify subscription
User
Font Size
Information
- Harter, J. K., Schmidt, F. L., & Hayes, T. L. (2002). Business unit level outcomes between employee satisfaction, employee engagement and business outcomes: a meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(2), 268-279.
- Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692-724.
- Perrin, T. (2003). Working today: Understanding what drives employee engagement. Towers Perrin, Stamford, CT. Robinson, J. (2006). A caterpillar dealer unearths employee engagement. Retrieved from http://gmj.gallup.com (accessed on September 20, 2010).
- Rothbard, N. (1999). Enriching or Depleting: The Dynamics of Engagement in Work and Family. Dissertation Abstracts International US: University Microfilm International.
- Truss, C., Soane, E., Edwards, C., Wisdom, K., Croll, A., & Burtnett, J. (2006). Working Life: Employee Attitude and Engagement. Charted Institute of Personnel and Development.
- Boxall, P., & Macky, K. (2009). research and theory on high-performance work systems, progressing the high-involvement stream. Human Resource Management Journal, 19(1), 3-23.
- Collins, C. J., & Smith, K. G. (2006). Knowledge exchange and combination, the role of human resource practice in the performance of high technology firms. Academy of Management Journal, 49(3), 544-560.
- Combs, J. G., Ketchen, D. J., Jr., Hall, A. T., & Liu, Y. (2006). Do high performance work practices matter? A Meta analysis of their effects on organizational performance. Personnel Psychology, 59(3), 501-528.
- Datta, D. K., Guthrie, J. P., & Wright, P. M. (2005). Human resource management and labor productivity, does industry matter? Academy of Management Journal, 48(1), 135-145.
- Delaney, J. T., & Godard, J. (2001). An industrial relations perspective on the high performance paradigm. Human Resource Management Review, 11(4), 395-429.
- Godard, J. (1999). Do implementation processes and rationales matter? The case of workplace reforms. Journal of Management Studies, 36(5), 679-704.
- Godard, J. (2004). Critical assessment of high performance paradigm. British Journal of Industrial Relation, 42(2), 349-378.
- Nishii, L., & Wright, P. (2008). Variability within organizations: Implications for strategic human resource management. In: The people make the place: Dynamic linkages between individuals and organization. (pp. 225-248). D.B. Smith (Ed.). New York: Taylor and Francis Group.
- Nishii, L., Lepak, D. P., & Schneider, B. (2009). Employee attributions of the 'why' of HR practices: Their effects on employee attitudes and behaviors, and customer satisfaction. Personnel Psychology, 61(3), 503-545.
- Pfeffer, J. (2005). Producing sustainable competitive advantage through the effective management of people. Academy of Management Executive, 19(4), 95-106.
- Yadav, S. K., & Yadav, D. (2013). Exploring HPWPs in Indian organizations. Maharaja Agarshen Journal of Management, 12(2), 112-110.
![](https://i-scholar.in/public/site/images/abstractview.png)
Abstract Views: 308
![](https://i-scholar.in/public/site/images/pdfview.png)
PDF Views: 0