OPUS: HR Journal

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Emerging Trends in Employee Engagement:A Review of Literature


Affiliations
1 National Institute of Technology Karnataka, Surathkal, Karnataka, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


One of the strategic areas identified in Global Human Capital trend study 2014 by Deloitte is "attract and engage". The topic deserves attention because 78% of the managers who participated in the study rated retention and engagement as urgent or important. Employee engagement is the extent to which employees feel passionate about their jobs, are committed to their organizations, and put discretionary effort into their work. Engaging people has become a source of competitive advantage for the organizations. Though there are hundreds of vendors offering validated surveys and benchmarking tools, managers feel these as insufficient majorly because the current process is neither detailed enough nor realtime. Moreover with Generation Y at work, who looks at experience rather than engagement, employee engagement garners furthermore attention. In this context the concept of engagement needs redefining. The purpose of this conceptual study is to present an overall view of the new engagement models aimed at creating "irresistible organizations". Seminal works on the topic are identified and reviewed for a better understanding of the developments in the field. Emerging as well as consistent predictors of employee engagement in Indian context are discussed in detail. Also, the article explores the upcoming tools and approaches which better measures happiness, alignment, and job satisfaction in real time. While companies in India have started recognizing the impact of employee engagement, a large proportion is yet to understand the extent of the real challenge. The roadblocks and implications for Indian organizations bring this article to a close.

Keywords

Employee Engagement, Modern Workforce, Emerging Trends, Changing Work Place.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Anderson, D., & Kelliher, C. (2009). Flexible working and engagement: The importance of choice. Strategic HR Review, 8(2), 13-18.

  • Agarwala, T. (2003). Innovative Human Resources Practices and Organisational Commitment: An Empirical Investigation. International Journal of Human ResourceManagement, 14(2), 175–97.

  • Aon Hewitt. (2014). 2014 trends in global employee engagement. Retreieved from www. Aonhewitt.com

  • Bakker, A. B., Albrecht, S. L., & Leiter, M. P. (2011). Key questions regarding work engagement. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 20, 4–28.

  • Bates, S. (2004, February). Getting Engaged. HR Magazine, 49(2), 44-51.

  • Baumruk, R. (2004). The missing link: the role of employee engagement in business success. Workspan, 47, 48-52.

  • Best companies to work for 2014: List from 11 to 100. (2014, June 30). The Economic Times

  • Biswas, S., & Bhattacharyya, R. (2014, March 25). Companies like Mindtree, Marico, PepsiCo eager to help employees strike a better work-life balance. The Economic Times.

  • Blessing White. (2013). Employee engagement research update. Retrieved from www.blessingwhite.com

  • Blessing White & HR Anexi. (2008). The employee engagement equation in India.

  • Boone, J. B. (2012). Improving employee engagement: Making the case for planned organizational change using the Burke-Litwin model of organizational performance and change. Information Management and Business Review, 4(7), 402-408.

  • Brown, D. (2008, June 3). Pay and engagement: A totally rewarding relationship. Personnel Today, 6(3), 18.

  • Chaturvedi, V. (2010). India’s Strange Predicament. Gallup Business Journal. Retrieved from http://www.gallup.com/businessjournal/ 145202/india-strange-predicament.aspx

  • Chermack, T., & Passmore, D. (2005). Using research journals and data bases. In R. Swanson & E. Holton (Eds.). Research in organizations: Foundations and methods of inquiry. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.

  • Cole, M. S., Walter, F., Bedeian, A. G., & O‟Boyle, E. H. (2012). Job burnout and employee engagement: A meta-analytic examination of construct proliferation. Journal of Management, 38, 1550–1581.

  • Deloitte Consulting. (2014). Global human capital trends. Engaging the 21st century workforce. Deloitte University Press. Retrieved from www.deloitte.com

  • Densten, I. L. (2005). The relationship between visioning behaviours of leaders and follower burnout. British Journal of Management, 16(2), 105-118.

  • Gallup. (2013). The state of global workforce.

  • HayGroup. (2012). The loyalty deficit. The employees are restless again. Retrieved from www.haygroup.com

  • Harter, J. K., Schmidt, F. L., & Hayes, T. L. (2002). Business-unit level relationship between employee satisfaction, employee engagement, and business outcomes: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 268-79.

  • Kahn, W. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33, 692-724.

  • KellyOCG. (2013). Kelly global workforce index. Retrieved from www. kellyocg.com

  • Lockwood, N. R. (2007, March). Leveraging employee engagement for competitive advantage: HR‟s strategic role. HR Magazine, 52(3), 1-11.

  • Macey, W., & Schneider, B. (2008). The meaning of employee engagement. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1, 3-30.

  • Maslach, C., Schaufeli, W. B., & Leiter, M. P. (2001). Job burnout. Annual Review ofPsychology, 52, 397-422.

  • May, D. R., Gilson, R. L., & Harter, L. M. (2004). The psychological conditions of meaningfulness, safety, and availability and the engagement of the human spirit at work. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 77, 11-37.

  • Mohapatra, M., &. Sharma, B. R. (2008). Drivers of organisational commitment among managers of industrial organisations: A case study. Global Business Review, 9(1), 51–63.

  • Mohapatra, M., & Sharma, B. R. (2010). Study of employee engagement and its predictors in an indian public sector undertaking. Global Business Review, 11(2), 281-301.

  • Quirk, A. (2012, April). The business case for flex. HR Magazine, 57(4), 44-46.

  • Rice, C. (2008, November). Low engagement? Leadership Excellence, 25(11), 10.

  • Rich, B. L., LePine, J. A., & Crawford, E. R. (2010). Job engagement: Antecedents and effects of job performance. Academy of Management Journal, 53, 617–635.

  • Richman, A. (2006). Everyone wants an engaged workforce how can you create it?.Workspan, 49, 36-39.

  • Robinson, D., Perryman, S., & Hayday, S. (2004). The drivers of employee engagement. Institute for Employment Studies, Brighton.

  • Rothbard, N. P. (2001). Enriching or depleting? The dynamics of engagement in work and family Roles. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46, 655-84.

  • Saks, A. M. (2006). Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21, 600-619.

  • Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., González-Roma, V., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, 71-92.

  • Shuck, B., & Wollard,K. (2010). Employee engagement and HRD: A seminal review of the foundations. Human Resource Development Review, 9(1), 89-110

  • Soane, E., Truss, C., Alfes, K., Shantz, A., Rees, C., & Gatenby, M. (2012). Development and application of a new measure of employee engagement: The ISA Engagement Scale. Human Resource Development International, 15, 529–547.

  • Stumpf, S. A., Tymon, W. G., Jr., & van Dam, N. H. M. (2013). Felt and behavioral engagement in workgroups of professionals. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 83, 255–264.

  • Torraco, J. (2005). Writing integrative literature reviews: Guidelines and examples. Human Resource Development Review, 4.

  • Towers Watson. (2012). Global workforce study. Engagement at risk: Driving strong performance in a volatile global environment.

  • Xanthopoulou, D., Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2009a). Reciprocal relationships between job resources, personal resources, and work engagement. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 74, 235–244.


Abstract Views: 567

PDF Views: 0




  • Emerging Trends in Employee Engagement:A Review of Literature

Abstract Views: 567  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Manju Mahipalan
National Institute of Technology Karnataka, Surathkal, Karnataka, India
Sheena
National Institute of Technology Karnataka, Surathkal, Karnataka, India

Abstract


One of the strategic areas identified in Global Human Capital trend study 2014 by Deloitte is "attract and engage". The topic deserves attention because 78% of the managers who participated in the study rated retention and engagement as urgent or important. Employee engagement is the extent to which employees feel passionate about their jobs, are committed to their organizations, and put discretionary effort into their work. Engaging people has become a source of competitive advantage for the organizations. Though there are hundreds of vendors offering validated surveys and benchmarking tools, managers feel these as insufficient majorly because the current process is neither detailed enough nor realtime. Moreover with Generation Y at work, who looks at experience rather than engagement, employee engagement garners furthermore attention. In this context the concept of engagement needs redefining. The purpose of this conceptual study is to present an overall view of the new engagement models aimed at creating "irresistible organizations". Seminal works on the topic are identified and reviewed for a better understanding of the developments in the field. Emerging as well as consistent predictors of employee engagement in Indian context are discussed in detail. Also, the article explores the upcoming tools and approaches which better measures happiness, alignment, and job satisfaction in real time. While companies in India have started recognizing the impact of employee engagement, a large proportion is yet to understand the extent of the real challenge. The roadblocks and implications for Indian organizations bring this article to a close.

Keywords


Employee Engagement, Modern Workforce, Emerging Trends, Changing Work Place.

References