Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

What Causes Product Returns in Online Purchases? A Review and Research Agenda


Affiliations
1 Associate Professor, School of Management, KIIT Deemed to be University, Patia, Bhubaneswar - 751 024, Odisha, India
2 Assistant Professor, Marketing, School of Management, KIIT Deemed to be University, Patia, Bhubaneswar - 751 024, Odisha, India
3 Ph.D. Scholar, KSOM, School of Management, KIIT Deemed to be University, Patia, Bhubaneswar - 751 024, Odisha, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The growth in e-commerce is an opportunity, but the resulting product return is a challenge. The complex and multidimensional nature of product return influences the manufacturer, product, retailer, channel, return policy, logistics service provider, customers, or any combination thereof. Compared to other economies, the level of product return is high in an emerging economy like India, which prompted this structured literature review. The literature pointed to the product return as a ‘moment of truth’ involving emerging practices like buy online return in store (BORIS), wardrobing, renting, bracketing, home-try programs, subscription than buy, and sending of curated choices to customers, which drastically change purchases as well as returns. The return policy, dynamic pricing, website design and usability, product category, and inventory visibility influence product returns. Fraudulent returns are of concern compared to legitimate returns. Customer attitude, informationseeking behavior, post-purchase dissonance, individual and group decisions, and different temporal variables make customers sensitive to return. Additionally, the product utility, competitive and comparative value, perceived fairness, and customer empowerment also influence returns. Switching physical processes to online creates an additional challenge. A comprehensive understanding of product return in online purchase situations is expected to create value for customers and agents in the value chain. Effective information sharing across the value chain and within an organization can adjust the inevitable product returns to an optimal level and ensure multi-channel interoperability.

Keywords

Product Return, Online Purchase, Customer Attitude, Supply Chain.

JEL Classification : M310, L810, L910.

Paper Submission Date : May 20, 2021 ; Paper Sent Back for Revision : March 5, 2022 ; Paper Acceptance Date : March 15, 2022; Paper Published Online : April 15, 2022./p>

User
Subscription Login to verify subscription
Notifications
Font Size

  • Abbey, J., Ketzenberg, M., & Metters, R. (2018). A more profitable approach to product returns. MIT Sloan Management Review, 60(1), 1–6. https://mitsmr.com/2v09gtB

  • Altug, M. S., & Aydinliyim, T. (2016). Counteracting strategic purchase deferrals: The impact of online retailers' return policy decisions. Manufacturing and Service Operations Management, 18(3), 376–392. https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2015.0570

  • Appriss Retail. (2018). Consumer returns in the retail industry. https://appriss.com/retail/wp-content/uploads/sites/4/2018/12/AR3018_2018-Customer-Returns-in-the-Retail-Industry_Digital.pdf

  • Banerjee, N., Dutta, A., & Dasgupta, T. (2010). A study on customers' attitude towards online shopping - An Indian perspective. Indian Journal of Marketing, 40(11), 36–42. http://indianjournalofmarketing.com/index.php/ijom/article/view/37374

  • Bansal, V. (2018, January 17). Product returns: Fashion e-comm firms like Flipkart, Myntra uncover fake product returns. ETtech. https://tech.economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/internet/fashion-e-comm-firms-like-flipkart-myntra-uncover-fake-product-returns/62533671

  • Barker, T. J., & Zabinsky, Z. B. (2008). Reverse logistics network design: A conceptual framework for decision making. International Journal of Sustainable Engineering, 1(4), 250–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/19397030802591196

  • Batarfi, R., Jaber, M. Y., & Aljazzar, S. M. (2017). A profit maximization for a reverse logistics dual-channel supply chain with a return policy. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 106, 58–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CIE.2017.01.024

  • Buhler, B. (2018). Returns: The value conundrum. https://www.accenture.com/_acnmedia/pdf-95/accenture-postal-vision-2020-returns-slideshare.pdf

  • Cook, S. C., & Yurchisin, J. (2017). Fast fashion environments: Consumer's heaven or retailer's nightmare? International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management, 45(2), 143–157. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJRDM-03-2016-0027

  • Cui, H., Rajagopalan, S., & Ward, A. R. (2020a). Predicting product return volume using machine learning methods. European Journal of Operational Research, 281(3), 612–627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2019.05.046

  • Cui, H., Rajagopalan, S., & Ward, A. R. (2020b). Impact of task-level worker specialization, workload, and product personalization on consumer returns. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 23(2), 346–366. https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2019.0836

  • Dailey, L. C., & Ülkü, M. A. (2018). Retailers beware: On denied product returns and consumer behavior. Journal of Business Research, 86, 202–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.01.064

  • Dzyabura, D., El Kihal, S., Hauser, J. R., & Ibragimov, M. (2019). Leveraging the power of images in managing product return rates. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3209307

  • Foscht, T., Ernstreiter, K., Maloles, C., Sinha, I., & Swoboda, B. (2013). Retaining or returning? : Some insights for a better understanding of return behaviour. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 41(2), 113–134. https://doi.org/10.1108/09590551311304310

  • Ganguly, P. (2016, November 22). E-commerce players in India bring down product returns this festive season. ETtech. https://tech.economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/internet/e-commerce-players-in-india-bring-down-product-returns-this-festive-season/55553507

  • Gelbrich, K., Gäthke, J., & Hübner, A. (2017). Rewarding customers who keep a product: How reinforcement affects customers' product return decision in online retailing. Psychology & Marketing, 34(9), 853–867. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21027

  • Griffis, S. E., Rao, S., Goldsby, T. J., & Niranjan, T. T. (2012). The customer consequences of returns in online retailing: An empirical analysis. Journal of Operations Management, 30(4), 282–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2012.02.002

  • Han, Y., Chandukala, S. R., & Che, H. (2017). Exchange and refund of complementary products. Marketing Letters, 28(1), 113–125. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-015-9393-7

  • Harris, L. C. (2008). Fraudulent return proclivity: An empirical analysis. Journal of Retailing, 84(4), 461–476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2008.09.003

  • Hellemann, N. J., & Brettel, M. (2016). The impact of website stimuli on product returns in online retailing: A structured abstract. In, K. Kim (eds), Celebrating America's pastimes: Baseball, hot dogs, apple pie and marketing? Developments in Marketing Science: Proceedings of the Academy of Marketing Science. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26647-3_10

  • Jack, L., Frei, R., & Krzyzaniak, S.- A. (2019). The challenges and opportunities of product returns in a multichannel environment. https://institutducommerce.org/medias/publications/Final Report on Online Returns.pdf

  • Jain, K., Gautam, S., & Pasricha, D. (2018). The pleasure and the guilt - Impulse purchase and post purchase regret: A study of young Indian consumers. Indian Journal of Marketing, 48(3), 49–63. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2018/v48/i3/121984

  • Jaiswal, A. K., Niraj, R., Park, C. H., & Agarwal, M. K. (2018). The effect of relationship and transactional characteristics on customer retention in emerging online markets. Journal of Business Research, 92, 25–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.07.007

  • Kar, S. S., & Sahoo, S. K. (2009). Organised retailing in India: Issues and challenges. Indian Journal of Marketing, 39(11), 10–14. http://52.172.159.94/index.php/ijom/article/view/37102

  • Khare, A., Khare, A., Mukherjee, S., & Goyal, T. (2016). Do consumer shopping styles influence consumer attitudes toward services offered by shopping websites? Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 28(1), 28–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/08961530.2015.1072075

  • Kincade, D. H., Giddings, V. L., & Chen-Yu, H. J. (1998). Impact of product-specific variables on consumers' post-consumption behaviour for apparel products: USA. Journal of Consumer Studies & Home Economics, 22(2), 81–90. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-6431.1998.tb00718.x

  • Koufaris, M., Kambil, A., & Labarbera, P. A. (2001). Consumer behavior in web-based commerce: An empirical study. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 6(2), 115–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/10864415.2001.11044233

  • Kumar, A., & Anjaly, B. (2017). How to measure post-purchase customer experience in online retailing? A scale development study. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 45(12), 1277–1297. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJRDM-01-2017-0002

  • Kumar, N., & Gupta, U. (2017). Factors influencing online purchase behaviour of customers in tier III cities of India - A factor analysis approach. International Journal of Marketing and Business Communication, 6(1), 29–36. http://www.publishingindia.com

  • Kumar, P., & Kanchan. (2019). Purchasing criteria for apparels among Indian consumers. Indian Journal of Marketing, 49(1), 48–60. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2019/v49/i1/140606

  • Kumar, S. (2019). Consumer preference towards private label brands with reference to retail apparel in India. Indian Journal of Marketing, 49(7), 49–66. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2019/v49/i7/145404

  • Kurup, A. J., & Jain, P. (2018). Effect of e-loyalty cues on repurchase behavioural intentions among online shoppers. Indian Journal of Marketing, 48(11), 7–22. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2018/v48/i11/137982

  • Lee, S., & Yi, Y. (2017). “Seize the Deal, or Return It Losing Your Free Gift”: The effect of a gift-with-purchase promotion on product return intention. Psychology & Marketing, 34(3), 249–263. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20986

  • Lepthien, A., & Clement, M. (2019). Shipping fee schedules and return behavior. Marketing Letters, 30(2), 151–165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-019-09486-8

  • Li, Y., Xu, L., & Li, D. (2013). Examining relationships between the return policy, product quality, and pricing strategy in online direct selling. International Journal of Production Economics, 144(2), 451–460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.03.013

  • Lohse, T., Kemper, J., & Brettel, M. (2017). How online customer reviews affect sales and return behavior–An empirical analysis in fashion e-commerce. Conference on Information Systems (ECIS), Guimarães, Portugal, June 5–10, 2017, 2635–2644. https://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2017_rip/16

  • Martin, M. J. (2016). Customers' determination of service quality and satisfaction in a return/repair process: A quantitative study. International Academy of Marketing Studies Journal, 20(1), 36.

  • Misra, S., & Arivazhagan, D. (2017). Application of design thinking techniques in marketing of fashion apparel e-commerce. Indian Journal of Marketing, 47(8), 18–30. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2017/v47/i8/117430

  • Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. Annals of Internal Medicine, 151(4), 264. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135

  • Narvar. (2018). The state of returns: What today's shoppers expect. Narvar Consumer Report 2018. https://see.narvar.com/rs/249-TEC-877/images/Consumer-Report-Returns-2018-4.3.pdf

  • Pei, Z., & Paswan, A. (2018). Consumers' legitimate and opportunistic product return behaviors in online shopping. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 19(4), 301–319.

  • Petersen, J. A., & Kumar, V. (2015). Perceived risk, product returns, and optimal resource allocation: Evidence from a field experiment. Journal of Marketing Research, 52(2), 268–285. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmr.14.0174

  • Pham, T. S., & Ahammad, M. F. (2017). Antecedents and consequences of online customer satisfaction: A holistic process perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 124, 332–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.04.003

  • Powers, T. L., & Lord, J. C. (2018). An examination of retail product return behavior based on category of good: An abstract (pp. 101–101). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68750-6_29

  • Radhi, M., & Zhang, G. (2018). Pricing policies for a dual-channel retailer with cross-channel returns. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 119, 63–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2018.03.020

  • Rajan, C. R., Swaminathan, T. N., & Pavithra, M. R. (2017). Key drivers of purchase intent by Indian consumers in omni-channel shopping. Indian Journal of Marketing, 47(5), 7–20. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2017/v47/i5/114233

  • Rao, S., Rabinovich, E., & Raju, D. (2014). The role of physical distribution services as determinants of product returns in Internet retailing. Journal of Operations Management, 32(6), 295–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2014.06.005

  • Rosenbaum, M. S., & Kuntze, R. (2003). The relationship between anomie and unethical retail disposition. Psychology and Marketing, 20(12), 1067–1093. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.10109

  • Saarijärvi, H., Sutinen, U.-M., & Harris, L. C. (2017). Uncovering consumers' returning behaviour: A study of fashion e-commerce. The International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research, 27(3), 284–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593969.2017.1314863

  • Sahoo, N., Dellarocas, C., & Srinivasan, S. (2018). The impact of online product reviews on product returns. Information Systems Research, 29(3), 723–738. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2017.0736

  • Salema, M. I., Barbosa-Povoa, A. P., & Novais, A. Q. (2010). Simultaneous design and planning of supply chains with reverse flows: A generic modelling framework. European Journal of Operational Research, 203(2), 336–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EJOR.2009.08.002

  • Samorani, M., Alptekinoglu, A., & Messinger, P. R. (2019). Product return episodes in retailing. Service Science, 11(4), 263–278. https://doi.org/10.1287/SERV.2019.0250

  • Seo, J. Y., Yoon, S., & Vangelova, M. (2016). Shopping plans, buying motivations, and return policies : Impacts on product returns and purchase likelihoods. Marketing Letters, 27(4), 645–659. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-015-9381-y

  • Variyar, M. (2018, December 05). Amazon gets more product returns in India than any other markets. ETtech. https://tech.economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/internet/amazon-gets-more-product-returns-in-india-than-any-other-markets/66946547

  • Xu, L., Li, Y., Govindan, K., & Xu, X. (2015). Consumer returns policies with endogenous deadline and supply chain coordination. European Journal of Operational Research, 242(1), 88–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2014.09.049

  • Xu, X., & Jackson, J. E. (2019). Investigating the influential factors of return channel loyalty in omni-channel retailing. International Journal of Production Economics, 216, 118–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.03.011

  • Yan, R., & Cao, Z. (2017). Product returns, asymmetric information, and firm performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 185, 211–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.01.001

  • Zhou, W., & Hinz, O. (2016). Determining profit-optimizing return policies–A two-step approach on data from taobao.com. Electronic Markets, 26(2), 103–114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-015-0198-6

  • Zhou, W., Hinz, O., & Benlian, A. (2018). The impact of the package opening process on product returns. Business Research, 11(2), 279–308. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40685-017-0055-x


Abstract Views: 338

PDF Views: 0




  • What Causes Product Returns in Online Purchases? A Review and Research Agenda

Abstract Views: 338  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Brajaballav Kar
Associate Professor, School of Management, KIIT Deemed to be University, Patia, Bhubaneswar - 751 024, Odisha, India
Arvind Tripathy
Assistant Professor, Marketing, School of Management, KIIT Deemed to be University, Patia, Bhubaneswar - 751 024, Odisha, India
Mallika Devi Pathak
Ph.D. Scholar, KSOM, School of Management, KIIT Deemed to be University, Patia, Bhubaneswar - 751 024, Odisha, India

Abstract


The growth in e-commerce is an opportunity, but the resulting product return is a challenge. The complex and multidimensional nature of product return influences the manufacturer, product, retailer, channel, return policy, logistics service provider, customers, or any combination thereof. Compared to other economies, the level of product return is high in an emerging economy like India, which prompted this structured literature review. The literature pointed to the product return as a ‘moment of truth’ involving emerging practices like buy online return in store (BORIS), wardrobing, renting, bracketing, home-try programs, subscription than buy, and sending of curated choices to customers, which drastically change purchases as well as returns. The return policy, dynamic pricing, website design and usability, product category, and inventory visibility influence product returns. Fraudulent returns are of concern compared to legitimate returns. Customer attitude, informationseeking behavior, post-purchase dissonance, individual and group decisions, and different temporal variables make customers sensitive to return. Additionally, the product utility, competitive and comparative value, perceived fairness, and customer empowerment also influence returns. Switching physical processes to online creates an additional challenge. A comprehensive understanding of product return in online purchase situations is expected to create value for customers and agents in the value chain. Effective information sharing across the value chain and within an organization can adjust the inevitable product returns to an optimal level and ensure multi-channel interoperability.

Keywords


Product Return, Online Purchase, Customer Attitude, Supply Chain.

JEL Classification : M310, L810, L910.

Paper Submission Date : May 20, 2021 ; Paper Sent Back for Revision : March 5, 2022 ; Paper Acceptance Date : March 15, 2022; Paper Published Online : April 15, 2022./p>


References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom%2F2022%2Fv15i4%2F162837