Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

The Study of Upper Body Angle of Fire-Fighters Carrying a Patient on a Stretcher with Helmets


Affiliations
1 Dept. Emergency Medical Technology, Kangwon National University, Joongang-roSamcheok-siGangwon-do, 25913, Korea, Democratic People's Republic of
2 Republic of Korea Air Force Academy, Sangdang-gu Namil-myeon 335-1 Cheongju, Chungbuk, 28187, Korea, Democratic People's Republic of
3 Korea Fire Institute 331 Jisamro, Giheung-gu, Yongin-si, Gyeonggi-do, 17088, Korea, Democratic People's Republic of
4 Dept. of Management Information System, Korea National University of Transportation, 50 Daehak-ro, Chungju-si, Chungbuk,27469, Korea, Democratic People's Republic of
5 Yangpeong Fire Station, Kyungkang-ro 2047 Yangpeong–eupYangpeong–gun Kyungkido, 12547, Korea, Democratic People's Republic of
6 Dept. Emergency Medical Technology, Korea National University of Transportation, 50 Daehak-ro, Chungju-si, Chungbuk,27469, Korea, Democratic People's Republic of
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Background/Objectives: This study analyzed the upper body angle of firefighters carrying a patient on a stretcher with helmets. The purpose of the study was to reduce musculoskeletal symptoms.

Methods/Statistical analysis: Fire firefighters (N=15) with helmets performed lifting and lowering a stretcher. At this time, we compared the angles of their neck, shoulders, back, and upper body muscles. With the collected data, descriptive statistics were conducted for each part and situation.

Findings: We used an analysis method to verify the difference before and after wearing helmets. Upper body angles were calculated as follows. With a helmet, the shoulder angle at E1 while the worker was lifting down the stretcher was statistically significant (p<.05). The neck angle at E2 and E3 while the worker was lifting the stretcher was statistically significant (p<.005, p<.05). And the back angle at E2 (p<.05) and shoulder angle at E2 (p<.005) showed statistically significant values with helmet, while the worker was lifting the stretcher.

Improvements/Applications: Therefore, our results suggest that developing higher helmets will reduce the stress of neck and back and musculoskeletal fatigue.


Keywords

Firefighter, Musculoskeletal, Body Angle, Helmets, Stress of Neck and Back.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Ministry of Public Safety and Security Agency, Fire Administration and Statistics, 2016

  • Shin D, Hong E, Kim K, Kim K, Moon T, Musculoskeletal Diseases in 119 Rescuers, Journal of Digital Policy and Management,2013, 11(9), pp.209-219

  • National Emergency Management, Fire Administration and Statistics, 2011

  • Kim D, Moon M, Kim K, A Survey of Musculoskeletal Symptoms and Risk Factors for the119 Emergency Medical Services (EMS) Activities, Journal of the Ergonomics Society of Korea, 2010, 29(2), pp.211-216

  • Kim I, Sung J, Occupational Health and Fitness for Work of Firefighters, The Journal of the Korean Medical Association , 2008, 51(12) , pp.1078-1086.

  • Hong SW, Uhm DC, Jun MH, Job Stress and Work-Related Musculoskeletal Symptoms of 119 Emergency Medical Technicians. Korean Journal of Occupational Health Nursing, 2010, 19(2), pp.223-235

  • Ministry of the Interior, Fire Administration and Statistics, 2004.

  • Shin D, Lee I, Dynamic Model during Emergency Medical Technicians Lifting Postures, Korean Society of sport and leisure studies, 2006, 27, pp. 203-214.

  • Ham Y, An Y, A Study on Low Back Pain Prevalence Rate and Related Factors among Emergency Medical Technicians Working at Fire Stations Purpose, Korean Society of Muscle and Joint Health, 2008, 15(2), pp.175-182.

  • Kang S, Kim W, Work-related Musculoskeletal Disorders in Firefighters, Journal of Korean Medicine Association, 2008, 51(12), pp.1111-1117.

  • Lee K, Ji H, A Study of Overexertion of Neck and Arm Muscles when Working on Objects Overhead at Orchards, Proceeding. Journal of Ergonomics Society of Korea,2012, pp.67-76

  • Kim K, Risk exposure and health impact of firefighters, Journal of Korean Industrial Hygiene Association., 2005, 207, pp.9-19.

  • Oh J, Shin E, Chung I, Analysis of Range of Motion of Neck and Muscle Activity According to VDT Working Time, Korean Journal of Sports Science, 2016, 25(3), pp.1531-1539.

  • Park H, Kim T, Effect of Pelvic Tilting and the Back-belt on Electromyographic Activity of Erector Spinae during Lifting, International Journal of Contents, 2009, 9(3), pp. 296-304.

  • Sartorio F, Vercelli S, Ferriero G, D'Angelo F, Migliario M, Franchignoni M, Work-related musculoskeletal diseases in dental professionals, 1. Prevalence and risk factors. GiornaleItaliano Di Medicina Del Lavoro Ed Ergonomia, 2005, 27(2), pp.165-169.

  • Bejia I, Younes M, Jamila H, Khalfallah T, Ben Salem T, Touzi M, Precalence and factors associated to low back pain among hospital staff, Joint Bone Spine, 2005, 72(3), pp.254-259

  • Barbara A, paramedic practice today, Elsevier Science Health Science division. 2011.

  • Macdonald G, Hazards in dental workplace, International Journal of Dental Hygiene, 1987, 61(5), pp. 212-218.

  • Lee K, Ji H, A Study of Overexertion of Neck and Arm Muscles when Working on Objects Overhead at Orchards, Journal of Ergonomics Society of Korea, 2012, pp.67-76.

  • Lee K, Park J, A Study of Loadings of Neck Muscles when Bent Backward, Journal of the Korean Society of Safety, 2012, 27(1), pp.111-116.

  • Weon J, Oh J, Cynn HS, Influence of forward head posture on scapular upward rotators during isometric shoulder flexion, Journal of Body work and Movement Therapies, 2010, 14, pp.367-374.

  • Janda V, Muscles and cervicongenicpain syndromes; In Physical therapy of the cercical and thoracicspine, Ed. R. Grand, New York: Churchill Livingstone,1988, pp.153-166.

  • Kim K, Risk exposure and health impact of firefighters, Journal of Korean Industrial Hygiene Association, 2005, 207, pp.9-19.


Abstract Views: 278

PDF Views: 0




  • The Study of Upper Body Angle of Fire-Fighters Carrying a Patient on a Stretcher with Helmets

Abstract Views: 278  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Byung-Jun Cho
Dept. Emergency Medical Technology, Kangwon National University, Joongang-roSamcheok-siGangwon-do, 25913, Korea, Democratic People's Republic of
Ga-Ram Choi
Republic of Korea Air Force Academy, Sangdang-gu Namil-myeon 335-1 Cheongju, Chungbuk, 28187, Korea, Democratic People's Republic of
Yong-Taek Han
Korea Fire Institute 331 Jisamro, Giheung-gu, Yongin-si, Gyeonggi-do, 17088, Korea, Democratic People's Republic of
Seung-Yong Kim
Dept. of Management Information System, Korea National University of Transportation, 50 Daehak-ro, Chungju-si, Chungbuk,27469, Korea, Democratic People's Republic of
Gyoung-Yong Kim
Yangpeong Fire Station, Kyungkang-ro 2047 Yangpeong–eupYangpeong–gun Kyungkido, 12547, Korea, Democratic People's Republic of
Dong-Min Shin
Dept. Emergency Medical Technology, Korea National University of Transportation, 50 Daehak-ro, Chungju-si, Chungbuk,27469, Korea, Democratic People's Republic of

Abstract


Background/Objectives: This study analyzed the upper body angle of firefighters carrying a patient on a stretcher with helmets. The purpose of the study was to reduce musculoskeletal symptoms.

Methods/Statistical analysis: Fire firefighters (N=15) with helmets performed lifting and lowering a stretcher. At this time, we compared the angles of their neck, shoulders, back, and upper body muscles. With the collected data, descriptive statistics were conducted for each part and situation.

Findings: We used an analysis method to verify the difference before and after wearing helmets. Upper body angles were calculated as follows. With a helmet, the shoulder angle at E1 while the worker was lifting down the stretcher was statistically significant (p<.05). The neck angle at E2 and E3 while the worker was lifting the stretcher was statistically significant (p<.005, p<.05). And the back angle at E2 (p<.05) and shoulder angle at E2 (p<.005) showed statistically significant values with helmet, while the worker was lifting the stretcher.

Improvements/Applications: Therefore, our results suggest that developing higher helmets will reduce the stress of neck and back and musculoskeletal fatigue.


Keywords


Firefighter, Musculoskeletal, Body Angle, Helmets, Stress of Neck and Back.

References