Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Recent Trends in Impedance Cardiography-A Review


Affiliations
1 Department of ECE, School of EEE, SASTRA Deemed to be University, SRC, Kumbakonam, Tamil Nadu, India
2 Departments of EIE, School of EEE, SASTRA Deemed to be University, Thanjavur, Tamil Nadu, India
3 Department of EIE, SASTRA Deemed to be University, Thanjavur, Tamil Nadu, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Heart related diseases are the major cause of death in many developing countries. The hemodynamic status monitoring is essential for Cardiovascular Disease (CVD) patients in Intensive Care Units (ICU). Cardiac Output (CO) measurement indicates the volume of blood pumped by the heart per minute, provides the information about perfusion of oxygen with body’s demand. Using the Impedance Cardiography signal, various valvular heart diseases (VHD) such as mitral & aortic insufficiency, mitral & aortic stenosis and myocardial infarction can be diagnosed. The different techniques for measurement of Cardiac Output (CO) are echocardiography, chest radiography and dilution methods and they are normally used. The Cardiac Output can be measured either by invasive or minimal invasive or non-invasive methods. In this paper an overview literature survey of the non-invasive methods for measuring the cardiac output by the impedance cardiography is compared with invasive method.

Keywords

Cardiac Output, Impedance Cardiography, Non-invasive, Cardiovascular Disease, Valvular Heart Disease.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Michael Gilbert, Cardiac output measurement, Anesthesia and intensive care medicine, 2016; 17(2): 95-101.
  • Yatin Mehta, Dheeraj Arora, Newer methods of cardiac output Monitoring-Review, World journal of cardiology, 2014; 6(9): 1022-1029.
  • Lavdaniti M, Invasive and non-invasive methods for cardiac output Measurement-Review, International Journal of Caring Sciences, 2008; 1(3):112-117.
  • Yannick Peeters, Jelle Bernards, Michael Mekeirele, Britta Hoffmann, Marijke De Raes, Manu L.N.G. Malbrain, Hemodynamic monitoring: To calibrate or not to calibrate? Part 1 – Calibrated techniques, Anaesthesiology Intensive Therapy, 2015; 47(5): 487-500.
  • R.P. Patterson, Fundamentals of Impedance cardiography, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine, 1989; 8(1): 35-38.
  • Louise Jensen, Joan Yakimets and Koon K. Teo, A review of impedance cardiography, Heart and Lung: The journal of critical care, 1995; 24(3): 183-193.
  • M. Snajdarova, S.Borik, I. Cap, Design of Measurement Device for Impedance Cardiography In: Computational problems of electrical engineering (CPEE): proceedings of 18th international conference(IEEE), 2017: 1-4.
  • Abdelakram Hafid, Sara Benouar, Malika Kedir–Talha, Farhad Abtahi, Mokhtar Attari and Fernando, Full Impedance Cardiography measurement device using Raspberry PI3 and System-onChip biomedical Instrumentation Solutions, IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics, 2017.
  • Monica J. E. Parry, Judith McFetridge-Durdle, Ambulatory Impedance Cardiography: A Systematic Review, Nursing Research, 2006; 55(4): 283-291.
  • Cybulski G, Ambulatory Impedance Cardiography: The Systems and their Applications, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2011.
  • Tushar Kanti Bera, Bioelectrical Impedance Methods for Noninvasive Health Monitoring: A Review”, Journal of Medical Engineering, 2014; 2014: 1-28.
  • Wilson Tang W.H, Wilson Tong, Measuring impedance in congestive heart failure:Current options and clinical applications, American Heart Journal, 2009; 157(3):402-411.
  • Albert N.M, Hail M.D, Jianbo Li, Young J.B, George M. and Linda H, Equivalence of the Bioimpedance and thermodilution methods in measuring cardiac output in hospitalized patients with advanced, decompensated chronic heart failure, American Journal of Critical care, 2004; 13(6):469-479.
  • Mark H. Drazner, Brenda Thompson, Paul B. Rosenberg, Patricia A. Kaiser, James D. Boehrer, Brian J. Baldwin, Daniel L. Dries, Clyde W. Yancy, Comparison of Impedance Cardiography with Invasive Hemodynamic Measurements in Patients with Heart Failure Secondary to Ischemic or Non ischemic Cardiomyopathy, The American Journal of Cardiology, 2002; 89(8):993-998.
  • Yung GL, Fedullo PF, Kinninger K, Johnson W, Channick RN, Comparison of impedance cardiography to direct Fick and thermodilution cardiac output determination in pulmonary arterial hypertension, Congestive Heart Failure, 2004; 10(2):7-10.
  • Woo MA, Hamilton M, Stevenson LW, Vredevoe DL, Comparison of thermodilution and transthoracic electrical bioimpedance cardiac outputs, Heart lung, 1991; 20(4):357-362.
  • Romualdo Belardinelli, Nino Ciampani, Carlo Costantini, Alfonso Blandini, Augusto Purcaro, Comparison of impedance cardiography with thermodilution and direct Fick methods for noninvasive measurement of stroke volume and cardiac output during incremental exercise in patients with Ischemic cardiomyopathy, The American journal of cardiology, 1996; 77(15):1293-1301.
  • Gad Cotter, Yaron Moshkovitz, Edo Kaluski, Amram J. Cohen, Hilton Miller, Daniel Goor and Zvi Vered, Accurate, Noninvasive Continuous Monitoring of Cardiac Output by Whole-Body Electrical Bioimpedance, Clinical Investigations in Critical Care, 2004; 39(2):245-251.
  • W. Scott Sageman, Robert H. Riffenburgh and Bruce D. Spiess, Equivalence of Bioimpedance and Thermodilution in Measuring Cardiac Index After Cardiac Surgery, Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, 2002; 16(1):8-14.
  • Doering Lynn, Lum Evelyn, Dracup Kathleen, Friedman Arnold, Predictors of between-method differences in cardiac output measurement using thoracic electrical bioimpedance and thermodilution, Critical Care Medicine, 1995; 23(10), 1667-1673.
  • Vikas Sharma, Ajmer Singh, Bhuvnesh Kansara, Anil Karlekar, Comparison of transthoracic electrical bioimpedance cardiac output measurement with thermodilution method in post coronary artery bypass graft patients, Annals of Cardiac Anesthesia, 2011; 14(2), 104-110.
  • W. Frank Peacock, Richard L. Summers, Jody Vogel, Charles E. Emerman, Impact of Impedance Cardiography on Diagnosis and Therapy of Emergent Dyspnea: The ED-IMPACT Trial, Academic Emergency Medicine, 2006; 13(4): 365-371.
  • Pradip Barde, Ajay Bhatnagar, Rajiv Narang, KK Deepak, Comparison of non-invasive cardiac output measurement using indigenous impedance cardiography with invasive Fick method, International Journal of Biomedical Research, 2012; 3(11): 431-434.
  • Arunodaya R. Gujjar, K. Muralidhar, Sanjay Banakal, Ratan Gupta, Talakad N. Sathyaprabha, and P. S. Jairaj, Non –invasive cardiac output by transthoracic electrical bioimpedance in post cardiac surgery patients: Comparison with thermodilution method, Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, 2008; 22(3): 175-180.
  • Joseph M. Van De Water, Timothy W. Miller, Robert L. Vogel, Bruce E. Mount and Martin L. Dalton, Impedance Cardiography: The Next Vital Sign Technology, American College of Chest Physicians, 2003; 123(6):2028-2033.
  • Bruce D. Spiess, Muhammad A. Patel, Louise O. Soltow and Ian H. Wright, Comparison of Bioimpedance versus Thermodilution Cardiac Output During Cardiac Surgery: Evaluation of a Second-Generation Bioimpedance Device, Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, 2001; 15(5) : 567-573.
  • Liang-Yu Shyu, Chia-Yin Chiang, Chun-Peng Liu, Wei-Chih Hu, Portable Impedance Cardiography System for Real-Time Noninvasive Cardiac Output Measurement, Journal of Medical and Biological Engineering, 2000; 20(4): 57-62.
  • Yazdanian H, Mahnam A, Edrisi M, Esfahani MA, Design and Implementation of a Portable Impedance Cardiography System for Noninvasive Stroke Volume Monitoring, Journal of medical signals and sensors, 2016; 6(1) :47-56.
  • John kellett, Jean Bour, Impedance Cardiography- A rapid and cost –effective screening tool for cardiac disease, European journal of internal medicine, 2018; 19(6) :399- 405.
  • Ridha Ben Salah, Tareq Alhadidi, Sofienne Mansouri, Mounir Naouar, A New method for Cardiac diseases diagnosis, Advances in Bioscience and Biotechnology, 2015; 6(4):311-319.
  • Souhir Chabchoub, Sofienne Mansouri, Ridha Ben Salah, Detection of valvular heart diseases using impedance cardiography ICG, biocybernetics and biomedical engineering, 2017; 38(2): 251-261.

Abstract Views: 184

PDF Views: 0




  • Recent Trends in Impedance Cardiography-A Review

Abstract Views: 184  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

V. G. Rajendran
Department of ECE, School of EEE, SASTRA Deemed to be University, SRC, Kumbakonam, Tamil Nadu, India
S. Jayalalitha
Departments of EIE, School of EEE, SASTRA Deemed to be University, Thanjavur, Tamil Nadu, India
K. Adalarasu
Department of EIE, SASTRA Deemed to be University, Thanjavur, Tamil Nadu, India

Abstract


Heart related diseases are the major cause of death in many developing countries. The hemodynamic status monitoring is essential for Cardiovascular Disease (CVD) patients in Intensive Care Units (ICU). Cardiac Output (CO) measurement indicates the volume of blood pumped by the heart per minute, provides the information about perfusion of oxygen with body’s demand. Using the Impedance Cardiography signal, various valvular heart diseases (VHD) such as mitral & aortic insufficiency, mitral & aortic stenosis and myocardial infarction can be diagnosed. The different techniques for measurement of Cardiac Output (CO) are echocardiography, chest radiography and dilution methods and they are normally used. The Cardiac Output can be measured either by invasive or minimal invasive or non-invasive methods. In this paper an overview literature survey of the non-invasive methods for measuring the cardiac output by the impedance cardiography is compared with invasive method.

Keywords


Cardiac Output, Impedance Cardiography, Non-invasive, Cardiovascular Disease, Valvular Heart Disease.

References