Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Reactions to Acrylic Resin in Orthodontic Patient


Affiliations
1 Saveetha Dental College, Saveetha University, Chennai, India
2 Department of Orthodontics, Saveetha Dental College, Saveetha University, 162, Poonamalle, High Road Chennai 600077 Tamil Nadu, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Aim: To review the allergic reactions of acrylic resin in orthodontic patient. Objective: To determine allergic reaction to self-curing acrylic resin in orthodontic treatment. Background and reason: There are various dental materials that can cause adverse reactions in the patient during their use in the treatment. Acrylic resin becoming one of them as it elicits sensitivity to the wearer due to level of residual monomer, particularly stomatitis venenata, a contact allergy. The allergic reactions is described as type IV which takes place following re-exposing a subject to the allergen. The allergic reaction towards methylmetacrylate can be confirmed by patch testing and histopathologic evaluations. The main cause of allergic reactions is suggested to be due to leaching of residual monomer into the oral environment.

Keywords

Acrylic Resin, Allergy, Orthodontics, Prosthetics, Residual Monomer.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Ivkovik N, Bozovic D, Ristic S, Mirjanic V, Jankovil O. the residual monomer in dental acrylic resin and its adverse effects. Contemp Mater 2013 Jul; 1(4):84-91.
  • Hochman N, Zalkind M. Hypersensitivity to methyl methacrylate: mode of treatment. J Prosthet Dent 1997 Jan;77(1):93-96.
  • Ruiz-Genao DP, Moreno de Vega MJ, Sanchez Perez J, García-Díez A. Labial edema due to an acrylic dental prosthesis. Contact Dermatitis. 2003; 48:273-4.
  • Lunder T, Rogl-Butina M. Chronic urticaria from an acrylic dental prosthesis. Contact Dermatitis. 2000; 43:232-3.
  • Giunta JL, Grauer I, Zablotsky N. Allergic contact stomatitis caused by acrylic resin. J Prosthet Dent. 1979; 42:188-90.
  • Ali A, Bates JF, Reynolds AJ, Walker DM. The burning mouth sensation related to the wearing of acrylic dentures: an investigation. Br Dent J. 1986; 161:444-77
  • Cibirka RM, Nelson SK, Lefebvre CA. Burning mouth syndrome: A review of etiologies. J Prosthet Dent. 1997; 78:93-7. [PubMed].
  • Van Toost T, Van Ulsen J, Van Loon La. Contact allergy to denture materials in the burning mouth syndrome. Contact dermatitis. 1988; 18:97-9. [PubMed].
  • Stafford GD, Brooks SC. The loss of residual monomer from acrylic orthodontic resins. Dent Mater 1985; 1:135-8.
  • Goncalves, T. (n.d.). Allergy to auto-polymerized acrylic resin in an orthodontic patient. Retrieved December 17, 2017, from http://www.academia.edu/21300949/Allergy_to_autopolymerized acrylic resin in_ an orthodontic patient
  • Anusavice, KJ.; Phillips, RW. Phillips’ science of dental materials. 11th ed. St. Louis: Saunders; 2003. Xxx, p. 805
  • Aktuel nordisk odontology. Kobenhavn: Munksgaard; 2008.
  • T. S. Goncalves, M. A. Morganti, L.C. Campos, S. M. Rizzatto, and L. M. Menezes, Allergy to auto polymerized acrylic resin in an orthodontic patient, American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Vol. 129 (2006) 431–435.
  • F. Bettencourt, C. B. Neves, M. S. de Almeida, L. M. Pinheiro, S. Arantes e Oliveir, L. P. Lopes, and F. M. Castr, Biodegradation of acrylic based resins: A review. Dental Materials, Vol. 26 (2010) e171–e180.
  • J. P. Santerre, L. Shajii, and B. W. Leung, Relation of dental composite formulations to their degradation and the release of hydrolyzed polymeric-resin-derived products, Critical Reviews in Oral Biology and Medicine, Vol. 12 (2001) 136–151.
  • A. Faltermeier, M. Rosentritt and D. Müssig, Acrylic removable appliances: Comparative evaluation of different postpolymerization methods, American Journal of Orthodontics and Dento-facial Orthopedics, Vol. 131 (2007) e16–22.
  • T. Kawahara, Y. Nomura, N.Tanaka, W. Teshima, M. Okazaki, and H. Shintani, Leachability of plasticizer and residual monomer from commercial temporary restorative resins, Journal of Dentistry, Vol. 32 (2004) 277–283.
  • J. L Ferracane, Hygroscopic and hydrolytic effects in dental polymer networks. Dental Materials, Vol. 22. (2006) 211–222.
  • Y. Finer, and J. P. Santerre, Salivary esterase activity and its association with the biodegradation of dental composites, Journal of Dental Research, Vol. 83 (2004) 22–26.
  • B. A. Lin, F. Jaffer, M. D. Duff, Y. W. Tang, and J. P. Santerre, Identifying enzyme activities within human saliva which are relevant to dental resin composite biodegradation, Biomaterials, Vol. 26 (2005) 4259–4264.
  • B. Willershausen, A. Callaway, C. P. Ernst, and E. Stender, The influence of oral bacteria on the surfaces of resin-based dental restorative materials: an in vitro study, International Dental Journal, Vol. 49 (1999) 231–239.
  • C. M. Bollen, P. Lambrechts, and M. Quirynen, Comparison of surface roughness of oral hard materials to the threshold surface roughness for bacterial plaque retention: a review of the literature. Dental Materials, Vol. 13 (1997) 258−269.
  • M. Quirynen, M. Marechal, H. J. Busscher, A. H. Weerkamp, P. L. Darius, and D. van Steenberghe, The influence of surface free energy and surface roughness on early plaque formation. An in vivo study in man, Journal of Clinical Periodontology, Vol. 17 (1990) 138−144.
  • N. J. A. Jepson, J. T. McGill, and J. F. McCabe, Influence of dietary simulating solvents on the viscoelasticity of temporary soft lining materials, Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, Vol. 83 (2000) 25–31.
  • D. Koutis, and S. Freeman. Allergic contact stomatitis caused by acrylic monomer in a denture, Australasian Journal of Dermatology, Vol. 42 (2001) 203−206.
  • D. P. Ruiz-Genao, M. J. Moreno de Vega, J. Sanchez-Perez, and A. Garcia-Diez, Labial edema due to an acrylic dental prosthesis, Contact Dermatitis, Vol.48 (2003) 273-274.
  • Schmaltz, G.; Arenholt Bindslev, D. Biocompatibility of dental materials. Berlin: springer; 2009. XVI, p. 379
  • Schmaltz, G.; Arenholt Bindslev, D.; SpringerLink (Online Service). Biocompatibility of dental materials. Berlin: springer; 2009.
  • Fleisch AF, Sheffield PE, Chinn C, Edelstein BL, Landrigan PJ. Bisphenol A and related compounds in dental materials. Paediatrics 2010 Oct;126(4):760-768.
  • Walther UI, Walther SC, Liebl B, Reichl FX, Kehe K, Nilius M, et al. Cytotoxicity of ingredients of various dental materials and related compounds in L2- and A549 cells. J Biomed Mater Res. 2002; 63:643–9. [PubMed]
  • Sokmen S, Oktemer M. Histopathological examinations of rat lungs that exposed to low concentration of methyl methacrylate monomer vapor. J Hacettepe Factors Dent. 1988;12:1–4.
  • Böhling HG, Borchard U, Drouin H. Monomeric methylmethacrylate (MMA) acts on the desheathed myelinated nerve and on the node of Ranvier. Arch Toxicol. 1977; 38:307–14. [PubMed]
  • Antimicrobial defense systems in saliva. van 't Hof W, Veerman EC, Nieuw Amerongen AV, Ligtenberg AJ Monogr Oral Sci. 2014; 24():40-51. [PubMed]
  • Sheridan PJ, Koka S, Ewoldsen NO, Lefebvre CA, Lavin MTInt J Prosthodont. 1997 Jan-Feb; 10(1):73-7.[PubMed]
  • Tansy MF, Martin JS, Benhaim S, Landin WE, Kendall FMJ Pharm Sci. 1977 May; 66(5):613-9. [PubMed]
  • Jorge JH, Giampaolo ET, Vergani CE, Machado AL, Pavarina AC, Carlos IZ. Biocompatibility of denture base acrylic resins evaluated in culture of L292 cells. Effects of polymerization cycle and post polymerization treatments. Gerondotology 2007 Mar;24(1):52-57.
  • Ivkovik N, Bozovic D, Ristic S, Mirjanic V, Jankovik o. The residual monomer in dental acrylic resins and its adverse effects. Contemp Mater 2013 Jul;1(4):84-91.
  • Goon A. Contact allergy to acrylates. Nord Dem Ven 2011;16 (1):25-26.
  • Marino R, Capacio P, Pignataro L, Spadari F. Burning mouth syndrome: the role of contact hypersensitivity. Oral Dis 2009 may;15 (4):255-258.
  • Krejins, J. The low allergen denture. Tandarts Praktijk: 2012.
  • Marino R, Capaccio P, Pignataro L, Spadari F. Burning mouth syndrome: the role of contact hypersensitivity. Oral Dis 2009 May;15(4):255-258.
  • Kreijns, J. The low-allergen denture. Tandarts Praktijk; 2012
  • Sunil A, Mukunda A, Gonsalves MN, Basheer AB, Deepthi. An overview of burning mouth syndrome. Indian J Clin Pract 2012 Aug;23(3):145-152.
  • Goon A. Contact allergy to acrylates. Nord Derm Ven 2011;16(1):25-26.
  • Sokmen S, Oktemer M. Histopathological examinations of rat lungs that exposed to low concentration of methyl methacrylate monomer vapor. J Hacettepe Factors Dent. 1988; 12:1–4.
  • Smith DC, Bains MED. The detection and estimation of residual monomer in polymethyl methacrylate. J Dent Res 1956;35: 16–24.

Abstract Views: 182

PDF Views: 0




  • Reactions to Acrylic Resin in Orthodontic Patient

Abstract Views: 182  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Nurul Husniyah Binti Che Soh
Saveetha Dental College, Saveetha University, Chennai, India
Saravana Pandian
Department of Orthodontics, Saveetha Dental College, Saveetha University, 162, Poonamalle, High Road Chennai 600077 Tamil Nadu, India

Abstract


Aim: To review the allergic reactions of acrylic resin in orthodontic patient. Objective: To determine allergic reaction to self-curing acrylic resin in orthodontic treatment. Background and reason: There are various dental materials that can cause adverse reactions in the patient during their use in the treatment. Acrylic resin becoming one of them as it elicits sensitivity to the wearer due to level of residual monomer, particularly stomatitis venenata, a contact allergy. The allergic reactions is described as type IV which takes place following re-exposing a subject to the allergen. The allergic reaction towards methylmetacrylate can be confirmed by patch testing and histopathologic evaluations. The main cause of allergic reactions is suggested to be due to leaching of residual monomer into the oral environment.

Keywords


Acrylic Resin, Allergy, Orthodontics, Prosthetics, Residual Monomer.

References