Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Automatic Patch Adhesion Testing using Arduino


Affiliations
1 SNS College of Engineering, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India
2 PSG College of Technology, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India
3 Excel Engineering College, Namakkal Dt, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


In order to study and evaluate the suitability method of predicting the long term adhesion properties of patches to human skin is the biggest challenges in the medical sectors. adhesion to the skin is strictly linked to the efficiently and safety of the therapeutic treatment, now-a- days numerous report of in vivo adhesion lacking are still addressed to regulatory agencies. In real time health care system involving human skin an adhesion patch need to be integrated into diagnostic device. In medical field it is efficient to provide a patch adhesive capacity. Our motive is to develop the patch adhesion tester to determine adhesiveness of the patch. When the patch is given to the proposed tester then the measured values of the given patch will be displayed.

Keywords

Patch Adhesive Tester, Bio Medical Instruments, Embedded Medical Instruments.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Malten KE, Nater JP, van Ketel WG (1976) Patch testing guidelines. Dekker and van de Vegt, Nijmegen

  • Fregert S (1981) Manual of contact dermatitis, 2nd edn. Munksgaard, Copenhagen

  • Rajagopolan R, Anderson R (1997) Impact of patch testing on dermatology-specific quality of life in patients with allergic contact dermatitis. Am J Contact Dermat 8:215–221

  • Thomson KF, Wilkinson SM, Sommer S, Pollock B (2002) Eczema: quality of life by body site and the effect of patch testing. Br J Dermatol 146:627–630

  • Woo PN, Hay IC, Ormerod AS (2003) An audit of the value of patch testing and its effect on quality of life. Contact Dermatitis 48:244–247

  • Van der Valk PGM, Devos SA, Coenraads P-J (2003) Evidence-based diagnosis in patch testing. Contact Dermatitis 48:121–125

  • Mowad CM (2006) Patch testing: pitfalls and performance. CurrOpin Allergy ClinImmunol 6:340–344

  • Jadassohn J (1896) Zur Kenntnisder ikamentösen Dermatosen, Verhandlungen der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft. Fünfter Congress, Raz, 1895. Braunmuller, Vienna, p 106

  • Foussereau J (1984) History of epicutaneous testing: the blotting-paper and other methods. Contact Dermatitis 11:219–223

  • Fischer TI, Hansen J, Kreilgård B, Maibach HI (1989) The science of patch test standardization. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am 9:417–443

  • Belsito DV, Storrs FJ, Taylor JS, Marks JG Jr, Adams RM, Rietschel RL, Jordan WP, Emmett EA (1992) Reproducibility of patch tests: a United States multi-centre study. Am J Contact Dermat 3:193–200

  • Breit R, Agathos M (1992) Qualitätskontrolle der Epikutantestung – Reproduzierbarkeitim Rechts-Links-Vergleich. Hautarzt 43:417–421

  • Bousema MT, Geursen AM, van Joost T (1991) High reproducibility of patch tests. J Am Acad Dermatol 24:322–323

  • Lachapelle JM, Antoine JL (1989) Problems raised by the simultaneous reproducibility of positive allergic patch test reactions in man. J Am Acad Dermatol 21:850–854

  • Machácková J, Seda O (1991) Reproducibility of patch tests. J Am Acad Dermatol 25:732–733

  • Lindelöf B (1990) A left versus right side comparative study of Finn Chamber™ patch tests in 220 consecutive patients. Contact Dermatitis 22:288–289

  • Stransky L, Krasteva M (1992) A left versus right side comparative study of Finn Chamber patch tests in consecutive patients with contact sensitization. Dermatosen 40:158–159

  • Brasch J, Henseler T, Aberer W, Bäuerle G, Frosch PJ, Fuchs T, Fünfstück V, Kaiser G, Lischka GG, Pilz B, Sauer C, Schaller J, Scheuer B, Szliska C (1994) Reproducibility of patch tests. A multicenter study of synchronous left-versus right-sided patch tests by the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group. J Am Acad Dermatol 31:584–591

  • Gollhausen R, Przybilla B, Ring J (1989) Reproducibility of patch test results: comparison of True test and Finn Chamber test. In: Frosch PJ, Dooms-Goossens A, Lachapelle JM, Rycroft RJ, Scheper RJ (eds) Current topics in contact dermatitis. Springer, Berlin, pp 524–529

  • Lachapelle J-M, Bruynzeel DP, Ducombs G, Hannuksela M, Ring J, White IR, Wilkinson J, Fischer T, Billberg K (1988) European multicenter study of the True test™. Contact Dermatitis 19:91–97

  • Ruhnek-Forsbeck M, Fischer T, ing B, Pettersson L, Stenberg B, Strand A, Sundberg K, Svensson L, Wahlberg JE, Widström L, Wrangsjö K, Billberg K (1988) Comparative multi-center study with True test™ and Finn Chamber® patch test methods in eight Swedish hospitals. ActaDermVenereol (Stockh) 68:123–128

  • Stenberg B, Billberg K, Fischer T, Nordin L, Pettersson L, Ruhnek-Forsbeck M, Sundberg K, Swanbeck G, Svensson L, Wahlberg JE, Widström L, Wrangsjö K (1989) Swedish multicenter study with True test, panel 2. In: Frosch PJ, Dooms-Goossens A, Lachapelle JM, Rycroft RJ, Scheper RJ (eds) Current topics in contact dermatitis. Springer, Berlin, pp 518–523

  • Wilkinson JD, Bruynzeel DP, Ducombs G, Frosch PJ, Gunnarsson Y, Hannuksela M, Ring J, Shaw S, White IR (1990) European multicenter study of TRUE test, panel 2. Contact Dermatitis 22:218–225

  • Rajashri R. Kulkarni, Dipti G. Phadtare. The Microneedle Patches: An Innovative Approach. Asian J. Pharm. Tech. 2015; Vol. 5(4): 195-200.

  • Schiessl C, Wolber C, Strohal R (2004) Reproducibility of patch tests: comparison of identical test allergens from different commercial sources. Contact Dermatitis 50:27–30

  • Kintu Patel, SankalpPatel,Samir K. Shah. Daily dose, in a Dot. Asian J. Pharm. Res. 2017; 7(4): 225-229.

  • Katta Manogna, T.N. Shilpa, . Development of Medicated Topical Patches in Transdermal drug delivery system. Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 2018; 11(1): 397-404.

  • Brasch J, Szliska C, Grabbe J (1997) More positive patch test reactions with larger test chambers? Contact Dermatitis 37:118–120

  • Gefeller O, Phahlberg A, Geier J, Brasch J, Uter W (1999) The association between size of test chamber and patch test reaction: a statistical reanalysis. Contact Dermatitis 40:14–18

  • Arijit Das, Sibaji Ghosh, Sudip Das, Biplab Kr. Dey, Tarun Kanti Ghosh. Formulation and In Vitro Evaluation of Transdermal Patches of Metformin Hydrochloride Using Hydrophilic and Hydrophobic Polymer Complex. Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 4(4): April 2011; Page 561-565.

  • Dooms-Goossens A, Degree H (1983) Contact allergy to petrolatums I. Sensitizing capacity of different brands of yellow and white petrolatums. Contact Dermatitis 9:175–185

  • Dey BK, Kar PK, Nath LK. Formulation Design, Preparation and In vitro – In vivo Evaluation of Propranolol Hydrochloride Transdermal Patches using Hydrophilic and Hydrophobic Polymer complex. Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 2(1): Jan.-Mar. 2009; Page 155-160

  • Fischer T, Maibach H (1989) Easier patch testing with TRUE test. J Am AcadDermatol 20:447–453

  • Magnusson B, Blohm S-G, Fregert S, Hjorth N, Høvding G, Pirilä V, Skog E (1966) Routine patch testing II. ActaDermVenereol (Stockh) 46:153–158

  • Suresh V Kulkarni, Ranjit Kumar P, Nikunj Patel, Ramesh B, Someshwara Rao B, Ashok Kumar P. Development and Evaluation of Diltiazem Hydrochloride Transdermal Patches by Using Glycerol and Castor Oil as Plasticizers. Research J. Pharm. and Tech.3 (3): July-Sept. 2010; Page 905-909.

  • Benezra C, Andanson J, Chabeau C, Ducombs G, Foussereau J, Lachapelle JM, Lacroix M, Martin P (1978) Concentrations of patch test allergens: are we comparing the same things? Contact Dermatitis 4:103–105

  • Suja C., Ramasamy C., Narayanacharyulu R. Development and Evaluation of Lisinopril Transdermal Patches. Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 4(8): August 2011; Page 1260-1264.

  • Akhil Gupta, Anuj Mittal ,Alok Kumar Gupta. Colon Targeted Drug Delivery Systems – A Review. Asian J. Pharm. Res. 1(2): April-June 2011; Page 25-33.

  • Wahlberg JE (1996) Nickel: the search for alternative, optimal and non-irritant patch test preparations. Assessments based on laser Doppler flowmetry. Skin Res Technol 2: 136–141

  • Asma Afroz, Md. Asaduzzaman, Md. Rezowanur Rahman, S.M. Ashraful Islam. Development and Evaluation of Muco-Adhesive Ciprofloxacin Bi-Layer Tablet for Extended Drug Release. Asian J. Pharm. Res. 1(3): July-Sept. 2011; Page 64-68

  • Design and Evaluation of Terbutaline Sulphate Buccal Patch Wani MS, Dehghan MH, Mahendra Kumar C, Polshettiwar SA, Yadav VB. Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 2(1): Jan.-Mar. 2009; Page 86-90.

  • Daecke C, Schaller S, Schaller J, Goos M (1993) Contact urticaria from acrylic acid in Fixomull tape. Contact Dermatitis 29:216–217.


Abstract Views: 177

PDF Views: 0




  • Automatic Patch Adhesion Testing using Arduino

Abstract Views: 177  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

P. Ramya
SNS College of Engineering, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India
B. Padmapriya
PSG College of Technology, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India
S. Poornachandra
Excel Engineering College, Namakkal Dt, India
M. Arumugaraja
PSG College of Technology, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India

Abstract


In order to study and evaluate the suitability method of predicting the long term adhesion properties of patches to human skin is the biggest challenges in the medical sectors. adhesion to the skin is strictly linked to the efficiently and safety of the therapeutic treatment, now-a- days numerous report of in vivo adhesion lacking are still addressed to regulatory agencies. In real time health care system involving human skin an adhesion patch need to be integrated into diagnostic device. In medical field it is efficient to provide a patch adhesive capacity. Our motive is to develop the patch adhesion tester to determine adhesiveness of the patch. When the patch is given to the proposed tester then the measured values of the given patch will be displayed.

Keywords


Patch Adhesive Tester, Bio Medical Instruments, Embedded Medical Instruments.

References