Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Use of Infection Control Protocol among Dental Setup in Chennai


Affiliations
1 Saveetha Dental College, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, India
2 Department of Public Health Dentistry, Saveetha Dental College, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Transmission of infectious agents from patients to dental health care personnel (DHCP) in dental setting is very rare. However, from 2003 to 2015, transmissions in dental settings, including patient-patient transmissions, have been documented. In most cases, investigators failed to link a specific lapse of infection prevention and control with a transmission. However, infection prevention procedures included unsafe injection practices, failure to heat sterilize dental handpieces between patients, and failure to monitor (e.g., conduct spore testing) autoclaves. These reports highlight the need for comprehensive training to improve understanding of underlying principles, recommended practices, their implementation, and the conditions that must be met for disease transmission. All dental settings, regardless of level of care provided, must make infection prevention a priority and should be equipped to observe Standard Precautions and other infection prevention recommendations contained in CDC’s Guidelines for Infection Control in Dental Health-Care Settings. The information presented here is based primarily upon the recommendations from the 2003 guideline and represents infection prevention expectations for safe care in dental settings. It is intended for use by anyone needing information about basic infection prevention measures in dental health care setting but is not a replacement for the more extensive guidelines.The dental environment is associated with significant exposure to various micro-organisms. Infection control is one of the prime elements for a successful dental practice. There are many infectious diseases that can be transmitted during a dental treatment. New diseases with serious consequences a high rate of transmission have evolved in the past. Infection control is directed at prevention to exposure of such infections and to prevent it being transferred from person to person. The universal law for infection control considers that ‘Every patient should be considered Infectious’. This review article represents various aspects of infection control in dental environment.

Keywords

Medical History, Cross Infection, Risk Assessment, Hand Hygiene, Sterilisation and Disinfection.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Larson EL. APIC Guideline for handwashing and hand antisepsis in health care settings. Am J Infect Control 1995; 23:251-269.

  • Pottinger J, Burns’ S, Manske C. Bacterial carriage by artificial versus natural nails. Am J Infect Control 1989; 17:340-344.

  • Hoffman PN, Cooke EM, McCarville MR, Emmerson AM. Micro-organisms isolated from skin under wedding rings worn by hospital staff. Br Med J 1985; 290:206-207.

  • Jacobson G, Thiele JE, McCune JH, Farell LD. Handwashing: ring-wearing and number of micro-organisms. Nurse Res 1985; 34(3):186-188.

  • Salisbury DM, Hutfilz P, Green LM, Bollin GE. The effect of rings on microbiological load of health care workers hands. Am J Infect Control 1997; 25:24-27.

  • Daha T. Piercings. Tijdschr Hyg en Inf Prev 1999; 2:49.

  • Gezondheidsraad. Commissie Vaccinatie tegen hepatitis B. Bescherming tegen hepatitis B. 1996; 15.

  • Boyce JM, Pittet D. Guideline for hand hygiene in healthcare settings: Recommendations of the healthcare infection control practices advisory committee and the HICPAC/SHEA/APIC/IDSA hand hygiene task force. CDC MMWR 2002; 51:1-45.

  • Larson E. A causal link between handwashing and risk of infection? Examination of the evidence. Inf Control Hosp Epidemy 1988; 9(1):28-36.

  • Daha T. Handen wassen of desinfecteren? Tijdschr Hyg en Inf Prev 1998; 4:127.

  • CBO. Consensus preventie ziekenhuisinfecties. 1989.

  • Kampf G, Kramer A. Epidemiologic Background of Hand Hygiene and Evaluation of the Most Important Agents for Scrubs and Rubs. Clinical Microbiology Reviews 2004; 17(4):863-893.

  • Melse J. De preventieparadox van rubber gloves. Tijdschr Hyg en Inf Prev 1996; 4:123-126.

  • Pitten FA, Herdemann G, Kramer A. The Integrity of Latex Gloves in Clinical Dental Practice. Infection 2000; 28(6):388-392.

  • L.C.I. Landelijkerichtlijn Prikaccidenten. 2007.

  • Gwyther J. Sharps disposal containers and their use. J Hosp Infect 1990; 15:287- 294.

  • De Bruijn ACP, van Drongelen AW, Wassenaar C. De Europese norm voor kleine steam steriliseren. Tijdschr Hyg en Inf Prev 2000; 5:125-130.Infection prevention in dental practice 21

  • R. Varshan, Meignana Arumugham, Ashish R. Jain. Knowledge and practice of infection control among dental students, Saveetha University, Tamil Nadu. Journal of Pharmacy Research 11(12) 2017:1499-1502

  • Santhosh Kumar MP, Saveetha University, Tamil Nadu. Knowledge, attitude and practices regarding infection control. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and clinical research 9:1(2016):220-224

  • Velmurugan Rajan and Mohammad Nabeel Nazar, Saveetha University, Tamil Nadu. Research Journal of Pharmaceutical, biological and chemical sciences. Cross infection control in Dentistry (2014) 5(2):650-657

  • Harrita S, Dhanraj and Preetham Prasad, Saveetha University, Tamil Nadu, International Journal of Advanced Research(2017)


Abstract Views: 182

PDF Views: 0




  • Use of Infection Control Protocol among Dental Setup in Chennai

Abstract Views: 182  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Daniel Silas Samuel
Saveetha Dental College, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, India
S. Pavithra Priyadarshoni
Department of Public Health Dentistry, Saveetha Dental College, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, India

Abstract


Transmission of infectious agents from patients to dental health care personnel (DHCP) in dental setting is very rare. However, from 2003 to 2015, transmissions in dental settings, including patient-patient transmissions, have been documented. In most cases, investigators failed to link a specific lapse of infection prevention and control with a transmission. However, infection prevention procedures included unsafe injection practices, failure to heat sterilize dental handpieces between patients, and failure to monitor (e.g., conduct spore testing) autoclaves. These reports highlight the need for comprehensive training to improve understanding of underlying principles, recommended practices, their implementation, and the conditions that must be met for disease transmission. All dental settings, regardless of level of care provided, must make infection prevention a priority and should be equipped to observe Standard Precautions and other infection prevention recommendations contained in CDC’s Guidelines for Infection Control in Dental Health-Care Settings. The information presented here is based primarily upon the recommendations from the 2003 guideline and represents infection prevention expectations for safe care in dental settings. It is intended for use by anyone needing information about basic infection prevention measures in dental health care setting but is not a replacement for the more extensive guidelines.The dental environment is associated with significant exposure to various micro-organisms. Infection control is one of the prime elements for a successful dental practice. There are many infectious diseases that can be transmitted during a dental treatment. New diseases with serious consequences a high rate of transmission have evolved in the past. Infection control is directed at prevention to exposure of such infections and to prevent it being transferred from person to person. The universal law for infection control considers that ‘Every patient should be considered Infectious’. This review article represents various aspects of infection control in dental environment.

Keywords


Medical History, Cross Infection, Risk Assessment, Hand Hygiene, Sterilisation and Disinfection.

References