South Asian Journal of Management

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Personal Effectiveness and Self-efficacy as Predictors of Individual Role Efficacy:An Analysis Based on PLS Path Modeling


Affiliations
1 Human Resources and Organizational Behavior, Xavier Labor Relations Institute (XLRI), C. H Area (East), Jamshedpur 831001, Jharkhand, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Changing and complex work environments are putting individual employees under tremendous pressure to perform well in their roles. Pareek defines role-efficacy associated with an individual in a role as the individual’s potential effectiveness. Ever since the proposition of role theory by Katz and Kahn, there has been a series of research pertaining to concepts like role ambiguity, role-efficacy, and role conflict. Past research has attempted to study their interrelationships in the context of self-efficacy, however, the effect on role-efficacy by the hitherto not explored personal effectiveness types of Pareek lends to a new focus on how role-efficacy can be enhanced. This study of 187 working professionals establishes that individual role-efficacy is dependent not just on personal effectiveness but also critically on self-efficacy of the individual. Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) used for Partial Least Squares (PLS) path analysis of the research model indicates that personal effectiveness predicts role-efficacy and this relationship is mediated by self-efficacy.

Keywords

Personal Effectiveness, PLS-SEM, Role, Role-Efficacy, Self-Efficacy.
User
Subscription Login to verify subscription
Notifications
Font Size

  • Akuoko, D. K. O., & Baffoe, J. (2012). Performance appraisal and human resource development in Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana. International Journal of Social Science & Interdisciplinary Research, 1(10), 52-69.

  • Andreev, P., Heart, T., Maoz, H., & Pliskin, N. (2009). Validating formative partial least squares (PLS) models: methodological review and empirical illustration. ICIS 2009 Proceedings, 193.

  • Austin, J. T., & Vancouver, J. B. (1996). Goal constructs in psychology: Structure, process, and content. Psychological Bulletin, 120(3), 338-375. doi: 10.1037/00332909.120.3.338

  • Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191

  • Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.

  • Bandura, A. (1991). Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Organizational behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 248-287.

  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efcacy: The exercise of control: W. H. Freeman & Co.

  • Bandura, A., & Schunk, D. H. (1981). Cultivating competence, self-efficacy, and intrinsic interest through proximal self-motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41(3), 586-598.

  • Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182. doi: 10.1093/alcalc/34.2.197

  • Beauchamp, M. R., Bray, S. R., Eys, M. a., & Carron, A. V. (2002). Role ambiguity, role efficacy, and role performance: Multidimensional and mediational relationships within interdependent sport teams. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 6(3), 229-242. doi: 10.1037/1089-2699.6.3.229

  • Becker, J. M., Klein, K., & Wetzels, M. (2012). Hierarchical latent variable models in PLS-SEM: guidelines for using reflective-formative type models. Long Range Planning, 45(5), 359-394.

  • Becker, M. C., Lazaric, N., Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (2005). Applying organizational routines in understanding organizational change. Industrial and Corporate Change, 14(5), 775-791.

  • Biddle, B. (1986). Recent Developments in Role Theory. Annual Review of Sociology, 12, 67-92. doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.12.1.67

  • Bollen, K. a., & Ting, K.-F. (1993). Confirmatory Tetrad Analysis. Kenneth A. Bollen. Sociological Methodology, 23(August 1991), 147-175.

  • Boyatzis, R. E. (1982). The competent manager: A model for effective performance. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.

  • Bray, S. R. (1998). Role efficacy within interdependent teams, measurement development and tests of theory (Doctoral dissertation). University of Waterloo, ON, Canada. Retrieved from https://uwspace.uwaterloo.ca/bitstream/handle/10012/298/nq32817.pdf?sequence=1

  • Bray, S. R., & Brawley, L. R. (2000). Role efficacy and perceived role performance relationships: Longitudinal evidence for reciprocality. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 22, S22-S23.

  • Bray, S. R., Balaguer, I., & Duda, J. L. (2004). The relationship of task selfefficacy and role efficacy beliefs to role performance in Spanish youth soccer. Journal of Sports Sciences, 22(1978), 429-437. doi: 10.1080/02640410410001675333

  • Bray, S. R., & Brawley, L. R. (2002). Role efficacy, role clarity, and role performance effectiveness. Small Group Research, 33(2), 233-253. doi: 10.1177/104649640 203300204

  • Bray, S. R., Brawley, L. R., & Carron, A. V. (2002). Efficacy for interdependent role functions: Evidence from the sport domain. Small Group Research, 33(6), 644-666.

  • Brewis, J. (1996). The ‘Making’ of the ‘Competent’ Manager. Management Learning, 27(1), 65-86. doi: 0803973233

  • Buchanan, D. A., & McCalman, J. (1989). High performance work systems: The digital experience. London, UK: Routledge.

  • Chang, S. J., Van Witteloostuijn, A., & Eden, L. (2010). From the editors: Common method variance in international business research. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(2), 178-184.

  • Das, G. S. (1984). Purposeful role-behavior and its determinants. Bombay, India: National Institute of Bank Management.

  • Das, S., & Padhy, P. K. (2015). A study on role efficacy and engendering trust on performance indicators. Journal of Management and Science, 5(1), 1-6.

  • Dean Jr, J. W., & Snell, S. A. (1991). Integrated manufacturing and job design: Moderating effects of organizational inertia. Academy of Management Journal, 34(4), 776-804. doi: 10.2307/256389

  • Diamantopoulos, A., & Winklhofer, H. M. (2001). Index construction with formative indicators: An alternative to scale development. Journal of Marketing research, 38(2), 269-277.

  • Diamantopoulos, A., Riefler, P., & Roth, K. P. (2008). Advancing formative measurement models. Journal of Business Research, 61(12), 1203-1218. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2008.01.009

  • Doty, D. H., & Glick, W. H. (1998). Common methods bias: does common methods variance really bias results?. Organizational research methods, 1(4), 374-406.

  • Fisher, C. D., & Gitelson, R. J. (1983). A Meta-Analysis of the Correlates of Role Conflict and Ambiguity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2(68), 320-320.

  • Frayne, C. A., & Latham, G. P. (1987). Application of social learning theory to employee self-management of attendance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72(3), 387-392.

  • Gefen, D., Straub, D., & Boudreau, M. C. (2000). Structural equation modeling and regression: Guidelines for research practice. Communications of the association for information systems, 4(1), 1-77.

  • Gist, M. E. (1989). The influence of training method on selfefficacy and idea generation among managers. Personnel psychology, 42(4), 787-805.

  • Gudergan, S. P., Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., & Will, A. (2008). Confirmatory tetrad analysis in PLS path modeling. Journal of Business Research, 61(12), 1238-1249. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2008.01.012

  • Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Pieper, T. M., & Ringle, C. M. (2012). The use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in strategic management research: A review of past practices and recommendations for future applications. Long Range Planning, 45(5-6), 320-340. doi: 10.1016/j.lrp.2012.09.008

  • Hall, D. T. (1972). A model of coping with role conflict: The role behavior of college educated women. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(4), 471-486.

  • Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sinkovics, R. R. (2009). The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 20(1), 277-319. doi: 10.1016/0167-8116(92)90003-4

  • Jain, N. P., Gupta, S. D., Jha, R., & Bhatta, G. K. (2013). Personal effectiveness of public health management personnel in South East Asia region : A study. SAARC Journal of Tuberculosis, Lung Diseases & HIV/AIDS PERSONAL, 10(2), 1-6.

  • Jarvis, C. B., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, P. M. (2003). A critical review of construct indicators and measurement model misspecification in marketing and consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 30(2), 199-218.

  • Jeffrey, B. C. (2002). Are Work Stress Relationships Universal? A nine regionexamination of role stressors, efficacy and burnout (Doctoral dissertation). University of Sarasota, Florida, USA.

  • Jerusalem, M., & Schwarzer, R. (1992). Self-efficacy as a resource factor in stress appraisal processes. Self-efficacy: Thought Control of Action, 195-213.

  • Jyothi Sree, V., & Jyothi, P. (2012). Assessing work-life balance: from emotional intelligence and role efficacy of career women. Advances in Management. 5(6).

  • Kahn, R. L., Wolfe, D. M., Quinn, R. P., Snoek, J. D., & Rosenthal, R. A. (1964). Organizational Stress: Studies in Role Conflict and Ambiguity. Oxford, UK: John Wiley & Sons.

  • Katz, D., & Kahn, R. (1966). The Social Psychology of Organizations: John Wiley & Sons.

  • Klinefelter, G. (1993). Role efficacy and job satisfaction of hospital nurses. Journal for Nurses in Professional Development. Journal for Nurses in Professional Development, 179-183.

  • Ladegard, G., & Gjerde, S. (2014). Leadership coaching, leader role-efficacy, and trust in subordinates. A mixed methods study assessing leadership coaching as a leadership development tool. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(4), 631-646.

  • Le Deist, F. D., & Winterton, J. (2005). What is competence?. Human Resource Development International, 8(1), 27-46.

  • Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (1990). A theory of goal setting & task performance. Prentice-Hall, Inc.

  • Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation. A 35-year odyssey. The American Psychologist, 57(9), 705-717. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.57.9.705

  • Locke, E. A., Motowidlo, S. J., & Bobko, P. (1986). Using self-efficacy theory to resolve the conflict between goal-setting theory and expectancy theory in organizational behavior and industrial/organizational psychology. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 4(3), 328-338. doi: 10.1521/jscp.1986.4.3.328

  • Lowry, P. B., & Gaskin, J. (2014). Partial least squares (PLS) structural equation modeling (SEM) for building and testing behavioral causal theory: When to choose it and how to use it. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 57(2), 123-146.

  • Luszczynska, A., GutiérrezDoña, B., & Schwarzer, R. (2005). General selfefficacy in various domains of human functioning: Evidence from five countries. International Journal of Psychology, 40(2), 80-89. doi: 10.1080/00207590444000041

  • Luft, J., & Ingham, H. (1961). The johari window. Human Relations Training News, 5(1), 6-7.

  • Maheshwari, N., & Kumar, V. (2008). Personal effectiveness as a function of psychological androgyny. Industrial Psychiatry Journal, 17(1), 39-45.

  • McCormick, M. J. (2001). Self-efficacy and leadership effectiveness: Applying social cognitive theory to leadership. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 8(1), 22-33. doi:10.1177/107179190100800102

  • McNeil, L. J. (1996). The correlation of role efficacy to perceived productivity in a financial setting.

  • Mitchell, T. R., Hopper, H., Daniels, D., George-Falvy, J., & James, L. R. (1994). Predicting self-efficacy and performance during skill acquisition. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(4), 506.

  • Netemeyer, R. G., Johnston, M. W., & Burton, S. . (1990). Analysis of role conflict and role ambiguity in a structural equations framework. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(2), 148.

  • Oreg, S. (2006). Personality, context, and resistance to organizational change. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 15(1), 73-101.

  • Pareek, U. (1978). Personal effectiveness. The 1978 Annual Handbook for Group Facilitators, 170-178. La Jolla, CA: University Associates.

  • Pareek, U. (1980). Dimensions of role efficacy. The 1980 Annual Hand book for Group Facilitators, 143-145. University Associates, San Diego, CA: University Associates

  • Pareek, U. (1987). Motivating organizational roles: Role efficacy approach. Rawat Publications.

  • Pareek, U. (1993). Making organizational roles effective. New Delhi, India: Tata McGraw-Hill.

  • Pareek, U. (1997). Handbook of instruments for HRD and training. New Delhi, India: Tata McGraw-Hill.

  • Pareek, U. (2003). Training instruments in HRD and OD. New Delhi, India: Tata McGraw Hill.

  • Parker, S. K. (1998). Enhancing role breadth self-efficacy: the roles of job enrichment and other organizational interventions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(6), 835-852. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.83.6.835

  • Pestonjee, D. M. (1992). Stress and coping: The Indian experience. New Delhi, India: Sage Publications India Pvt. Ltd.

  • Pestonjee, D. M., & Pandey, A. (1996). Enhancing role efficacy: An OD intervention. Vikalpa, 21(2), 43-52.

  • Pestonjee, D. M., Shweta, O., & Sayeed-uz-Zafar. (2000). A study of learned helplessness & perceived role efficacy among executives in pharmaceutical industry. Ahmedabad, India: Research and Publication Department, Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad

  • Ployhart, R. E., & Moliterno, T. P. (2011). Emergence of the human capital resource: A multilevel model. Academy of Management Review, 36(1), 127-150.

  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903.

  • Preacher, K. J., Rucker, D. D., & Hayes, A. F. (2007). Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42(1), 185-227. doi: 10.1080/00273170701341316

  • Priyadarshini, R. R. G. (2009). The Importance of Role Efficacy and Self Efficacy in Organizations and its Relationship with HR Practices. Management and Labour Studies, 34(1), 57-72. doi: 10.1177/0258042X0903400104

  • Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., & Becker, J. M. (2015). SmartPLS 3. Boenningstedt: SmartPLS GmbH. Retrieved from http://www.smartpls.com.

  • Rizzo, J. R., House, R. J., & Lirtzman, S. (1970). Role Conflict and Ambiguity in Complex Organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 15(2), 150-163.

  • Schwarzer, R. (1992). Self-efficacy: Thought control of action. London, UK: Routledge.

  • Schwarzer, R., & Jerusalem, M. (1995). Generalized Self-Efficacy scale. In J. Weinman, S. Wright, & M. Johnston (eds.), Measures in health psychology: A user’s portfolio. Causal and control beliefs (pp.35-37). Windsor, UK: NFER-NELSON.

  • Schwarzer, R., & Hallum, S. (2008). Perceived teacher self-efficacy as a predictor of job stress and burnout: Mediation analyses. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 57(s1), 152-171.

  • Shenkar, O., & Zeira, Y. (1992). Role conflict and role ambiguity of chief executive officers in international joint ventures. Journal of International Business Studies, 23(1), 55-75.

  • Singh, S. B., & Singh, R. K. (2012). Analysis of effectiveness and outcome of organizational development interventions in Bhilai Steel Plant (Doctoral dissertation). MATS University School of Management & Research. Shodhganga@INFLIBNET. doi: 10.1088/1751-8113/44/8/085201

  • Sinha, V., Abraham, A., Bhaskarna, B., Xavier, K., & Kariat, K. (2014). Role efficacy: Studying the impact on employee engagement, employee motivation and attrition. . International Journal of Human Capital and Information Technology Professionals 5(4), 35-54.

  • Smith, K. (1994). Role ambiguity, role conflict and role efficacy of contract and self-operating college and university food service managers. Journal of College & University Foodservice, 1(4), 23-32.

  • Spector, P. E. (2006). Method variance in organizational research: Truth or urban legend?. Organizational Research Methods, 9(2), 221-232.

  • Stajkovic, A. D., & Luthans, F. (1998a). Self-efficacy and work-related performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 124(2), 240-261. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.124.2.240

  • Stajkovic, A., & Luthans, F. (1998b). Social cognitive theory and self-efficacy: Going beyond traditional motivational and behavioural approaches. Organisational Dynamics, 26(4), 62-74.

  • Vancouver, J. B., Thompson, C. M., & Williams, A. A. (2001). The changing signs in the relationships among self-efficacy, personal goals, and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(4), 605-620. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.86.4.605

  • Waddar, M. S., & Aminabhavi, V. A. (2012). Role based performance and role efficacy of aircraft employees in relation to their emotional labour: A study for developing employability skill. International Journal of Engineering and Management Sciences, 3(1), 24-28.

  • Wetzels, M., Odekerken-Schröder, G., & Van Oppen, C. (2009). Using PLS path modeling for assessing hierarchical construct models: Guidelines and empirical illustration. MIS Quarterly, 33(1), 177-195.

  • Wood, R., & Bandura, A. (1989). Social cognitive theory of organizational management. Academy of Management Review, 14(3), 361-384. doi: 10.5465/AMR.1989.4279067

  • Zaccaro, S. J. (1996). Social contextual considerations of efficacy beliefs: Defining mutliple forms of social efficacy. Keynote address presented at the annual meeting of the Association for the Advancement of Applied Sport Psychology.

  • Zaccaro, S. J., Blair, V., Peterson, C., & Zazanis, M. (1995). Collective efficacy. In J. E. Maddux (Ed.), Self-efficacy, adaptation, and adjustment: Theorv. research. and application (pp. 305-328). New York, NY: Plenum.

  • Zollo, M., & Winter, S. (1999). From organizational routines to dynamic capabilities (Working Paper No. 99-07). Reginald H. Jones Center: University of Pennysylvania.


Abstract Views: 221

PDF Views: 0




  • Personal Effectiveness and Self-efficacy as Predictors of Individual Role Efficacy:An Analysis Based on PLS Path Modeling

Abstract Views: 221  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Kalpana Srinivasan
Human Resources and Organizational Behavior, Xavier Labor Relations Institute (XLRI), C. H Area (East), Jamshedpur 831001, Jharkhand, India
M. G. Jomon
Human Resources and Organizational Behavior, Xavier Labor Relations Institute (XLRI), C. H Area (East), Jamshedpur 831001, Jharkhand, India

Abstract


Changing and complex work environments are putting individual employees under tremendous pressure to perform well in their roles. Pareek defines role-efficacy associated with an individual in a role as the individual’s potential effectiveness. Ever since the proposition of role theory by Katz and Kahn, there has been a series of research pertaining to concepts like role ambiguity, role-efficacy, and role conflict. Past research has attempted to study their interrelationships in the context of self-efficacy, however, the effect on role-efficacy by the hitherto not explored personal effectiveness types of Pareek lends to a new focus on how role-efficacy can be enhanced. This study of 187 working professionals establishes that individual role-efficacy is dependent not just on personal effectiveness but also critically on self-efficacy of the individual. Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) used for Partial Least Squares (PLS) path analysis of the research model indicates that personal effectiveness predicts role-efficacy and this relationship is mediated by self-efficacy.

Keywords


Personal Effectiveness, PLS-SEM, Role, Role-Efficacy, Self-Efficacy.

References