South Asian Journal of Management

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Factors Influencing Share Buyback Decisions of Indian Companies


Affiliations
1 Vinod Gupta School of Management, Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


This study examines the motivation for share repurchase decision by taking 240 non-financial share buybacks from the period 1998-99 to 2014-15. It employs logistic regression model to find the association between the firm-specific parameters and share repurchase decision. The empirical findings corroborate the evidence that excess capital hypothesis, undervaluation hypothesis, liquidity hypothesis and employee stock option hypothesis are the prime incentives for share repurchase decision in India. In the Indian context, leverage hypothesis does not hold good because of restriction of the use of debt in share repurchase. The study does not support substitution hypothesis. The study for the first time, examines liquid hypothesis, employee stock option hypothesis and corporate governance hypothesis along with other hypotheses to know the impact of these on share buyback decisions. The result shows that share repurchasing firms are more liquid than non-repurchasing firms. This study finds a significant and positive relationship between stock options and the decisions to buy back shares, but it does not find any evidence supporting corporate governance hypothesis.

Keywords

Corporate Governance, Employee Stock Option Hypothesis, Liquidity Hypothesis, Logistic Regression, Share Repurchases.
User
Subscription Login to verify subscription
Notifications
Font Size

  • Amihud, Y. (2002). Illiquidity and stock returns: cross-section and time-series effects. Journal of Financial Markets, 5(1), 31-56.

  • Andriosopoulos, D., &Hoque, H. (2013). The determinants of share repurchase in Europe. International Review of Financial Analysis, 27, 65-76.

  • Arora, A. (2012). Liquidity Effects of Buyback Announcements: Evidence for Indian capital markets. Apeejay Journal of Management & Technology, 7(1).

  • Arora, A., & Pasricha, J. S. (2012, December). Motivations for buyback among Indian companies. In XI Capital Markets Conference (pp. 21-22).

  • Asquith, Paul., & David, W. Mullins. Jr. (1986). Signalling with dividends, stock repurchases, and equity issues. Financial Management, 27-44.

  • Bagwell, L. S. (1991). Share repurchase and takeover deterrence. The RAND Journal of Economics, 72-88.

  • Bagwell, L. S., & Shoven, J. B. (1988). Share repurchases and acquisitions: An analysis of which firms participate. In Corporate takeovers: Causes and consequences (pp. 191-220). University of Chicago Press.

  • Barclay, M. J., & Smith, C. W. (1988). Corporate payout policy: Cash dividends versus open-market repurchase. Journal of Financial Economics, 22(1), 61-82.

  • Bartov, E. (1991). Open-market stock repurchases as signals for earnings and risk changes. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 14(3), 275-294.

  • Bens, D. A., Nagar, V., Skinner, D. J., & Wong, M. F. (2003). Employee stock options, EPS dilution, and stock repurchases. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 36(1), 51-90.

  • Bhattacharya, S. (1979). Imperfect information, dividend policy, and “the bird in the hand” fallacy. Bell Journal of Economics, 10(1), 259-270.

  • Billett, Matthew T., & HuiXue. (2007). The takeover deterrent effect of open market share repurchases. The Journal of Finance, 62(4), 1827-1850.

  • Bonaimé, A. A., Öztekin, Ö. & Warr, R. S. (2014). Capital structure, equity mispricing, and stock repurchases. Journal of Corporate Finance, 26, 182-200.

  • Boudry, W. I., Kallberg, J. G., & Liu, C. H. (2013). Investment opportunities and share repurchases. Journal of Corporate Finance, 23, 23-38.

  • Brockman, P., & Chung, D. Y. (2001). Managerial timing and corporate liquidity: evidence from actual share repurchases. Journal of Financial Economics, 61(3), 417-448.

  • Brockman, P., Howe, J. S., & Mortal, S. (2008). Stock market liquidity and the decision to repurchase. Journal of Corporate Finance, 14(4), 446-459.

  • Chan, K., Ikenberry, D. L., & Lee, I. (2007). Do managers time the market? Evidence from open-market share repurchases. Journal of Banking & Finance, 31(9), 2673-2694.

  • Chavali, Kavita., & Shemeem, S. (2011). Impact of buybacks on share price performance of companies in Indian context. European Journal of Finance and Banking Research, 4(4), 23.

  • Comment, R., & Jarrell, G. A. (1991). The relative signalling power of Dutchauction and fixed price selftender offers and openmarket share repurchases. The Journal of Finance, 46(4), 1243-1271.

  • Cook, D. O., Krigman, L., & Leach, J. C. (2004). On the timing and execution of open market repurchases. Review of Financial Studies, 17(2), 463-498.

  • Dann, L. Y. (1981). Common stock repurchases: An analysis of returns to bondholders and stockholders. Journal of Financial Economics, 9(2), 113-138.

  • DeAngelo, Harry, Linda DeAngelo., & Douglas J. Skinner. (2000). Special dividends and the evolution of dividend signaling. Journal of Financial Economics 57(3), 309-354.

  • De Ridder, A., & Råsbrant, J. (2009). The market liquidity impact of repurchase trading. Nasdaq OMX website.

  • Denis, D. J., & Osobov, I. (2008). Why do firms pay dividends? International evidence on the determinants of dividend policy. Journal of Financial Economics, 89(1), 62-82.

  • Dittmar, A. K. (2000). Why do firms repurchase stock. The Journal of Business, 73(3), 331-355.

  • Dixon, R., Palmer, G., Stradling, B., & Woodhead, A. (2008). An empirical survey of the motivation for share repurchases in the UK. Managerial Finance, 34(12), 886-906.

  • Dua, Vibha., Himanshu, Puri., & Mittal, R. K. (2010). “Impact of buyback of shares on stock prices in India: An empirical testing of stock market efficiency in its semi-strong form. Pranjana: The Journal of Management Awareness, 13(1).

  • Easterbrook, F. H. (1984). Two agency-cost explanations of dividends. The American Economic Review, 74(4), 650-659.

  • Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (2001). Disappearing dividends: changing firm characteristics or lower propensity to pay? Journal of Financial Economics, 60(1), 3-43.

  • Fenn, G. W., & Liang, N. (2001). Corporate payout policy and managerial stock incentives. Journal of financial economics, 60(1), 45-72.

  • Ginglinger, E., & Hamon, J. (2007). Actual share repurchases timing and liquidity. Journal of Banking & Finance, 31(3), 915-938.

  • Grullon, G., & Michaely, R. (2002). Dividends, share repurchases, and the substitution hypothesis. The Journal of Finance, 57(4), 1649-1684.

  • Grullon, G., & Michaely, R. (2004). The information content of share repurchase programs. The Journal of Finance, 59(2), 651-680.

  • Guay, W., & Harford, J. (2000). The cash-flow permanence and information content of dividend increases versus repurchases. Journal of Financial Economics, 57(3), 385-415.

  • Gupta, L. C., Jain, N., & Kumar, A. (2005). Corporate Practices regarding Buyback of Shares and its Regulation in India. Study Sponsored by Indian Council of Social Science Research, 1-76.

  • Heaton, J. B. (2002). Managerial optimism and corporate finance. Financial Management, 33-45.

  • Hovakimian, A. (2004). The role of target leverage in security issues and repurchases. The Journal of Business, 77(4), 1041-1072.

  • Hovakimian, A., Opler, T., & Titman, S. (2001). The debt-equity choice. Journal of Financial and Quantitative analysis, 36(1), 1-24.

  • Hyderabad, R. L. (2009). Price performance following share buyback announcement in India. Vision, 13(1), 59-78.

  • Hyderabad, R. L. (2013). An Examination of Free Cash Flow Hypothesis in Indian Repurchase Decisions. Asian Journal of Business Management, 5(1), 1-12.

  • Hyderabad, R. L. (2013). Are share repurchases substitutes for dividend payment in India? The IUP Journal of Applied Finance, 19(1), 27-46.

  • Ikenberry, D., Lakonishok, J., & Vermaelen, T. (1995). Market underreaction to open market share repurchases. Journal of financial economics, 39(2), 181-208.

  • Jagannathan, M., & Stephens, C. (2003). Motives for multiple open-market repurchase programs. Financial Management, 71-91.

  • Jagannathan, M., Stephens, C. P., & Weisbach, M. S. (2000). Financial flexibility and the choice between dividends and stock repurchases. Journal of financial Economics, 57(3), 355-384.

  • Jain, B. A., Shekhar, C., & Torbey, V. (2009). Payout initiation by IPO firms: The choice between dividends and share repurchases. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 49(4), 1275-1297.

  • Jensen, M. C. (1986). Agency cost of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. Corporate Finance and Takeovers. American Economic Review, 76(2).

  • Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360.

  • Kahle, K. M. (2002). When a buyback isn’t a buyback: open market repurchases and employee options. Journal of Financial Economics, 63(2), 235-261.

  • Lang, L. H., & Litzenberger, R. H. (1989). Dividend announcements: Cash flow signalling vs. free cash flow hypothesis? Journal of Financial Economics, 24(1), 181-191.

  • Lee, B. S., & Suh, J. (2011). Cash holdings and share repurchases: International evidence. Journal of Corporate Finance, 17(5), 1306-1329.

  • Li, K., & McNally, W. (2007). The information content of Canadian open market repurchase announcements. Managerial Finance, 33(1), 65-80.

  • Liang, Woan-lih, et al. (2013). Motivation for repurchases: A life cycle explanation. Journal of Financial Services Research, 43(2), 221-242.

  • Lintner, J. (1956). Distribution of incomes of corporations among dividends, retained earnings, and taxes. The American Economic Review, 46(2), 97-113.

  • Masulis, R. W. (1980). Stock repurchase by tender offer: An analysis of the causes of common stock price changes. The Journal of Finance, 35(2), 305-319.

  • Miller, M. H., & Modigliani, F. (1961). Dividend policy, growth, and the valuation of shares. The Journal of Business, 34(4), 411-433.

  • Mitchell, J. D., & Dharmawan, G. V. (2007). Incentives for on-market buy-backs: Evidence from a transparent buy-back regime. Journal of Corporate Finance, 13(1), 146-169.

  • Mitchell, J. D., & Robinson, P. (1999). Motivations of Australian Listed Companies Effecting Share BuyBacks. Abacus, 35(1), 91-119.

  • Mitchell, J. D., Dharmawan, G. V., & Clarke, A. W. (2001). Managements’ views on share buybacks: an Australian survey. Accounting & Finance, 41(12), 93-129.

  • Nohel, T., & Tarhan, V. (1998). Share repurchases and firm performance: new evidence on the agency costs of free cash flow. Journal of Financial Economics, 49(2), 187-222.

  • Oded, J. (2005). Why do firms announce open-market repurchase programs? Review of Financial Studies, 18(1), 271-300.

  • Opler, T., & Titman, S. (1993). The determinants of leveraged buyout activity: Free cash flow vs. financial distress costs. The Journal of Finance, 48(5), 1985-1999.

  • Rajagopalan, N. V. R., & Shankar, H. (2012). Stock market behaviour around buyback announcements in India: An empirical justification for preferring the open market repurchase mode. Indian Journal of Finance, 6, 43-52.

  • Rajagopalan, N. V. R., & Shankar, H. (2013). Buyback Announcements and Stock Market Reaction in India: Testing the Market Condition Hypothesis. IUP Journal of Applied Finance, 19(2), 64.

  • Reddy, K. S., Nangia, V. K., & Agrawal, R. (2013). Share repurchases, signalling effect and implications for corporate governance: Evidence from India. Asia-Pacific Journal of Management Research and Innovation, 9(1), 107-124.

  • Reddy, Y. S. (2014). Factors influencing on-market share repurchase decisions in Australia. Studies in Economics and Finance, 31(3), 255-271.

  • Roll, R. (1986). The hubris hypothesis of corporate takeovers. Journal of business, 197-216.

  • Sinha, S. (1991). Share repurchase as a takeover defense. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 26(02), 233-244.

  • Skinner, D. J. (2008). The evolving relation between earnings, dividends, and stock repurchases. Journal of financial economics, 87(3), 582-609.

  • Stephens, C. P., & Weisbach, M. S. (1998). Actual share reacquisitions in openmarket repurchase programs. The Journal of Finance, 53(1), 313-333.

  • Vafeas, N. (1997). Determinants of the choice between alternative share repurchase methods. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 12(2), 101-124.

  • Vafeas, N., & Joy, O. M. (1995). Open market share repurchases and the free cash flow hypothesis G35. Economics Letters, 48(3), 405-410.

  • Vermelen, T. (1981). Common Stock Repurchase and Market Signaling. Journal of Financial Economic, 9, 139-183.

  • Von, Eije, H., & Megginson, W. L. (2008). Dividends and share repurchase in the European Union. Journal of Financial Economics, 89(2), 347-374.

  • Yeh, Hung-Ting., Yu-Xun Huang., & Kaie-chin, Chung. (2013). “Empirical study on influential determinants for enterprise capital reduction: Evidence from cash reduction and stock repurchase. International Journal of Organizational Innovation (Online), 5(4), 100.


Abstract Views: 224

PDF Views: 0




  • Factors Influencing Share Buyback Decisions of Indian Companies

Abstract Views: 224  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Sarthak Kumar Jena
Vinod Gupta School of Management, Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur, India
Chandra Sekhar Mishra
Vinod Gupta School of Management, Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur, India
Prabina Rajib
Vinod Gupta School of Management, Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur, India

Abstract


This study examines the motivation for share repurchase decision by taking 240 non-financial share buybacks from the period 1998-99 to 2014-15. It employs logistic regression model to find the association between the firm-specific parameters and share repurchase decision. The empirical findings corroborate the evidence that excess capital hypothesis, undervaluation hypothesis, liquidity hypothesis and employee stock option hypothesis are the prime incentives for share repurchase decision in India. In the Indian context, leverage hypothesis does not hold good because of restriction of the use of debt in share repurchase. The study does not support substitution hypothesis. The study for the first time, examines liquid hypothesis, employee stock option hypothesis and corporate governance hypothesis along with other hypotheses to know the impact of these on share buyback decisions. The result shows that share repurchasing firms are more liquid than non-repurchasing firms. This study finds a significant and positive relationship between stock options and the decisions to buy back shares, but it does not find any evidence supporting corporate governance hypothesis.

Keywords


Corporate Governance, Employee Stock Option Hypothesis, Liquidity Hypothesis, Logistic Regression, Share Repurchases.

References