South Asian Journal of Management

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

An Assessment of the Influence of the Psychological Consequences of Task Significance on Employee Engagement and Turnover Intentions


Affiliations
1 Great Lakes Institute of Management, Dr. Bala V. Balachandar Campus, East Coast Road, Manamai-603102, Tirukazhukundram Taluk, Kanchipuram District, Tamil Nadu, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Task significance refers to the aspect of job design that allows one to make a positive difference in others’ lives through one’s work. Perceived prosocial impact, affective commitment to beneficiaries and perceived social worth are the psychological outcomes of the task significance aspect of job design. These three psychological mechanisms mediate between task significance and work performance. These variables could be crucial in understanding the problem of high turnover being faced by Indian organizations. The aim of this paper is to analyze the relationship between perception of prosocial impact of one’s job, affective commitment to beneficiaries and perceived social worth on employee engagement and turnover intentions. The sample consists of participants working in roles with high task significance in various Indian organizations. The findings suggest that perceived prosocial impact and perceived social worth are strong predictors of employee engagement and reduced turnover intentions. Affective commitment to beneficiaries is comparatively weaker in predicting these variables. The managerial and research implications of the findings have been discussed.

Keywords

Employee Engagement, Job Design, Perceived Pro-social Impact, Task Significance, Turnover Intentions.
User
Subscription Login to verify subscription
Notifications
Font Size

  • Agarwal, U. A., Datta, S., BlakeBeard, S., & Bhargava, S. (2012). Linking LMX, innovative work behaviour and turnover intentions: The mediating role of work engagement. Career Development International, 17(3), 208-230.

  • Ahmed, A. M. (2009). Are Religious People More Prosocial? A Quasi-Experimental Study with Madrasah Pupils in a Rural Community in India. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 48(2), 368-374.

  • Arekar, K., Sherin, P., & Deshpande, B. (2013). Impact of correlates on Process and structural determinants – A study of employee turnover in Indian context. Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business, 5(3), 127-136.

  • Bakker, A. B., Hakanen, J. J., Demerouti, E., & Xanthopoulou, D. (2007). Job resources boost work engagement particularly when job demands are high. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 274-284.

  • Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2007). The job demands-resources model: state of the art. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22, 309-28.

  • Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.

  • Bhatnagar, J. (2007). Talent management strategy of employee engagement in Indian ITES employees: key to retention. Employee Relations, 29(6), 640-663.

  • Biswas, S. (2010). Relationship between psychological climate and turnover intentions and its impact on organizational effectiveness: A study in Indian organizations. IIMB Management Review, 22(3), 102-110.

  • Brown, M. J., & Cody, M. J. (1991). Effects of a Prosocial Television Soap Opera in Promoting Women’s Status. Human Communication Research, 18(1), 114-144.

  • Cammann, C., Fichman, M., Jenkins, D., & Klesh, J. (1979). The Michigan Organizational Assessment Questionnaire. Unpublished Manuscript, University of Michigan.

  • Choi, Y., & Yu, Y. (2014). The influence of perceived corporate sustainability practices on employees and organizational performance. Sustainability, 6(1), 348-364.

  • Christian, M. S., Garza, A. S., & Slaughter, J. E. (2011). Work engagement: A quantitative review and test of its relation with task and contextual performance. Personnel Psychology, 64, 89-136.

  • Cooper-Hakim, A., & Viswesvaran, C. (2005). The construct of work commitment: Testing an integrative framework. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 241-259.

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Self-Determination Theory: A Macro theory of Human Motivation, Development, and Health. Canadian Psychology, 49(3), 182-185.

  • Devi, R. V. (2009). Employee engagement is a two way street. Human Resource Management International Digest, 17(2), 3-4.

  • Eisenberg, N., Guthrie, I. K., Cumberland, A., Murphy, B. C., Shepard, S. A., Zhou, Q., & Carlo, G. (2002). Prosocial Development in Early Adulthood: A Longitudinal Study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(6), 993-1006.

  • Firth, L., Mellor, D. J., Moore, K. A., & Loquet, C. (2004). How can managers reduce employee intention to quit? Journal of Managerial Psychology, 19(2), 170-187.

  • Fleming, J. H., & Asplund, J. (2007). Where Employee Engagement Happens. In Human Sigma: Managing the Employee-Customer Encounter, New York, NY: Gallup Press.

  • Fried, Y., & Ferris, G. R. (1987), The Validity of Job Characteristics Model: A Review and Meta-Analysis. Personnel Psychology, 40(2), 287-322.

  • Garg, P. & Rastogi, R. (2006). New model of job design: Motivating Employees’ performance. Journal of Management Development, 25(6), 572-587.

  • Goldstein, N. J., & Cialdini, R. B. (2007). The spyglass self: A model of vicarious self-perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(3), 402- 417.

  • Grant, A. M., & Gino, F. (2010). A little thanks goes a long way: Explaining why gratitude expressions motivate prosocial behaviour. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 946- 955.

  • Grant, A. M. (2007). Relational job design and the motivation to make a prosocial difference. Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 393-417.

  • Grant, A. M. (2008a). The significance of task significance: Job performance effects, relational mechanisms, and boundary conditions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(1), 108-124.

  • Grant, A. M. (2008b). Employees without a cause: The motivational effects of prosocial impact in public service. International Public Management Journal, 11(1), 48-66.

  • Grant, A. M. (2008c). Designing jobs to do good: Dimensions and psychological characteristics of prosocial job characteristics. Journal of Positive Psychology, 3(1), 19-39.

  • Grant, A. M. (2009). Putting self-interest out of business? Contributions and unanswered questions from use-inspired research on prosocial motivation. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 2(1), 94-98.

  • Grant, A. M., & Berg, J. M. (2010). Prosocial motivation at work: When, why, and how making a difference makes a difference. In K. S. Cameron and G. M. Spreitzer (Eds.), Handbook of Positive Organizational Scholarship (pp. 28-44), Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

  • Grant, A. M., & Berry, J. W. (2011). The necessity of others is the mother of invention: Intrinsic and prosocial motivations, perspective-taking, and creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 54(1), 73-96.

  • Grant, A. M., & Campbell, E. M. (2007). Doing good, doing harm, being well and burning out: The interactions of perceived prosocial and antisocial impact in service work. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 80(4), 665-691.

  • Grant, A. M., & Mayer, D. M. (2009). Good soldiers and good actors: Prosocial and impression management motives as interactive predictors of affiliative citizenship behaviors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(4), 900-912.

  • Grant, A. M., & Wrzesniewski, A. (2010). I won’t let you down… or will I? Core self-evaluations, other-orientation, anticipated guilt and gratitude, and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(1), 108-121.

  • Grant, A. M., Campbell, E. M., Chen, G., Cottone, K.,Lapedis, D., & Lee, K. (2007). Impact and art of motivation maintenance: The effect of contact with beneficiaries on persistence behaviour. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 103(1), 53-67.

  • Grant, A. M., Dutton, E., & Rosso, D. (2008). Giving commitment: Employee support programs and the prosocial sensemaking process. Academy of Management Journal, 51(5), 898-918.

  • Gupta, R. K. & Panda, A. (2003). The individualized familial self: The evolving self of qualified technocrats in india. Psychology and Developing Societies, 5(1), 131-150.

  • Gutek, B. A., Bhappu, A. D., Liao-Troth, M. A., & Cherry, B. (1999). Distinguishing between service relationships and encounters. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(2), 218- 233.

  • Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1976). Motivating through the design of work: Test of a theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16, 250-279.

  • Hackman, J. R. & Oldham, G. R. (1980). Work Redesign. Reading, MA: AddisonWesley.

  • Hair Jr. J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2014). A primer on partial least squares structural equations modeling (PLS-SEM). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc.

  • Hansen, S., Dunford, Benjamin B., Boss, D., Boss, R., & Angermeier, I. (2011). Corporate Social Responsibility and the benefits of employee trust, Journal of Business Ethics, 102(1), 29-45.

  • Harter, J. K., Schmidt, F. L., & Hayes, T. L. (2002). Business-unit level relationship between employee satisfaction, employee engagement, and business outcomes: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(2), 268-279.

  • Hirschi, A. (2010). Positive adolescent career development: The role of intrinsic and extrinsic work values. The Career Development Quarterly, 58(3), 276-287.

  • Joshi, R. J., & Sharma, B. R. (1997). Determinants of managerial job satisfaction in a private organization. Indian Journal of Industrial Relations, 33(1): 48-67.

  • Kahn, W. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692-724.

  • Kahn, W. A. (1992). To be fully there: Psychological presence at work. Human relations, 45(4), 321-349.

  • Kärtner, J., Keller, H., & Chaudhary, N. (2010). Cognitive and social influences on early prosocial behavior in two sociocultural contexts. Developmental Psychology, 46(4), 905-914.

  • Khatri, N., Fern, C. T., & Budhwar, P. (2001). Explaining employee turnover in an Asian context. Human Resource Management Journal, 11(1), 54-74.

  • Kochanski, J. & Sorensen, A. (2008). Turning around employee turnover. Financial Executive, 24(5), 28-31.

  • Kumar, R., & Sia, S. K. (2012). Employee engagement: Explicating the contribution of work environment. Management and Labour Studies, 37(1), 31-43.

  • Lacity, M. C., Iyer, V. V., & Rudramuniyaiah, P. S. (2008). Turnover intentions of Indian IS professionals. Information Systems Frontiers, 10(2), 225-241.

  • Lambert, E. G., Hogan, N. L., & Barton, S. M. (2001). The impact of job satisfaction on turnover intent: Test of a structural measurement model using a national sample of workers. The Social Science Journal, 38(2), 233-250.

  • Leary, M. R., Haupt, A. L., Strausser, K. S., Chokel, J. T. (1998). Calibrating the sociometer: The Relationship between interpersonal appraisal and state-selfesteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(5), 1290-1299.

  • Lee, J. (2005). Effects of leadership and leader-member exchange on commitment. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 26(8), 655-72.

  • Macey, W. H., & Schneider, B. (2008). The meaning of employee engagement. Industrial and organizational Psychology, 1(1), 3-30.

  • MacLeod, D. & Clarke, N. (2009). The MacLeod Review – Engaging for Success: Enhancing Performance though Employee Engagement. London, UK: Department for Business Innovation and Skills.

  • Manerikar, V., & Patil, V. (1983). A profile of Indian managers’ perception of jobcharacteristics. Indian Journal of Industrial Relations, 18(3), 423-428.

  • Markos, S., & Sridevi, M. S. (2010). Employee engagement: The key to improving performance. International Journal of Business and Management, 5(12), 89-96.

  • Mauno, S., Kinnunen, U., & Ruokolainen, M. (2007). Job demands and resources as antecedents of work engagement: A longitudinal study. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 70(1), 149-171.

  • McNeely, B. L., & Meglino, B. M. (1994). The role of dispositional and situational antecedents in prosocial organizational behavior: An examination of the intended beneficiaries of prosocial behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(6), 836-844.

  • Medina, E. (2012). Job satisfaction and employee turnover intention: What does organizational culture have to do with it? (Unpublished master’s dissertation). Columbia University, NY.

  • Meglino, B. M., & Korsgaard, M. A. (2004). Considering rational self-interest as a disposition: Organizational implications of other orientation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(6), 946-959.

  • Mishra, S. K., & Bhatnagar, D. (2010). Linking emotional dissonance and organizational identification to turnover intention and emotional well-being: A study of medical representatives in India. Human Resource Management, 49(3), 401-419.

  • Morgeson, F. P., & Humphrey, S. E. (2006). The work design questionnaire (WDQ): Developing and validating a comprehensive measure for assessing job design and the nature of work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(6), 1321-1339.

  • Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 36(4), 717-713.

  • Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling techniques for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879-891.

  • Preacher, K. J., Rucker, D. D., & Hayes, A. F. (2007). Addressing moderated mediation hypothesis: Theory, Methods and Prescription. Multivariate Behavioural Research, 42(1), 185-227.

  • Pugh, D., & Dietz, J. (2008). Employee engagement at the organizational level of analysis. Industrial and Organizational Psychology. 1(1), 44-47.

  • Putti, J. M., Shapiro, J. H., & Kang, L. B. (1984). Intrinsic and extrinsic work values in the ASEAN subsidiaries of a Japanese company. Academy of Management Proceedings, 1984(1), 105-109.

  • Rao, N., & Stewart, S. M. (1999). Cultural influences on sharer and recipient behavior. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology. 30(2), 219-241.

  • Riketta, M. (2002). Attitudinal organizational commitment and job performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23(3), 257-266.

  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78.

  • Sahoo, C. K., & Sahu, G. (2009). Effective employee engagement: The mantra of achieving organizational excellence. Management and Labour Studies, 34(1), 73-84.

  • Saks, M. (2006). Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21(7), 600-619.

  • Salancik, G. R., & Pfeffer, J. (1978). A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23, 224-253.

  • Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. (2004). Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: a multi-sample study. Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 25(3), 293-315.

  • Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. (2006). The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: A cross national study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(4), 701-716.

  • Schaufeli, W., Salanova, M., Gonzalez-Roma, V., & Bakker, A. (2002). The measurement of burnout and engagement: A confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3(1), 71-92.

  • Schwepker, C. H. (2001). Ethical climate’s relationship to job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and turnover intention in the salesforce. Journal of Business Research, 54(1), 39-52.

  • Schimel, J., Arndt, J., Pyszcynski, T., Greenberg, J. (2001). Being accepted for who we are: Evidence that social validation of the intrinsic self reduces general defensiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(1), 35-52.

  • Shukla, A., Srinivasan, R. & Chaurasia, S. (2013). Impact of work related attitudes on turnover intention. Indian Journal of Industrial Relations, 49(1), 111-122.

  • Singh, P., Bhandarker, A., Rai, S. & Jain, A. K. (2011). Relationship between values and workplace: An exploratory analysis. Facilities, 29(11/12), 499-520.

  • Singhal, A., & Rogers, E. M. (1989). Prosocial Television for development in India. In R. E. Rice, and C. Atkin, (Eds), Public Communication Campaigns (pp. 331-350). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications Inc.

  • Soane, E. C. (2013). Leadership and employee engagement. In C. Truss, K. Alfes, R. Delbridge, A. Shantz and E. C. Soane (Eds.), Employee Engagement in Theory and Practice. London, UK: Routledge.

  • Somers, M. J. (1995). Organizational commitment, turnover and absenteeism: An examination of direct and interaction effects. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 16(1) 49-58.

  • Sonnentag, S. (2003). Recovery, work engagement, and proactive behavior: A new look at the interface between non-work and work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(3), 518-528.

  • Srivastava, P., & Bhatnagar, J. (2008). Talent acquisition due diligence leading to high employee engagement: case of Motorola India MDB. Industrial and Commercial Training, 40(5), 253-260.

  • Tymon, W. G., Stumph, S. A., & Doh, J. P. (2010). Exploring talent management in India: The neglected role of intrinsic rewards. Journal of World Business, 45(2), 109-121.

  • Vandenberg, R. J., & Nelson, J. B. (1999). Disaggregating the motives underlying turnover intentions: When do intentions predict turnover behaviour? Human Relations, 52, 1313-1336.

  • Weinstein., & Ryan, M. (2010). When helping helps: Autonomous motivation for prosocial behavior and its influence on well-being for the helper and recipient. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(2), 222-244.

  • Wollman, W. K., Bachner, M. L., & Peterson, C. (1980). Specificity of values and prediction of prosocial behaviour. The Journal of Social Psychology, 111, 35-40.

  • Wrzesniewski, A., & Dutton, J. E. (2001). Crafting a job: Revisioning employees as active crafters of their work. Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 179-201.

  • Wrzesniewski, A. (2003). Finding positive meaning in work. In K. S. Cameron, J. E. Dutton and R. E. Quinn (Eds), Positive Organizational Scholarship: Foundations of a New Discipline, (pp. 296-308). San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers Inc.

  • Wrzesniewski, A., McCauley, C., Rozin, P., & Schwartz, B. (1997). Jobs, careers and callings: People’s relations to their work. Journal of Research in Personality, 31(1), 21-33.

  • Wrzesniewski, A., Berg, J. M., & Dutton, J. E. (2010). Managing yourself: Turn the job you have into the job you want. Harvard Business Review, 88(6), 114-117.


Abstract Views: 203

PDF Views: 0




  • An Assessment of the Influence of the Psychological Consequences of Task Significance on Employee Engagement and Turnover Intentions

Abstract Views: 203  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

M. V. Anuradha
Great Lakes Institute of Management, Dr. Bala V. Balachandar Campus, East Coast Road, Manamai-603102, Tirukazhukundram Taluk, Kanchipuram District, Tamil Nadu, India
R. S. Lakshmi
Great Lakes Institute of Management, Dr. Bala V. Balachandar Campus, East Coast Road, Manamai-603102, Tirukazhukundram Taluk, Kanchipuram District, Tamil Nadu, India
Seerat Ghuman
Great Lakes Institute of Management, Dr. Bala V. Balachandar Campus, East Coast Road, Manamai-603102, Tirukazhukundram Taluk, Kanchipuram District, Tamil Nadu, India

Abstract


Task significance refers to the aspect of job design that allows one to make a positive difference in others’ lives through one’s work. Perceived prosocial impact, affective commitment to beneficiaries and perceived social worth are the psychological outcomes of the task significance aspect of job design. These three psychological mechanisms mediate between task significance and work performance. These variables could be crucial in understanding the problem of high turnover being faced by Indian organizations. The aim of this paper is to analyze the relationship between perception of prosocial impact of one’s job, affective commitment to beneficiaries and perceived social worth on employee engagement and turnover intentions. The sample consists of participants working in roles with high task significance in various Indian organizations. The findings suggest that perceived prosocial impact and perceived social worth are strong predictors of employee engagement and reduced turnover intentions. Affective commitment to beneficiaries is comparatively weaker in predicting these variables. The managerial and research implications of the findings have been discussed.

Keywords


Employee Engagement, Job Design, Perceived Pro-social Impact, Task Significance, Turnover Intentions.

References