South Asian Journal of Management

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Analyzing Confidence of Youth for Incubator Direction Assessment:A Study in the State of Jammu and Kashmir


Affiliations
1 J&K Institute of Management Public Administration and Rural Development, Regional Campus, Sidhra, Jammu-180017, Jammu & Kashmir, India
2 Department of Management Studies, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, Hauz Khas, New Delhi- 110016, India
3 School of Business, SMVD University, Kakryal, Katra-192320, Jammu & Kashmir, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Incubators are gaining popularity as entrepreneurship promotion agencies. Although the services and production sectors are equally important for Indian nation but the former continues to lure potential entrepreneurs for reasons of reduced production hassles, workers’ management, government clearances, compliance of various legislations, adherence to labor laws,, etc. In case of business incubators, the qualified youth with intention for either kinds of business ideas, viz., Product-based Business (PBB) or Idea-based Business (IBB), may require and seek the initial support and mentoring provided by them, and the incubator managers have to oblige. But, cluster theory as well as the theory of entrepreneurship capital, suggests a likelihood of non-equal business preferences in societies. Using the State of Jammu and Kashmir in India as a case, this paper attempts a comparative confidence analysis of the PBB or IBB intentions of first-generation entrepreneurs. The findings of significant differences are reported and the likely reasons and suggestions are discussed.

Keywords

Business Incubators, Direction Identification, Idea-based Business (IBB), Jammu and Kashmir, Product-based Business (PBB).
User
Subscription Login to verify subscription
Notifications
Font Size

  • Abetti, P. A. (2004). Government-supported incubators in the Helsinki region, Finland: infrastructure, results, and best practices. Journal of Technology Transfer, 29(1), 19-40.

  • Adegbite, O. (2001). Business incubators and small enterprise development: the Nigerian experience, Small Business Economics, 17(3), 157-66.

  • Aerts, K., Matthyssens, P. & Vandenbempt, K. (2007). Critical Role and Screening Practices of European Business Incubators. Technovation, 27(5), 254 -267.

  • Allen, D. N. & McCluskey, R. (1990), Structure, policy, services and performance in the business incubator industry, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. 15(2), 61-78.

  • Allen, D. N. & Rahman, S. (1985). Small business incubators: A positive environment for entrepreneurship. Journal of Small Business Management, 2(3), 12-22.

  • Audretsch, D. B. & Keilbach, M. (2004). Does entrepreneurship capital matter? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28(5), 419-29.

  • Audretsch, D., Bönte W. & Keilbach, M. (2008). Entrepreneurship capital and its impact on knowledge diffusion and economic performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 23, 687-98.

  • Begley, T. M., Tan, W. L. & Schoch, H. (2005). Politico-economic factors associated with interest in starting a business: A multi-country study. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29, 35-55.

  • Berglund, H. (2015). Between cognition and discourse: phenomenology and the study of entrepreneurship. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 21(3), 472-488.

  • Bosma, N., Jones, K., Autio, E., & Levie, J. (2008). Global Entrepreneurship Monitor 2007 Executive Report. Babson Park, MA and London, UK: Babson College and London Business School. Retrieved from http://lincscot.info/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/gem_2007_executive_report.pdf

  • Bruton, G. D. (1998). Incubators as a small business support in Russia: Contrast of university-related U.S. incubators with the Zelenograd scientific and technology park. Journal of Small Business Management, 36, 91-94.

  • Caleb, M. A., Olaopa R.O. & Siyanbola, W. O. (2012). Technology business incubation as strategy for SME development: How far, how well in Nigeria. Science and Technology, 2(6), 172-181

  • Chandra, A. (2007). The role of HRD in business incubation centres. Available at www.midwestacademy.org (last assessed May, 2016).

  • Doi, N. & Cowling, M. (1998). The evolution of firm size and employment share distribution in Japanese and UK manufacturing: A study of small business presence. Small Business Economics, 10, 283-92.

  • Eichengreen, B., & Gupta, P. (2011). The service sector as India’s road to economic growth. In S. Berry, B. Bosworth and A. Panagariya (Eds.), India Policy Forum, 2010-11 (Volume 7) (pp. 1-42). New Delhi, India: National Council for Applied Economic Research. Retrieved from http://testnew.ncaer.org/image/userfiles/file/IPF-Volumes/Volume%207/1_Barry%20Eichengreen%20and%2 0 Poonam%20Gupta.pdf

  • Fife-Schaw, C. (2002). Surveys and sampling issues. In G. M. Breakwell, S. Hammond, and C. Fife-Schaw (Eds.) Research Methods in Psychology. London, UK: Sage Publications.

  • Gassman, O. & Becker, B. (2006). Towards a resource-based view of corporate incubators, International Journal of Innovation Management, 10(1), 19-45.

  • Government of Jammu and Kashmir. Planning and Development Department. (2014). J&K Economic Survey 2012-13. Srinagar, India: Author. Retrieved July, 1, 2014, from http://www.jandkplanning.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=2307&Itemid=295〈=en

  • Hanadi, A. L. M. & Busler, M. (2012). A comparative study of incubators’ landscapes in Europe and the Middle-east. European Journal of Business and Management, 4(10), 1-10.

  • Hindle, K. (2010). How community context affects entrepreneurial process: A diagnostic framework, Entrepreneurship & Regional Development. 22(7-8), 599-677.

  • Huggins, R. & Williams, N.(2011). Entrepreneurship and regional competitiveness: the role and progression of policy. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 23(9-10), 907-932.

  • Kabiraj, T. & Yang, C. (2001). Licensing vs. innovation incentives under uncertain government policies. International Review of Economics & Finance, 10(3), 247-261.

  • Kolvereid, L. (1996). OE versus SE: reasons for career choice intentions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 21(1), 47-57.

  • Krueger, N. F. (2000). The Cognitive infrastructure of opportunity emergence. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 24, 5-23.

  • Krueger, N. F., Reilly, M. D., &Carsrud, A. L. (2000). Competing models of entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Business Venturing, 15(5), 411-432.

  • Lalkaka, R. (2002). Technology business incubators to help build an innovationbased economy. Journal of Change Management, 3(2), 167-76.

  • Liñán, F., Urbano, D. & Guerrero, M. (2011). Regional variations in entrepreneurial cognitions: start-up intentions of university students in Spain, Entrepreneurship & Regional Development,. 23(3-4), 187-215.

  • Lussier, R. N., Bandara, C., &Marom, S. (2016). Entrepreneurship success factors: An empirical investigation in Sri Lanka. World Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development, 12(2), 102-112.

  • Manimala, M. J. (1994). Policies and founder characteristics of new technology based firms (NTBFs): A comparison between British and Indian firms. In R. Oakay, (Ed.), New technology-based firms in the 1990s (pp. 192-203). London, UK: Paul Chapman Publishing.

  • Manimala, M. J. (1999). Entrepreneurial policies and strategies: The innovator’s choice. New Delhi, India: Sage Publications.

  • Manimala, M. J., Mitra, J. & Singh, V. (2009). Enterprise Support Systems: Nature and relevance. In M. J. Manimala,, J. Mitra and V. Singh, (Eds.), Enterprise support systems: An international perspective (pp. 1-35). New Delhi, India: Sage Publications.

  • Markley, D. M. & McNamara, K. T. (1996). Local economic and state fiscal impacts of business incubators. State & Local Government Review, 28(1), 17-27.

  • Meek, W. R., Pacheco D. & York J. G. (2010). The impact of social norms on entrepreneurial action: evidence from the environmental entrepreneurship context. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(5), 493-509.

  • Michael, S. C. & Pearce, J. A. (II), (2009). The need for innovation as a rationale for government involvement in entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 21, 285-302.

  • Miller R. & Cote M. (1987), Growing the Next Silicon Valley. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

  • Narasimhan, R., Kumar, R. M. V. & Sridhar, M. K. (2015). Internationalization of technology-based SMEs in India: Critical factors of transformation. South Asian Journal of Management, 22(2), 144-166.

  • Nooteboom, B. (1988). The facts about small business and the real values of its ‘life world’. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 47(3), 299-314.

  • Nowak, M. J. & Grantham, C. E. (2000). The virtual incubator: Managing human capital in the software industry. Research Policy, 29(2), 125-34.

  • Ojha, A. K. (2009). Innovation and entrepreneurship in Indian IT industry: Contextual Impediments. In M. J. Manimala, J. Mitra and V. Singh, (Eds.), Enterprise support systems: An international perspective (pp. 89-106). New Delhi, India: Sage Publications.

  • Peters, L., Rice, M. & Sundararajan, M. (2004). The role of incubators in the entrepreneurial process. Journal of Technology Transfer, 29(1), 83-91.

  • Raju, D. & Rajan, A. T. (2015). SME firm performance and access to export markets: the role of institutional credit. South Asian Journal of Management. 22(2), 99-118.

  • Schwartz, M. (2009). Beyond incubation: an analysis of firm survival and exit dynamics in the post-graduation period. Journal of Technology Transfer, 34, 403-421.

  • Sharma, V. (2017). A study of employment preferences with special reference to entrepreneurship among the educated youth of Jammu and Kashmir, India (Doctoral dissertation). Katra, India: S.M.V.D University.

  • Sharma, V., Jain S. K. & Sharma, S. K. (2016). Identifying challenges and generating inputs for new business-incubators. Journal of Management & Entrepreneurship, 10(3), 50-64

  • Sherman, H. & Chappell, D. S. (1998). Methodological challenges in evaluating business incubator outcomes. Economic Development Quarterly, 12, 313-321.

  • Smilor. & Gill. (1986). Cited in Lewis, D. (2001). Does technology incubation work? A critical review. Rutgers University, Review of Economic Development Literature and Practice. No. 11. US Economic Dept. of Administration.

  • Stefanovic, M., Goran, D., & Milan, E. (2008). Incubators in developing countries: development perspectives. International Journal for Quality Research, 2(3), 157-163.

  • Tkachev, A., & Kolvereid, L. (1999). Self-employment intentions among Russian students. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 11(3), 101-114.

  • Trettin, L. & Welter, F. (2011). Challenges for spatially oriented entrepreneurship research, Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 23, 575-602.

  • Veciana, J. M., Aponte, M. & Urbano, D. (2005). University students’ attitudes towards entrepreneurship: a two countries comparison. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 1(2), 165-182.

  • Wennekers, S. & Thurik, A. R. (1999). Linking entrepreneurship and economic growth. Small Business Economics, 13, 27-55.

  • Yamane, T. (1967). Statistics: An Introductory Analysis (2nd Edn). New York: Harper and Row.

  • Yli-Renko, H., Autio, E. & Sapienza, H. J. (2011). Social capital, knowledge acquisition and knowledge exploitation in young technology-based firms. Strategic Management Journal, Special issue on ‘Strategic Entrepreneurship: Entrepreneurial Strategies for Wealth Creation’, 22(6/7), 587-613.

  • Zeffane, R. (2014). Does collectivism necessarily negate the spirit of entrepreneurship? International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 20(3), 278-296.

  • Zerbinati, S. & Souitaris, V. (2005). Entrepreneurship in the public sector: a framework of analysis in European local governments. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 17, 43-64.


Abstract Views: 183

PDF Views: 0




  • Analyzing Confidence of Youth for Incubator Direction Assessment:A Study in the State of Jammu and Kashmir

Abstract Views: 183  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Vivek Sharma
J&K Institute of Management Public Administration and Rural Development, Regional Campus, Sidhra, Jammu-180017, Jammu & Kashmir, India
Sudhir K. Jain
Department of Management Studies, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, Hauz Khas, New Delhi- 110016, India
Supran K. Sharma
School of Business, SMVD University, Kakryal, Katra-192320, Jammu & Kashmir, India

Abstract


Incubators are gaining popularity as entrepreneurship promotion agencies. Although the services and production sectors are equally important for Indian nation but the former continues to lure potential entrepreneurs for reasons of reduced production hassles, workers’ management, government clearances, compliance of various legislations, adherence to labor laws,, etc. In case of business incubators, the qualified youth with intention for either kinds of business ideas, viz., Product-based Business (PBB) or Idea-based Business (IBB), may require and seek the initial support and mentoring provided by them, and the incubator managers have to oblige. But, cluster theory as well as the theory of entrepreneurship capital, suggests a likelihood of non-equal business preferences in societies. Using the State of Jammu and Kashmir in India as a case, this paper attempts a comparative confidence analysis of the PBB or IBB intentions of first-generation entrepreneurs. The findings of significant differences are reported and the likely reasons and suggestions are discussed.

Keywords


Business Incubators, Direction Identification, Idea-based Business (IBB), Jammu and Kashmir, Product-based Business (PBB).

References