South Asian Journal of Management

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Development of a Bi-directional and Multi-Dimensional Measure of Work-life Balance


Affiliations
1 Institute of Management Nirma University (IMNU), Nirma University, Sarkhej- Gandhinagar Highway, Ahmedabad 382481, Gujarat, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Issues related to the interactions between personal and professional life have gained popularity amongst academicians as well as practitioners in recent times. In spite of this development, research in this area is not holistic as it has been mainly focusing on the adverse or favorable nature of interactions between work and life. Moreover, the scope of research in this area is largely restricted to the study of individuals with family responsibilities or is developed and appropriate only in distinct western cultural contexts. There is a lack of reported scale of work-life balance that assesses holistically the bi-directional and multi-dimensional nature of work-life interaction. In this study, an attempt has therefore been made to develop a holistic scale for measuring work-life balance. Data was collected from 400 working professionals working in diverse sectors and based in four major cities in India. Quantitative analysis has yielded a 19-item, four-factor scale for measuring work to life and life to work interference and enhancement with high reliability and validity measures. This paper further discusses the strategic implications of this scale for human resource management in general.

Keywords

Bi-Directional, India, Multi-Dimensional, Scale Development, Work-Life Balance.
User
Subscription Login to verify subscription
Notifications
Font Size

  • Basu, S. (2008). Gender stereotype in corporate India: A glimpse. New Delhi, India: Response Books.

  • Bharat, S. (1995). Attitudes and sex-role perceptions among working couples in India. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 26(3), 371-388.

  • Budhwar, P., Saini, D., & Bhatnagar, J. (2005). Women in management in the new economic environment: The case of India. Asia Pacific Business Review, 11(2), 179-193.

  • Carlson, D., Kacmar, K., Wayne, J., & Grzywacz, J. (2006). Measuring the positive side of the work–family interface: Development and validation of a work–family enrichment scale. Journal of Vocational Behaviour, 68(1), 131-164.

  • Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and internal structure tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297-334.

  • D’Cruz, P., & Bharat, S. (2001). Beyond joint and nuclear: The Indian family revisited. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 32(2), 167-194.

  • De Cieri, H., Holmes, B., Abbott, J., & Petti, T. (2005). Achievements and challenges for work/life strategies in Australian organizations. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 16(1), 90-103.

  • Duxbury, L. E., & Higgins, C. A. (1991).Gender differences in work-family conflict.Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(1), 60-74.

  • Fisher, G., Bulger, C., & Smith, C. (2009). Beyond work and family: A measure of work/nonwork interference and enhancement. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 14(4), 441-456.

  • Fisher-McAuley, G., Stanton, J., Jolton, J., & Gavin, J. (2003, April). Modelling the Relationship Between Work Life Balance and Organisational Outcomes. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial-Organisational Psychology. Orlando, FL, USA.

  • Frone, M. (2003). Work–Family Balance. In J. C. Quick & L. E. Tetrick (Eds.), Handbook of Occupational Health Psychology (pp. 143-162). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

  • Frone, M., Russell, M., & Cooper, M. (1992). Antecedents and outcomes of work– family conflict: Testing a model of the work-family interface. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77(1), 65-75.

  • Garrett, E., & Woodworth, S. (1981). Statistics in Psychology and Education. Bombay, India: Vakils, Feffer & Simons Ltd.

  • Giordini, A. (2008). Effects of work-family human resource practices: a longitudinal perspective. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 19(11), 2079-2094.

  • Greenhaus, J., & Beutell, N. (1985). Sources of conflict between work and family roles. Academy of Management Review, 10(1), 76-88.

  • Greenhaus J., Collins K., & Shaw, J. (2003). The relation between work-family balance and quality of life. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 63(3), 510-531.

  • Grzywacz, J. & Marks, N. (2000). Reconceptualizing the work-family interface: An ecological perspective on the correlates of positive and negative spillover between work and family. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 5(1), 111-126.

  • Hair, J., Anderson, R., Tatham, R., & Black, W. (1989). Multivariate Data Analysis. New Jersey, NJ: Prentice-Hall Inc.

  • Hayman, J. (2005). Psychometric Assessment of an Instrument Designed to Measure Work Life Balance. Research and Practice in Human Resource Management, 13(1), 85-91.

  • Hill, E., Hawkins, A., Ferris, M., & Weitzman, M. (2001). Finding an extra day a week: The positive influence of perceived job flexibility on work and family life balance. Family Relations, 50(1), 49-58.

  • Hinkin, T. (1995). A review of scale development practices in the study of organizations. Journal of Management, 21(5), 967-988.

  • Huffman, A. H., Payne, S. C. & Casper, W. J. (2004, April). A Comparative Analysis of Work-family Balance on Retention: Single Earner Versus Dual Earner Family Employees. Paper presented at the 19th Annual Meeting of the Society for Industry and Organisational Psychology, Chicago, IL, USA.

  • Kahn, R., Wolfe, D., Quinn, R., Snoek, D., & Rosenthal, R. (1964). Organizational Stress: Studies in Role Conflict and Ambiguity. New York, NY: Wiley.

  • Khandelwal, P. (2002). Gender Stereotypes at work: Implications for organizations. Indian Journal of Training and Development, 32(2), 72-83.

  • Kirchmeyer, C. (1992). Perceptions of nonwork-to-work spillover: Challenging the common view of conflict-ridden domain relationships. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 13(2), 231-249.

  • Kulkarni, S. S. (2002). Women and professional competency – A survey report. Indian Journal of Training and Development, 31(2), 11-16.

  • Lewis, S., & Cooper, C. (1995). Balancing the work/home interface: A European perspective. Human Resource Management Review, 5(4), 289-305.

  • Lewis, S., Gambles, R., & Rapoport, R. (2007). The constraints of a ‘work-life balance’ approach: an international perspective. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 18(3), 360-373.

  • MacDermid S. M. (2005). (Re)considering conflict between work and family. In E. Kossek E. and S. Lambert (Eds.), Work and Life Integration -organizational, Cultural and individual perspectives (pp. 19-40). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

  • MacKenzie, S. B., Podsakoff, P. M., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2011). Construct measurement and validation procedures in MIS and behavioral research: Integrating new and existing techniques. MIS Quarterly, 35(2), 293-334.

  • Meurs, J., Breaux, D., & Perrewe, P. (2008). The family and HRM in North America: How the demographic and social changes are shifting the way work-family issues are managed by organizations and employees. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 19(8), 1455-1471.

  • Milkie, M., & Peltola, P. (1999). Playing all the roles: Gender and the workfamily balancing act. Journal of Marriage and Family, 61(2), 476-490.

  • Narayan, A., & Bhardwaj, G. (2005). Dual career nuclear families in India: Attitudes and social support. Indian Journal of Industrial Relations, 41(1), 79-93.

  • Nord, W., Fox, S., Phoenix, A., & Viano, K. (2002). Real-world reactions to work-life balance programs: Lessons for effective implementation. Organisational Dynamics, 30(3), 223-238.

  • Perry-Smith, J., & Blum, T. (2000). Work–family human resource bundles and perceived organizational performance. Academy of Management Journal, 43(6), 1107-1117.

  • Rajadhyaksha, U., & Bhatnagar, D. (2000). Life role salience: A study of dualcareer couples in the Indian context. Human Relations, 53(4), 489-511.

  • Reiter, N. (2007). Work life balance: What do you mean of the ethical ideology underpinning appropriate application? The Journal of Applied Behavioural Science, 43(2), 273-294.

  • Roberts, K. (2007). Work-life balance – The sources of the contemporary problem and the probable outcomes. Employee Relations, 29(4), 334-351.

  • Seiber, S. (1974). Towards a theory of role accumulation. American Sociological Review, 39, 567-578.

  • Saltzstein, A., Ting Y., & Saltzstein, G. (2001). Work-family balance and job satisfaction: The impact of family-friendly policies on attitudes of federal government employees. Public Administration Review, 61(4), 452-467.

  • Schriesheim, C. A., & Hill, K. D. (1981). Controlling acquiescence response bias by item reversals: The effect on questionnaire validity. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 41(1), 1101-1114.

  • Schriesheim, C. A., Powers, K. J., Scandura, T. A., Gardiner, C. C., & Lankau, M. J. (1993). Improving construct measurement in management research: Comments and a quantitative approach for assessing the theoretical content adequacy of paper-and-pencil survey-type instruments. Journal of Management, 19(2), 385-417.

  • Schwab, D. P. (1980). Construct Validity in Organizational Behavior. In Research in Organizational Behavior, 2, 3-43, Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

  • Shah, R. (2012). Work-life balance: The theoretical framework. In Hand book of Management and Behavioural Science Dynamics of Change- Micro and Macro Perspective (pp. 382-391). New Delhi, India: Wisdom Publications.

  • Stamper, C., & Masterson, S. (2002). Insider or outsider? How employee’s perception of insider status affect work behaviour. Journal of Organisational Behaviour. 23, 875-894.

  • Stephens, G., & Sommer, S. (1996). The measurement of work to family conflict. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 56(3), 475-486.

  • Tarabadkar, A., & Ghadially R. (1985). Achievement motivation and job satisfaction. Productivity, 26, 231-237.

  • Valcour, M. & Hunter, L. (2005). Technology, organizations and work-life integration. In E. Kossek E. and S. Lambert S. (Eds.), Work and Life Integration Organizational, Cultural and Individual Perspectives (pp. 61-84) Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

  • Voydanoff, P. (2004). The effects of work demands and resources on worktofamily conflict and facilitation.Journal of Marriage and Family, 66(2), 398-412.

  • Voydanoff, P. (2005). Social integration, work-family conflict and facilitation, and job and marital quality. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67(3), 666-679.

  • Wesley, R., Muthuswamy, P., & Darling, S. (2009). Gender difference in family participation and family demand in dual career families in India – An empirical study. Vilakshan: The XIMB Journal of Management, 6(2), 49-62.

  • White, J. (1999). Work-family stage and satisfaction with work-family balance. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 30(2), 163-175.


Abstract Views: 270

PDF Views: 0




  • Development of a Bi-directional and Multi-Dimensional Measure of Work-life Balance

Abstract Views: 270  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Reena Shah
Institute of Management Nirma University (IMNU), Nirma University, Sarkhej- Gandhinagar Highway, Ahmedabad 382481, Gujarat, India

Abstract


Issues related to the interactions between personal and professional life have gained popularity amongst academicians as well as practitioners in recent times. In spite of this development, research in this area is not holistic as it has been mainly focusing on the adverse or favorable nature of interactions between work and life. Moreover, the scope of research in this area is largely restricted to the study of individuals with family responsibilities or is developed and appropriate only in distinct western cultural contexts. There is a lack of reported scale of work-life balance that assesses holistically the bi-directional and multi-dimensional nature of work-life interaction. In this study, an attempt has therefore been made to develop a holistic scale for measuring work-life balance. Data was collected from 400 working professionals working in diverse sectors and based in four major cities in India. Quantitative analysis has yielded a 19-item, four-factor scale for measuring work to life and life to work interference and enhancement with high reliability and validity measures. This paper further discusses the strategic implications of this scale for human resource management in general.

Keywords


Bi-Directional, India, Multi-Dimensional, Scale Development, Work-Life Balance.

References