Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Disinvestment of National Aluminium Company Limited (NALCO):A Public Sector Enterprise, Government of India


Affiliations
1 Public Systems Group, Indian Institute of Management, Vastrapur, Ahmedabad 380009, India
2 B K School of Business Management, Gujarat University, Navrangapura, Ahmedabad 380009, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Disinvestment, the major agenda of the economic reforms of the Government of India (GOI) since 1991, led a debate on the policy and its impact on stakeholders. Following its agenda, the GOI decided to disinvest the National Aluminium Company Limited (NALCO) during 2002-03 and 2005-06. This case highlights the decision to disinvest NALCO, the reaction of stakeholders and its implication, and outcomes. The first part describes the background and the case facts and the second part presents an analysis of the case and proposes the stakeholders’ management in the disinvestment process.
User
Subscription Login to verify subscription
Notifications
Font Size

Abstract Views: 172

PDF Views: 0




  • Disinvestment of National Aluminium Company Limited (NALCO):A Public Sector Enterprise, Government of India

Abstract Views: 172  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Amit Kumar Srivastava
Public Systems Group, Indian Institute of Management, Vastrapur, Ahmedabad 380009, India
Vilas Kulkarni
B K School of Business Management, Gujarat University, Navrangapura, Ahmedabad 380009, India

Abstract


Disinvestment, the major agenda of the economic reforms of the Government of India (GOI) since 1991, led a debate on the policy and its impact on stakeholders. Following its agenda, the GOI decided to disinvest the National Aluminium Company Limited (NALCO) during 2002-03 and 2005-06. This case highlights the decision to disinvest NALCO, the reaction of stakeholders and its implication, and outcomes. The first part describes the background and the case facts and the second part presents an analysis of the case and proposes the stakeholders’ management in the disinvestment process.