South Asian Journal of Management

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

ISRAI:A New Barometer to Appraise Retailing Attractiveness in Indian States


Affiliations
1 Army Institute of Management Kolkata, Maulana Abul Kalam Azad University of Technology, Judges Court Road, Alipore, Opposite Alipore Telephone Exchange, Kolkata-700027, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The greatest challenge in decision making that retailers cope up, is in choosing an ideal destination for retailing. This paper delves deep to evaluate the relative attractiveness of retailing destinations among 29 Indian states by constructing a new composite index (ISRAI). Multiple criteria decision making framework of TOPSIS forms the structural base of this index. Five factors representing market attractiveness and fifteen differing criteria explaining them are identified from prior research. For a more realistic estimation, this index incorporates criteria weights determined from entropic considerations. This study has identified states with higher attractiveness of retailing opportunities, which includes the larger as well as smaller ones in terms of geographical area. Finally, the outcome of ISRAI has been validated with VIKOR, a contemporary prioritization model. A significant convergence of outputs from these two approaches endorses validity of ISRAI and thus its use by retailers as a decision making tool is anticipated.

Keywords

Entropy, ISRAI, Market Attractiveness, Multiple Criteria Decision Making, Retailing Attractiveness.
User
Subscription Login to verify subscription
Notifications
Font Size

  • Anisseh, M., Yusuff, R. M., Shahraki, M. R., &Agamohamadi, F. B. (2011). An extended group decision-making model for personnel performance evaluation. Journal for International Business and Entrepreneurship Development, 5(4), 351-361. doi: 10.1504/JIBED.2011.042389.

  • A.T. Kearny. (2019). The 2019 Global Retail Development Index. Retrieved from https://www.atkearney.com/global-retail-development-index

  • Awasthi, A., Chauhan, S. S., & Goyal, S. K. (2011a). A fuzzy multi criteria approach for evaluating environmental performance of suppliers. International Journal of Production Economics, 126, 370-378.

  • Awasthi, A., Chauhan, S. S., & Goyal, S. K. (2011b). A multi-criteria decision making approach for location planning for urban distribution centers under uncertainty. Mathematical and Computer Modeling, 53, 98–109.

  • Behzadian, M., Otaghsara, S.K., Yazdani, M., & Ignatius, J. (2012). A state-of the-art survey of TOPSIS applications. Expert Systems with Applications, 39, 13051– 13069. Retrieved from http://kgk.uni-obuda.hu/sites/default/files/A%20stateof%20the-art%20survey%20of%20TOPSIS%20applications.pdf

  • Birkin, M., Clarke, G., & Clarke, M. (2010). Refining an operationalizing entropy maximizing models for business application. Geographical Analysis, 42(4), 422-445.

  • Burger, M., Meijers, E., Van Oort., F. (2014). Regional spatial structure and retail amenities in The Netherlands. Regional Studies, 48(12), 1972-1992.

  • Büyüközkan, G., & Görener, A. (2015). Evaluation of product development partners using an integrated AHP-VIKOR model. Kybernetes, 44, 220–237.

  • Büyüközkan, G., &Karabulut, Y. (2017). Energy project performance evaluation with sustainability perspective. Energy, 119(C), 549-560. Retrieved from https:// econpapers.repec.org/article/eeeenergy/v_3a119_3ay_3a2017_3ai_3ac_3ap_3a549-560.htm.

  • Care Ratings. (2017). Indian retail industry – structure and prospects. Retrieved from http://www.careratings.com

  • Chang, T.-H. (2014). Fuzzy VIKOR method: A case study of the hospital service evaluation in Taiwan. Information Sciences, 271, 196-212.

  • Chattopadhyay, A., &Samanta, S. (2017). Assaying compromise solution from the perspective of a renewable energy generation potential in India. Journal of Advance Research in Management, 5(5), 212-224.

  • Chen, I.-S., & Chen, J.-K. (2012). Creativity strategy selection for the higher education system. Quality & Quantity, 46, 739-750.

  • Chen, J. & Hobbs, P. (2003). Global Real Estate Risk Index, The Journal of Portfolio Management, Special Real Estate Issue, 66-75.

  • Chin, W., Dent, P., & Claire, R. (2006). An Explanatory Analysis of Barriers to Investment and Market Maturity in Southeast Asian Cities. Journal of Real Estate Portfolio Management, 12(1), 49-57.

  • Clarke, G. (1998). Changing methods of location planning for retail companies. Geojournal, 45(4), 289-298.

  • D’Arcy, E., & Keogh, G. (1998). Territorial Competition and Property Market Process: an Exploratory Analysis. Urban Studies, 35(8), 1215-1220.

  • Deloitte. (2019). Unraveling the Indian consumer. Retrieved from https:// www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/in/Documents/consumer-business/inconsumerRLS-2019-noexp.pdf.

  • Deng, H., Yeh, C. H., & Willis, R. J. (2000). Inter-company comparison using modified TOPSIS with objective weights. Computers & Operations Research, 27, 963-973.

  • Dennis, C. (2005). Objects of desire: Consumer behavior in shopping centre choices. Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

  • Dincer, H., & Hacioglu, U. (2013). Performance evaluation with fuzzy VIKOR and AHP method based on customer satisfaction in Turkish banking sector. Kybernetes, 42, 1072–1085.

  • Directorate of Registration and Stamp Revenue. (2017). Stamp Duty Calculator for Property registration. Retrieved from TodayPriceRates:http:// property.todaypricerates.com/stamp-duty-registration-percentage-value-calculator

  • Du, Y., Gao, C., Hu, Y., Mahadevan, S., & Deng, Y. (2014). A new method of identifying influential nodes in complex networks based on TOPSIS. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 399, 57-69.

  • Erdin, C., &Akbaº, H. (2019). A Comparative Analysis of Fuzzy TOPSIS and Geographic Information Systems (GIS) for the Location Selection of Shopping Malls: A Case Study from Turkey. Sustainability. doi:11. 3837.10.3390/su11143837.

  • Franklin, L. A. (1988). A note on approximations and convergence in distribution for spearman’s rank correlation coefficient. Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, 17(1), 55-59. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/ 03610928808829609

  • Guerts, T. G., & Jaffe, A. J. (1996). Risk and Real Estate Investment: An International perspective, The Journal of Real Estate Research, 11(2), 117-130.

  • Guo, P, &Pedryez, W (eds.), Human-Centric Decision Making Models for Social Sciences. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer-Verlag. Doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-393075_4,

  • Hoskin, N., Higgins, D., & Cardew, R. (2004). Macroeconomic Variables and Real Estate Returns: An International Comparison. The Appraisal Journal, Spring, 163-170. Retrieved from https://www.lasalle.com/documents/ISA_2017.pdf

  • Huang, J. (2008). Combining entropy weight and TOPSIS method for information system selection. In Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE conference on cybernetics and intelligent systems, Chengdu, China, 21–24 September 2008, 1281–1284. doi: 10.1109/ICCIS.2008.4670971.

  • Hwang, C-L., & Yoon, K. (1981). Multiple Attribute Decision Making Methods and Applications. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.

  • İç, Y. T. (2014). A TOPSIS based design of experiment approach to assess company ranking. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 227, 630–647.

  • Indian Brand Equity Foundation. (2018). Organized Retail Expansion of India 2017. Retrieved from https://www.ibef.org/industry/retail-india.aspx

  • Jahanshahloo, G. R., Lotfi, F. H., & Davoodi, A. R. (2009). Extension of TOPSIS for decision-making problems with interval data: Interval efficiency. Mathematical and Computer Modeling, 49, 1137-1142.

  • JLL. (2017). ISA 2017 Investment Strategy Annual. Retrieved from https:// www.lasalle.com/documents/ISA_2017.pdf

  • JLL. (2018). Global Real Estate Transparency Index 2018. Retrieved from https:// www.jll.co.in/en/trends-and-insights/research/global-real-estate-transparency-index-2018

  • Kahraman, C., & Otay, I. (Eds.). (2019). Fuzzy multi-criteria decision making using neutrosophic sets. Retrieved from https:// doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00045-5_11.

  • Keogh, G., & D’Arcy, E. (1999). Property Market Efficiency:An Institutional Economies Perspective, Journal Of Urban Studies, 36(13), 2401-2444.

  • Knack, S. & Keefer, P. (1995). Institutions and economic performance: CrossCountry tests using alternative institutional measures. Economics and Politics, 7(3), 207-227.

  • Kwong, C. K., & Tam, S. M. (2002). Case-based reasoning approach to concurrent design of low power transformers. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 128, 136-141.

  • La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F. Shleifer, A. and Vishny, R. (1997). Law and Finance (NBER working paper No 5661). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

  • Lee, S. (2001). The risks of investing in real estate markets of the Asian region (Working paper of Department of Land Management, The University of Reading, No. 6). Reading, UK: University of Reading.

  • Lee, Z.-Y., & Pai, C.-C. (2015). Applying Improved DEA and VIKOR Methods to Evaluate the Operation Performance for World’s Major TFT–LCD Manufacturers. Asia-Pacific Journal of Operations Research, 32(3), 1-33.

  • Li, H., Adeli, H., Sun, J., & Han, J.-G. (2011). Hybridizing principles of TOPSIS with case-based reasoning for business failure prediction. Computers & Operations Research, 38, 409–419.

  • Li, M., Jin, L., & Wang, J. (2014). A new MCDM method combining QFD with TOPSIS for knowledge management system selection from the user’s perspective in intuitionistic fuzzy environment. Applied Soft Computing, 21, 28–37.

  • Li, Y.-M., Lai, C.-Y., & Kao, C.-P. (2011). Building a qualitative recruitment system via SVM with MCDM approach. Applied Intelligence, 35, 75–88.

  • Liao, H., & Mei, J. P. (1999). Institutional Factors and Real Estate – A Cross Country Study, International Real Estate Review, 2(1), 21-34.

  • Liu, W. (2016). VIKOR method for group decision making problems with ordinal interval numbers. International Journal of Hybrid Information Technology, 9(2), 67-74.

  • Lynn, D. J. (2007). The tectonic forces of global real estate: Implications for global investment and portfolio managers. Journal of Real Estate Portfolio Management, 13(1), 87-92.

  • Mardani, A., Zavadskas, E. K., Govindan, K., Senin, A. A., & Ahmad, J. (2016). VIKOR Technique: A Systematic Review of the State of the Art Literature on Methodologies and Applications. Sustainability, 8(1), 37. Retrieved from https:// doi.org/10.3390/su8010037.

  • Ministry Of Agriculture And Farmers Welfare. (2017). 2015-16. Augmenting Rural Storage Infrastructure Through Scheme Of Rural Godowns. Retrieved from http://164.100.47.193/lsscommittee/Agriculture/16_Agriculture_28.pdf

  • Ministry of food Processing Industries. (2017). State wise distribution of Cold Storage capacity.Retrieved from http://pib.nic.in/newsite/PrintRelease.aspx?relid=168990

  • Ministry of Housing and Urban Poverty Alleviation National Buildings Organization. (2013). State Of Housing In India a Statistical Compendium. Retrieved from http://nbo.nic.in/Images/PDF/Housing_in_India_Compendium_ English_Version.pdf

  • Ministry of Human Resource development. (2018). Retrieved from https://mhrd.gov.in/documents_reports

  • Ministry of Labour & Employment Labour Bureau. (2018). Retrieved from http://labourbureaunew.gov.in

  • Ministry of Power. (2017). Retrieved from http://www.cea.nic.in

  • Ministry of Railways. (2016). Statewise Length of Railway Lines and Survey For New Railway Lines. Retrieved from http://pib.nic.in/newsite/PrintRelease.aspx?relid=155019

  • Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation. (2018). Roads-Statistical Year Book India 2017. Retrieved from http://www.mospi.gov.in/statistical-year-book-india/ 2017/190

  • National Council of Applied Economic Research. (2018). 2017-18 annual report of the NCAER. Retrieved from www.ncaer.org/uploads/annual-report/pdf/

  • NITI Aayog. (2015). Per Capita NSDP at current prices (2004-05 to 2014-15). Retrieved from http://niti.gov.in/content/capita-nsdp-current-prices-2004-05-2014-15

  • Office of the Registrar General & Census Commisioner, India. (2017). 2011 Census of India. Retrieved from http://www.censusindia.gov.in/2011census

  • Opricovic, S. (1998). Multi criteria optimization of civil engineering systems (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Belgrade, Serbia: Faculty of Civil Engineering.

  • Park, J. H., Park, I., Kwun, Y. C., & Tan, X. (2011). Extension of the TOPSIS method for decision making problems under interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy environment. Applied Mathematical Modeling, 35, 2544-2556.

  • Planning Commission. (2013). Retrieved from planningcommission.nic.in/reports/genrep/ann_e13_14.pdf

  • PWC. (2015). The promise of Indian retail – From vision to execution. Retrieved from https://www.pwc.in/assets/pdfs/publications.

  • PWC. (2017). The promise of Indian retail – From vision to execution. Retrieved from https://www.pwc.in/assets/pdfs/publications/2017/the-promise-of-indian-retailfromvision-to-execution.pdf.

  • PWC. (2018). The changing landscape of the retail food service industry. Retrieved from https://www.pwc.in/assets/pdfs/publications/2018.

  • Quijano, H. R., Botero, B. S., & Domínguez, B. J. (2012). MODERGIS application: Integrated simulation platform to promote and develop renewable sustainable energy plans, Colombian case study. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16, 5176-5187.

  • REIS-JLL. (2014). Retail. Retrieved from https://www.jll.co.in/en/industries/retail 69. Sahu, A., & Jena, P. (2018). Role of libraries in promoting education: a bibliometric analysis (2012-2016). Collection and Curation, 37(1), 1-8. Retrieved from https:// doi.org/10.1108/CC-01-2018-001.

  • Sanayei, A., Mousavi, S. F., & Yazdankhah, A. (2010). Group decision making process for supplier selection with VIKOR under fuzzy environment. Expert Systems with Application, 37, 24-30.

  • Sarrafha, K., Rahmati, S. H. A., Niaki, S. T. A., & Zaretalab, A. (2015). A biobjective integrated procurement, production, and distribution problem of a multiechelon supply chain network design: A new tuned MOEA. Computers & Operations Research, 54, 35-51.

  • Shannon, C.E., & Weaver, W. (1947). The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana, IL: The University of Illinois Press.

  • Shemshadi, A., Shirazi, H., Toreihi, M., & Tarokh, M. J. (2011). A fuzzy VIKOR method for supplier selection based on entropy measure for objective weighting. Expert Systems with Application, 38, 12160–12167.

  • Svensson, J. (1998). Investment, property rights and political instability: Theory and evidence. European Economic Review, 42(7), 1317-1341.

  • Tavanaa, M., Mavi, R. K., Arteaga, F. J. S., &Doust, E. R. (2016). An extended VIKOR method using stochastic data and subjective judgments. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 97(C), 240-247.

  • Telecom Regulatory Authority of India. (2018). Highlights of Telecom Subscription Data Retrived from https://www.trai.gov.in/release-publication/reports/telecom-subscriptions-reports

  • The Economic Times. (2017, Mar 21). Consumption story set to treble to $4 trillion by 2025: Report. Retrieved from https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/economy/indicators/affluence-to-drive-consumption-in-india-to-4-trillion-by-2025-boston-consulting-group/articleshow/57751144.cms

  • Tong, K. W., Kwong, C. K., & Ip, K. W. (2003). Optimization of process conditions for the transfer molding of electronic packages. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 138, 361-365.

  • Tsai, W.-H., Chou, W.-C., &Leu, J.-D. (2011). An effectiveness evaluation model for the web-based marketing of the airline industry. Expert Systems with Application, 38, 15499-15516.

  • Ülengin, F., Kabak, Ö., Önsel, Ş ., Ülengin, B., & Aktaş, E. (2010). A problemstructuring model for analyzing transportation–environment relationships. European Journal of Operational Research, 200, 844-859.

  • Union Investment. (2019). The Global Retail Attractiveness Index 2019. Retrieved from https://www.across-magazine.com/global-retail-attractiveness-index-second-quarter-2019/

  • Venkatesh, N. (2013). Indian Retail Industries Market Analysis: Issues, Challenges and its Opportunity for the 21st Century. International Journal of Application or Innovation in Engineering & Management, 2(12), 164-174.

  • Wang, C. N., Huang, Y. F., Cheng, I. F., & Nguyen, V. T. (2008). A Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) Approach Using Hybrid SCOR Metrics, AHP, and TOPSIS for Supplier Evaluation and Selection in the Gas and Oil Industry. Processes, 6(252). Doi:10.3390/pr6120252. Retrieved from www.mdpi.com/journal/ processes

  • Wang, C.-H., & Wu, C.-W. (2014). Combining conjoint analysis with Kano model to optimize product varieties of smart phones: A VIKOR perspective. Journal of Industrial and Production Engineering, 31, 177-186.

  • Wang, T. C., & Lee, H. D. (2009). Developing a fuzzy TOPSIS approach based on subjective weights and objective weights. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(5), 8980-8985. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2008.11.035

  • Wang, T. C., Lee, H. D., & Chang, M. C. S. (2007). A fuzzy TOPSIS Approach with entropy measure for decision-making problem. In: Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE International conference on industrial engineering and engineering management, Singapore, Singapore, 2-4 December 2007. Doi: 10.1109/IEEM.2007.4419164.

  • Wei, G. W. (2010). Extension of TOPSIS method for 2-tuple linguistic multiple attribute group decision making with incomplete weight information. Knowledge Information System, 25, 623-634. Doi: 10.1007/s10115-009-0258-3.

  • Wu, H.-Y., Tzeng, G.-H., & Chen, Y.-H. (2009). A fuzzy MCDM approach for evaluating banking performance based on Balanced Scorecard. Expert Systems with Application, 2009, 36, 10135-10147.

  • Yurdakul, M., & Ic, Y. T. (2009). Application of correlation test to criteria selection for multi criteria decision making (MCDM) models. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 40, 403-412.

  • Zandi, F., & Tavana, M. (2010). A multi-attribute group decision support system for information technology project selection. International Journal of Business Information Systems, 6(2), 179-199.

  • Zeng, Q.-L., Li, D.-D., & Yang, Y.-B. (2013). VIKOR method with enhanced accuracy for multiple criteria decision making in healthcare management. Journal of Medical Systems, 37, 1-9.

  • Zhang, S., & Xu, J. (2013). Transmission system accuracy optimum allocation for multiaxis machine tools’ scheme design. Proceedings of Institute of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, 227, 2762-2779.

  • Zhu, G.-N., Hu, J., Qi, J., Gu, C.-C., & Peng, Y.-H. (2015). An integrated AHP and VIKOR for design concept evaluation based on rough number. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 29, 408-418.


Abstract Views: 183

PDF Views: 0




  • ISRAI:A New Barometer to Appraise Retailing Attractiveness in Indian States

Abstract Views: 183  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Ayan Chattopadhyay
Army Institute of Management Kolkata, Maulana Abul Kalam Azad University of Technology, Judges Court Road, Alipore, Opposite Alipore Telephone Exchange, Kolkata-700027, India
Somarata Chakraborty
Army Institute of Management Kolkata, Maulana Abul Kalam Azad University of Technology, Judges Court Road, Alipore, Opposite Alipore Telephone Exchange, Kolkata-700027, India

Abstract


The greatest challenge in decision making that retailers cope up, is in choosing an ideal destination for retailing. This paper delves deep to evaluate the relative attractiveness of retailing destinations among 29 Indian states by constructing a new composite index (ISRAI). Multiple criteria decision making framework of TOPSIS forms the structural base of this index. Five factors representing market attractiveness and fifteen differing criteria explaining them are identified from prior research. For a more realistic estimation, this index incorporates criteria weights determined from entropic considerations. This study has identified states with higher attractiveness of retailing opportunities, which includes the larger as well as smaller ones in terms of geographical area. Finally, the outcome of ISRAI has been validated with VIKOR, a contemporary prioritization model. A significant convergence of outputs from these two approaches endorses validity of ISRAI and thus its use by retailers as a decision making tool is anticipated.

Keywords


Entropy, ISRAI, Market Attractiveness, Multiple Criteria Decision Making, Retailing Attractiveness.

References