South Asian Journal of Management

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

The Effect of Research Infrastructure on the Scientific Benefits of Collaboration: An Empirical Investigation of Shanghai Synchrotron Radiation Facility (SSRF)


Affiliations
1 School of Economics and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (UCAS), Building 7, #80, Zhongguancun East Road, Haidian District, Beijing, China
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The coexistence of knowledge sharing and knowledge leakage in scientific collaboration positively and negatively affects the researchers to collaborate. Extant literatures extensively link the scientific benefits of collaboration with Research Infrastructure (RI). In this study, we discuss the direct and indirect effects of RI on scientific benefits of collaboration in the context of Shanghai Synchrotron Radiation Facility (SSRF). Based on 295 papers published by SSRF, we empirically analyze the direct effects of mutual trust and research subsidies on scientific benefits, and the indirect effect of SSRF as a RI. The results show that mutual trust and research subsidies have a direct positive effect on scientific benefits of collaboration, while RI has an indirect negative effect between research subsidies and scientific benefit. Our findings contribute to the understanding of the role of RI as an experimental platform, paying attention to knowledge sharing and knowledge leakage in scientific collaboration.

Keywords

Collaboration, Knowledge Leakage, Knowledge Sharing, Research Infrastructures (RI), Scientific Benefits.
User
Subscription Login to verify subscription
Notifications
Font Size

  • Acs, Z. J., Audretsch, D. B., & Feldman, M. P. (1992). Real effects of academic research: comment. The American Economic Review, 82(1), 363-367.

  • Ahmad, A., Bosua, R., & Scheepers, R. (2014). Protecting organizational competitive advantage: A knowledge leakage perspective. Computers & Security, 42, 27-39.

  • Ambrosini, V., & Bowman, C. (2001). Tacit knowledge: Some suggestions for operationalization. Journal of Management Studies, 38(6), 811-829.

  • Annamalai, B., & Varshney, S. (2018). Practical Implications in Popular Consumer Behaviour Research. The Marketing Review, 18(3), 322-343.

  • Auranen, O., & Nieminen, M. (2010). University research funding and publication performance—An international comparison. Research Policy, 39(6), 822-834. Doi:10.1016/j.respol.2010.03.003

  • Autio, E., Hameri, A.-P., & Bianchi-Streit, M. (2003). Technology transfer and technological learning through CERN’s procurement activity: Cern.

  • Autio, E., Hameri, A.-P., & Vuola, O. (2004). A framework of industrial knowledge spillovers in big-science centers. Research Policy, 33(1), 107-126.

  • Beatrice D’Ippolitoa, T., Charles-Clemens Rüling. (2019). Research collaboration in Large Scale Research Infrastructures. Research Policy. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2019.01.011

  • Benavent-Pérez, M., Gorraiz, J., Gumpenberger, C., & de Moya-Anegón, F. (2012). The different flavors of research collaboration: a case study of their influence on university excellence in four world regions. Scientometrics, 93(1), 41-58.

  • Bernsteiner, R., Strasser, J., Ploder, C., Schlögl, S., & Dilger, T. (2019). Knowledge Governance Helps Minimizing the Risks of External Knowledge Transfer. Paper presented at the International Conference on Knowledge Management in Organizations.

  • Bo, C. F. D. (2015). The rate of return to investment in R&D: The case of research infrastructures. Technological Forecasting & Social Change. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2016.02.018

  • Bozeman, B., & Youtie, J. (2017). The strength in numbers: The new science of team science: Princeton University Press.

  • Bressan, B., & Boisot, M. (2011). The individual in the ATLAS Collaboration: A learning perspective. Collisions and collaboration: The organization of learning in the ATLAS experiment at the LHC, 201-225.

  • Broekel, T., Fornahl, D., & Morrison, A. (2015). Another cluster premium: Innovation subsidies and R&D collaboration networks. Research Policy, 44(8), 1431-1444.

  • Bruneel, J., D’Este, P., & Salter, A. (2010). Investigating the factors that diminish the barriers to university–industry collaboration. Research Policy, 39(7), 858-868. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2010.03.006

  • Brusoni, S., Prencipe, A., & Pavitt, K. (2001). Knowledge specialization, organizational coupling, and the boundaries of the firm: why do firms know more than they make? Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(4), 597-621.

  • Bstieler, L., Hemmert, M., & Barczak, G. (2015). Trust formation in university– industry collaborations in the US biotechnology industry: IP policies, shared governance, and champions. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32(1), 111-121.

  • Camporesi, T. (2001). High-energy physics as a career springboard. European Journal of Physics, 22(2), 139.

  • Carrazza, S., Ferrara, A., & Salini, S. (2016). Research infrastructures in the LHC era: a scientometric approach. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 112, 121-133.

  • Casimir, G., Lee, K., & Loon, M. (2012). Knowledge sharing: influences of trust, commitment and cost. Journal of Knowledge Management, 16(5), 740-753.

  • Castelnovo, P., Florio, M., Forte, S., Rossi, L., & Sirtori, E. (2018). The economic impact of technological procurement for large-scale research infrastructures: Evidence from the Large Hadron Collider at CERN. Research Policy, 47(9), 18531867. Doi:10.1016/j.respol.2018.06.018

  • Chapple, W., Lockett, A., Siegel, D., & Wright, M. (2005). Assessing the relative performance of UK university technology transfer offices: parametric and nonparametric evidence. Research Policy, 34(3), 369-384.

  • Chesbrough, H. W. (2006). The era of open innovation. Managing innovation and change, 127(3), 34-41.

  • Christensen, C. M., & Bower, J. L. (1996). Customer power, strategic investment, and the failure of leading firms. Strategic Management Journal, 17(3), 197-218.

  • Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1994). Fortune favors the prepared firm. Management Science, 40(2), 227-251.

  • Cowan, R., & Zinovyeva, N. (2013). University effects on regional innovation. Research Policy, 42(3), 788-800.

  • Cummings, J., & Kiesler, S. (2011). Organization theory and new ways of working in science. Paper presented at the 2011 Atlanta Conference on Science and Innovation Policy.

  • D’Ippolito, B., & Rüling, C.-C. (2019). Research collaboration in Large Scale Research Infrastructures: Collaboration types and policy implications. Research Policy, 48(5), 1282-1296. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2019.01.011

  • De Jong, G., & Woolthuis, R. K. (2008). The institutional arrangements of innovation: antecedents and performance effects of trust in hightech alliances. Industry and Innovation, 15(1), 45-67.

  • Devarakonda, S. V., & Reuer, J. J. (2018). Knowledge sharing and safeguarding in R&D collaborations: The role of steering committees in biotechnology alliances. Strategic Management Journal, 39(7), 1912-1934.

  • Di Guardo, M. C., & Harrigan, K. (2016). Shaping the path to inventive activity: The role of past experience in R&D alliances. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 41(2), 250-269.

  • Ding, X.-H., Liu, H., & Song, Y. (2013). Are internal knowledge transfer strategies double-edged swords? Journal of Knowledge Management, 17(1), 69-86.

  • Drivas, K., & Economidou, C. (2013). Government sponsorship and nature of patenting activity of US universities and corporations. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 22(8), 775-806.

  • Estrada, I., Faems, D., & de Faria, P. (2016). Coopetition and product innovation performance: The role of internal knowledge sharing mechanisms and formal knowledge protection mechanisms. Industrial Marketing Management, 53, 56-65. Doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2015.11.013

  • Falagas, M. E., Kouranos, V. D., Arencibiajorge, R., & Karageorgopoulos, D. E. (2008). Comparison of SCImago journal rank indicator with journal impact factor. The FASEB Journal, 22(8), 2623-2628.

  • Florio, M., & Sirtori, E. (2016). Social benefits and costs of large scale research infrastructures. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 112, 65-78. Doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2015.11.024

  • Foss, N. J., Husted, K., & Michailova, S. (2010). Governing knowledge sharing in organizations: Levels of analysis, governance mechanisms, and research directions. Journal of Management Studies, 47(3), 455-482.

  • Geuna, A., Steinmeuller, W., & Salter, A. (2003). Science and innovation: Changing rationales for the public funding of research. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

  • Goel, A. K., Rana, G., & Rastogi, R. (2010). Knowledge Management as a Process to Develop Sustainable Competitive Advantage. South Asian Journal of Management, 17(3), 104-116.

  • Gupta, S., & Polonsky, M. (2014). Inter-firm learning and knowledge-sharing in multinational networks: An outsourced organization’s perspective. Journal of Business Research, 67(4), 615-622.

  • Hardy, C., Phillips, N., & Lawrence, T. B. (2003). Resources, knowledge and influence: The organizational effects of interorganizational collaboration. Journal of Management Studies, 40(2), 321-347.

  • Heiman, B. A., & Nickerson, J. A. (2004). Empirical evidence regarding the tension between knowledge sharing and knowledge expropriation in collaborations. Managerial and Decision Economics, 25(67), 401-420.

  • Hemmert, M., Okamuro, H., Bstieler, L., & Ruth, K. (2008). An inquiry into the status and nature of university-industry research collaborations in Japan and Korea. Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics, 163-180.

  • Hertzfeld, H. R., Link, A. N., & Vonortas, N. S. (2006). Intellectual property protection mechanisms in research partnerships. Research Policy, 35(6), 825-838.

  • Hoye, K., & Pries, F. (2009). ‘Repeat commercializers,’ the ‘habitual entrepreneurs’ of university-industry technology transfer. Technovation, 29(10), 682-689.

  • Huizingh, E. K. (2011). Open innovation: State of the art and future perspectives. Technovation, 31(1), 2-9.

  • Hurmelinna-Laukkanen, P., & Olander, H. (2014). Coping with rivals’ absorptive capacity in innovation activities. Technovation, 34(1), 3-11.

  • Husted, K., & Michailova, S. (2010). Dual allegiance and knowledge sharing in inter-firm R&D collaborations. Organizational Dynamics, 39(1), 37-47.

  • Inkpen, A. C., & Tsang, E. W. (2005). Social capital, networks, and knowledge transfer. Academy of Management Review, 30(1), 146-165.

  • Janowicz, M., & Noorderhaven, N. G. (2002). The role of trust in interorganizational learning in joint ventures: Tilburg, Netherlands: Tilburg University.

  • Jiang, X., Li, M., Gao, S., Bao, Y., & Jiang, F. (2013). Managing knowledge leakage in strategic alliances: The effects of trust and formal contracts. Industrial Marketing Management, 42(6), 983-991.

  • Kale, P., & Singh, H. (2010). Building Firm Capabilities through Learning: The Role of the Alliance Learning Process in Alliance Capability and Firm-Level Alliance Success. Strategic Management Journal, 28(10), 981-1000.

  • Katz, J. S., & Martin, B. R. (1997). What is research collaboration? Research Policy, 26(1), 1-18.

  • Lam, A., & Lambermont-Ford, J. P. (2010). Knowledge sharing in organisational contexts: a motivationbased perspective. Journal of Knowledge Management, 51-66.

  • Le Roy, F., Robert, M., & Lasch, F. (2016). Choosing the best partner for product innovation: Talking to the enemy or to a friend? International Studies of Management & Organization, 46(2-3), 136-158.

  • Leon, G., & Elias, P. (2010). A vision for strengthening world-class research infrastructures in the ERA (Report of the Expert Group for Research Infrastructures). Brussels, Belgium: EU Publications.

  • Levitt, B., & March, J. G. (1988). Organizational learning. Annual Review of Sociology, 14(1), 319-338.

  • Lowman, M., Trott, P., Hoecht, A., & Sellam, Z. (2012). Innovation risks of outsourcing in pharmaceutical new product development. Technovation, 32(2), 99-109.

  • Lozano, S., Rodríguez, X.-P., & Arenas, A. (2013). Atapuerca: evolution of scientific collaboration in an emergent large-scale research infrastructure. Scientometrics, 98(2), 1505-1520. Doi:10.1007/s11192-013-1162-x

  • Mamuneas, T. P. (1999). Spillovers from publicly financed R&D capital in hightech industries. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 17(2), 215-239.

  • Mansfield, E. (1991). Academic research and industrial innovation. Research Policy, 20(1), 1-12.

  • Mansfield, E. (1998). Academic research and industrial innovation: An update of empirical findings. Research Policy, 26(7-8), 773-776.

  • McEvily, B., & Marcus, A. (2005). Embedded ties and the acquisition of competitive capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 26(11), 1033-1055.

  • Meghabghab, G. (2001). Google’s Web Page Ranking applied to different topological Web Graph structures. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 52(9), 736-747.

  • Misra, D. (2015). University Knowledge Spillover Effects on Entrepreneurship: An Exploratory Study of Indian Entrepreneurs [Dagger]. South Asian Journal of Management, 22(4), 29.

  • Muthusamy, S. K., & White, M. A. (2005). Learning and knowledge transfer in strategic alliances: A social exchange view. Organization Studies, 26(3), 415-441.

  • Muthusamy, S. K., White, M. A., & Carr, A. (2007). An empirical examination of the role of social exchanges in alliance performance. Journal of Managerial Issues, 53-75.

  • Nielsen, B. B., & Nielsen, S. (2009). Learning and innovation in international strategic alliances: An empirical test of the role of trust and tacitness. Journal of Management Studies, 46(6), 1031-1056.

  • Okamuro, H., & Nishimura, J. (2018). Whose business is your project? A comparative study of different subsidy policy schemes for collaborative R&D. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 127, 85-96. Doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2017.07.017

  • Plewa, C., & Quester, P. (2007). Key drivers of university-industry relationships: the role of organisational compatibility and personal experience. Journal of Services Marketing, 21(5), 370-382.

  • Qiao, L., Mu, R., & Chen, K. (2016). Scientific effects of large research infrastructures in China. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 112, 102-112. Doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2016.07.029

  • Qiu, S., Liu, X., & Gao, T. (2017). Do emerging countries prefer local knowledge or distant knowledge? Spillover effect of university collaborations on local firms. Research Policy, 46(7), 1299-1311. Doi:10.1016/j.respol.2017.06.001

  • Qiu, X., & Haugland, S. A. (2019). The role of regulatory focus and trustworthiness in knowledge transfer and leakage in alliances. Industrial Marketing Management, 83, 162-173. Doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2019.03.014

  • Radicic, D., & Pinto, J. (2019). Collaboration with External Organizations and Technological Innovations: Evidence from Spanish Manufacturing Firms. Sustainability, 11(9), 2479.

  • Reid, D., Bussiere, D., & Greenaway, K. (2001). Alliance formation issues for knowledgebased enterprises. International Journal of Management Reviews, 3(1), 79-100.

  • Ring, P. S., & Van de Ven, A. H. (1992). Structuring cooperative relationships between organizations. Strategic Management Journal, 13(7), 483-498.

  • Ritala, P., Husted, K., Olander, H., & Michailova, S. (2018). External knowledge sharing and radical innovation: the downsides of uncontrolled openness. Journal of Knowledge Management, 22(5), 1104-1123.

  • Ritala, P., Olander, H., Michailova, S., & Husted, K. (2015). Knowledge sharing, knowledge leaking and relative innovation performance: An empirical study. Technovation, 35, 22-31. Doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2014.07.011

  • Rosenkopf, L., & Almeida, P. (2003). Overcoming local search through alliances and mobility. Management Science, 49(6), 751-766.

  • Sagawa, S., & Segal, E. (2000). Common interest, common good: Creating value through business and social sector partnerships. California Management Review, 42(2), 105-122.

  • Salter, A. J., & Martin, B. R. (2001). The economic benefits of publicly funded basic research: a critical review. Research Policy, 30(3), 509-532.

  • Santoro, M. D., & Gopalakrishnan, S. (2000). The institutionalization of knowledge transfer activities within industry–university collaborative ventures. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 17(3-4), 299-319.

  • Santoro, M. D., & Gopalakrishnan, S. (2001). Relationship dynamics between university research centers and industrial firms: Their impact on technology transfer activities. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 26(1-2), 163-171.

  • Santoro, M. D., & Saparito, P. A. (2003). The firm’s trust in its university partner as a key mediator in advancing knowledge and new technologies. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 50(3), 362-373.

  • Satish, K. P., & Srinivasan, R. (2010). Total Quality Management and Innovation Performance: An Empirical Study on the Interrelationships and Effects. South Asian Journal of Management, 17(3), 8-22.

  • Scaringella, L., & Chanaron, J.-J. (2016). Grenoble–GIANT Territorial Innovation Models: Are investments in research infrastructures worthwhile? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 112, 92-101. Doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2016.05.026

  • Schopper, H. (2009). LEP-The Lord of the Collider Rings at CERN 1980-2000: The Making, Operation and Legacy of the World’s Largest Scientific Instrument. Springer Science & Business Media.

  • Sherwood, A. L., & Covin, J. G. (2008). Knowledge acquisition in university– industry alliances: An empirical investigation from a learning theory perspective. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 25(2), 162-179.

  • Singh, T., & Premarajan, R. K. (2007). Antecedents to Knowledge Transfer: Trust and Culture. South Asian Journal of Management, 93-104.

  • Szücs, F. (2018). Research subsidies, industry–university cooperation and innovation. Research Policy, 47(7), 1256-1266. Doi:10.1016/j.respol.2018.04.009

  • Tan, K. H., Wong, W., & Chung, L. (2016). Information and knowledge leakage in supply chain. Information Systems Frontiers, 18(3), 621-638.

  • Vafaei-Zadeh, A., Hanifah, H., Foroughi, B., & Salamzadeh, Y. (2019). Knowledge leakage, an Achilles’ heel of knowledge sharing. Eurasian Business Review, 9(4), 445-461. Doi:10.1007/s40821-019-00128-7

  • Vasconcelos, S. M., Steneck, N. H., Anderson, M., Masuda, H., Palacios, M., Pinto, J. C., & Sorenson, M. M. (2012). The new geography of scientific collaborations: Changing patterns in the geography of science pose ethical challenges for collaborations between established and emerging scientific powers. EMBO Reports, 13(5), 404-407.

  • von Wyl, V., & Beck, K. (2016). Do insurers respond to risk adjustment? A longterm, nationwide analysis from Switzerland. The European Journal of Health Economics, 17(2), 171-183.

  • Witherspoon, C. L., Bergner, J., Cockrell, C., & Stone, D. N. (2013). Antecedents of organizational knowledge sharing: a meta-analysis and critique. Journal of Knowledge Management, 17(2), 250-277.

  • Wuchty, S., Jones, B. F., & Uzzi, B. (2007). The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science, 316(5827), 1036-1039.

  • Xu, L., Li, J., & Zhou, X. (2017). Exploring new knowledge through research collaboration: the moderation of the global and local cohesion of knowledge networks. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 44(3), 822-849. Doi:10.1007/s10961017-9614-8

  • Zhuge, H. (2002). A knowledge flow model for peer-to-peer team knowledge sharing and management. Expert Systems with Applications, 23(1), 23-30.


Abstract Views: 316

PDF Views: 0




  • The Effect of Research Infrastructure on the Scientific Benefits of Collaboration: An Empirical Investigation of Shanghai Synchrotron Radiation Facility (SSRF)

Abstract Views: 316  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Zhenhua Yang
School of Economics and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (UCAS), Building 7, #80, Zhongguancun East Road, Haidian District, Beijing, China
Yanmei Xu
School of Economics and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (UCAS), Building 7, #80, Zhongguancun East Road, Haidian District, Beijing, China

Abstract


The coexistence of knowledge sharing and knowledge leakage in scientific collaboration positively and negatively affects the researchers to collaborate. Extant literatures extensively link the scientific benefits of collaboration with Research Infrastructure (RI). In this study, we discuss the direct and indirect effects of RI on scientific benefits of collaboration in the context of Shanghai Synchrotron Radiation Facility (SSRF). Based on 295 papers published by SSRF, we empirically analyze the direct effects of mutual trust and research subsidies on scientific benefits, and the indirect effect of SSRF as a RI. The results show that mutual trust and research subsidies have a direct positive effect on scientific benefits of collaboration, while RI has an indirect negative effect between research subsidies and scientific benefit. Our findings contribute to the understanding of the role of RI as an experimental platform, paying attention to knowledge sharing and knowledge leakage in scientific collaboration.

Keywords


Collaboration, Knowledge Leakage, Knowledge Sharing, Research Infrastructures (RI), Scientific Benefits.

References