SAMVAD: International Journal of Management

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Examining Perceptual Dilemmas of Young Leaders with Respect to Ageism


Affiliations
1 SIBM Pune, Symbiosis International Deemed University, Pune, India
 

The purpose of this study is to present a review of the existing literature and derive possible propositions and future agendas in the context of young leaders and the issues they might face due to ageism and lack of experience. The literature was searched through specific keywords on online data bases and journal publications were taken as the base for the review. The analyses indicated that demographic details played an important role in influencing young leaders' decision making, and could contribute to their work related dilemmas. Additionally, the role of older workers in organization cannot be relegated to the background. The key is collaboration among different cohorts and this also involves plugging the gaps occurring due to age and lack of experience, if any. The study aims to offer some insights for both practitioners and academics.

Keywords

Ageism, Older Workers, Demographics, Perception, Young Leaders.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Amin, S. & Kamal, Y. (2016). Impact of natural born leader qualities on the project team performance: The influences of demographics (gender and age). International Journal of Management, Accounting and Economics, 3, 306−318.

  • Arsenault, P.M. (2004). Validating generational differences: A legitimate diversity and leadership issue. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 25(1/2), 124−141. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437730410521813.

  • Ayalon, L. (2013). Feelings towards older vs. younger adults: Results from the European Social Survey. Educational Gerontology, 39(12), 888−901. https://doi.org/10.1080/03601277.2013.767620.

  • Bunker, K.A., Kram, K.E. & Ting, S. (2002). The young and the clueless. Harvard Business Review, 80(12), 80−87.

  • Butler, R.N. (1969). Age-ism: Another form of bigotry. The gerontologist, 9(4_Part_1), 243−246. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/9.4_Part_1.243. PMid: 5366225.

  • Butler, R.N. (1969). Dispelling ageism: The cross-cutting intervention. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 503(1), 138−147. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716289503001011.

  • Day, D. & Harrison, M. (2007). A multilevel, identity-based approach to leadership development. Human Resource Management Review, 17, 360−373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2007.08.007.

  • DeRue, D.S., & Ashford, S.J. (2010). Who will lead and who will follow? A social process of leadership identity construction in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 35, 627−647. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.35.4.zok627. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2010.53503267.

  • Drucker, P. (1998). The future that has already happened.The Futurist, 32(8), 16.

  • Eversole, B., Venneberg, D. & Crowder, C. (2012). Creating a flexible organizational culture to attract and retain talented workers across generations. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 14, 607−625. https://doi.org/10.1177/1523422312455612.

  • Ghosh, R., Haynes, R. & Kram, K. (2013). Developmental networks at work: Holding environments for leader development. Career Development International, 18, 232−256. https://doi.org/10.1108/CDI-09-2012-0084.

  • Goleman, D. (2003). What makes a leader. Organizational Influence Processes, 82, 229-241.

  • Goleman, D., Boyatzis, R. & McKee, A. (2001). Primal leadership: The hidden driver of great performance. Harvard Business Review, 79(11), 42−53.

  • Halevy, N., Chou, E.Y. & Galinsky, A.D. (2011). A functional model of hierarchy: Why, how and when vertical differentiation enhances group performance. Organizational Psychology Review, 1, 32−52. https://doi.org/10.1177/2041386610380991.

  • Heifetz, R. (2006). Foreword. New Directions for Youth Development, 2006(109), 1−2. https://doi.org/10.1002/yd.149.

  • Iversen, T.N., Larsen, L. & Solem, P.E. (2009). A conceptual analysis of ageism. Nordic Psychology, 61(3), 4−22. https:// doi.org/10.1027/1901-2276.61.3.4.

  • Iweins, C., Desmette, D., Yzerbyt, V. & Stinglhamber, F. (2013). Ageism at work: The impact of intergenerational contact and organizational multi-age perspective. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 22(3), 331−346. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2012.748656.

  • Kearney, E. & Voelpel, S.C. (2012). Diversity research: What do we currently know about how to manage diverse organizational units? Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft, 82, 3−18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-011-0540-1.

  • Leger, D.E. (2000). Help! I’m the new boss. Fortune, May 29, 281-284. Retrieved from accessed 3rd July, 2019. https://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune_archive/2000/05/29/280636/index.htm.

  • Lord, R. & Hall, R. (2005). Identity, deep structure and the development of leadership skill. The Leadership Quarterly, 16, 591−615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.06.003.

  • Luthans, F. & Youssef, C.M. (2004). Human, Social, and now positive psychological capital management: Investing in people for competitive advantage. Organizational Dynamics, 2(33), 143−160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.org-dyn.2004.01.003.

  • Maltby, T. (2007). The employability of older workers: What works? In: S. Vickerstaff and W. Loretto W(eds) The Future for Older Workers: New Perspectives, p. 161−181. Bristol: Polity Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt9qgkr1.18.

  • Parry, E. & Urwin, P. (2011). Generational differences in work values: A review of theory and evidence, International Journal of Management Reviews, 13, 79−96. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2010.00285.x.

  • Perry, E.L., Kulik, C.T. & Zhou, J. (1999). A closer look at the effects of subordinate-supervisor age differences. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20, 341−357. https:// doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(199905)20:3<341::AIDJOB915>3.0.CO;2-D.

  • Schreiber, S. (2015). Leadership and aging workforces: Effects of leader’s relative age on team’s and leader’s effectiveness. Doctoral dissertation, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.

  • Shore, L.M., Cleveland, J.N. & Goldberg, C.B. (2003). Work attitudes and decisions as a function of manager and employee age. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(3), 529−537. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.3.529.

  • Smith, W. J. & Harrington, K. V. (1994). Younger supervisor-older subordinate dyads: A relationship of cooperation or resistance? Psychological Reports, 74, 803−812. https:// doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1994.74.3.803.

  • Spedale, S. (2019). Deconstructing the ‘older worker’: Exploring the complexities of subject positioning at the intersection of multiple discourses. Organization, 26(1), 38−54. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508418768072.

  • Truxillo, D.M., Finkelstein, L.M., Pytlovany, A.C. & Jenkins, J.S. (2015). Age discrimination at work: A review of the research and recommendations for the future. In: The Oxford handbook of workplace discrimination. Oxford: Oxford University Press. p. 1−37. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199363643.013.10.

  • Wachs, E. (2000). Why the best man for the job is a woman: The unique female qualities of leadership. NY: Harper Business.

  • Warr, P. (1994). Age and employment. In: H.C. Triandis, M.D. Dunnette, & L.M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology. Palo Alto, CA, US: Consulting Psychologists Press. p. 485−550.

  • Weller, S. (2007). Discrimination, labor markets and the labor market prospects of older workers: What can a legal case teach us? Work, Employment and Society, 21(3), 417−37. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017007080006.

  • Zenger, J. & Folkman, J. (2015). What younger managers should know about how they are perceived. Harvard Business Review. accessed 10th June, 2019. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2015/09/what-younger-managers-should-know-about-how-theyre-perceived.


Abstract Views: 218

PDF Views: 87




  • Examining Perceptual Dilemmas of Young Leaders with Respect to Ageism

Abstract Views: 218  |  PDF Views: 87

Authors

Sonal Shree
SIBM Pune, Symbiosis International Deemed University, Pune, India
Anugamini Priya Srivastava
SIBM Pune, Symbiosis International Deemed University, Pune, India

Abstract


The purpose of this study is to present a review of the existing literature and derive possible propositions and future agendas in the context of young leaders and the issues they might face due to ageism and lack of experience. The literature was searched through specific keywords on online data bases and journal publications were taken as the base for the review. The analyses indicated that demographic details played an important role in influencing young leaders' decision making, and could contribute to their work related dilemmas. Additionally, the role of older workers in organization cannot be relegated to the background. The key is collaboration among different cohorts and this also involves plugging the gaps occurring due to age and lack of experience, if any. The study aims to offer some insights for both practitioners and academics.

Keywords


Ageism, Older Workers, Demographics, Perception, Young Leaders.

References