Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Advancements in Capital Budgeting Evaluation Practices: A Conceptual Analysis


Affiliations
1 Department of Management Studies, SUPRABHATH PG COLLEGE, Hyderabad, (A.P), India
 

Capital budgeting decisions are crucial to a firm's success for several reasons. First, capital expenditures typically require large outlays of funds. Second, firms must ascertain the best way to raise and repay these funds. Third, most capital budgeting decisions require a long-term commitment. Finally, the timing of capital budgeting decisions is important. When large amounts of funds are raised, firms must pay close attention to the financial markets because the cost of capital is directly related to the current interest rate.

This paper focuses on advances in Capital Budgeting Techniques theory and practice and its impact on the investment decisions at the same time focused on evaluation practices.


Keywords

Capital Budgeting Techniques, Payback Period, NPV, ARR, IRR, Cash Outlays, Etc.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Aggarwal, Raj, 1980, “Corporate Uses of Sophisticated Capital Budgeting Techniques: A Strategic Perspective and a Critique of Survey Results,” Interfaces 10 (No. 2, April) 31-34.
  • Brealey, Richard A. and Stewart A. Myers., 1997, Principles of Corporate Finance, 5th edition, McGraw-Hill Companies, New York.
  • Brigham, Eugene F., 1975, “Hurdle Rates for Screening Capital Expenditure Proposals,” Financial Management 4 (No. 3, Autumn), 17-26.
  • Dorfman, Robert, “The Meaning of Internal Rates of Return,” The Journal of Finance, Vol. XXXVI, No. 5, December
  • Evans, Dorla A. and Shawn M. Forbes, 1993, “Decision Making and Display Methods: The Case of Prescription and Practice in Capital Budgeting,” The Engineering Economist 39 (No. 1, Fall), 87-92.
  • Financial Management Panel Discussion on Corporate Investment, (1989), Samuel C. Weaver, moderator, Financial Management 18 (No. 1, Spring), 10-17.
  • Fremgen, James M., 1973, “Capital Budgeting Practices: A Survey,” Management Accounting 54 (No. 11, May), 19-25.
  • Gitman, Lawrence J. and Charles E. Maxwell, 1985, “Financial Activities of Major U.S Firms: Survey and Analysis of Fortune’s 1000,” Financial Management 14 (No. 4, Winter) 57-65.
  • Gitman, Lawrence J. and John R. Forrester, Jr., 1977, “A Survey of Capital Budgeting Techniques Used by Major U.S. Firms,” Financial Management 6 (No. 3, Fall), 66-71.
  • Gitman, Lawrence J. and Vincent A. Mercurio, 1982, “Cost of Capital Techniques Used by Major U.S. Firms: Survey and Analysis of Fortune’s 1000,” Financial Management 14 (No. 4, Winter), 21-29.
  • Hendricks, James A., 1983, “Capital Budgeting Practices Including Inflation Adjustments: A Survey,” Managerial Planning (January-February), 22-28.
  • Istvan, Donald F., 1961, “Capital-Expenditure Decisions: How They Are Made in Large Corporations,” Bureau of Business Research, Indiana University.
  • Jog, Vijay M. and Ashwani K. Srivastava, 1995, “Capital Budgeting Practices in Corporate Canada,” Financial Practice and Education 5 (No. 2, Fall-Winter), 37-43.
  • Kester, George W., Rosita P. Chang, Erlinda S. Echanis, Shalahuddin Haikal, Mansor Md. Isa, Michael T. Skully, Kai-Chong Tsui, and Chi-Jeng Wang, 1999, “Capital Budgeting Practices in the Asia-Pacific Region: Australia, Hong, Kong, Indonesia, Malasia, Philippines, and Singapore,” Financial Practice and Education, (Spring/Summer) 25- 33.
  • Klammer, Thomas, 1972, “Empirical Evidence of the Adoption of Sophisticated Capital Budgeting Techniques,” The Journal of Business 45 (No. 3, July), 387-397.
  • Mao, James C.T., 1970, “Survey of Capital Budgeting: Theory and Practice,” Journal of Finance 25 (No. 2, May), 349-360.
  • McDaniel, William R., Daniel E. McCarty and Kenneth A. Jessell, “Discounted Cash Flow with Explicit Reinvestment
  • Miller, E., “The Competitive Market Assumption and Capital Budgeting Criteria,” Financial Management, Vol. 16, No. 44 (Winter 1987), pp. 22-28.
  • Miller, James H., 1960, “A Glimpse at Practice in Calculating and Using Return on Investment,” N.A.A. Bulletin (now Management Accounting), June, 65-76.
  • Neelakantam Tatikonda (2013), “ Capital budgeting Practices in manufacturing industry” International Journal of technology and business management”, june-33-42
  • Oblak, David and Roy J. Helm, Jr., 1980, “Survey and Analysis of Capital Budgeting Methods Used by Multinationals,” Financial Management 9 (No. 4, Winter), 37-41.
  • Petry, Glenn H., 1975, “Effective Use of Capital Budgeting Tools,” Business Horizons 5 (October), 57-65.
  • Petty, J. William, David F. Scott, Jr., and Monroe M. Bird, 1975, “The Capital Expenditure Decision-Making Process of Large Corporations,” The Engineering Economist 20 (No. 3, Spring), 159-172.
  • Pike, Richard, 1996, “A Longitudinal Survey on Capital Budgeting Practices,” Journal of Business Finance and Accounting 23 (No. 1, January), 79-92.
  • Poterba, James M. and Lawrence H. Summers, 1995, “A CEO Survey of U.S. Companies’ Time Horizons and Hurdle Rates” Sloan Management Review 37 (No. 1, Fall), 43-53.
  • Rates: Tutorial and Extension,” The Financial Review, Vol. 23, No. 3, August 1988, pp. 369-385.
  • Ross, Marc, 1986, “Capital Budgeting Practices of Twelve Large Manufacturers,” Financial Management 15 (No. 4, Winter), 15-22.
  • Schall, Lawrence D., Gary L. Sundem, and William R. Geijsbeek, Jr., 1978, “Survey and Analysis of Capital Budgeting Methods,” Journal of Finance 33 (No. 1, March), 281- 288.
  • Scott, Jr. David and J. William Petty, II, 1984, “Capital Budgeting Practices in Large American Firms: A Retrospective Analysis and Synthesis,” Financial Review 19 (No.1, March), 111-123.
  • Shapiro, Alan, 1978, “Capital Budgeting for the Multinational Corporation,” Financial Management 7 (No. 1, Spring), 7-16.
  • Trahan, Emery A. and Lawrence J. Gitman, 1995, “Bridging the Theory-Practice Gap in Corporate Finance: A Survey of Chief Financial Officers,” Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance 35 (No. 1, Spring), 73-87.
  • Williams, Jr., Ronald B., 1970, “Industry Practice in Allocating Capital Resources,” Managerial Planning (May-June), 15-22.

Abstract Views: 318

PDF Views: 101




  • Advancements in Capital Budgeting Evaluation Practices: A Conceptual Analysis

Abstract Views: 318  |  PDF Views: 101

Authors

Tatikonda Neelakantam
Department of Management Studies, SUPRABHATH PG COLLEGE, Hyderabad, (A.P), India

Abstract


Capital budgeting decisions are crucial to a firm's success for several reasons. First, capital expenditures typically require large outlays of funds. Second, firms must ascertain the best way to raise and repay these funds. Third, most capital budgeting decisions require a long-term commitment. Finally, the timing of capital budgeting decisions is important. When large amounts of funds are raised, firms must pay close attention to the financial markets because the cost of capital is directly related to the current interest rate.

This paper focuses on advances in Capital Budgeting Techniques theory and practice and its impact on the investment decisions at the same time focused on evaluation practices.


Keywords


Capital Budgeting Techniques, Payback Period, NPV, ARR, IRR, Cash Outlays, Etc.

References