Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
Year
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Chitale, Ranjeet Harihar
- Production Environment Motivation Levels between Superior and Subordinate; Exploring the Relationship in Small and Medium Enterprises in Pune
Abstract Views :213 |
PDF Views:66
Authors
Affiliations
1 Amity Global Business School, Pune, Maharashtra, IN
2 Department of Management Sciences, Savitribai Phule Pune University, Pune, Maharashtra, IN
1 Amity Global Business School, Pune, Maharashtra, IN
2 Department of Management Sciences, Savitribai Phule Pune University, Pune, Maharashtra, IN
Source
SAMVAD: International Journal of Management, Vol 19 (2019), Pagination: 48-54Abstract
The subject of Production Environment and Motivation is a complex one. Production is affected because of motivational levels between superior and subordinate. On one hand the environment is marked by various mechanical systems and contrivances, on the other hand there are various elements which affect the Hygiene Factors around an employee. Motivation involves the inner self and the outside factors in a subtle way. For employees working in a typical production system; the external work environment changes from one type of operation to another. The motivational level of superior influences the motivational level of subordinate. The researchers put effort to find out whether different work environments in a production system influence the working relationship in the subordinate-superior dyad. The concept of ‘Relative Motivation’ was used to explore the relationship by the researcher in the research work. The subject was chosen in context of Small and Medium Enterprises (SME) in Pune which is considered the hotbed for SME activities in different kinds of production systems.Keywords
Motivational Levels, Production Environment, Relative Motivation.Full Text
References
- Delić, Dragiša (2011). The motivation of managers and their influence on employee’s motivation, Zbornik Radova Ekonomskog Fakulteta u Istocnom Sarajevu, 5, 359–368.
- Ronen, J., & Livingstone, J. L. (1975). An expectancy theory approach to the motivational impacts of budgets, Accounting Review, 50(4), 671–685.
- Burdsal Jr., Charles (1976). An examination of the relationship between personality traits and motivational dynamics, Journal of Psychology, 94(2), 261–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1976.9915847. PMid: 994072.
- Arazy, Ofer, Gellatly, & Ian R. (2012). Corporate Wikis: The effects of owners’ motivation and behavior on group members’ engagement, Journal of Management Information Systems, 29(3), 87–116. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222290303
- Ehiobuche, Chris (2012). Organizational dynamics and the imperatives of leadership and motivational theories, Leadership and Organizational Management Journal, 2012(2), 105–120.
- Oncioiu, Ionica, Petrescu, Marius, Duicã, Mircea Constantin, & Croitoru, Gabriel (2018). The impact of employee motivation on romanian organizational performance, Information Resources Management Journal, 31(4), 59–74. https://doi.org/10.4018/IRMJ.2018100104.
- Kanfer, Ruth, Chen, Gilad (2016). Motivation in organizational behavior: History, advances and prospects, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 136, 6–19. 14p. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2016.06.002.
- Hitchcock, Jennifer A., & Stavros, Jacqueline M. (2017). Organizational collective motivation: A new framework for motivating employees in organizations, OD Practitioner. 49(4), 28–35. https://www.academia.edu/8127918/Organizational_Collective_Motivation_Motivating_for_Organizational_Change_and_Transformation.
- Benkhoff, Birgit (1996). Catching up on competitors: How organizations can motivate employees to work harder, International Journal of Human Resource Management, 7(3), 736–752. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585199600000153.