Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
Year
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Ghosh, Chaitali
- Implementation of TOPSIS Method to Compare the Libraries of Top-Ranking Universities Abroad and in India
Abstract Views :138 |
PDF Views:2
Authors
Affiliations
1 Jadavpur University, Department of Library and Information Science, Main Campus, 188, Raja S.C Mallick Rd, Kolkata − 700032, West Bengal, IN
1 Jadavpur University, Department of Library and Information Science, Main Campus, 188, Raja S.C Mallick Rd, Kolkata − 700032, West Bengal, IN
Source
Journal of Information and Knowledge (Formerly SRELS Journal of Information Management), Vol 59, No 2 (2022), Pagination: 111-122Abstract
Abstract This study was made for comparison of university libraries in India and abroad. Ten top-ranking universities by Quacquarelli Symonds (QS) were considered for making a comparison from each category. The main objective of the study was to know whether the library plays any role to achieve top rank or not. Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) method was used for analyzing and for the TOPSIS method, 5 important criteria were considered, viz., total collection, total library staff, total budget, total working hours, and major divisions of the library. Important criteria were selected from University Grant Commission (UGC) and American Library Association (ALA). Initially, TOPSIS method was applied to university libraries abroad; next, to Indian university libraries and finally, both Indian and foreign university libraries were considered. Results represented that the library played a role in helping the parent university achieve a rank but not entirely. The University of Cambridge got the highest rank as per the study but in QS ranking MIT stood first.Keywords
Libraries, Quacquarelli Symonds (QS) Ranking, Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) Analysis, University Libraries, University Ranking.
References
- Rubin, R. E. (2017). Foundations of library and information science. American Library Association.
- Rathe, B. and Lisa Blankenship. (2006). Recreational reading collections in academic libraries. Collection Management, 30(2): 73-85. Accessed on 1st August 2020. https://doi.org/10.1300/J105v30n02_06. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1300/J105v30n02_06.
- Rinehart, R. and Robert Rinehart, eds. (2004). Library. ABC-CLIO. 4. Simpson, J.A. and Weiner, E.S.C. (1989). Oxford English Dictionary, Clarendon Press.
- Dobrota, M., et al. (2016). A new approach to the QS university ranking using the compositeI‐distance indicator: Uncertainty and sensitivity analyses. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(1): 200-211. Accessed on 1st July 2019. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/272196537_A_new_approach_to_the_QS_university_ranking_using_the_composite_I-distance_indicator_Uncertainty_and_sensitivity_analyses_A_New_Approach_to_QS_University_Ranking_Using_Composite_I-Distance_Indicator_U. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23355.
- Huang, Mu-H. (2011). A comparison of three major academic rankings for world universities: From a research evaluation perspective. Journal of Library and Information Studies, 9(1). Accessed on 20th July 2019. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228419322_A_Comparison_of_Three_Major_Academic_Rankings_for_World_Universities_From_a_Research_Evaluation_Perspective.
- Kao, C. and Lin, Y. (2009). Comparing University Libraries of different University size. Libri, 49(3): 150-158. https://doi.org/10.1515/libr.1999.49.3.150.
- Hsieh, L., Chin, J. and Wu, M. (2006). Performance evaluation for university electronic libraries in Taiwan. The Electronic Library, 24(2): 212-224. Accessed on 20th July 2019. https://doi.org/10.1108/02640470610660387.
- Mancev, M. (2016). The Application of the TOPSIS Method in selecting the best academic library at the University of Nis. Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science, 40: 81-96.
- Chen, T., and Chueh-Yung Tsao. (2008). The interval-valued fuzzy TOPSIS method and experimental analysis. Fuzzy sets and systems, 159(11): 1410-1428. Accessed on 1st July 2019. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S016501140700509X. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fss.2007.11.004.
- Roszkowska, E. (2011). Multi-criteria decision making models by applying the TOPSIS method to crisp and interval data. Multiple Criteria Decision Making/University of Economics in Katowice, 6, 200-230. Accessed on 20th July 2019. http://www.mcdm.ue.katowice.pl/files/papers/mcdm11(6)_11.pdf.