Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
Year
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Das, Subarna Kumar
- A Study of Subject Headings vs. User Generated Tags
Abstract Views :184 |
PDF Views:5
Authors
Affiliations
1 DLIS, Jadavpur University, Kolkata − 700032, West Bengal, IN
1 DLIS, Jadavpur University, Kolkata − 700032, West Bengal, IN
Source
Journal of Information and Knowledge (Formerly SRELS Journal of Information Management), Vol 59, No 3 (2022), Pagination: 177-182Abstract
User-generated tagging or folksonomy is one of the most popular Web 2.0 applications and has attracted the interest of libraries and information centres, which has developed services that facilitate user community collaboration. In the digital environment, social tagging has the potential to overcome certain limitations of traditional subject headings. The main objectives of this research paper are to identify the scope of user-generated tags as compared to Subject Heading Lists and to explore the extent to which these user-generated tags can be used to enhance subject access. In this research paper, the problem is comparison between the Subject heading List and user generated tags. This work is an exploratory research and has followed a case study method. Five searches were performed in Library Thing using its Tag mash feature (essentially a keyword search of the user tag field) using 5 tags. After searching articles and interpreting all data, a comparison between the subject heading list and User-generated tags have been made.Keywords
Folksonomy, Library Thing, Subject Heading List, Tagging, User-Generated Tags, World Cat.References
- Adamich, T. (2014). The Sears List -- An Old Friend With A 21st Century Look. Library Media Connection, 32(4), 43.
- Bateman, S. (2007) “Collaborative Tagging : Folksonomy, Metadata, Visualization, e-Learning, Thesis.” HARVEST, University of Saskatchewan, 1 Dec. 2007, https://harvest.usask.ca/handle/10388/etd-12112007-221606.
- Ferris, A. M. (2018). Birth of a subject heading. Library Resources & Technical Services, 62(1), 16-27.
- Hayman, S. (2007) “ FOLKSONOMIES AND TAGGING: New Developments in Social Bookmarking .” Ark Education, Ark Group Conference: Developing and Improving Classification Schemes, http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?d oi=10.1.1.138.8884&rep=rep1&type=pdf. Accessed 16 Jan.2022.
- Mas, M.D. (2012) “Intelligent Interface Architectures for Folksonomy Driven Structure Network,” 2012 Sixth International Conference on Complex, Intelligent, and Software Intensive Systems, 2012, pp. 519-525, https://doi.org/10.1109/CISIS.2012.158
- Petek, M. (2012). Comparing user-generated and librarian-generated metadata on digital images. OCLC Systems and Services: International Digital Library Perspectives, 28(2), 101 -111. https://doi.org/10.1108/10650751211236659.
- Rolla, P. (2009). User Tags versus Subject Headings. Library Resources & Technical Services, 53(3), 174-184. https://doi.org/10.5860/lrts.53n3.174
- Samadder, H. (2019). Subject Heading List Vs User-Generated Tags: A Case Study (dissertation). Rabindra Bharati University, Kolkata, West Bengal.
- West, W (2013). Tag, You’re IT: Enhancing Access to Graphic Novels. Portal: Libraries and the academy, 13(3), 301-324