Social Work Chronicle

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Sex Identity vs. Sexual Orientation: Understanding Transgender Category in India


Affiliations
1 Christ University, Bangalore., India
2 Corvinus University of Budapest, Budapest., Hungary
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Emancipation and equality for the sexuality minorities in India is no longer a distant dream while taking into account the recent developments. The period of June-July 2009 drew the attention of academics, social activists and policy makers across India to the issues of sexuality minorities. During this period, their protests against discrimination were widely flashed in leading national dailies. The Delhi High Court legalized gay sex on July 2nd 2009 by declaring that the section 377, which criminalized some sexual acts of adults in private, though consensual in nature. It said that section 377 violated the fundamental right to live with freedom and equality guaranteed in the Indian constitution. It is indeed a landmark judgment enabling the third gender to exercise their rights. One can also understand that the Government of India is also cognizant of this trend. The Union Home Ministry claims that the section 377 of the Indian Penal Code defining 'unnatural sex' is an 'absurdity in the present day'. Besides, the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare and the Ministry of Law called for an extensive public debate on this issue and stressed the importance of making the public understand and accept the changes proposed in the law and its repercussions if any. This paper attempts to analyze the conceptual problems in defining transgender and homosexual categories and tries to arrive at a conclusion based on a good deal of reasoning, which corroborates the claim that transgender people are to be differentiated from homosexuals and the liberation of the former would precede the latter.

Keywords

Transgender, Homosexuality, Hijras, Sex Identity, Sexual Orientation
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Bornstein, K. (1994). Gender Outlaw: On Men, Women and the Rest of Us. New York and London: Routledge.

  • Britzman. (1995). Is There a Queer Pedagogy? Or, Stop Reading Straight. Educational Theory, 45 (2), 151-165.

  • Colvin, R. (2000). Improving State Policies Prohibiting Public Employment Discrimination Based on Sexual Orientation. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 20(2), 5-19.

  • Devi, S. (1977). The World of Homosexuals. New Delhi: Vikas Publishing House.

  • Denial of Rights to Sexual Minorities (Editorial). (2008). Economic and Political Weekly. 43(6).

  • Ekins, R. & Dave, K. (1996). Blending Genders: Social Aspects of Cross Dressing and Sex-Changing. London: Routledge.

  • Ekins, R. & Dave, K. (2005). Virginia Prince: Pioneer of Transgendering. New York: Haworth Medical Press.

  • Foucault, M. (1990). The History of Sexuality. (Trans.) Hurley, Robert. New York: Vintage Books.

  • Fuss, D. (1991). Inside Out: Lesbian Theories. New York: Routledge.

  • Gross, L. (2005). The Past and the Future of Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual, and Transgender Studies. Journal of Communication, 55(3), 508-528.

  • Halperin, D. (1995). Saint Foucault: Towards a Gay Hagiography. New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Halperin, David. (2003). Normalization of Queer Theory. In A. Yup Gust (Eds.), Queer Theory and Communication: From Disciplining Queers to Queering the Discipline (pp. 76-99). New York: Harrington Park Press.

  • Heyes, C. (2003). Feminist Solidarity after Queer Theory: The Case of Transgender. Signs, 28(4), 1093-1120.

  • Homosexuality Okay if Practiced in Private. Sify News. India. Retrieved from http://sify.com/news/othernews/fullstory. php?id=13250892 (accessed June 11, 2010).

  • Jonathan, A. (2005). Transgender Rhetorics: (Re) Composing Narratives of the Gendered Body. College Composition and Communication, (57), 45-82.

  • Kole, S. (2006). To Trade in Pleasure. The Telegraph, Calcutta, India. Retrieved from http://www.telegraphindia.com/1060125/asp/opin ion/story_5700323.asp (accessed June 10, 2010).

  • Kole, S. (2007). Globalizing Queer? AIDS, Homophobia and the Politics of Sex Identity in India. Globalization and Health, 3(8), 1-16.

  • Law Commission of India. (2000). 172nd Report on Review of Rape Laws. Retrieved from http://www.lawcommissionofindia.nic. in/rapelaws.htm (accessed June 10, 2010).

  • Marks, S. (2006). Global Recognition of Human Rights for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender People. Health and Human Rights 9(1), 33-42.

  • Monro, S. (2003). Transgender Politics in the UK. Critical Social Policy. (23), 433-452.

  • Narain, A. (2003). Queer People and the Law. Retrieved from http://www.india-seminar.com/2003/524/524%20arvind%20narrain.html (accessed June 10, 2010).

  • Narayan, R. K. (1978). Mahabharata. London: Heinemann.

  • Plea to Legalize Prostitution. (2005). Times of India, 5.

  • Prince,V. (1976). Understanding Cross-Dressing. Los Angeles: Chevalier Publications.

  • Roche, M. (1992). Rethinking Citizenship: Welfare, Ideology and Change in Modern Society. Cambridge: Polity Press.

  • Somasundaram, O. (2009). Transgenderism: Facts and Fictions. Indian Journal of Psychiatry, 51(1), 73-75.

  • Stryker. (2008). Transgender History, Homonormativity and Disciplinarity. Radical History Review. Winter, (100), 145-157.

  • Tauches, K. (2008). Encyclopedia of Gender and Society. New Delhi: Sage Publications.

  • Vanita, R. & Kidwai, S. (2000). Same-Sex Love in India: Readings from Literature and History. New York: St. Martin’s Press.


Abstract Views: 450

PDF Views: 2




  • Sex Identity vs. Sexual Orientation: Understanding Transgender Category in India

Abstract Views: 450  |  PDF Views: 2

Authors

L.T. Om Prakash
Christ University, Bangalore., India
G. Karunanithi
Corvinus University of Budapest, Budapest., Hungary

Abstract


Emancipation and equality for the sexuality minorities in India is no longer a distant dream while taking into account the recent developments. The period of June-July 2009 drew the attention of academics, social activists and policy makers across India to the issues of sexuality minorities. During this period, their protests against discrimination were widely flashed in leading national dailies. The Delhi High Court legalized gay sex on July 2nd 2009 by declaring that the section 377, which criminalized some sexual acts of adults in private, though consensual in nature. It said that section 377 violated the fundamental right to live with freedom and equality guaranteed in the Indian constitution. It is indeed a landmark judgment enabling the third gender to exercise their rights. One can also understand that the Government of India is also cognizant of this trend. The Union Home Ministry claims that the section 377 of the Indian Penal Code defining 'unnatural sex' is an 'absurdity in the present day'. Besides, the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare and the Ministry of Law called for an extensive public debate on this issue and stressed the importance of making the public understand and accept the changes proposed in the law and its repercussions if any. This paper attempts to analyze the conceptual problems in defining transgender and homosexual categories and tries to arrive at a conclusion based on a good deal of reasoning, which corroborates the claim that transgender people are to be differentiated from homosexuals and the liberation of the former would precede the latter.

Keywords


Transgender, Homosexuality, Hijras, Sex Identity, Sexual Orientation

References