Open Access
Subscription Access
Open Access
Subscription Access
Disability as Disjuncture:A Theory to Guide Social Work Practice
Subscribe/Renew Journal
Over the past several decades, disability and social work have become increasingly strange bedfellows, in large part due to the espousal of the medical model of disability on the part of social workers. This approach locates disability with the body as a deficit in need of repair, revision, or ongoing professional scrutiny. In opposition to this approach, disability scholars proposed the social model, which holds negative stereotyping and oppression as disabling factors, thereby creating a binary debate on cause and appropriate response to disability. We suggest that this binary is not useful in guiding social work to consider disability as a complex phenomenon, which requires multifaceted action responses. We therefore propose disability as disjuncture. This interactive model synthesizes a wealth of interdisciplinary fields to inform social work analysis and response to disability that meets the goals of advancing individual function, locating disability within a broad diversity dialog, and thus promoting equivalence of rights, choice, and opportunity for full participation for those who fit within the disability category. We conclude with exemplars of the thinking and action processes, guided by disjuncture theory, that illustrate the potency of this framework and its guiding properties for progressive social work disability practice.
Keywords
Determinants, Attitude, Practices, Child Marriage, Rural.
Subscription
Login to verify subscription
User
Font Size
Information
- Allen, J. L. (2000, November 11). University grabs a leadership role in a provocative field - disability studies. Chicago Tribune (via Knight-Ridder/Tribune News Service). Retrieved from http://www.accessmylibrary.com/coms2/summary_0286-7247418_ITM
- Allen, W., Bonous-Hammarth, M., & Teranishi, R.T. (2006). Higher education in a global societyAchieving diversity, equity, and excellence (Advances in education in diverse communities: Research policy and practice), 5.Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
- American Legacy Foundation. (2008). Building a world were young people reject tobacco and everyone can quit. Retrieved from http:// www.americanlegacy.org
- Barrett, J. (n.d.). History of discrimination against disabled people. Retrieved from http://www.jackiebarrett.ca/DisabledDiscrimination2.htm
- Bellhouse, D. (2011). Abraham De Moivre: Setting the stage for classical probability and its applications. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
- Canguilhem, G. (1989). The normal and the pathological. New York, NY: Zone.
- Caroll, J. (2004). Literary Darwinism. New York, NY: Routledge.
- Colby, A., Beaumont, E., Ehrlich, T., & Corngold, J. (2007). Educating for democracy: Preparing undergraduates for responsible political engagement. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
- Cowger, C. D. (2007). Clientism and clientification: Impediments to strengths-based social practice. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 25, 25-37
- Davis, L. (Ed.). (1997). The disability studies reader. New York: NY Routledge.
- DePoy, E., & Gilson S. (2008). Healing the disjuncture: Social work disability practice. In K. M. Sowers & C. N. Dulmus (Series Eds.), & B. W.White (Vol. Ed.), Comprehensive handbook of social work and social welfare: Vol. 1. The profession of social work (pp. 267282). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
- DePoy, E., & Gilson S. (2007). Evaluation practice: How to do good evaluation research in work settings. New York: Routledge.
- DePoy, E., & Gilson, S.F. (2004). Rethinking disability: Principles for professional and social change. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
- Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education. New York, NY: MacMillan.
- Eisner, E. (1985). Educational imagination. New York, NY: MacMillan.
- Ernst, W. (2006). Histories of the Normal and the Abnormal: Social and cultural histories of norms and normativity. Abindon, Oxon, UK: Routledge.
- Finucane, R. C. (1995). Miracles and pilgrims. New York: Macmillan.
- Friedson, E. (1980). Doctoring together: A study of professional social control. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
- Gill, C. (1992, November). Who gets the profits? Workplace oppression devaluesthe disability experience. Mainstream, 12, 14–17.
- Gilson, S. F., & DePoy, E. (2007). Da Vinci’s ill fated design legacy: Homogenization and standardization [Electronic version]. The International Journal of the Humanities, 5(7), 145-154.
- Gilson, S. F., & DePoy, E. (2008). Explanatory legitimacy: A model for disability policy development and analysis. In K. M. Sowers (Series Ed.), & I. Colby (Vol. Ed.), Comprehensive handbook of social work and social welfare: Vol 4. Social policy and policy practice (pp. 203-217). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
- Gupta, V. B. (2011). How Hindus cope with disability. Journal of Religion, Disability & Health, 15, 72-78.
- Imrie, R., & Hall, P. (2001). Inclusive design: Designing and developing accessible environments. New York: Spon Press.
- International Federation of Social Work. (2012, March 3). Global Standards. Retrieved from International Federation of Social Work: http://ifsw.org/policies/global-standards/
- Korner, S. (Ed.). (2001). Practical reason. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
- Livingston, J. (2006). Insights from an African history of disability. Radical History Review, 94(94), 111–126.
- May, G.,& Raske, M. (2004).Ending disability discrimination: Strategies for social workers. Saddle River, NJ: Allyn & Bacon.
- McClellan, J. E.,&Dorn;,H. (2006).Science and technology in world history (2nd ed.).Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
- Metzler, I. (2006). Disability in Medieval Europe.New York: Routledge.
- Pardeck, J., & Murphy, J. ( 2004). Disability issues for social workers and human services professionals in the twenty-first century. Philadelphia, PA: Haworth.
- Nancy, J. L. (2008). Corpus. New York: Fordham University Press.
- Newman, S. (2012). Writing disability: A critical history. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
- Parsons, T. (1956).Economy and society: A study in the integration of economicand social theory. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
- Pierce, C. (1993-2000). Faith Healing. Retrieved from Microsoft® Encarta® Online Encyclopedia 2000:http://autocww2.colorado. edu/~toldy2/E64ContentFiles/Occult/FaithHealing.html
- Rose, M. (2003).The staff of Oedipus. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
- Rothman, J. (2010). The challenge of disability and access: Reconceptualizing the role of the medical model. Journal of Social Work in Disability & Rehabilitation. , 9(2-3), 194-222.
- Salvendy, G. (2006). Handbook of human factors and ergonomics. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
- Shilling, C. (2008). Changing bodies: Habit, crisis, and creativity. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Slaughter, S., & Rhoades, G. (2004). Academic capitalism and the new economy: Markets, state,and higher education. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
- Slingerland, E. (2008). What science offers the humanities: Integrating body and Culture. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
- Nakamura, O. (2006). Rakukita Iwakura psychosis’s treatment in. Human Sciences: Osaka Prefecture University Bulletin 2 , 97-114.
- Society for Disability Studies. (2004). Guidelines for disability studies programs. Retrieved from http://www.disstudies.org/guidelines_ for_disability_studies_programs
- Sullivan, W. M., & Rosin, M. S. (2008). A new agenda for higher education: Shaping a life of the mind for practice. San Francisco: Josey-Bass.
- Tregaskis, C. (2004). Constructions of disability: Researching the interface betweendisabled and nondisabled people. London: Routledge.
- Warschauer, M. (2004). Technology and social inclusion. Cambridge: MIT Press.
- Yuen, F. K. O., Cohen, C. B., & Tower, K. (2007). Disability and social workeducation: Practice and policy issues. New York: Routledge.
- Yong, A. (2007). Theology and downsyndrome. Waco, TX: Baylor University Press.
- Zee News. (2013, Jan 24). Blind man gets ATM card after six months of wait in India. Retrieved from http://globalaccessibilitynews.com/2013/01/14/blind-man-gets-atm-card-after-six-months-ofwaitin-india/
- Zeldich, M. (2001). Theories of legitimacy. In J. Jost & B. Major, (Eds.), Psychology of legitimacy (pp. 33-53). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Abstract Views: 419
PDF Views: 0