Toxicology International (Formerly Indian Journal of Toxicology)

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Effect of Mobile Phone Radiation on Neurobehaviour: Possible Mechanisms from Preclinical Studies


Affiliations
1 Department Of Pharmaceutics, Srm College Of Pharmacy, Srmist, Kattankulathur, Chennai – 603203, Tamil Nadu, India
2 Department Of Pharmacology, Srm College Of Pharmacy, Srmist, Kattankulathur, Chennai – 603203, Tamil Nadu, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Excessive usage of gadgets Emitting Electromagnetic Radiation (EMR), especially smartphones, by people of all age groups, and so forth chronic exposure to the radiation, were indeed sounding the alarm about a multitude of health risks. The nervous system was significantly affected, altering the brain and behavior of people and animals. Many preclinical experimental studies have been performed to uncover the pathways that lead to injury, but the results have been contradictory. A strategic search was conducted to identify studies published between 2011 and 2020, using electronic databases such as PubMed and Science Direct. Based on predefined criteria, studies were identified for study and assessed individually. All of the included studies were assessed for the risk of bias, and no study was found to be free of bias. In preclinical research, heterogenicity was detected in the exposure settings (EMF-RF type, MW, pulsed, SAR value, and length of exposure) after a thorough assessment of the studies included. Exposure to mobile phone radiation can produce oxidative stress, which can lead to the activation of apoptotic and necrotic pathways if not reversed in time. The available scientific literature is insufficient to draw particular conclusions, but the possibility of harmful impacts cannot be ruled out, according to the authors. There is a great need to restrict extensive investigations and instead conduct a systematic and complete blinded study with significant reproducibility and long-term research. This review intended to explain the potential mechanisms and risks associated with mobile phone radiation exposure.

Keywords

Apoptosis, Electromagnetic Radiation, Mobile Phone, Neurobehaviour, Oxidative Stress.
User
Subscription Login to verify subscription
Notifications
Font Size

  • Velmurugan MS. Sustainable perspectives on energy consumption, EMRF, environment, health and accident risks associated with the use of mobile phones. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2017; 67:192–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RSER.2016.09.011.

  • Kesari KK, Siddiqui MH, Meena R, Verma HN, Kumar S. Cell phone radiation exposure on brain and associated biological systems. Indian J Exp Biol. 2013; 51(3):187–200.

  • Sahin D, Ozgur E, Guler G, et al. The 2100MHz radio frequency radiation of a 3G-mobile phone and the DNA oxidative damage in brain. J Chem Neuroanat. 2016; 75(2015):94–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchem-neu.2016.01.002.

  • Mahdavi SM, Sahraei H, Yaghmaei P, Tavakoli H. Effects of electromagnetic radiation exposure on stress- related behaviors and stress hormones in male wistar rats. Biomol Ther. 2014; 22(6):570–576. https://doi.org/10.4062/biomolther.2014.054.

  • Sahin D, Ozgur E, Guler G, Tomruk A, Unlu I, Sepici Dinçel A, et al. The 2100MHz radiofrequency radiation of a 3G-mobile phone and the DNA oxidative damage in brain. J Chem Neuroanat. 2016; 75(Pt B):94–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCHEMNEU.2016.01.002.

  • Bilgici B, Akar A, Avci B, Tuncel OK. Effect of 900 MHz radiofrequency radiation on oxidative stress in rat brain and serum. Electromagn Biol Med. 2013; 32(1):20–29. https://doi.org/10.3109/15368378.2012.699012.

  • Kocaman, Gul M, Yurt KK, Altun G, Zayman E, Kıvrak EG. Does omega-3 have a protective effect on the rat adrenal gland exposed to 900 MHz electromagnetic fields- J Microsc Ultrastruct. 2017; 5(4):185. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JMAU.2017.08.003.

  • Ghaedi S, Hossein KJ, Mohammad F, Sara A, Saeid MT, Hamid B. Effects of mobile phone radiation on the liver of immature rats. Adv Environ Biol. 2013:1127–1133.

  • Monfared AL, Nooraii A, Shamsi M. Histological and biochemical studies of mice kidney after exposure to mobile phone radiation. J Basic Res Med Sci. 2016; 3(3):45–51. https://doi.org/10.18869/acadpub.jbrms.3.3.45.

  • La Vignera S, Condorelli RA, Vicari E, D’Agata R, Calogero AE. Effects of the exposure to mobile phones on male reproduction: A review of the literature. J Androl. 2012; 33(3):350–356. https://doi.org/10.2164/jandrol.111.014373.

  • El-Gohary OA, Said MA-A. Effect of electromag netic waves from mobile phone on immune status of male rats: possible protective role of vitamin D. Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 2017; 95(2):151–156. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjpp-2016-0218.

  • Liu C, Gao P, Xu S-C, et al. Mobile phone radiation induces mode-dependent DNA damage in a mouse spermatocyte-derived cell line: A protective role of melatonin. Int J Radiat Biol. 2013; 89(11):993–1001. https://doi.org/10.3109/09553002.2013.811309.

  • Kivrak E, Yurt K, Kaplan A, Alkan I, Altun G. Effects of electromagnetic fields exposure on the antioxidant defense system. J Microsc Ultrastruct. 2017; 5(4):167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmau.2017.07.003.

  • Fragopoulou AF, Samara A, Antonelou MH, et al. Brain proteome response following whole body exposure of mice to mobile phone or wireless DECT base radiation. Electromagn Biol Med. 2012; 31(4):250–274. https://doi.org/10.3109/15368378.2011.631068.

  • Maskey D, Kim M, Aryal B, et al. Effect of 835 MHz radiofrequency radiation exposure on calcium binding proteins in the hippocampus of the mouse brain. Brain Res. 2010; 1313:232–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2009.11.079.

  • Megha K, Deshmukh PS, Ravi AK, Tripathi AK, Abegaonkar MP, Banerjee BD. Effect of low-intensity microwave radiation on monoamine neurotransmit ters and their key regulating enzymes in rat brain. Cell Biochem Biophys. 2015; 73(1):93–100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12013-015-0576-x.

  • Arendash GW, Sanchez-Ramos J, Mori T, et al. Electromagnetic field treatment protects against and reverses cognitive impairment in Alzheimer’s disease mice. J Alzheimer’s Dis. 2010; 19(1):191–210. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-2010-1228.

  • Hooijmans CR, Rovers MM, de Vries RB, Leenaars M, Ritskes-Hoitinga M, Langendam MW. SYRCLE’s risk of bias tool for animal studies. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014; 14(1):43. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-14-43.

  • McGuinness LA, Higgins JPT. Risk‐of‐bias VISualization (robvis): An R package and Shiny web app for visualizing risk‐of‐bias assessments. Res Synth Methods. 2021; 12(1):55–61. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1411.

  • Kwon Y, Lemieux M, McTavish J, Wathen N. Identifying and removing duplicate records from systematic review searches. J Med Libr Assoc. 2015; 103(4):184–188. https://doi.org/10.3163/1536-5050.103.4.004.

  • Ntzouni MP, Skouroliakou A, Kostomitsopoulos N, Margaritis LH. Transient and cumulative memory impairments induced by GSM 1.8 GHz cell phone signal in a mouse model. Electromagn Biol Med. 2013; 32(1):95–120. https://doi.org/10.3109/15368378.2012.709207.

  • Mirhadi AJ. Overview of radiation therapy terms and procedures in the management of thoracic malignancies. In: Medical Management of the Thoracic Surgery Patient. Elsevier; 2010:252–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-4160-3993-8.00025-8.

  • Behari J. Biological responses of mobile phone frequency exposure. Indian J Exp Biol. 2010; 48(10):959–981. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429287947-5.

  • Narayanan SN, Jetti R, Kesari KK, Kumar RS, Nayak SB, Bhat PG. Radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation-induced behavioral changes and their possible basis.Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2019; 26(30):30693–30710. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-06278-5.

  • Balawender K, Orkisz S. The impact of selected modifiable lifestyle factors on male fertility in the modern world. Cent Eur J Urol. 2020; 73(4):563–568. https://doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2020.1975

  • Wust P, Kortüm B, Strauss U, et al. Non-thermal effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields. Sci Rep. 2020; 10(1):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-69561-3.

  • Ntzouni MP, Stamatakis A, Stylianopoulou F, Margaritis LH. Short-term memory in mice is affected by mobile phone radiation. Pathophysiology. 2011; 18(3):193–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pathophys.2010.11.001.

  • Li Y, Shi C, Lu G, Xu Q, Liu S. Effects of electromagnetic radiation on spatial memory and synapses in rat hippocampal CA1. Neural Regen Res. 2012; 7(16):1248–1255. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1673-5374.2012.16.007.

  • Aldad TS, Gan G, Gao XB, Taylor HS. Fetal radiofrequency radiation exposure from 800–1900 Mhz-rated cellular telephones affects neurodevelopment and behavior in Mice. Sci Rep. 2012; 2(December 2008). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep00312.

  • Narayanan SN, Kumar RS, Karun KM, Nayak SB, Bhat PG. Possible cause for altered spatial cognition of prepubescent rats exposed to chronic radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation. Metab Brain Dis. 2015; 30(5):1193–1206. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11011-015-9689-6.

  • Saikhedkar N, Bhatnagar M, Jain A, Sukhwal P, Sharma C, Jaiswal N. Effects of mobile phone radiation (900 MHz radiofrequency) on structure and functions of rat brain. Neurol Res. 2014; 36(12):1072–1079. https://doi.org/10.1179/1743132814Y.0000000392.

  • Ahmadi S, Alavi SS, Jadidi M, Ardjmand A. Exposure to GSM 900-MHz mobile radiation impaired inhibitory avoidance memory consolidation in rat: Involvements of opioidergic and nitrergic systems. Brain Res. 2018; 1701:36–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2018.07.016.

  • Narayanan SN, Mohapatra N, John P, et al. Radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation exposure effects on amygdala morphology, place preference behavior and brain caspase-3 activity in rats. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol. 2018; 58(November 2017):220–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.etap.2018.01.009.

  • Singh KV, Gautam R, Meena R, Nirala JP, Jha SK, Rajamani P. Effect of mobile phone radiation on oxidative stress, inflammatory response, and contextual fear memory in Wistar rat. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2020; 27(16):19340–19351. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-07916-z.

  • Redza-Dutordoir M, Averill-Bates DA. Activation of apoptosis signalling pathways by reactive oxygen species. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2016; 1863(12):2977–2992. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamcr.2016.09.012.

  • Popa-Wagner A, Mitran S, Sivanesan S, Chang E, Buga A-M. ROS and brain diseases: The good, the bad, and the ugly. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2013; 2013 (Figure 1):1–14. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/963520.

  • Kesari KK, Kumar S, Behari J. 900-MHz microwave radiation promotes oxidation in rat brain. Electromagn Biol Med. 2011; 30(4):219–234. https://doi.org/10.3109/15368378.2011.587930.

  • Calcabrini C, Mancini U, De Bellis R, et al. Effect of extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields on antioxidant activity in the human keratinocyte cell line NCTC 2544. Biotechnol Appl Biochem. 2017; 64(3):415–422. https://doi.org/10.1002/bab.1495.

  • Dringen R, Hirrlinger J. Glutathione pathways in the brain. Biol Chem. 2003; 384(4):505–516. https://doi.org/10.1515/BC.2003.059.

  • Hussein S, El-Saba AA, Galal MK, et al. Biochemical and histological studies on adverse effects of mobile phone radiation on rat’s brain. J Chem Neuroanat. 2016; 78:10–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchemneu.2016.07.009.

  • Imge EB, Kilicoglu B, Devrim E, Çetin R, Durak I. Effects of mobile phone use on brain tissue from the rat and a possible protective role of vitamin C a preliminary study. Int J Radiat Biol. 2010; 86(12):1044–1049. https://doi.org/10.3109/09553002.2010.501838.

  • Zorov DB, Juhaszova M, Sollott SJ. Mitochondrial reactive oxygen species (ROS) and ROS-induced ROS release. Physiol Rev. 2014; 94(3):909–950. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00026.2013.

  • Taso O V., Philippou A, Moustogiannis A, Zevolis E, Koutsilieris M. Lipid peroxidation products and their role in neurodegenerative diseases. Ann Res Hosp. 2019; 3(4):2–2. https://doi.org/10.21037/arh.2018.12.02.

  • Motawi TK, Darwish HA, Moustafa YM, Labib MM. Biochemical modifications and neuronal damage in brain of young and adult rats after long-term exposure to mobile phone radiations. Cell Biochem Biophys. 2014; 70(2):845–855. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12013-014-9990-8.

  • McIlwain DR, Berger T, Mak TW. Caspase functions in cell death and disease. Cold Spring HarbPerspect Biol. 2013; 5(4). https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a008656.

  • Fischer R, Maier O. Interrelation of oxidative stress and inflammation in neurodegenerative disease: Role of TNF. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2015; 2015:1–18. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/610813.

  • Yan B, Wang H, Rabbani ZN, et al. Tumor necrosis factor-α is a potent endogenous mutagen that promotes cellular transformation. Cancer Res. 2006; 66(24):11565–11570. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-2540.

  • Nakajima T. Positive and negative regulation of radiation-induced apoptosis by protein Kinase C. J Radiat Res. 2008; 49(1):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1269/jrr.07053.

  • Wallimann T, Tokarska-Schlattner M, Schlattner U. The creatine kinase system and pleiotropic effects of creatine. Amino Acids. 2011; 40(5):1271–1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00726-011-08773.

  • Liu D, Xu Y. p53, Oxidative stress, and aging. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2011; 15(6):1669–1678. https://doi.org/10.1089/ars.2010.3644.

  • Kim Y, Kim J, He M, Lee A, Cho E. Apigenin ameliorates scopolamine-induced cognitive dysfunction and neuronal damage in mice. Molecules. 2021; 26(17):5192. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26175192.

  • Um H-D. Bcl-2 family proteins as regulators of cancer cell invasion and metastasis: A review focusing on mitochondrial respiration and reactive oxygen species. Oncotarget. 2016; 7(5):5193–5203. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.6405.

  • Kale J, Osterlund EJ, Andrews DW. BCL-2 family proteins: Changing partners in the dance towards death. Cell Death Differ. 2018; 25(1):65–80. https://doi.org/10.1038/cdd.2017.186.

  • Yilmaz A, Yilmaz N, Serarslan Y, et al. The effects of mobile phones on apoptosis in cerebral tissue: An experimental study on rats. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2014; 18(7):992–1000.

  • Shahabi S, Taji IH, Hoseinnezhaddarzi M, et al. Exposure to cell phone radiofrequency changes corticotrophin hormone levels and histology of the brain and adrenal glands in male wistar rat. Iran J Basic Med Sci. 2018; 21(12):1269–1274. https://doi.org/10.22038/ijbms.2018.29567.7133.

  • Anand KS, Dhikav V. Hippocampus in health and disease: An overview. Ann Indian Acad Neurol. 2012; 15(4):239–246. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-2327.104323.

  • Rubin RD, Watson PD, Duff MC, Cohen NJ. The role of the hippocampus in flexible cognition and social behavior. Front Hum Neurosci. 2014; 8(SEP):1–15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00742.

  • Mugunthan N, Shanmugasamy K, Anbalagan J, Rajanarayanan S, Meenachi S. Effects of Long Term Exposure of 900-1800 MHz Radiation Emitted from 2G Mobile Phone on Mice Hippocampus — A Histomorphometric Study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016; 10(8):AF01–6. https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2016/21630.8368.

  • Fragopoulou AF, Polyzos A, Papadopoulou MD, et al. Hippocampal lipidome and transcriptome profile alterations triggered by acute exposure of mice to GSM 1800 MHz mobile phone radiation: An exploratory study. Brain Behav. 2018; 8(6):1–18. https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.1001.


Abstract Views: 161

PDF Views: 0




  • Effect of Mobile Phone Radiation on Neurobehaviour: Possible Mechanisms from Preclinical Studies

Abstract Views: 161  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Vara Prasad Saka
Department Of Pharmaceutics, Srm College Of Pharmacy, Srmist, Kattankulathur, Chennai – 603203, Tamil Nadu, India
V. Chitra
Department Of Pharmacology, Srm College Of Pharmacy, Srmist, Kattankulathur, Chennai – 603203, Tamil Nadu, India
N. Damodharan
Department Of Pharmaceutics, Srm College Of Pharmacy, Srmist, Kattankulathur, Chennai – 603203, Tamil Nadu, India

Abstract


Excessive usage of gadgets Emitting Electromagnetic Radiation (EMR), especially smartphones, by people of all age groups, and so forth chronic exposure to the radiation, were indeed sounding the alarm about a multitude of health risks. The nervous system was significantly affected, altering the brain and behavior of people and animals. Many preclinical experimental studies have been performed to uncover the pathways that lead to injury, but the results have been contradictory. A strategic search was conducted to identify studies published between 2011 and 2020, using electronic databases such as PubMed and Science Direct. Based on predefined criteria, studies were identified for study and assessed individually. All of the included studies were assessed for the risk of bias, and no study was found to be free of bias. In preclinical research, heterogenicity was detected in the exposure settings (EMF-RF type, MW, pulsed, SAR value, and length of exposure) after a thorough assessment of the studies included. Exposure to mobile phone radiation can produce oxidative stress, which can lead to the activation of apoptotic and necrotic pathways if not reversed in time. The available scientific literature is insufficient to draw particular conclusions, but the possibility of harmful impacts cannot be ruled out, according to the authors. There is a great need to restrict extensive investigations and instead conduct a systematic and complete blinded study with significant reproducibility and long-term research. This review intended to explain the potential mechanisms and risks associated with mobile phone radiation exposure.

Keywords


Apoptosis, Electromagnetic Radiation, Mobile Phone, Neurobehaviour, Oxidative Stress.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18311/ti%2F2022%2Fv29i2%2F29000