![Open Access](https://i-scholar.in/lib/pkp/templates/images/icons/fulltextgreen.png)
![Restricted Access](https://i-scholar.in/lib/pkp/templates/images/icons/fulltextred.png)
URLs Link Rot:Implications for Electronic Publishing
In recent years the authors of scholarly publications have relied on e-resources. But e-resources have raised the question of permanency on the web. In this context, this article investigates the availability, persistence of Uniform Resource Locator (URL) citations cited in two Library and Information Science (LIS) journal articles published by Emerald Publishers during 2008 and 2012. In total, 2477 URLs cited in 406 research articles published in two LIS journals spanning a period of five years (2008-2012) were extracted. The study found that 23.81 per cent (2,477 out of 10,400 references) of URLs were cited in these journal articles. 49.53 per cent of URL citations were not accessible and the remaining 51.47 per cent of URL citations were still accessible. The study used W3C link checker to identify HTTP errors associated with missing URLs. HTTP 500 error message-'page not found' was the overwhelming message that represented 39.18 per cent of all HTTP error messages. This study attempts to focus on URLs link rot and its implications for electronic publishing.
Keywords
Link Rot, E-Publishing, Web Citations, Wayback Machine, HTTP Errors.
User
Font Size
Information
- Altman M and King G. 2007. A proposed standard for the scholarly citation of quantitative data. D-LibMagazine. Available at <http://www.dlib.org/dlib/march07/altman/03altman.html> (last accessed on June 25, 2013).
- Aronsky D, Madani S, Carnevale R J, Duda S, and Feyder F T. 2007. The prevalence and inaccessibility of Internet references in the biomedical literature at the time of publication. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 14(2): 232–234.
- Dimitrova D V and Bugeja M. 2007. The half-life of Internet references cited in communication journals. New Media & Society 9(9): 811–826.
- DOI.org. 2012. DOI System and Persistent URLs (PURLs). Available at (last accessed on July 1, 2013).
- Ducut E, Liu F and Fontelo P. 2008. An update on uniform resource locators (URL) decay in MEDLINE abstract and measures for its mitigation. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 8: 23. Available at <http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6947/8/23> (last accessed on July 5, 2013).
- Goh D H L and Ng P K. 2007. Link decay in leading information science journals. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 58(1): 15–24.
- Moorthy L R and Karisiddappa C R. 1996. Electronic publishing: Impact and implications on library and information centres. pp. 15–34. In Digital Libraries: Dynamic storehouse of digitized information, edited by N M Malwad, T B Rajashekar Rao, I K Ravichandra and N V Satyanarayana, New Delhi: New Age International.
- Sampath Kumar D and Vinay Kumar B T. 2013. HTTP 404-page (not) found: Recovery of decayed URL citations. Journal of Informetrics 7: 145–157. Available at <http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. joi.2012.09.007> (last accessed on June 29, 2013).
- Wren J D, Johnson K R, Crockett D M, Heilig L F, Schilling L M and Dellavalle R P. 2006. Uniform resource locator decay in dermatology journals: Author attitudes and preservation practices. Archives of Dermatology 142: 1147–1152.
- Sellitto C. 2005. The impact of impermanent web located citations: A study of 123 scholarly conference publications. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 56(7): 695–703.
![](https://i-scholar.in/public/site/images/abstractview.png)
Abstract Views: 596
![](https://i-scholar.in/public/site/images/pdfview.png)
PDF Views: 232