Indian Journal of Industrial Relations: Economics & Social Dev.

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Authentic Leadership & Work Engagement


Affiliations
1 Chandragupt Institute of Management, Patna, India
2 XLRI Jamshedpur, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The concern here is to understand how in organizations: a) authentic leadership relates to work engagement and psychological ownership, and b) psychological ownership interferes with the relationship between authentic leadership and work engagement. Using a correlational research design, the authors collected cross-sectional data from 117 working professionals through a Google Docs based survey in India. They found through regression analyses that authentic leadership indirectly relates to work engagement of employees through the full mediation of organization-based promotive psychological ownership. They discuss the implications for theory and research and argue that authentic leadership theory should include context variables such as control and position power.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Argyris, C. (1954), “The Fusion of an Individual with the Organization”, American Sociological Review, 19(3): 267-72.

  • Argyris, C. (1959), “The Individual and Organization: An Empirical Test”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 4(2): 145-67.

  • Argyris, C. (1964), Integrating the Individual and the Organization, New York: Wiley.

  • Argyris, C. (1973), “Personality and Organization Theory Revisited, Administrative Science Quarterly, 18(2): 141-67.

  • Attridge, M. (2009),” Measuring and Managing Employee Work Engagement: A Review of the Research and Business Literature”, Journal of Workplace Behavioral Health, 24(4): 383-98.

  • Avey, J. B., Avolio, B. J., Crossley, C. & Luthans, F. (2009), “Psychological ownership: Theoretical extensions, measurement, and relation to work outcomes”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30 (2), 173-191.

  • Avolio, B. J., Walumbwa, F. O. & Weber, T. J. (2009), “Leadership: Current Theories, Research, and Future Directions”, Annual Review of Psychology, 60(1): 421-49.

  • Baron, R. M. & Kenny, D. A. (1986), “The Moderator- Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6): 1173-82.

  • Bates, S. (2004), “Getting Engaged”, HR Magazine, 49(2): 44-51.

  • Baumeister, R. F. (1999), “The Nature and Structure of the Self”, in R. F. Baumeister (Ed.), The Self in Social Psychology : 1-20. Philadelphia, PA: Taylor & Francis.

  • Brown, T. (1989), “What Will It Take to Win? (psychological ownership), Industry Week, June 19, 238: 15.

  • Christian, M. S., Garza, A. S. & Slaughter, J. E. (2011), “Work Engagement: A Quantitative Review and Test of Its Relations with Task and Contextual Performance”, Personnel Psychology, 64(1):89-136.

  • Dittmar, H. (1992), The Social Psychology of Material Possessions: To Have Is To Be, New York: St. Martin’s Press.

  • Durbin, J. & Watson, G. S. (1951), “Testing for Serial Correlation in Least Squares Regression”, Biometrika, 38(1-2):159-78.

  • Gardner, W. L., Avolio, B. J., Luthans, F., May, D. R. & Walumbwa, F. (2005). “Can You See the Real Me? A Self-based Model of Authentic Leader and Follower Development”, Leadership Quarterly, 16(3): 343– 72.

  • Gardner, W. L., Avolio, B. J. & Walumbwa, F. O. (2006), Authentic Leadership Theory and Practice: Origins, Effects and Development, Amsterdam: Elsevier JAI Press.

  • Gardner, W. L. & Schermerhorn, J. R. (2004), “Unleashing Individual Potential Performance Gains Through Positive Organizational Behaviour and Authentic Leadership”, Organizational Dynamics, 33(3): 270-81.

  • Graen, G. B. & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995), “Relationship- Based Approach to Leadership: Development of Leader-Member Exchange (LMX) Theory of Leadership Over 25 Years: Applying a Multi-Level, Multi-Domain Perspective”, Leadership Quarterly, 20(2): 219-47.

  • Kahn, W. A. (1990),” Psychological Conditions of Personal Engagement and Disengagement at Work”, Academy of Management Journal, 33(4): 692-724.

  • Klenke, K. (2007), “Authentic Leadership: A Self, Leader, and Spiritual Identity Perspective”, International Journal of Leadership Studies, 3(1): 68-97.

  • Lawler, E. E. & Hall, D. T. (1970), “Relationship of Job Characteristics to Job Involvement, Satisfaction, and Intrinsic Motivation”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 54 (4): 305-12.

  • Lodahl, T. M. & Kejnar, M. (1965), “The Definition and Measurement of Job Involvement”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 49(1): 24-33.

  • Luthans, F. & Avolio, B. J. (2003), “Authentic Leadership: A Positive Developmental Approach” in K. S. Cameron, J. E. Dutton & R. E. Quinn (Eds.), Positive Organizational Scholarship: Foundations of a New Discipline (: 241-61), San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

  • Luthans, F. & Avolio, B. J. (2009), “The ‘Point’ of Positive Organizational Behaviour”. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30(2):291-307.

  • Maslach, C. & Leiter, M. P. (1997), The Truth about Burnout: How Organizations Cause Personal Stress and What to Do about It, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

  • Mayhew, M. G., Ashkanasy, N. M., Bramble, T. & Gardner, J. (2007), “A Study of the Antecedents and Consequences of Psychological Ownership in Organizational Settings”, The Journal of Social Psychology, 147(5), 477-500.

  • Novicevic, M. M., Harvey, M. G., Buckley, M. R., Brown, J. A. & Evans, R. (2006), “Authentic Leadership: A Historical Perspective”, Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 13(1): 64-76.

  • Pati, S. P. & Kumar, P. (2010), “Employee Engagement: Role of Self-efficacy, Organizational Support & Supervisor Support”. Indian Journal of Industrial Relations, 46(1): 126-37.

  • Pierce, J. L., Kostova, T. & Dirks, K. T. (2001), “Toward a Theory of Psychological Ownership in Organizations”, Academy of Management Review, 26(2): 296-310.

  • Pierce, J. L., Kostova, T. & Dirks, K. T. (2003), “The State of Psychological Ownership: Integrating and Extending a Century of Research”, Review of General Psychology, 7(1): 84-107.

  • Pierce, J. L., O’Driscoll, M. P. & Coghlan, A.-M. (2004), “Work Environment Structure and Psychological Ownership: The Mediating Effects of Control”, Journal of Social Psychology, 144(5): 507-34.

  • Price, T. L. (2003), “The Ethics of Authentic Transformational Leadership”, Leadership Quarterly, 14(1): 67-81.

  • Rhoades, L. & Eisenberger, R. (2002), “Perceived Organizational Support: A Review of the Literature”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4): 698-714.

  • Ryan, R. M. & Deci, E. L. (2000), “Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions”, Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54–67.

  • Ryan, R. M. & Deci, E. L. (2001), “On Happiness and Human Potential: A Review of Research on Hedonic and Eudaimonic Well being”, Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1): 141-66.

  • Saks, A. M. (2006), “Antecedents and Consequences of Employee Engagement”, Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21(7): 600- 19.

  • Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B. & Salanova, M. (2006), “The Measurement of Work Engagement with a Short Questionnaire: A Cross-national Study”, Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(4): 701-16.

  • Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., Gonza·lez-Roma, V. & Bakker, A. B. (2002), “The Measurement of Engagement and Burnout: A Two Sample Confirmatory Factor Analytic Approach”, Journal of Happiness Studies, 3(1): 71-92.

  • Van Dyne, L. & Pierce, J. L. (2004), “Psychological Ownership and Feelings of Possession: Three Field Studies Predicting Employee Attitudes and Organizational Citizenship Behaviour”, Journal of Organization Behaviour, 25(4): 439-59.

  • Walumbwa, F. O., Avolio, B. J., Gardner, W. L., Wernsing, T. S. & Peterson, S. J. (2008), “Authentic Leadership: Development and Validation of a Theory-Based Measure”, Journal of Management, 34(1): 89-126.

  • Walumbwa, F. O., Wang, P., Wang, H., Schaubroeck, J. & Avolio, B. J. (2010), “Psychological Processes Linking Authentic Leadership to Follower Behaviours”. Leadership Quarterly, 21(5): 901-14.

  • Yammarino, F. J., Dionne, S. D., Schriesheim, C. A. & Dansereau, F. (2008), “Authentic Leadership and Positive Organizational Behaviour: A Meso, Multi-level Perspective”, Leadership Quarterly, 19(6): 693- 707.


Abstract Views: 686

PDF Views: 0




  • Authentic Leadership & Work Engagement

Abstract Views: 686  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Kumar Alok
Chandragupt Institute of Management, Patna, India
D. Israel
XLRI Jamshedpur, India

Abstract


The concern here is to understand how in organizations: a) authentic leadership relates to work engagement and psychological ownership, and b) psychological ownership interferes with the relationship between authentic leadership and work engagement. Using a correlational research design, the authors collected cross-sectional data from 117 working professionals through a Google Docs based survey in India. They found through regression analyses that authentic leadership indirectly relates to work engagement of employees through the full mediation of organization-based promotive psychological ownership. They discuss the implications for theory and research and argue that authentic leadership theory should include context variables such as control and position power.

References