Abhigyan

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Influence of Job Attributes on Turnover:An Empirical Study on Indian Sales Personnel


Affiliations
1 Bharati Vidyapeeth University, Pune, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


HR personnel particularly in the Indian context need to customize job contents instead of generalize them to all employees. The imperative need to structure jobs as per the needs of each career stage will be a breakthrough in restricting employee exit. The present study aims to investigate the impact of employee needs and perception on the turnover intentions, considering a comprehensive set of job expectations. Career Stage Theory (CST), was used to further explore its influence on the relationship between job attributes and turnover intentions. Results highlight that job perception and not job expectations or met expectations influence turnover intentions. Variations were also visible with diverse career stage measures viz. age, occupational tenure and organizational tenure, indicating different job perception variables influencing turnover intentions at different points of the career. Theoretical and practical implications of these results and directions for future research have been discussed.

Keywords

Turnover Intention, Expectation, Perception, Experiences, Career Stage.
User
Subscription Login to verify subscription
Notifications
Font Size

  • Aggarwal,U., & Bhargava, S. (2009). Exploring psychological contract contents in India: The employee and employer perspective. Journal of Indian Business Research, 1 (4), 238-251.

  • Agarwal,P., & Venkatraman, A. (2012), Psychological Contract Scale Report, Faculty of Management Studies, University of Delhi, New Delhi.

  • Boles, J. S., Johnson, J. T., & Barksdale H. C., Jr. (2000). How salespeople build quality relationships: A replication and extension. Journal of Business Research, 48 (1), 75–81.

  • Bottger, P. C. (1990, August). Voluntary turnover: An empirical test of the Met expectations hypothesis. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 28(3), 18-27.

  • Broadbridge, A. M., Maxwell, G. A., & Ogden S. M. (2007). Experiences, perceptions and expectations of retail employment for Generation Y. Career Development International, 12 (6), 523-544.

  • Brown, S. A., Venkatesh, V., Kuruzovich, J., & Massey, A. P. (2007). Expectation confirmation: An examination of three competing models. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 105 (1), 52–66.

  • Buchanan II, B. (1974). Building organizational commitment: The socialization of managers in work organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 19 (4), 533-546.

  • Conway, E. (2004). Relating career stage to attitudes towards HR practices and commitment:Evidence of interaction effects? European Journal of Work & Organizational Psychology, 13 (4), 417-46.

  • Cron, W. L., & Slocum, J. W. (1986). The influence of career stages on salespeople's job attitudes, work perceptions, and performance. Journal of Marketing Research, 23 (2), 119-129.

  • Dam, K. V. (2008). Time frames for leaving: An explorative study of employees’ intentions to leave the organization in the future. Career Development International, 13 (6), 560-571.

  • DeConinck, J. B., & Johnson, J. T. (2009). The effects of perceived supervisor support, perceived organizational support, and organizational justice on turnover among salespeople. Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management, 29 (4), 333-350.

  • Eddy, S. W. Ng., Schweitzer, L., & Lyons, S. T. (2010). New generation, great expectations: A field study of the millennial generation. Journal Business Psychology, 25 (2), 281–292.

  • Eisenberger, R., Stinglhamber, F., Vandenberghe, C., Sucharski, I., & Rhoades, L. (2002). Perceived supervisor support: Contributions to perceived organizational support and employee retention. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87 (3), 565–573.

  • Feldman, D. C. (1976). A contingency theory of socialization. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21 (3), 433-452.

  • Flaherty, K. E., & Pappas, J. M.(2002). Using career stage theory to predict turnover intentions among salespeople. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 10 (3), 48-57.

  • Griffeth, R.W., Hom, P. W., & Gaertner, S. (2000). A meta-Analysis of antecedents and correlates of employee turnover: Update, moderator tests, and research implications for the next millennium. Journal of Management, 26 (3), 463-488.

  • Griffin, M. L., Hogan, N. L.,& Lambert E. G. (2013). Career stage theory and turnover intent among correctional officers. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 20 (10), 1–16.

  • Gupta, A., Ramamoorthy, N., Taylor, M. S., & Premack, S. (2002). Antecedents of Met-expectations of newcomers: A longitudinal analysis. IIM Bangalore Research Paper, (195).

  • Hess, N., & Jepsen, D. M. (2009). Career stage and generational differences in psychological contracts. Career Development International, 14 (3), 261-83.

  • Irving, P. G., & Meyer, J. P. (1994). Re-examination of the met-expectations hypothesis: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79 (6), 937-949.

  • Johnston, M. W., & Futrell, C. M.(1989). Functional salesforce turnover: An Empirical Investigation into the Positive Effects of Turnover. Journal of Business Research, 18 (2), 141-157.

  • Johnston, M. W., Griffeth, R., Burton, S., & Carson P. (1993). An exploratory investigation into the relationships between promotion and turnover: A quasi-experimental longitudinal study. Journal of Management, 19 (1), 33-49.

  • Jones, E., Kantak, D., Futrell, C. M., & Johnston, M. W. (1996). Leader behavior, work-attitudes, and turnover of salespeople: An integrative study. Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management, 16 (2), 13-23.

  • Katz, R.(1976). Career implications for job satisfaction. Academy of Management Proceedings, 36th Annual Meeting, 104-108.

  • Kowske, B. J., Rasch, R., & Wiley J. (2010). Millennials’ (Lack of) attitude problem: An empirical examination of generational effects on work attitudes. Journal of Business Psychology, 25 (2), 265–279.

  • Lam, T. (2003). Leader-member exchange and team-member exchange: The roles of moderators in new employees' socialization. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Research, 27 (1), 48-68.

  • Levinson, D. J., Darrow, C. N., Klein, E. B., Levinson, M. H., & McKee, B. (1978). The season of man’s life. New York: Alfred A Knopf.

  • Lucas, G. H., Jr., Parasuraman, A., Davis R. A., & Enis, B. M. (1987). An empirical study of salesforce turnover. Journal of Marketing, 51 (3), 34–59.

  • Malik,S., & Subramanian,V. (2015). Job expectations and perception variations across career stages: An empirical study in Indian tractor industry. Paradigm, 19 (2), 212-231.

  • McElroy, J. C., Rodriguez, J. M., Griffin, G. C., Morrow, P. C., & Wilson, M. (1993). Career stage, time spent on the road and truckload driver attitudes. Transportation Journal, 33 (1), 5-14.

  • Mehta, R., Anderson, R. E., & Dubinsky, A. J. (2000). The perceived importance of sales managers' rewards: A career stage perspective. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 15 (7), 507-524.

  • Miao, C. F., Lund, D. J., & Evans, K. R. (2009). Reexamining the influence of career stages on salesperson motivation: A cognitive and affective perspective. Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management, 29 (3), 243–255.

  • Min, H. (2007) Examining sources of warehouse employee turnover. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 37 (5), 375-388.

  • Mir, A., Mir R. & Mosca J. B. (2002). The new age employee: An exploration of changing employee-organization relations. Public Personnel Management, 31 (2), 187-200.

  • Moncarz, E., Zhao, J., & Kay, C. (2009). An exploratory study of US lodging properties’ organizational practices on employee turnover and retention. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 21(4), 437- 458.

  • O’Driscoll,M.P., & Beehr, T.A. (1994). Supervisor behaviors, role stressors and uncertainty as predictors of personal outcomes for subordinates. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15 (2), 141-55.

  • Ornstein, S., Cron, W. L., & Slocum, J. W. (1989). Life stage versus career stage: A comparative test of the theories of Levinson and Super. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 10 (2), 117–133.

  • Porter, L.W., & Steers, R.M. (1973). Organizational, work, and personal factors in employee turnover and absenteeism. Psychological Bulletin, 80 (2), 151-176.

  • Reichheld, F. E., & Detrick, C. (2003). Want to know how to keep expenses low? Think loyalty. American Banker, 168 (181), 6.

  • Sager,J. K., Varadarajan, P., & Futrell, C. M. (1988). Understanding salesperson turnover: A partial evaluation of Mobley's turnover process model. Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management, 8 (1), 21-35.

  • Stumpf, S. A., & Rabinowitz, S. (1981). Career stage as a moderator of performance relationships with facets of job satisfaction and role perceptions. Journal of Vocational Behaviour, 18 (2), 202–218.

  • Taris, R., Feij, J. A., & Van Vianen, A. E. (2005). Met expectations and supplies–values fit of Dutch young adults as determinants of work outcomes. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 16 (3), 366-382.

  • Walk, M., Schinnenburg, H., & Handy, F. (2013). What do talents want? Work expectations in India, China, and Germany. Zeitschrift für Personalforschung/ German Journal of Research in Human Resource Management, 27 (3), 251-278.


Abstract Views: 301

PDF Views: 0




  • Influence of Job Attributes on Turnover:An Empirical Study on Indian Sales Personnel

Abstract Views: 301  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Sonia Malik
Bharati Vidyapeeth University, Pune, India

Abstract


HR personnel particularly in the Indian context need to customize job contents instead of generalize them to all employees. The imperative need to structure jobs as per the needs of each career stage will be a breakthrough in restricting employee exit. The present study aims to investigate the impact of employee needs and perception on the turnover intentions, considering a comprehensive set of job expectations. Career Stage Theory (CST), was used to further explore its influence on the relationship between job attributes and turnover intentions. Results highlight that job perception and not job expectations or met expectations influence turnover intentions. Variations were also visible with diverse career stage measures viz. age, occupational tenure and organizational tenure, indicating different job perception variables influencing turnover intentions at different points of the career. Theoretical and practical implications of these results and directions for future research have been discussed.

Keywords


Turnover Intention, Expectation, Perception, Experiences, Career Stage.

References