Abhigyan

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

A Study on Modelling the Personality Construct of Brands


Affiliations
1 Department - MBA, Seacom Engineering College, Howrah, West Bengal, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Brand personality, which is defined as "personality attributes associated with the brands" forms the core of the symbolic attributes of a brand. Firms attain a differential position among all the competing brands, by designing a suitable brand personality. Although theoretical studies illustrated the construction of brand personality and identified important constructing factors, empirical validation of the theories and the constructing components was not done. Moreover, identification of the relative importance of the brand personality constructing components across different brands was also not done. In this work, an attempt has been made to create a model of brand personality, adhering to the theoretical studies. A methodology is also developed to empirically justify the relevance of the theoretical construct. The relative importance of the constructing components of brand personality is also measured across different brands of wrist watch operating in the Indian market product categories.

Keywords

Brand Personality, Brand Personality Constructs, Direct Association, Indirect Association, Modeling Brand Personality.
User
Subscription Login to verify subscription
Notifications
Font Size

  • Aaker J.L. (1997). Dimensions of brand personality. Journal of Marketing Research, 34( 3), 347-56.

  • Alt, M., & Griggs S. (1988). Can a Brand be Cheeky?” Marketing Intelligence and Planning, 6 ( 4), 9-16.

  • Batra, R., Lehmann D. R., & Singh D. (1993). The brand personality component of brand goodwill: Some antecedents and consequences. In Aaker D. A. and Biel. A. (eds). Brand equity and advertising, Hillsdale. NJ: Lawrence Eribaum Associates.

  • Belk, R. W. (1988, September). Possessions and the extended self. Journal of Consumer Research, 15 (2), 139-68.

  • Biel, A. (1993). Converting image into equity. In Aaker D. A. and Biel. A. (eds). Brand equity and advertising, Hillsdale. NJ: Lawrence Eribaum Associates.

  • Chu, S C., & Sung Y. (2011). Brand personality dimensions in China. Journal of Marketing Communications, 17 ( 3), 163-181.

  • De Charnatony L. (2010). From brand vision to brand evaluation. Strategically building and sustaining brands. Oxford: Batterworth Heinemann.

  • Ferrandi J. M., Valette-Florence P., & Fine-Falcy S. (2000). Aaker's brand personality scale in a French context: A replication and a preliminary test of its validity”, Developments in Marketing Science; Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the Academy of Marketing Science, Montreal, Vol. 23, pp. 7 – 13

  • Gilmore. G. W. (1919). Animism. Boston: Marshall Jones Company.

  • Grubb, E.L., & Grathwohl, H.L. (1967). Consumer self-concept, symbolism and market behavior: A theoretical approach. Journal of Marketing, 31 ( 4), 22-7.

  • Hall, C. S., & Gardner, L. (1957). Theories of personality. NewYork: John Wiley and Sons.

  • Halliday, J. (1996). Chrysler brings out brand personalities with '97 Ads. Advertising Age, 67 (40), 3.

  • Hieronimus F. (2003). Personality-directed brand management- An empirical study on the measurement, perception and impact of brand personality, Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.

  • Keller, K. L. (1993, January). Conceptualizing, measuring, and managing customer-based brand equity. Journal of Marketing, 57( 1), 1-22.

  • Kim, H. S. (2000). Examination of the brand personality and brand attitude within the apparel product category. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 4 (3), 243-252.

  • Kleine, R. E., Kleine S.S., & Kernan, J.B. (1993). Mundane consumption and the self: A social-identity perspective. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 2 (3), 209-35.

  • Levy, S.J. (1959). Symbols for sale. Harvard Business Review, 37 (4), 117-124.

  • Malhotra, N. K. (1981). A scale to measure self-concepts, person concepts, and product concepts. Journal of Marketing Research, 18 (4), 456-64.

  • McCracken, G. (1989). Who is the celebrity endorser? Cultural foundations of the endorsement process. Journal of Consumer Research, 16 (3), 310-21.

  • Park, B. (1986). A method for studying the development of impressions of real people. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 907-17.

  • Plummer. J. T (1985). Brand personality: A strategic concept for multinational advertising. Marketing Educators' Conference. New York: Young and Rubicam, 1-31

  • Rojas-Mendez J. I., PodlechE. I., & Silva-Olave E. (2004). The Ford brand personality in Chile. Corporate Reputation Review, 7(3), 232–51.

  • Rojas-Mendez Jose, I., Murphy S. A., & Papadopoulos N. (2013. The US brand personality: A Sino perspective. Journal of Business Research, 66 (8), 1028-1034.

  • Sentis, K., & Markus H. (1986). Brand personality and self. In Jerry Corrie Olson and Keith Sentis (eds), Advertising and consumer psychology, 3, (pp132-48), New York: Praeger Publishers.

  • Siguaw J. A., Mattila A., & Austin J. R. (1999). The brand personality scale: An application for restaurants. Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly , 4 (3),48–55.

  • Sung Y, Tinkham S. (2005). Brand personality structures in the United States and Korea: Common and culture-specificfFactors. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 15(4), 334–50.

  • Supphellen M., & Grønhaug K. (2003). Building foreign brand personalities in Russia: The moderating effect of consumer ethnocentrism. International Journal of Advertising, 22( 2), 203–26.

  • Villegas J, Earnhart K., & Burns N. (2000). The brand personality scale: an application for the personal computer industry, in Proceedings of the 108th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, Washington (DC).

  • Warner , L. (1959). The living and the dead. New Heaven: Yale University Press.

  • Wysong S. (2000). This brand's for you: a conceptualization and investigation of brand personality as a process with implications for brand management, Dissertation, University of Texas at Arlington, United States.


Abstract Views: 651

PDF Views: 3




  • A Study on Modelling the Personality Construct of Brands

Abstract Views: 651  |  PDF Views: 3

Authors

Saugat Ghosh
Department - MBA, Seacom Engineering College, Howrah, West Bengal, India

Abstract


Brand personality, which is defined as "personality attributes associated with the brands" forms the core of the symbolic attributes of a brand. Firms attain a differential position among all the competing brands, by designing a suitable brand personality. Although theoretical studies illustrated the construction of brand personality and identified important constructing factors, empirical validation of the theories and the constructing components was not done. Moreover, identification of the relative importance of the brand personality constructing components across different brands was also not done. In this work, an attempt has been made to create a model of brand personality, adhering to the theoretical studies. A methodology is also developed to empirically justify the relevance of the theoretical construct. The relative importance of the constructing components of brand personality is also measured across different brands of wrist watch operating in the Indian market product categories.

Keywords


Brand Personality, Brand Personality Constructs, Direct Association, Indirect Association, Modeling Brand Personality.

References