Abhigyan

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Disinvestment and Firm Performance- A Comparative Analysis of Strategic Sale vs. Public Offerings by Indian Public Sector Enterprises


Affiliations
1 FORE School of Management, New Delhi, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The state owned enterprises tend to suffer from operational and financial inefficiency due to severe agency problem and lack of market discipline. Disinvesting the state's stake in the state owned firms to either a strategic partner or offloading it to the general public or financial institutions, is considered as one of the effective solution to the agency problem of these firms. Sale of stake to the strategic partner is supposed to inculcate profit maximization objective in state owned firms and offloading minority stake to the general public and/or financial institutions is supposed to bring the firm under stock market monitoring mechanism, and better analyst coverage.

In the present paper, two modes of disinvestment are compared and contrasted for pre and post disinvestment performance of firms on certain parameters such as valuation, financial leverage, and operating efficiency. Paper found no statistically significant difference between pre and post disinvestment valuation ratios, financial leverage, and operating efficiencies for either of the data sets, i.e., minority sales as well as strategic sales. However, results indicate that strategic sale as a mode of disinvestment improves the valuation, operating efficiency and financial leverage for the firm.


Keywords

Disinvestment, Strategic Sale, Public Offering, Agency Problem, Public Sector Enterprises.
User
Subscription Login to verify subscription
Notifications
Font Size

  • Atkinson, S., & Halvorsen, R. (1986). The relative efficiency of public and private and firms in a regulated environment: The case of U.S. electric utilities. Journal of Public Economics, 29 (3), 281294.

  • Bhaya, H. (1990). Management efficiency in the private and public sectors in India. In J. Heath (ed.), Public enterprises at the crossroads, London: Routledge.

  • Boardman, A., & Vinning, A. (1989). Ownership and performance in competitive environments: A comparison of the performance of private, mixed and state owned enterprises. Journal of Law and Economics, 32 (1), 1-33.

  • Borins, S., & Boothman, B. (1985). Crown corporations and economic efficiency. In D.W. Mc-Fetridge (ed.), Canadian industrial policy in action, Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

  • Boyd, C. (1986). The comparative efficiency of state-owned enterprises. In A Negandhi, H. Thomas and K.L.K Rao (ed.), Multinational enterprises and state owned enterprises: A new challenge in international business, Greenwich: JAI Press.

  • Fare, R., Grosskopf, S., & Logan, J. (1985). The relative performance of publicly owned and privately owned electric utilities. Journal of Public Economics, 26 (1), 89-106.

  • Jha, R., & Sahni, B. (1992). Measures of efficiency in private and public sector industries: The case of India, Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 63(3), 489-495.

  • Kaur, S. (1998). Privatization of public regulation – A managerial perspective, Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Delhi.

  • Majumdar, S. (1995). Public, joint, and private sectors in Indian industry – evaluating relative performance differences. Economic and Political Weekly, 30 (7-8), M25-32.

  • Meyer, R. (1975). Publicly owned vs privately owned utilities: A policy choice. The Review of Economics and Statistics, LVII (4), 391-399.

  • Millward, R. (1982). The comparative performance of public and private ownership. In E. Roll (ed.), The mixed economy. London: Macmillan.

  • Naib, S. (2002). Ownership – Does it matter? Productivity, 43(2), 303-313.

  • Naib, S. (2003). Partial divestiture and performance of Indian public sector enterprise. Economic and Political Weekly, 38 (29), 3088-3093.

  • Pescatrice, D., & Tarapani, J. (1980). The performance and objectives of public and private utilities operating in the United States. Journal of Public Economics, 13 (2), 259-276.

  • Pryke, R. (1980). The comparative performance of public and private enterprises. Fiscal Studies, 3(2), 6881.

  • Rowley, C., & Yarrow, G. (1981). Property rights, regulations and public enterprises: The case of the British steel industry 1957-1975. International Review of Law and Economics, 1, 63-96.

  • Sharma, R., & Sinha, N. (1995). Frontier system and estimation of productive efficiency in intraindustrial private and public firms. The Journal of Institute of Public Enterprises, 18 (1-2), 27-25.

  • Trivedi, P. (1990). Comparative efficiency of public and private enterprises: Further evidence. Decision, 17 (3-4), 177-198.

  • Vickers, J., & Yarrow, G. (1998). Privatization: An economic analysis, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.


Abstract Views: 348

PDF Views: 0




  • Disinvestment and Firm Performance- A Comparative Analysis of Strategic Sale vs. Public Offerings by Indian Public Sector Enterprises

Abstract Views: 348  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Himanshu Joshi
FORE School of Management, New Delhi, India

Abstract


The state owned enterprises tend to suffer from operational and financial inefficiency due to severe agency problem and lack of market discipline. Disinvesting the state's stake in the state owned firms to either a strategic partner or offloading it to the general public or financial institutions, is considered as one of the effective solution to the agency problem of these firms. Sale of stake to the strategic partner is supposed to inculcate profit maximization objective in state owned firms and offloading minority stake to the general public and/or financial institutions is supposed to bring the firm under stock market monitoring mechanism, and better analyst coverage.

In the present paper, two modes of disinvestment are compared and contrasted for pre and post disinvestment performance of firms on certain parameters such as valuation, financial leverage, and operating efficiency. Paper found no statistically significant difference between pre and post disinvestment valuation ratios, financial leverage, and operating efficiencies for either of the data sets, i.e., minority sales as well as strategic sales. However, results indicate that strategic sale as a mode of disinvestment improves the valuation, operating efficiency and financial leverage for the firm.


Keywords


Disinvestment, Strategic Sale, Public Offering, Agency Problem, Public Sector Enterprises.

References