Open Access
Subscription Access
Open Access
Subscription Access
Intellectual Capital and Financial Performance:A Study of Selected BSE S & P 500 Listed Firms
Subscribe/Renew Journal
In the present scenario, no business can excel in the market by virtue of tangible assets only; it is the intellectual capital or intangible which plays significant role in enhancing the financial performance of a business firm. In this study, an attempt has been made is to estimate the relationship, if any between Firms financial performance and intellectual capital and its constituents. And also to study the significant role of intellectual capital coefficient in firm’s performance. To provide a sound conceptual base for developing business model for value creation. In this empirical paper, analytical research design has been used. Pulic’s VAIC (modified version) has been used to estimate the intellectual capital coefficient of BSE SandP 500 listed firms from 2007-2016. Data has been collected from CMIE and collected data has been analysed using Pearson correlation and linear multiple regression. Findings shows that almost all firms under study have good VAIC score means above 4 and the top VAIC scorer firms were mainly from refinery, metal, cement, steel, tobacco. Correlation analysis and Linear multiple regression analysis shows that financial performance has significant relationship with the intellectual capital and its constituents except structural capital (STVA) but significant relationship between innovation capital (Rand D/BV of shares). This paper will definitely contribute in the existing literature and also this is the first study to examine the relationship between intellectual capital and financial performance pertaining to BSE SandP 500.
Keywords
Intellectual Capital, VAICtm, Financial Performance, Value Creation, BSE SandP 500 Firms.
User
Subscription
Login to verify subscription
Font Size
Information
- Al-Musali, M. A. K., & Ismail, K. N. I. K. (2014). Intellectual capital and its effect on financial performance of banks: Evidence from Saudi Arabia, Procedia- Social and Behavioral Sciences, pp. 201-207 (presented in International Conference on Accounting Studies 2014, ICAS 2014, 18-19 August 2014, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia).
- Andrissen, D. (2004). Making sense of Intellectual Capital: Designing a method for the valuation of intangibles. Burlington, MA: Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann.
- Afroze, R. (2011). IC and its influence on the financial performance. ASA University Review, 5 (1).
- Belkaoui, Ahmed-Riahi. (2003). Intellectual capital and firm performance of US multinational firms: A study of the resource- based and stakeholders views. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 4 (2), 215-226.
- Bontis, N. Keow, W. C. C., & Richardson, S. (2000). Intellectual capital and business performance in Malaysian industries. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 1 (1), 85-100.
- Chu, S., Chan, K., Yu, K., Ng, H., & Wong, W. (2011). An empirical study of the impact of intellectual capital on business performance. Journal of Information and Knowledge Management, 10 (1), 11-21.
- Cezair. J.A. (2008). Intellectual capital, hiding in plain view. Journal of Performance Management, 13, 29-39.
- Chang, S. L. (2007). Valuing Intellectual capital and firm’s performance-modifying valued added intellectual coefficient (VAICTM)” in Taiwan IT industry, Golden Gate University, Dissertation.
- Chen, M., Cheng, S., & Hwang, Y. (2005). An empirical investigation of the relationship between IC and Firms’ market value and Financial Performance. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 6 (2), 159-176.
- Clarke, M., Seng, D., & Whiting, R. H. (2010). Intellectual capital and firm performance in Australia. Department of Accountancy and Business Law, Working Paper Series No. 12.
- Dzenopoljac, V., Yaacoub, C., Elkanj, N., & Bontis, N. (2017). Impact of intellectual capital on corporate performance: Evidence from the Arab region. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 18. 00-00. 10.1108/JIC-012017-0014.
- Firer, S., & Williams, S. M. (2003). Intellectual capital and traditional measures of corporate performance. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 4 (3), 348-360.
- Goh, P. Chen. (2005). Intellectual Capital performance of commercial banks in Malaysian. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 6 (3), 385-396.
- Joshi, M., Cahil, D., Sindhu, J., & Kansal, M. (2013). Intellectual capital and financial performance: An evaluation of the Australian financial sector. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 14 (2), 264-285.
- Kamath, B. G. (2006). Intellectual capital performance of Indian banking sector. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 8 (1), 96-123.
- Kamath, B. G. (2008). Intellectual capital and corporate performance in Indian pharmaceutical industry. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 9 (4), 684-704.
- Lazzolino, G., & Laise, D. (2013). Value added intellectual coefficient (VAIC): A methodological and critical review. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 14 (4), 547-563.
- Madnitinos, D., Chatzoudes, D., Tsairidis, C., & Theriou, G. (2011). The impact of intellectual capital on firm’s market value and financial performance. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 12 (1), 132-151.
- Mondal, A., & Ghosh, S. K. (2012). Intellectual capital and financial performance of Indian banks. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 13 (4), 515-530.
- Sardo, F., & Serrasqueiro, Z. (2017). A European empirical study of the relationship between firms’ intellectual capital, financial performance and market value. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 18 (4), 771788.
- Stahle, P., Stahle, S., & Aho, S. (2011). Value added intellectual coefficient (VAIC): A critical analysis. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 12(4), 531-551.
- Sullivan, P. (2000).Value-driven Intellectual Capital: How to convert intangible corporate assets into market value. Newyork : John Wiley & Sons.
Abstract Views: 416
PDF Views: 1